Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 341–360 | Cite as

Mathematics curriculum development and indigenous language revitalisation: contested spaces

  • Colleen McMurchy-Pilkington
  • Tony Trinick
  • Tamsin Meaney
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

This paper examines the development of two iterations of mathematics curricula over a 15-year period for classrooms teaching in te reo Māori, the endangered Indigenous language of Aotearoa New Zealand. Similarities and differences between the two iterations are identified. Although parameters set by the New Zealand Ministry of Education about what the curricula would look like and how they would be developed were not always commensurate with Māori aspirations, analysis suggests that Māori were able to use opportunities to ensure that their agendas for language development and revitalisation were achieved. Spaces were made available because of the government’s ideological assumptions, but were used by Māori to achieve their ideological aims. However, neither iteration was smooth, with Māori having to determine how to operate within these contested spaces. The result of Māori requirements to have language recognised as an important issue was that both process and product of curriculum development were affected.

Keywords

Indigenous mathematics curriculum iterations Language revitalisation Walker's model of curriculum development Contested spaces 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper was presented at Topic Study Group 32 Curriculum Development at ICME12 in July 2012, Seoul, Korea. Much of the data for the first iteration of Pāngarau came from McMurchy-Pilkington’s thesis that was accepted in 2004. Full details are provided in the reference list.

