Advertisement

European Actuarial Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 29–53 | Cite as

Optimal supervisory rules for pension funds under diverse pension security mechanisms

  • An Chen
  • Simona Clever
Original Research Paper

Abstract

The present paper analyzes optimal supervisory rules for pension funds taking account of diverse pension security mechanisms: support provided by either a plan sponsor, a pension guarantee fund or by both. Assuming that the regulatory rule is either to control the shortfall probability or expected shortfall, we show that both the security mechanisms and risk measures used by the regulators have a substantial impact on the optimal regulation and hence need to be considered adequately when setting regulatory rules.

Keywords

Regulation IORP Sponsor support Pension guarantee fund Risk measure 

References

  1. 1.
    Bikker JA, Broeders DWGA, de Dreu J (2010) Stock market performance and pension fund investment policy: rebalancing, free float, or market timing? Int J Cent Bank 6(2):53–79Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broeders DWGA, Chen A (2010) Pension regulation and the market value of pension liabilities—a contingent claims analysis using Parisian options. J Bank Financ 34(6):1201–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broeders DWGA, Chen A (2013) Pension benefit security: a comparison of solvency requirements, a pension guarantee fund and sponsor support. J Risk Insur 80(2):239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broeders DWGA, Pröpper M (2010) Risk based supervision of pension funds in the Netherlands. Pension fund risk management: financial and actuarial modeling. Chapman Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cummins J (1988) Risk-based premiums for insurance guarantee funds. J Financ 43(4):823–839MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duan JC, Yu MT (2005) Fair insurance guarantee premia in the presence of risk-based capital regulations, stochastic interest rate and catastrophe risk. J Bank Financ 29(10):2435–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grosen A, Jørgensen PL (2002) The bonus-crediting mechanism of Danish pension and life insurance companies: an empirical analysis. J Pension Econ Financ 1(3):249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grosen A, Jørgensen PL (2002) Life insurance liabilities at market values: an analysis of insolvency risk, bonus policy, and regulatory intervention rules in a barrier option framework. J Risk Insur 69(1):63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karatzas I, Shreve SE (1991) Brownian motions and stochastic calculus, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rymaszewski P, Schmeisser H, Wagner J (2012) Under what conditions is an insurance guaranty fund beneficial for policyholders? J Risk Insur 79(3):785–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharpe WF (1976) Corporate pension funding policy. J Financ Econ 3(3):183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© DAV / DGVFM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and EconomicsUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.DFG research training group 1100University of UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations