Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 301–321 | Cite as

Exploring relationships among teacher change and uses of contexts

  • Wendy M. Smith
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

The three middle level mathematics teachers in this set of case studies were engaged in a longitudinal professional development program that sought to impact teaching practices through increasing participants’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. This study investigates how teachers use the contexts in which their teaching practices are situated. Data collected include multiple classroom observations, videotapes, and interviews. The roles of contextual elements in the three teachers’ teaching practices vary greatly, influenced by teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. The realities of contexts were less important than how teachers chose to use those contexts. These cases specifically illuminate the complexities in teachers’ uses of school structure, professional development, curriculum, testing policies, principal expectations, community expectations, and extra-curricular activities. For the three teachers in this study, the roles of contextual elements in their teaching practices varied greatly; such roles are influenced by teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. While much of this analysis is specific to mathematics, some teaching practices transcend mathematics and thus be interesting to a wide audience.

Keywords

Teacher change Middle level Mathematical knowledge for teaching 

Abbreviations

Math in the Middle

M2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Augustine, N. R., et al. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian mathematics education study group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DuFour, R. (2001). In the right context. Journal of Staff Development, 22(1), 14–17.Google Scholar
  11. Flores, M. A., & Day, D. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friel, S., Rachlin, S., & Doyle, D. (2001). Navigating through algebra in grades 6–8. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  13. Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967/2007). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (4th ed.). New Brunswick: Adline Transaction.Google Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, L. T., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 19–54). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Hadjioannou, X. (2007). Bringing the background to the foreground: what do classroom environments that support authentic discussions look like? American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 370–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 21(8), 967–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heaton, R. M., Lewis, W. J., Homp, M. R., Dunbar, S. R., & Smith, W. M. (2012a). Challenging and rigorous yet accessible and relevant mathematics courses for middle level teachers. MAA Notes Series, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. Heaton, R. M., Lewis, W. J., & Smith, W. M. (2012b). The Math in the Middle Institute: Strengthening middle level teachers’ mathematical and pedagogical capacities. MAA Notes Series, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janvier, C. (1987). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, D. (1997). A conceptual framework for studying the relevance of context to mathematics teachers’ change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 131–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Lampert, M., & Blunk, M. L. (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of learning and teaching. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, B. S., Warfield, J., & Wood, T. (2001). Introduction. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 1–26). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peterson, P. L. (1990). Doing more in the same amount of time: Cathy Swift. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 261–280.Google Scholar
  30. Polly, D. (2011). Teachers’ learning while constructing technology-based instructional resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 950–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ried, D., & Zack, V. (2010a). Observing the process of mathematics teacher change—part 1. Journal of Math Teacher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10857-010-9158-4.
  32. Ried, D., & Zack, V. (2010b). Observing the process of mathematics teacher change—part 2. Journal of Math Teacher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10857-010-9165-5.
  33. Rolle, Y. A. (2008). Habits of practice: a qualitative case study of a middle-school mathematics teacher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, [location blinded for review]Google Scholar
  34. Schifter, D. (1996). What’s happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives, Vol. 1. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–28.Google Scholar
  37. Silver, E. A., & Herbst, P. G. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39–67). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Simon, M. A. (1997). Developing new models of mathematics teaching: An imperative for research on mathematics teacher development. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 55–86). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  39. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: an elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, W. M. (2008). Exploring how three middle level mathematics teachers use their experiences in an ambitious professional development program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln, NE, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12–17.Google Scholar
  44. Swidler, S. A. (2004). Naturally small: Teaching and learning in the last one-teacher schools. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tubbs, N. (2000). From reflective practitioner to comprehensive teacher. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareia Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options