References

  1. Apple, M. (1995). Taking power seriously: New directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajain (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 329–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, B., & Fairhall, U. (1995). Is mathematics a Trojan horse? In B. Barton & U. Fairhall (Eds.), Mathematics in Māori mathematics. Mathematics Education Unit, Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, B., Fairhall, U., & Trinick, T. (1998). Tikanga reo tatai: issues in the development of a Māori mathematics register. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, I. (2003). Exploring issues in mathematics education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  5. Codd, J. (1995). Contractualism, contestability and choice: Capturing the language of educational reform in New Zealand. In J. Kenway (Ed.), Marketing education: Some critical issues (pp. 101–116). Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Codd, J. (2005). Education policy and the challenges of globalisation: Commercialisation or citizenship? In J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education policy directions in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 3–18). Victoria: Thomson Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  7. Considine, M. (1994). Public policy: A critical approach. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia Pty.Google Scholar
  8. Durie, M. (1997). Whaiora: Maori health development. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Durie, M. (2001). A framework for considering Māori educational advancement. Opening address to the Hui Taumata Mātauranga, Tūrangi/Taupō, New Zealand, 24 February.Google Scholar
  10. Fairhall, U. (1993). Mathematics as a vehicle for the acquisition of Māori. In E. McKinley, P. Waiti, A. Begg, B. Bell, M. Biddulph, J. Carr, J. Chesney, & J. Young Loveridge (Eds.), SAMEpapers (pp. 116–123). Hamilton: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  11. Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  12. Harlow, R. (1993). A science and mathematics terminology for Maori, SAMEpapers. Hamilton: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  13. Harlow, R. (2003). Issues in Māori language planning and revitalisation. He puna Kōrero: Journal of Māori & Pacific Development, 4(1), 32–43.Google Scholar
  14. Haugh, H., & Kitson, M. (2007). The third way and the third sector: New labour’s economic policy and the social economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, 973–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howard, J., & Thomas, J. (2000). The politics of mathematics education 1996–1999. In K. Owens & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education research in Australasia 1996–1999 (pp. 341–368). Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar
  16. Humpage, L. (2006). An ‘inclusive’ society: a ‘leap forward’ for Māori. New Zealand. Critical Social Policy, 26(1), 220–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jahnke, A. (2012). The process of developing a syllabus: Reflections of a syllabus developer. Paper delivered at the 12th International Congress of Mathematics Education, Seoul, Korea, July 8–15, 2012. Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/4055530.html.
  18. Lange, D. (1988). Tomorrow’s Schools: The reform of educational administration in New Zealand. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  19. McMurchy-Pilkington, C. (2004a). Pāngarau Māori medium mathematics curriculum: Empowerment or new hegemonic accord? Unpublished EdD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  20. McMurchy-Pilkington, C. (2004b). He Arotakenga o ngā tuhinga e pā ana ki ngā Marautanga Māori. Auckland: University of Auckland Final report to the Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  21. McMurchy-Pilkington, C. (2008). Indigenous people: emancipatory possibilities in curriculum development. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(3), 614–635.Google Scholar
  22. May, S. (2003). Rearticulating the case for minority language rights. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4, 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meaney, T. (2001). An ethnographic case study of a community-negotiated mathematics curriculum development project. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  24. Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Fairhall, U. (2011). Collaborating to meet language challenges in Indigenous mathematics classrooms. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Meaney, T., & Irwin, K. C. (2005). Language used by students in mathematics for quantitative and numerical comparisons: NEMP Probe Study Report. Dunedin: EARU, University of Otago, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  26. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1992a). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  27. New Zealand Ministry of Education (1992b). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum: Curriculum statement for Māori. In Agreement for curriculum development services (pp. 1-8). Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  28. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996). Pāngarau i roto i te marautanga o Aotearoa. Te Whanganui ā Tara: Te Pou Taki Kōrero.Google Scholar
  29. Ohia, M. (1993a). Kaua e whakamāorita noatia, engari whakaritea ki tō te Māori e hiahia ai: Don’t translate it into Maori, but ensure it encapsulates the Maori needs and aspirations. In Te Puni Kokiri (Ed.), Pāngarau - Maori mathematics and education (pp. 1–6). Wellington: Te Puni Kokiri, Ministry of Maori Development.Google Scholar
  30. Ohia, M. (1993b). Adapting mathematics to meet Maori needs and aspirations: An attempt to shift paradigms. In E. McKinley, P. Waiti, A. Begg, B. Bell, F. Biddulph, M. Carr, J. Chesney, & J. Young Loveridge (Eds.), SAMEpapers (pp. 104–115). Hamilton: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  31. Ohia, M. (1995). Maori and mathematics: What of the future? In B. Barton & U. Fairhall (Eds.), Mathematics in Māori mathematics. Mathematics Education Unit, Auckland: University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  32. Olssen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A. M. (2004). Education policy: Globalisation, citizenship, democracy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. O’Neill, A.-M. (2005). Individualism, enterprise culture and curriculum policy. In J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education policy directions in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 71–86). Victoria: Thomson Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  34. Openshaw, R. (1996/1997). Social studies in the curriculum? Critical citizenship or crucial cop out? DELTA, 48(2), 159–172.Google Scholar
  35. Posner, G. J. (1988). Models of curriculum planning. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (pp. 77–97). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Print, M. (1993). Curriculum development and design. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  37. Reedy, T. (2000). Te Rēo Māori: the past 20 years and looking forward. Oceanic Linguistics, 39(1), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, G. H. (1990). The politics of reforming Maori education: the transforming potential of Kura Kaupapa Maori. In H. Lauder & C. Wylie (Eds.), Towards successful schooling (pp. 73–88). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, G. H. (1997). The development of kaupapa Māori: Theory and praxis. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  40. Spolsky, B. (2003). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Te Tahuhu o te Mātauranga. (2008). Te marautanga o Aotearoa. Whanganui a Tara: Te Pou Taki Kōrero.Google Scholar
  42. Trinick, T. (1997). The development and implementation of the Pāngarau curriculum statement. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Auckland. Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  43. Trinick, T. (forthcoming 2013). Tensions and issues in the development of the mathematics register for Māori-medium schooling. Unpublished EdD Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  44. Tribunal, W. (1986). Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the te reo Maori claim (Wai 11). Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.Google Scholar
  45. Waite, J. (1992). Aotearoa: Speaking for ourselves: A discussion on the development of a New Zealand languages policy: Part B: The issues. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, D. F. (1971). A naturalistic model for curriculum development. School Review, 80(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker, R. (1987). Ngā tautohetohe: Years of anger. Auckland: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen McMurchy-Pilkington
    • 1
  • Tony Trinick
    • 1
  • Tamsin Meaney
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Malmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options