Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 735–761 | Cite as

The role of gestures in making connections between space and shape aspects and their verbal representations in the early years: findings from a case study

  • Iliada Elia
  • Athanasios Gagatsis
  • Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

In recent educational research, it is well acknowledged that gestures are an important source of developing abstract thinking in early childhood and can serve as an additional window to the mind of the developing child. The present paper reports on a case study which explores the function of gestures in a geometrical activity at kindergarten level. In the study, the spontaneous gestures of the child are investigated, as well as the influence of the teacher's gestures on the child's gestures. In the first part of the activity, the child under study transforms a spatial array of blocks she has constructed by herself into a verbal description, so that another person, i.e., the teacher, who cannot see what the child has built, makes the same construction. Next, the teacher builds a new construction and describes it so that the child can build it. Hereafter, it is again the turn of the child to build another construction and describe it to the teacher. The child was found to spontaneously use iconic and deictic gestures throughout the whole activity. These gestures, and primarily the iconic ones, helped her make apparent different space and shape aspects of the constructions. Along with her speech, gestures acted as semiotic means of objectification to successfully accomplish the task. The teacher's gestures were found to influence the child's gestures when describing aspects of shapes and spatial relationships between shapes. This influence results in either mimicking or extending the teacher's gestures. These findings are discussed and implications for further research are drawn.

Keywords

Mathematics Kindergartner Spatial concepts Shape concepts Gestures Verbal descriptions Microgenetic analysis 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alibali, M. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: we think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, G. L. (2003). Gestures accompanying verbal route directions: do they point to a new avenue for examining spatial representations? Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzarello, F., & Edwards, L. (2005). Gesture and the construction of mathematical meaning. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 123–127). Melbourne: Melbourne University.Google Scholar
  5. Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gestures' beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, S. W., Yip, T., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesture makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 465–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egsgard, J. C. (1970). Some ideas in Geometry that can be taught from K-6. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(4), 478–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrlich, S., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1259–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot, J., & Smith, I. (1983). An international directory of spatial tests. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  17. Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gagatsis, A., & Patronis, T. (1990). Using geometric models in a process of reflective thinking in learning and teaching mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: the role of the sensory–motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garber, P., Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1998). Knowledge conveyed in gesture is not tied to the hands. Child Development, 69, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Göksun, T., Hirsh-Paseka, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2010). How do preschoolers express cause in gesture and speech? Cognitive Development, 25, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Beyond words: the importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71(1), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gestures: how our hands help us think. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1986). Words, plans, things, and locations: interactions between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage. In S. A. Kuzkaj & M. D. Barrett (Eds.), The development of word meaning: progress in cognitive development research (pp. 199–223). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, J. A., & Argyle, M. (1975). A cross-cultural study of the communication of extra-verbal meaning by gestures. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gullberg, M. (1999). Gestures in spatial descriptions. Working Papers, 47, 87–97.Google Scholar
  27. Haith, M. M., & Benson, J. B. (1998). Infant cognition. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th edition), Cognition, perception and language (Vol. 2, pp. 199–254). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Hannibal, M. Z. (1999). Young children's developing understanding of geometric shapes. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 353–357.Google Scholar
  29. Kellman, P. J., & Banks, M. S. (1998). Infant visual perception. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th edition), Cognition, perception and language (Vol. 2, pp. 103–146). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in non-verbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, M., Roth, W.-M., & Thom, J. (2010). Children's gestures and the embodied knowledge of geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kita, S., & Davies, T. S. (2009). Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 761–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: a process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A. P. F., Hsu, H., Messinger, D., & Fogel, A. (2005). Using microgenetic designs to study change processes. In D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 40–65). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levine, S., Ratliff, K., Huttenlocher, J., & Cannon, J. (2012). Early puzzle play: a predictor of preschoolers' spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 530–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maschietto, M., & Bartolini Bussi, M. (2009). Working with artefacts: gestures, drawings and speech in the construction of the mathematical meaning of the visual pyramid. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGregor, K., Rohlfing, K., Bean, A., & Marschner, E. (2009). Gesture as a support for word learning: the case of under. Journal of Child Language, 36, 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newcombe, N. (1989). The development of spatial perspective taking. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 203–247). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Newcombe, N., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: why, what, and how. Mind, Brain and Education, 4(3), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newcombe, N., & Sluzenski, J. (2004). Starting points and change in early spatial development. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: remembering where (pp. 25–40). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  47. Nunez, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. F. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning. Gesture, 4, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Hands in the air: using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1277–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students' non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization, advances in mathematics education (pp. 303–322). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Radford, L., Bardini, C., & Sabena, C. (2007). Perceiving the general: the multisemiotic dimension of students' algebraic activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 507–530.Google Scholar
  53. Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzarello, F. (2009). Introduction: beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roth, M.-W. (2001). Gestures: their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sabena, C., Radford, L., & Bardini, C. (2005). Synchronizing gestures, words and actions in pattern generalizations. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 129–136). Melbourne: PME.Google Scholar
  56. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research. Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: a microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 225–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teacher's gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sowa, T., & Wachsmuth, I. (2005). A model for the representation and processing of shape in coverbal iconic gestures. In K. Opwis & I. Penner (Eds.), Proceedings of the KogWis05 (pp. 183–188). Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
  60. Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M. A., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Teachers' gestures facilitate students' learning: a lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Buys, K. (Eds.). (2008). Young children learn measurement and geometry. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Wagner, S., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yakimanskaya, I. S. (1980). The development of spatial thinking in schoolchildren. Moscow: Pedagogika. (Translated into English 1991). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iliada Elia
    • 1
  • Athanasios Gagatsis
    • 1
  • Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Faculty of Science & Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options