Mixed dynamic and static risk-minimization with an application to survivor swaps

Original Research Paper


In the traditional setup, the financial market consists of liquid and dynamically traded financial assets. Here, we extend this setup to include an illiquid asset, which may be traded at fixed, discrete times only. Within this setting of mixed dynamic and static hedging, we adopt the criterion of risk-minimization and minimize the so-called risk process at the fixed trading times for the illiquid asset. The optimal mixed dynamic and static risk-minimizing strategies are compared with the optimal dynamic strategies, and certain correction terms that arise, when trading is restricted to discrete time for the illiquid asset, are identified. We apply the technique for a life insurance company whose liabilities are described by a general insurance payment process. Here, the traditional financial market contains a savings account and a zero coupon bond, which may be traded continuously, and an illiquid mortality derivative, traded at fixed times. We provide numerical illustrations with survivor swaps and compare the minimum obtainable risk with the risk for the optimal dynamic strategies.


Risk-minimization Hedging Life insurance Risk management Stochastic mortality Longevity Mortality derivative Survivor swap 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

62P05 91B28 


  1. 1.
    Björk T (2004) Arbitrage theory in continuous time, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cairns A, Blake D, Dowd K (2008) Modelling and management of mortality risk: a review. Scand Actuar J 79–113Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahl M (2004) Mortality in life insurance: market reserves and mortality-linked insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 35:113–136MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dahl M, Melchior M, Møller T (2008) On systematic mortality risk and risk-minimization with survivor swaps. Scand Actuar J 2008:114–146MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahl M, Møller T (2006) Valuation and hedging of life insurance liabilities with systematic mortality risk. Insur Math Econ 39:193–217MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dowd K, Blake D, Cairns A, Dawson P (2006) Survivor swaps. J Risk Insur 73:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Föllmer H, Schweizer M (1988) Hedging by sequential regression: an introduction to the mathematics of option trading. ASTIN Bull 18:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Föllmer H, Sondermann D (1986) Hedging of non-redundant contingent claims. In: Hildenbrand W, Mas-Colell A (eds) Contributions to mathematical economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 205–223Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Møller T (2001) Risk-minimizing hedging strategies for insurance payment processes. Finance Stoch 5(4):419–446MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schweizer M (1994) Risk-minimizing hedging strategies under restricted information. Math Finance 4:327–342MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schweizer M (2001) A guided tour through quadratic hedging approaches. In: Jouini E, Cvitanić J, Musiela M (eds) Option pricing, interest rates and risk management. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 538–574Google Scholar

Copyright information

© DAV / DGVFM 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen SDenmark
  2. 2.Copenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations