Pre-service teachers’ experiences teaching secondary mathematics in English-medium schools in Tanzania
Original Article
First Online:
- 295 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
In order to promote mathematical understanding among English Language Learners (ELLs), it is necessary to modify instructional strategies to effectively communicate mathematical content. This paper discusses the instructional strategies used by four pre-service teachers to teach mathematics to secondary students in English-medium schools in Arusha, Tanzania as a result of the tensions they faced and reflections on their teaching. Strategies such as code switching, attending to sentence structure, non-linguistic representations, and placing the content within a familiar context proved to be beneficial strategies for conveying mathematical ideas.
Keywords
English language learners Secondary mathematics education Kiswahili English-medium schools Pre-service teachersReferences
- Bailey, J., & Taylor, M. (2010). Conceptions, language, culture and mathematics and the New Zealand curriculum. Waikato Journal of Education, 15(3), 131–140.Google Scholar
- Brock-Utne, B. (2003). The language question in Africa in the light of globalization. International Journal of Peace, 8(2), 67–87.Google Scholar
- Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria: Association of Supervision of Curriculum.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. Piscataway: Transactions Publishers Paperback.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J., Morris, A., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: an “experiment” model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, K. (1992). Learning to teach: instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 507–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kohler, F. W., Henning, J. E., & Usma-Wilches, J. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions: an examination of teacher work samples. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2108–2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Lucas, T., & Katz, A. (1994). Reframing the debate: The role of native language in English-only programs for language minority students. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3).Google Scholar
- McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Foxx, S. M. (1996). Field laboratory experiences. In J. P. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 171–193). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.Google Scholar
- McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mewborn, D. S. (2000). Learning to teach elementary mathematics: ecological elements of a field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meyers, E. (2007). From activity to learning: using Cultural-Historical activity theory to model school library programmes and practices. Information Research, 12(3).Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education and Culture. (1995). Education and training policy. http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/Educationandtrainingpolicy01.pdf
- Moore. (1995). The craft of teaching. MAA Focus 15(2), 5–8.Google Scholar
- Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. (2011). Content-based instruction and vocabulary learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 631–644). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Okonkwo, C. (1983). Bilingualism in education: the Nigerian experience re-examined. Prospects, 13(3), 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Osaki, K. M. (1991). Factors influencing the use of the environment in science teaching. Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
- Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2011). Research in English for specific purposes. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 106–121). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Perso, T. (2003). School mathematics and its impact on cultural diversity. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 59(2), 10–16.Google Scholar
- Puja, G. (2001). Moving against the grain: The experiences of Tanzanian female undergraduates. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology and Equity. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Qorro, M. (2006). Does language of instruction affect quality of education? HakiElimu Working Papers, 06(8).Google Scholar
- Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.Google Scholar
- Samoff, J. (2002). Local initiatives and national policies: the politics of private schooling in Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Research, 15(5), 337–391.Google Scholar
- Shein, P. (2012). Seeing with two eyes: a teacher’s use of gestures in revoicing to engage English language learners in the repair of mathematical errors. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(2), 182–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smalley & Retallick. (2011). Purposes, activities, and documentation of early field experiences in agricultural education: A national Delphi study. Journal of Agricultural Education. 52(3), 100–109.Google Scholar
- Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Stillman, J., & Anderson, L. (2011). To follow, reject, or flip the script: managing instructional tension in an era of high-stakes accountability. Language Arts., 89(1), 22–37.Google Scholar
- Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The role of pedagogy in classroom discourse: a review of recent research into mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warren, E., Young, J., & deVries, E. (2007). Australian indigenous students: The role of oral language and representations in the negotiation of mathematical understanding. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zevenbergen, R. (2000a). Language implications for numeracy: A study of language use of disadvantaged students. In Improving Numeracy Learning Conference Proceedings, Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2000/2
- Zevenbergen, R. (2000b). Cracking the code of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social, and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 201–223). Westport: Alex.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2013