Advertisement

European Actuarial Journal

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 169–196 | Cite as

Defining principles of a robust insurance solvency regime

  • René Schnieper
Original Research Paper
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

The article deals with the fundamental features of a solvency regime: valuation and risk modelling. The paper argues that for solvency testing purposes the valuation method of choice is market consistent valuation. Statutory valuation based on historical costs is at best irrelevant and possibly misleading in the case of a compulsory winding up of a company and of forced sales of assets. As far as risk modelling is concerned, it is argued that stress tests and scenarios have an important role to play. They can complement or replace stochastic risk models. They have in particular the advantage of enabling an effective involvement of senior managers and Board members in the company’s quantitative risk management. It is argued that supervisors could use two co-existing models for solvency testing purposes: a probabilistic model and a set of scenarios based Solvency Capital Requirements. The paper draws on the experience of the EU regulatory authorities, CEIOPS and EIOPA, with the development of Solvency II. It also draws on the experience of FINMA, the Swiss supervisory authority, with the implementation of the Swiss Solvency Test. Finally, it takes into account the lessons of the Japanese life insurance crisis from 1997 to 2001.

Keywords

Solvency testing Solvency II Swiss Solvency Test Market consistent valuation Statutory valuation Matching adjustment Volatility adjustment Risk modelling Stress tests Scenarios Restructuring measures 

Notes

Glossary

A solvency assessment tool defines a required solvency capital and an available solvency capital. The solvency ratio is the ratio of available capital to required capital. These quantities bear different names depending on the jurisdiction. Within the Solvency II framework of the European Union the available capital are the Own Funds and the required capital is the Solvency Capital Requirements SCR. Within the framework of the Swiss Solvency Test those quantities are the Risk Bearing Capital and the Target Capital respectively. To be precise, the Target Capital is equal to the SCR plus the Market Value Margin. The latter quantity is the margin which must be added to the expected value of a liability in order to obtain the market value of that liability. The Market Value Margin is sometimes also referred to as Risk Margin.
EIOPA

European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority

CEIOPS

Predecessor Organisation of EIOPA

FINMA

Finanzmarktaufsicht, Swiss financial market supervisor

SST

Swiss Solvency Test

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Freeman M, Fujiki M (2001) Why some Japanese Insurers are Failing, Emphasis 2001/3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uemura N (2008) The failure without management. Oriental Life Insurance Cultural Development Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Solvency II Directive 2014/51 of the European Parliament and of the Council including “Omnibus II” and the Long-Term Guarantee MeasuresGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Domanski D, Shin HS, Suhko V (2015) The hunt for duration: not waving but drowning? BIS Working Paper No 519Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    FINMA-Rundschreiben 2013/2 SST Erleichterungen. https://www.finma.ch/en/documentation/circulars
  7. 7.
    Swiss National Bank (2014) Implementing the Countercyclical Capital Buffer in Switzerland, February 2014Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative risk management, Revised editionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber AA (2009) Pfandbriefmarkt und Finanzmarktkrise, Rede beim Jahresempfang des Verbandes Deutscher Pfandbriefbanken in Berlin am 26. November 2009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rebonato R (2010) Coherent stress testing, a Bayesian approach to the analysis of financial stress. Wiley, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    FINMA, Wegleitung für die Erarbeitung des SST-Berichtes 2016. https://www.finma.ch/en/supervision/insurers/cross-sectoral-tools/swiss-solvency-test-sst/
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Cont R, Schaanning E (2016) Fire sales, indirect contagion and systemic stress-testing. Norges Bank Working Paper 2/2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EAJ Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MännedorfSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations