Advertisement

Learning about knowledge: threshold concepts for Indigenous studies in education

  • Nikki MoodieEmail author
Article

Abstract

The idea of ‘threshold concepts’ for Indigenous studies has received little attention in the literature to date. Page’s work is the notable exception, identifying the basis for what may constitute threshold concepts in this field. This paper builds on Page’s approach by providing a theoretical consideration of five ideas that may function as threshold concepts in Indigenous studies: race, Country, relationality, policy and evidence. Much research on Indigenous teaching and learning focuses on curriculum and pedagogy, but it is unclear what prior content knowledge of Indigenous issues pre-service teachers require. Threshold concepts allow the specification of content knowledge, which could suggest that learning about knowledge production may function as a part of learning about teaching, and thus describe a foundational purpose for Indigenous studies in the field of education.

Keywords

Policy problematisation Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education Initial teacher education Teacher professional knowledge Race 

Notes

References

  1. Althaus, C., Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2013). The Australian policy handbook. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, J., & Fogarty, B. (2010). Indigenous Australians as ‘No Gaps’ subjects: Education and development in remote Australia. In I. Snyder, & J. Nieuwenhuysen (Eds.), Closing the gap in education? Improving outcomes in southern world societies (pp. 110–128). Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, C. (2009). Critical Indigenous studies: From difference to density. Cultural Studies Review, 15(2), 80–100.Google Scholar
  4. Antoine, A., Mason, R., Mason, R., Palahicky, S., & Rodriguez de France, C. (2018). Pulling together: A guide for curriculum developers. Retrieved January 24, 2019, from https://opentextbc.ca/indigenizationcurriculumdevelopers/
  5. Arabena, K. (2014). The ‘First 1,000 Days’: Implementing strategies across Victorian Government agencies to improve the health and wellbeing outcomes for Aboriginal children and their families. Melbourne: Indigenous Health Equity Unit, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. Aveling, N. (2006). ‘Hacking at our very roots’: Rearticulating White racial identity within the context of teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 9(3), 261–274.Google Scholar
  7. Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’ approach. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges (pp. 21–24). Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  8. Baynes, R. (2016). Teachers’ attitudes to including Indigenous knowledges in the Australian Science Curriculum. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 45(1), 80–90.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2015.29.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, J. J. (1999). Wirriyarra Awara: Yanyuwa Land and Sea Scapes. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 98(4), 801–816.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, L. (2018). Indigenous young people, disadvantage and the violence of settler colonial education policy and curriculum. Journal of Sociology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318794295.Google Scholar
  11. Burridge, N., Chodkiewicz, A., & Whalan, F. (2012). A study of action learning and Aboriginal cultural education. In N. Burridge, F. Whalan, & K. Vaughn (Eds.), Indigenous education: A learning journey for teachers, schools and communities (pp. 33–46). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  12. Calderon, D. (2014). Speaking back to manifest destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Educational Research, 20(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
  13. Carrington, K. (2011). Punitiveness and the criminalisation of the other: State wards. Unlawful Non-Citizens and Indigenous Youth. Somatechnics, 1(1), 30–48.Google Scholar
  14. Castellano, M. B. (2012). Indigenous Research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 424–429). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17, 4–5.Google Scholar
  16. Craven, R. G., Yeung, A. S., & Han, F. (2014). The impact of professional development and Indigenous Education Officers on Australian teachers’ Indigenous teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8), 85–108.Google Scholar
  17. de Plevitz, L., & Croft, L. (2003). Aboriginality under the microscope: The biological descent test in Australian law. Law and Justice Journal, 3(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
  18. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.Google Scholar
  19. Forsyth, H. (2017). Āta: An indigenous knowledge based pedagogical approach to teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1729–1735.Google Scholar
  20. Fozdar, F. (2015). Race and ethnicity. In J. Arvanitakis (Ed.), Sociologic: Analysing everyday life and culture. South Melbourne: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Habibis, D., Taylor, P., Walter, M., & Elder, C. (2016). Repositioning the racial gaze: Aboriginal perspectives on race, race relations and governance. Social Inclusion, 4(1), 57–67.  https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i1.492.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, N. (2013). Country teaches: The significance of the local in the Australian history curriculum. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 214–224.Google Scholar
  23. Harrison, N., & Greenfield, M. (2011). Relationship to place: Positioning Aboriginal knowledge and perspectives in classroom pedagogies. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  24. Hollinsworth, D. (2006). Race and racism in Australia (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
  25. Horton, D. (2016). AIATSIS map of Indigenous Australia. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  26. Klein, E. (2015). A critical review of the capability approach in Australian Indigenous policy. CAEPR Working Paper No. 102/2015. Canberra, ACT: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ANU.Google Scholar
  27. Kowal, E., & Jenkins, M. (2016). DNA Nation raises tough questions for Indigenous Australians. The Conversation. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from http://theconversation.com/dna-nation-raises-tough-questions-for-indigenous-australians-59877.
  28. Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (Eds.). (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ladwig, J. G., & Luke, A. (2014). Does improving school level attendance lead to improved school level achievement? An empirical study of Indigenous educational policy in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(2), 171–194.Google Scholar
  30. Lea, T., Thompson, H., McRae-Williams, E., & Wegner, A. (2011). Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic: Researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent–school engagement in north Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 26(3), 321–339.Google Scholar
  31. Lucas, U., & Mladenovic, R. (2007). The potential of threshold concepts: An emerging framework for educational research and practice. London Review of Education, 5(3), 237–248.Google Scholar
  32. Mackinlay, E., & Barney, K. (2010). Transformative learning in first year Indigenous Australian studies: Posing problems, asking questions and achieving change. A practice report. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 91–99.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, K. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re-search. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203–214.Google Scholar
  34. McKenzie, P., Rowley, G., Weldon, P., & Murphy, M. (2011). Staff in Australia’s schools 2010: Main report on the survey. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  35. McKenzie, P., Weldon, P., Rowley, G., Murphy, M., & McMillan, J. (2014). Staff in Australia’s schools 2013: Main report on the survey. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In J. H. F. Meyer, & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 3–18). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2016). Integrated threshold concept knowledge. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & M. T. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice. Educational futures: Rethinking theory and practice (Vol. 68, pp. 25–38). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.Google Scholar
  38. Moodie, N. (2018). Decolonizing race theory: place, survivance & sovereignty. In G. Vass, J. Maxwell, S. Rudolph, & K. N. Gulson (Eds.), The relationality of race in education research (pp. 33–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Moodie, N., & Patrick, R. (2017). Settler grammars and the Australian professional standards for teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(5), 439–454.Google Scholar
  40. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2003). I still call Australia home: Indigenous belonging and place in a white postcolonizing society. In S. Ahmed (Ed.), