Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 5–22 | Cite as

What’s the word for…? Is there a word for…? How understanding Mi’kmaw language can help support Mi’kmaw learners in mathematics

  • Lisa Lunney Borden
Article
First Online:

Abstract

As part of a larger project focused on decolonising mathematics education for Aboriginal students in Atlantic Canada, this article reports on the role of the Mi’kmaw language in mathematics teaching. By exploring how mathematical concepts are talked about (or not talked about) in the Mi’kmaw language, teachers and researchers can gain insight into how Mi’kmaw children think about mathematical concepts. It is argued that much can be learned by asking questions such as “What’s the word for…?” or “Is there a word for…?” Numerous examples of such conversations are presented. It is argued that particular complexities arise when words such as “flat” and “middle” are taken-for-granted as shared, but in fact do not have common use in the Mi’kmaw language. By understanding these complexities and being aware of the potential challenges for Mi’kmaw learners, teachers can better meet the needs of these students. It is argued that understanding Aboriginal languages can provide valuable insight to support Aboriginal learners in mathematics.

Keywords

Aboriginal education Mathematics education Mi’kmaq Indigenous education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was funded in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship Program.

References

  1. Barta, J., Abeyta, A., Gould, D., Galindo, E., Matt, G., Seaman, D., et al. (2001). The mathematical ecology of the Shoshoni and implications for elementary mathematics education and the young learner. Journal of American Indian Education, 40(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, B. (2008). Language and mathematics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battiste, M. (1998). Enabling the autumn seed: toward a decolonized approach to aboriginal knowledge, language, and education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22, 16–27.Google Scholar
  4. Battiste, M. (2000). Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  5. Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: a literature review with recommendations. Prepared for the National Working Group on Education and the Minister of Indian Affairs Indian and Northern AffairsCanada (INAC): Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Working Group on Education and the Minister of Indian Affairs Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC). Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/education/people/battistem/ikp_e.pdf.
  6. Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: an ecology of Indigenous education. Durango: Kivaki Press.Google Scholar
  7. Denny, J. (1981). Curriculum development for teaching mathematics in Inuktitut: the “Learning-from-Language” approach. Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 1(2), 199–204.Google Scholar
  8. Denzin, N. (2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 933–958). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Doolittle, E. (2006). Mathematics as Medicine. Proceedings of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group Conference, Calgary, 2006, 17–25Google Scholar
  10. Edmonds-Wathen, C. (2011). “Locating the Learner: Indigenous Language and Mathematics Education”. In Clark, J., B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer & S. Thornton (eds), Mathematics: Traditions and [New] Practices: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, 3–7 July 2011, Alice Springs, Adelaide: AAMT and MERGA, pp. 217–225Google Scholar
  11. Gutiérrez, R. (2007). Context matters: how should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In J. Choppin, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, D. Pimm, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: theories, practices and policies (pp. 17–33). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: literacy and discursive power (critical perspectives on literacy and education). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  13. Inglis, S. (2004). 400 years of linguistic contact between the Mi’kmaq and the English and the interchange of two world views. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 24(2), 389–402.Google Scholar
  14. Lipka, J. (1994). Culturally negotiated schooling: toward a Yup’ik mathematics. Journal of American Indian Education, 33(3), 14–30.Google Scholar
  15. Lipka, J. (2002). Yup’ik culture and everyday experience as a base for school mathematics. In W. Secada et al. (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: perspectives of indigenous people of North America (pp. 263–276). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  16. Lipka, J., Wildfeuer, S., Wahlberg, N., George, M., & Ezran, D. R. (2001). Elastic geometry and storyknifing: a Yup’ik Eskimo example. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 337–343.Google Scholar
  17. Little Bear, L. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 77–85). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lunney Borden, L. (2011). The “verbification” of mathematics: using the grammatical structures of mi’kmaq to support student learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 8–13.Google Scholar
  19. Lunney Borden, L., & Wagner, D. (2011). Qualities of respectful positioning and their connections to quality mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 379–391). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Fairhill, U. (2011). Collaborating to meet language challenges in indigenous mathematics classrooms. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicol, C., Archibald, J., Kelleher, H., & Brown, L. (2006). Transformative education for aboriginal mathematics learning: a community-based action research project (pp. 1–6). June: BC Educational Leadership Research.Google Scholar
  23. Orr, J., Paul, J., & Paul, S. (2002). Decolonizing Mi’kmaw education through cultural practical knowledge. McGill Journal of Education, 37(3), 331–354.Google Scholar
  24. Poirier, L. (2005). Teaching mathematics to Inuit children in Nunavik: taking into account the environment, the culture, and the language. In Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group / Groupe Canadien d'Etude en Didactique des Mathematiques. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, May 27–31, 2005.Google Scholar
  25. Powell, A., & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.). (1997). Ethnomathematics: challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rigney, L. (1999). Internationalisation of an indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: a guide to indigenist research methodology and its principles. WICAZO SA review, Fall, 14(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schleppegrell, M. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: a research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Secada, W., Hankes, J., & Fast, G. (Eds.). (2002). Changing the faces of mathematics: perspectives of indigenous people of North America. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  29. Setati, M. (2005). Teaching mathematics in a primary multilingual classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 447–466.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, L. (2005). On tricky ground. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 85–108). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  32. University of Alaska Fairbanks (n.d.). Math in a cultural context: lessons learned from Yup’ik Eskimo elders project. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Geography Program, School of Natural Resources and Natural Sciences. Retrieved July 6, 2009, from http://www.uaf.edu/mcc/
  33. Warren, E., Young, J., & de Vries, E. (2007). Australian Indigenous students: the role of oral language and representations in the negotiation of mathematical understanding. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the mathematics educational research group of Australia. Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar
  34. Yamamura, B., Netser, S., & Qanatsiaq, N. (2003). Community elders, traditional knowledge, and a mathematics curriculum framework. Education Canada, 43(1), 44–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationSt. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonishCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options