Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 377–397 | Cite as

It’s just as well kids don’t vote: the positioning of children through public discourse around national testing

  • Troels Lange
  • Tamsin Meaney
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

The importance of mathematics or its alter ego ‘numeracy’ is being cemented in the public's mind with the instigation of national, high-stakes testing in Australia. Discussions about national testing in press releases, online news articles and online public comments tacitly attribute importance to mathematics. In these discussions, children are positioned as commodities, with mathematics achievement being the value that can be added to them. Deficit language identified some children as being less valuable commodities and less likely to gain value from schooling. In the same public discourse, the value of the sort of mathematics that can be assessed in these tests appeared to be so accepted that it did not need to be mentioned. This has social justice implications.

Keywords

Media Public discourse National testing Children Social justice 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Lisa Pearson was a very valuable research assistant on this project.

References

  1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] (2010a). Frequently asked questions. ACARA. Retrieved 11 Sept. 2010a, from: http://www.naplan.edu.au/faqs/faq.html
  2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] (2010b). National minimum standards. ACARA. Retrieved 11 Sept. 2010b, from: http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/learning/7-12assessments/naplan/nms/index.html
  3. Balogh, S. (2009, Nov 17). Parents, teachers resist naming and shaming of school results. Courier Mail. Retrieved 12-9-2010, from: http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/parents-teachers-resist-naming-and-shaming-of-school-results/story-e6freoof-1225798340579
  4. Bernstein, B. B. (1971). On th classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 47–69). London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnor, C. (2010, Feb 24). My School and your school. Inside Story. Retrieved 12-9-2010, from: http://inside.org.au/my-school-and-your-school/
  7. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2008, Sep 10). The Hon Julia Gillard MP: NAPLAN, OECD Report, teacher quality, age pension [Transcript]. Retrieved 12-Sep-2010, from: http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Transcripts/Pages/Article_081009_185213.aspx
  8. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2008, Dec 19). NAPLAN national report released [Media release]. Retrieved 12-Sep-2010, from: http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Releases/Pages/Article_090105_133929.aspx
  9. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2009, Sep 11). 2009 NAPLAN results released. Retrieved 12-Sep-2010, from: http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Releases/Pages/Article_090911_120047.aspx
  10. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2009, Nov 10). The Hon Julia Gillard MP: Interview on Lateline (ABC) regarding My School website; class size; Teach for Australia [Transcript]. Retrieved 12-Sep-2010, from: http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Transcripts/Pages/Article_091112_092857.aspx
  11. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2010, Feb 17). The Hon Julia Gillard MP: Delivering the education revolution. National Press Club Address [Speech transcript]. Retrieved 12-Sep-2010, from: http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Speeches/Pages/Article_100224_143429.aspx
  12. Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: a history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Donnelly, K. (2009). Australia's education revolution: how Kevin Rudd won and lost the education wars. Ballan, Vic.: Connor Court Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. DuCharme, C. C. (1992). Margaret McMillan and Maria Montessori: Champions of the poor. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for the Education of the Young Children, New Orleans, LA, November 12–15 1992. Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED368463
  15. Ferrari, J. (2009, Oct 12). National literacy and numeracy tests 'not reliable'. The Australian. Retrieved 12-9-2010, from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/national-literacy-and-numeracy-tests-not-reliable/story-e6frg6nf-1225785573336
  16. Ferrari, J. (2009, Oct 13). Call to focus on schools' and students' progress. The Australian. Retrieved 12-9-2010, from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/call-to-focus-on-schools-and-students-progress/story-e6frg6no-1225786087013
  17. Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. C. (2011). Equity and quality of mathematics education: research and media portrayals. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 205–222). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Franklin, B. (2004). Education, education and indoctrination! Packaging politics and the three 'Rs'. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 255–270. doi: 10.1080/0268093042000207601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graue, M. E., & Smith, S. Z. (1996). Parents and mathematics education reform: voicing the authority of assessment. Urban Education, 30(4), 395–421. doi: 10.1177/0042085996030004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutiérrez, R., & Dixon-Román, E. (2011). Beyond gap gazing: how can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping quality and equity agendas in mathematics education (pp. 21–34). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Hanson, F. A. (1993). Testing testing: social consequences of the examined life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hardy, I., & Boyle, C. (2011). My School? Critiquing the abstraction and quantification of education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 211–222. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2011.588312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hattam, R., Prosser, B., & Brady, K. (2009). Revolution or backlash? The mediatisation of education policy in Australia. Critical Studies in Education, 50(2), 159–172. doi: 10.1080/17508480902859433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hursh, D. W., & Henderson, J. A. (2011). Contesting global neoliberalism and creating alternative futures. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 171–185. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2011.562665.Google Scholar
  25. Kenny, M. (2009, Nov 11). Gillard urges parents to confront schools. The Advertiser. Retrieved 12-9-2010, from: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/gillard-urges-parents-to-confront-schools/story-e6frea83-1225796261111
  26. Lange, T., & Meaney, T. (2012). The tail wagging the dog? The effect of national testing on teachers' agency. In C. Bergsten, E. Jablonka, & M. Raman (Eds.), Evaluation and comparison of mathematical achievement: dimensions and perspectives: proceedings from Madif8: The Eighth Swedish Mathematics Education Research Seminar, Umeå, January 24–25, 2012 (pp. 131–140). Linköping: Svensk Förening för Matematikdidaktisk Forskning.Google Scholar
  27. Leder, G. C. (2012). Mathematics for all? The case for and against national testing. Paper presented at 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 8 July - 15 July, 2012, Seoul, Korea. Available from: http://www.icme12.org/sub/sub02_04.asp
  28. Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. (2010). I liked it till Pythagoras: the public views of mathematics. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: proceedings of the 33th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia (pp. 328–335). Freemantle, Australia: MERGA Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147. doi: 10.1080/17508481003731026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ABC News (2010, Jan 28). My School site a victim of its own success: Gillard. ABS News. Retrieved 12-9-2009, from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/01/28/2803136.htm
  31. Quintos, B., & Civil, M. (2008). Parental engagement in a classroom community of practice: boundary practices as part of a culturally responsive pedagogy. Adults Learning Mathematics: An international Journal, 3(2a), 51–71. Available from: http://www.alm-online.net/images/ALM/journals/almij-volume3_2_a_nov2008.pdf
  32. Rawolle, S. (2010). Understanding the mediatisation of educational policy as practice. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 21–39. doi: 10.1080/17508480903450208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Rodgers, E. (2010, Jan 19). Teachers vote to boycott school tests. ABS News. Retrieved 12-9-2009, from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/01/19/2795904.htm
  35. Skovsmose, O. (1998). Linking mathematics education and democracy: citizenship, mathematical archaeology, mathemacy and deliberative interaction. ZDM, 30(6), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Stack, M. (2006). Testing, testing, read all about it: Canadian press coverage of the PISA results. Canada Journal of Education, 29(1), 49–69. Available from: http://www.csse-scee.ca/CJE/Articles/Articles.htm Google Scholar
  38. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, P. L. (2010). Parental choice? A critical reconsidation of choice and the debate about choice. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Woodley, N. (2009, Nov 17). Schools unite against ranking website. ABS News. Retrieved 12-9-2009, from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/17/2744666.htm

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Malmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options