Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 531–553 | Cite as

The role of indigenous traditional counting systems in children's development of numerical cognition: results from a study in Papua New Guinea

  • Rex A. S. Matang
  • Kay OwensEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The Government of Papua New Guinea undertook a significant step in developing curriculum reform policy that promoted the use of Indigenous knowledge systems in teaching formal school subjects in any of the country's 800-plus Indigenous languages. The implementation of the Elementary Cultural Mathematics Syllabus is in line with the above curriculum emphasis. Given the aims of the reform, the research reported here investigated the influence of children's own mother tongue (Tok Ples) and traditional counting systems on their development of early number knowledge formally taught in schools. The study involved 272 school children from 22 elementary schools in four provinces. Each child participated in a task-based assessment interview focusing on eight task groups relating to early number knowledge. The results obtained indicate that, on average, children learning their traditional counting systems in their own language spent shorter time and made fewer mistakes in solving each task compared to those taught without Tok Ples (using English and/or the lingua franca, Tok Pisin). Possible reasons accounting for these differences are also discussed.

Keywords

Ethnomathematics Papua New Guinea Languages and mathematics Elementary schools Ecocultural mathematics Transition to school 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is published posthumously. Following the sudden death of Rex Matang as he was finishing his doctoral studies, Kay Owens has generously taken time to go through his files and find his draft thesis and a draft conference paper, checked data information, and collated a literature review from his files to put this paper together for Rex, using his own words as far as possible.

The research reported here would not have been possible without the kind assistance and generosity of many people in Australia and Papua New Guinea. In particular, Rex wrote, I wish to acknowledge the following individuals and organisations for their untiring support during my data-collection fieldwork undertaken entirely in Papua New Guinea during the 2006 and 2007 academic year.

-The Australian Government for fully funding this research project through the International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (IPRS) administered by the Graduate Research College of Southern Cross University, Lismore Campus, Northern NSW, Australia;

-My principal PhD research supervisor, Professor Bob J. Wright for his valuable insights on all academic- and research-related matters relating to my PhD study;

-All academic advisors and support staff of Graduate Research College, School of Education, and SCU Library for providing all the necessary assistance during my consultation visits to Australia and frequent email contacts while in PNG;

-The Mathematics Department and The Glen Lean Ethnomathematics Research Centre (GLEC) at the University of Goroka for providing the immediate study facilities in conducting the entire research project in PNG as an external PhD research candidate;

-The PNG National Department of Education and its Provincial Divisions of Education for their permission to conduct this research in all the participating provinces and schools;

-All students and teachers in participating elementary and primary schools for sacrificing their time during my school visits to their schools;

-All my immediate and extended family members for the encouragement and valuable physical support in assisting me to travel to some of the most remote schools not accessible by road transport to collect the data for this study;

-ABOVE ALL, I thank the GOOD LORD for being the source of ALL wisdom and knowledge and His unending protection and guidance during all my research fieldwork in PNG travelling to some of the remote schools on foot and by road, sea, and air transport.

