Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 231–256 | Cite as

Implications for intervention: categorising the quantitative mental imagery of children

  • Jonathan Norris Thomas
  • Shelly Sheats Harkness
Original Article

Abstract

Unlike a child’s observable, physical interactions with mathematical tools (e.g., physically touching blocks in order to count them), the subtle manifestations of imagery construction can be considerably more challenging to identify and act upon. Although there have been substantive examinations of mental imagery in a variety of mathematical contexts (i.e., spatial patterns, geometric rotation, etc.) there is a paucity of study regarding the nature of mathematical imagery with respect to initial counting acts. Towards that end, we conducted clinical interviews and longitudinal teaching experiments to ascertain the salient features of early quantitative mental imagery. Our findings indicate that children construct imagined units that are variably connected to the mathematical tool of the moment. Moreover, while this variability appears congruent with existing mathematical progressions, attending to nuances in children’s mental imagery provides a platform for more refined instructional design. Indeed, identification of and attention to the child’s quantitative imagery in whatever form it may take is essential to maximising mathematical experiences.

Keywords

Numeracy Imagery Intervention Counting Teaching experiment Figurative Representation 

References

  1. Aspinwall, L., Shaw, K. L., & Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Uncontrollable mental imagery: graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battista, M., & Clements, D. (1996). Students’ understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 258–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownell, W. (1947). The place of meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. Elementary School Journal, January, 256–265.Google Scholar
  4. Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in the schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Central Advisory Council for Education (England). (1959). A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England), Crowther Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, F. B., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1–5. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: toward a framework for “research-based curricula”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 35–70.Google Scholar
  8. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, L. A. (1990). Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1097–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davydov, V. V. (1982). The psychological characteristics of the formation of elementary mathematical operations in children. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 224–238). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. De Hevia, M. D., Vallar, G., & Girelli, L. (2008). Visualizing numbers in the mind’s eye: the role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1361–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 122, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dörfler, W. (1991). Meaning: Image schemata and protocols. In F. Feringhetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th PME International Conference, 1 (pp. 17–32).Google Scholar
  14. Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite, & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Erlwanger, S. (1973). Benny’s conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7–26.Google Scholar
  16. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fosnot, C., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing number sense, addition and subtraction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  18. Fuson, K. C. (1982). An analysis of the counting-on solution procedure in addition. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Mosler, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 67–81). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschoolers counting: principles before skill. Cognition, 13, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Center for Science and Mathematics Education Press, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  24. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kosslyn, S. M. (1983). Ghosts in the mind’s machine: Creating and using images in the brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Mulligan, J., Bobis, J., & Francis, C. (1999). Insights into early numeracy: the count me in too project. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 4, 22–27.Google Scholar
  27. Mulligan, J. T., Prescott, A., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2003). Taking a closer look at visual imagery. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 8, 23–27.Google Scholar
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  29. O’Donoghue, J. (2002). Numeracy and mathematics. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 48, 47–55.Google Scholar
  30. Olive, J. (2001). Children’s number sequences: an explanation of Steffe’s constructs and an extrapolation to rational numbers of arithmetic. The Mathematics Educator, 11, 4–9.Google Scholar
  31. Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: Emergence from psychology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205–235). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: a critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: in search of a theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 157–238.Google Scholar
  35. Siegler, R. S., & Robinson, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsett (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 16 (pp. 242–312). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  36. Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), The origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Sophian, C. (1998). A developmental perspective on children’s counting. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 27–46). East Sussex, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  38. Steffe, L. (1992). Learning stages in the construction of the number sequence. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. Fischer (Eds.), Pathways to number: Children’s developing numerical abilities (pp. 83–88). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–307). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Steffe, L. P., Von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
  41. Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., & Von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephan, M., Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2001). The role of tools in supporting students’ development of measuring conceptions. Yearbook (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), 2001, 63–76.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, N. J. T. (2008). “Mental imagery”. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mental-imagery.
  44. Thomas, N., & Mulligan, J. T. (1995). Dynamic imagery in children’s representation of number. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas, J., & Tabor, P. D. (2012). Differentiating instruction to facilitate quantitative mental imagery. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19, 174–183.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, P. W. (1979). The teaching experiment in mathematics education research. Paper presented at the NCTM Research Presession, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  47. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Sensory experience, abstraction and teaching. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Wright, R. J. (1994). A study of the numerical development of 5-year-olds and 6-year-olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright, R. J., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. (2000). Early numeracy: Assessment for teaching and intervention. London: Paul Chapman/Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Wright, R. J., Martland, J., Stafford, A., & Stanger, G. (2002). Teaching number: Advancing children’s skills and strategies. London: Paul Chapman/Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Norris Thomas
    • 1
  • Shelly Sheats Harkness
    • 2
  1. 1.Northern Kentucky University & The Kentucky Center for MathematicsHighland HeightsUSA
  2. 2.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations