How can defined contribution pension plans benefit from momentum and mean reversion?

Original Research Paper


In this paper, we assess whether the stock market downturn can be an opportunity for Defined Contribution pension plan members to reinforce their risky assets exposure? In line with the framework developed by Kojein et al. (Manag Sci 55(7):1199–1213, 2009), we consider a DC plan investor, during the accumulation phase, whose aim is to maximize his terminal wealth. Within a continuous portfolio choice model, in which stock returns exhibit both momentum and mean reversion, DC plan members are allowed to invest their pension wealth into stocks as well as cash and bond assets. We derived the optimal portfolio candidate and we show how a DC plan investor can benefit from market opportunities by taking advantage of the momentum and mean reversion stock return properties. We find that long term investors such as DC plan members would benefit from a temporary increase of the share of risky assets in their portfolio in preparation of their retirement.


  1. 1.
    Balvers RJ, Gilliland E, Wu Y (2000) Mean reversion across national stock markets and parametric contrarian investment strategies. J Finance 55(2):745–772Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balvers RJ, Wu Y (2006) Momentum and mean reversion across national equity markets. J Empir Finance 13:24–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Battocchio P, Menoncin F (2002a) Optimal portfolio strategies with stochastic wage income and inflation: the case of a defined contribution pension plan, CeRP Working Papers 19, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, TurinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Battocchio P, Menoncin F (2002b) Optimal pension management under stochastic interest rates, wages, and inflation, Discussion Papers (IRES: Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales) 2002021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Battocchio P, Menoncin F, Scaillet O (2003) Optimal asset allocation for pension funds under mortality risk during the accumulation and decumulation phases, THEMA Working Papers 2003-28, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-PontoiseGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belaire-Franch J, Contreras D (2004) Ranks and signs-based multiple variance ratio tests, Working paper, University of ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belaire-Franch J, Opong KK (2005) Some evidence of random walk of euro Exchange rate using ranks and signs. J Banking Finance 29:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bodie Z, Merton RC, Samuelson WF (1992) Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life-cycle model. J Econ Dyn Control 16:427–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boulier JF, Huang SJ, Taillard G (2001) Optimal management under stochastic interest. Insur Math Econ 28:173–189MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brennan MlJ, Xia Y (2000) Dynamic Asset Allocation under Inflation, University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management 2893, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cairns AJG, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) Stochastic lifestyling: Optimal dynamic asset allocation for defined contribution pension plans. J Econ Dyn Control 30(5):843–877MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaudhuri K, Wu Y (2003) Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: Evidence from emerging markets. J Banking Finance 27(4):575–592Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chetouane M (2011) On the defined contribution strategic asset allocation. PhD dissertation, University Paris-Dauphine, LEDa-SDFiGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chow KV, Denning KC (1993) A simple multiple variance ratio test. J Econ 58(3):385–401MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cochrane JH (1988) How big is the random walk in GNP? J Political Econ, University of Chicago Press 96(5):893–920Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Bondt WFM, Thaler R (1985) Does the stock market overreact? J Finance. vol. 40(3):793–805Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diebold FX (1986) Testing for serial correlation in the presence of ARCH. In: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, vol 1, pp 323–328Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, Econometric Society 50(4):987–1007MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Escanciano JC, Lobato IN (2009) An automatic Portmanteau test for serial correlation. J Econ 1512:140–149MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fama EF, French KR (1988) Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. J Political Econ, University of Chicago Press 96(2):246–273Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econ J, Royal Economic Society 3(2):148–161MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgs H, Worthington AC (2003) Tests of random walks and market efficiency in Latin American stock markets: an empirical note, School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 157, School of economics and finance, Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Im Kyung So, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jarque CM, Bera AK (1980) Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Econ Lett 6(3):255–259MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jedageesh N (1990) Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. J Finance 45(3):881–898Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1995) Overreaction, delayed reaction, and contrarian profits. Rev Fin Studies, Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies 8(4):973–993Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jensen MC (1978) Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. J Financial Econ 6(2/3):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim JH (2006) Wild bootstrapping variance ratio tests. Econ Lett 92:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim TS, Omberg E (1996) Dynamic nonmyopic portfolio behavior. Rev Fin Studies, Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies 9(1):141–161Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim JH, Shamsuddin A (2008) Are Asian stock markets efficient? Evidence from new multiple variance ratio tests. J Empir Finance 15:518–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kojein RSJ, Rodriguez JC, Sbuelz A (2009) Momentum and mean-reversion in strategic asset allocation. Manag Sci 55(7):1199–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Korn R, Kraft H (2001) A stochastic control approach to portfolio problems with stochastic interest rates. SIAM J Control Optim 40(4):1250–1269MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lo AW, MacKinlay GA (1988) Stock prices do not follow a random walks: evidence from a simple specification test. Rev Financial Stud 1(1):41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lobato IN (2001) Testing that a dependent process is uncorrelated. J Am Stat Assoc, American Statistical Association 96:1066–1076MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Levin A, Lin CF, Shin CSJ (2002) Unit root test in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat, Department of Economics, University of Oxford 61(0):631–652Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Merton CR (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous time case. Rev Econ Stat 51(3):247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Merton CR (1971) Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous time model. J Econ Theory 3:373–413MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Merton CR (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica, Econometric Society 41(5):867–887MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Munk C, Sorensen C (2010) Dynamic asset allocation with stochastic income and interest rates. J Financial Econ 96:433-462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patro DK, Wu Y (2004) Predictability of short-horizon returns in international equity markets. J Empir Fin 11(4):553–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Poterba JM, Summers LH (1988) Mean reversion in stock prices: evidences and implications. J Fin Econ 22(1):27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Power DM, Lonie AA, Lonie R (1991) The overreaction effect Some UK evidence. British Account Rev 23(2):149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tobin J (1958) Liquidity preference as behaviour towards risk. Rev Econ Studies 25(67):65–86Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vasicek O (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J Financial Econ 5(2):177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Watcher JA (2002) Portfolio and consumption decision under mean reverting returns: an exact solution for complete markets. J Financial Quant Anal 37(1)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wright JH (2000) Alternative variance-ratio tests using ranks and signs. J Bus Econ Stat 18(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zarowin P (1990) Size, seasonality, and stock market overreaction. J Fin Quant Anal, Cambridge University Press 25(01):113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang A, Korn R, Ewald CO (2007) Optimal management and inflation protection for defined contribution pension plans. Blatter der DGVFM 28:239–258MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© DAV / DGVFM 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Economie de Dauphine (LEDa) and Stratégie et Dynamique Financiére (SDFi)Université Paris-DauphineParis cedex 16France
  2. 2.Banque de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations