Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 23–42 | Cite as

Supporting indigenous students’ understanding of the numeration system of their first language

  • José Luis Cortina
Original Article
First Online:
  • 259 Downloads

Abstract

Results from a project conducted in Mexico are discussed, in which a group of 17 indigenous teachers analyzed the numeration systems of their first language. The main goal of the project is to develop resources that help teachers in supporting students’ understanding of the systems. In the first phase of the project, the central organizing ideas of 14 numeration systems were specified. Each system belonged to a different Mesoamerican language. Three aspects of the systems were identified that would have to be accounted for in instructional design. They include using 20 as a multiplicative base. Examples are presented of the instructional resources that indigenous teachers could use to help their students understand the quantitative rationales of the systems.

Keywords

Numeration systems Indigenous education Ethnomathematics Natural numbers Elementary school 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was possible thanks to the work of the 17 indigenous teachers that participated in the research project. They are Adriana Roque Corona (Otomí), Belén Juárez López (Totonaco), Domingo Arcos Vázquez (Cho’l), Elodia Velasco Pacheco (Mixteco), Emma Candia Estrada (Tlapaneco), Flor Neyvis Hernández Mendoza (Chatino), Jorge Mendoza Cumplido (Southern Tepehuano), Judith Ibarra Bruno (Tlapaneco), Minerva Merino López (Mixteco), Nancy Martínez Ramírez (Náhuatl), Norma Filomena Martínez Jiménez (Mixe), Odelba Villegas López (Tarahumara), Reyna Isabel Santiz Gómez (Tseltal), Rogelio Ruiz Carrizosa (Mazateco), Silvia Benito Méndez (Mazahua), Vicente Hernández López (Triqui), and Yolanda Hernández Aguilar (Náhuatl). I am grateful to all of them. I am also grateful to the Universidad Pedagógica Nacional (Mexico’s National Pedagogical University) for funding the project.

References

  1. Barriga, F. (1998). Los sistemas de numeración indoamericanos (The Indo American numeration-systems). Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  2. Barriga, F. (2005). Historia natural de los sistemas de numeración (Natural history of numeration-systems). In M. Alvarado & B. M. Brizuela (Eds.), Haciendo números: Las notaciones numéricas vistas desde la psicología la didáctica y la historia (pp. 13–29). Mexico City: Paidós.Google Scholar
  3. Carpenter, T. P., Blanton, M. L., Cobb, P., Franke, M. L., Kaput, J. J., & McClain, K. (2004). Scaling up innovative practices in mathematics and science. Madison: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151–232). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Visnovska, J. (2008). Learning from and adapting the theory of realistic mathematics education. Education et Didactique, 2(1), 55–73.Google Scholar
  7. D’Ambrosio, U. (2001). General remarks on ethnomathematics. ZDM, 33, 37–39.Google Scholar
  8. Dirección General de Educación Indígena. (2010). Educación básica indígena (Indigenous elementary education). Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
  9. Ellerton, N. F., & Clarkson, P. C. (1996). Language factors in mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 987–1033). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Greenberg, J. H. (1990). Generalizations about numeral systems. In K. Denning & S. Kemmer (Eds.), On languages: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg (pp. 271–309). California: EEUU: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, K. D. (2007). When languages die. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2011). Censo de población y vivienda 2010 (Population and housing census 2010). Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.Google Scholar
  14. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. (2009). Panorama educativo de México, 2009 (Statistical profile of Mexico’s education, 2009). Mexico City: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.Google Scholar
  15. International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nunes, T. (1996). What is the difference between one, un, and yi? In C. S. Mansfield, N. A. Pateman, & N. Bednarz (Eds.), Mathematics for tomorrow’s young children: International perspectives on curriculum (pp. 177–185). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: an analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2009). Plan de estudios 2009. Educación básica. Primaria (Program of studies 2009. Elementary education. Primary education). Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
  21. Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2011). Sistema educativo de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, principales cifras, ciclo escolar 2009–2010 (Educational system of the Mexican United States, main data, school-year 2009–2010). Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
  22. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wright, R. J., Martland, J., Stafford, A. K., & Stanger, G. (2006). Teaching number. Thousand Oaks: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  24. Yamamoto, K. (2005). The acquisition of numeral classifiers: The case of Japanese children. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Área Académica Diversidad e InterculturalidadUniversidad Pedagógica NacionalMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options