References

  1. Adler, J. (2002). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, A. J. (1991). Mathematics enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, A. J. (2004, July). Critical issues in researching cultural aspects of mathematics education. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  4. Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Kloper (Eds.), Towards the thinking curriculum (pp. 174–205). Virginia: ASCD Alexandria.Google Scholar
  5. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Capell, A. (1969). A survey of New Guinea languages. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clarkson, P. C. (1993). Language and mathematics: a comparison of bilingual and monolingual students of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D'Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is ethnomathematics, and how can it help children in schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 308–311.Google Scholar
  9. D'Ambrosio, U. (2006). The program ethnomathematics: a theoretical basis of the dynamics of intra-cultural encounters. Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 1(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Education, PNG. (2002). National curriculum statement: Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Education, PNG. (2003). Cultural mathematics: elementary syllabus 2003. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Education & Training, NSW. (2002). Count me in too. Sydney: DETNSW.Google Scholar
  13. Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic: implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowker, A., & Lloyd, D. (2005). Linguistic influences on numeracy. In D. V. Jones, A. Dowker, & D. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics in the primary school (pp. 21–35). Oxford, UK: Bangor School of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Edgeworth, M., & Edgeworth, R. L. (1998). Practical Education. London.Google Scholar
  16. Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208, 1181–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fuson, K. C. (1991). Children's early counting: saying the number-word sequence, counting objects, and understanding cardinality. In K. Durkin & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education: research and practice (pp. 27–39). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fuson, K. C., & Kwon, Y. (1992). Korean children's understanding of multidigit addition and subtraction. Child Development, 63, 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galligan, L. (2001). Possible effects of English-Chinese language differences on the processing of mathematical text: a review. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greer, B. (1980). A first course in statistics. Gloucester: Stanley Thorns Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79(4), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groen, G. J., & Resnick, L. B. (1977). Can preschool children invent addition algorithms? Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(6), 645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Developing automacy. Teaching Exceptional Children, 19, 30–33.Google Scholar
  25. Hung, D. (2002). Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393-415. Retrieved from http://web5.infotrac.galegroup.com.ezproxy.scu.edu.au/itw/informark
  26. Kail, R. V. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that increases in processing speed and working memory enhance children's reasoning. Psychological Science, 18(4), 312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kail, R. V., & Ferrer, E. (2007). Processing speed in childhood and adolescene: longitudinal models for examining developmental change. Child Development, 78(6), 1760–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaleva, W. T. (1995). Ethnomathematics and its implication for mathematics education in Papua New Guinea. In O. P. Ahuja, J. C. Renaud, & R. M. Sekkappan (Eds.), Quality mathematics education in developing countries. Proceedings of the South Pacific conference on mathematics and mathematics education. UPNG, Port Moresby: New Delhi: UBS Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lean, G. A. (1992). Counting systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Lae, PNG: Papua New Guinea University of Technology.Google Scholar
  31. Lynch, J., Ross, M., & Crowley, T. (2002). The Oceanic languages. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Masingila, J. O. (1993). Learning from mathematics practice in out-of-school situations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 18–22.Google Scholar
  33. Matang, R. A. (1996). Towards an ethnomathematical approach to mathematics education in Papua New Guinea: An alternative proposal. Unpublished QUT M.Ed. dissertation, Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  34. Matang, R. A. (2002). The role of ethnomathematics in mathematics education in Papua New Guinea: implications for mathematics curriculum. Directions: Journal of Educational Studies, USP, 24(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
  35. Matang, R. A. (2003). The cultural context of mathematics learning and thinking in Papua New Guinea. In A. C. Maha & T. A. Flaherty (Eds.), Education for 21st century in Papua New Guinea and the South Pacific (pp. 161–168). Goroka, PNG: University of Goroka.Google Scholar
  36. Matang, R. A. (2005). Formalising the role of indigenous counting systems in teaching the formal English arithmetic strategies through local vernaculars: an example from Papua New Guinea. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: research, theory and practice (proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia) (pp. 505–512). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
  37. Matang, R. A. (2006). Enhancing the learning of formal English arithmetic strategies by elementary school children through indigenous counting systems of Papua New Guinea: the case of Kâte counting system of Morobe province. In P. M. Pena (Ed.), Sustainable curriculum development: the PNG curriculum reform experience (pp. 96–103). Port Moresby, PNG: PNG Department of Education.Google Scholar
  38. Matang, R. A. (2008). Enhancing children's formal learning of early number knowledge through Indigenous languages and ethnomathematics: The case of Papua New Guinea mathematics curriculum reform experience. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Monterray, Mexico. http://dg.icme11.org/document/get/322
  39. Matang, R. A. & Owens, K. (2004). Rich Transitions from Indigenous counting systems to English arithmetic strategies: Implications for mathematics education in Papua New Guinea. In F. Favilli (Ed.) Ethnomathematics and mathematics education. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Mathematics Education Discussion Group 15 Ethnomathematics (pp. 107-118). Pisa, Italy: Tiporafia Editrice Pisana.Google Scholar
  40. McMurchy-Pilkington, C., Trinick, T., Dale, H., & Tuwhagai, R. (2009). Mahi tahi: collaborating partnerships. In T. Trinick (Ed.), Quality teaching research and development project: Māori medium and Kura Kaupapa Māori research project (pp. 63–75). Auckland, NZ: The University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  41. Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Fairhall, U. (2012). Collaborating to meet language challenges in indigenous mathematics classrooms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miura, I. T., Kim, C. C., Chang, C., & Okamoto, Y. (1988). Effects of language characteristics on children's cognitive representation of number: cross-national comparisons. Child Development, 59(6), 1445–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Munro, J. (2003). Information processing and mathematics learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8(4), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nagai, Y. (1999). Developing a community-based vernacular school: a case study of Maiwala elementary school in Papua New Guinea. Language Education, 13(3), 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nagai, Y., & Lister, R. (2003). What is our culture? What is our language? Dialogue towards the maintenance of indigenous culture and language in Papua New Guinea. Language Education, 17(2), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Owens, K. (2000). Traditional counting systems and their relevance for elementary schools in Papua New Guinea. PNG Journal of Education, 36(1 & 2), 62–72.Google Scholar
  47. Owens, K. (2001). The work of Glendon Lean on the counting systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(1), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Park, M. (2000). Linguistic influence on numerical development. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 19–24.Google Scholar
  49. Pawley, A., Attenborough, R., Golson, J., & Hide, R. (2005). Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  50. Rickard, T. (1997). Bending the power law: a MPL theory of strategy shift and the automatization of cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 126, 288–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ross, M., Pawley, A., & Osmond, M. (Ed.). (1998). The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic Society (Vol. 1). Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  52. Saxe, G. B. (1982). Culture and the development of numerical cognition: studies among the Oksapmin of Papua New guinea. In C. J. Brainerd (Ed.), Children's logical and mathematical cognition (pp. 157–176). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saxe, G. (1985). The effects of schooling on arithmetical understandings: studies with Oksapmin children in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saxe, G. B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, G. P. S. (1980). Morobe counting systems: Some preliminary observations. Paper presented to 14th PNG Linguistic Society Congress, University of Technology, Lae.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, G. P. S. (1986). Counting and culture in North-East New Guinea. In P. Geraghty, L. Carrington, & S. A. Wurm (Eds.), Focal II: papers from 4th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics C-94 (pp. 343–349). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
  57. Song, M., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1987). The development of informal and formal mathematical thinking in Korean and U.S. children. Child Development, 58(5), 1286–1296.Google Scholar
  58. Trinick, T. (1999). The relationship between Māori culture and Māori mathematical language. (Masters), Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  59. Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. (1994). Yupno number system and counting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wheatley, T., & Wegner, D. M. (2001). Psychology of automaticity of action [Electronic Version]. International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences, (pp. -993). Retrieved 17/03/2008.Google Scholar
  61. Wortham, S. (1998). Language in cognitive development: emergence of the mediated mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(1), 76–79. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0501_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright, R. J. (1991). The role of counting in children's numerical development. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 16(2), 43–48.Google Scholar
  63. Wright, R. J. (2002). Assessing young children's arithmetical strategies and knowledge: providing learning opportunities for teachers. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(3), 31–36.Google Scholar
  64. Zeller, R. A., & Carmines, E. G. (1978). Statistical analysis of social data. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  2. 2.The Glen Lean Ethnomathematics CentreUniversity of GorokaGorokaPapua New Guinea
  3. 3.Charles Sturt UniversityDubboAustralia

Personalised recommendations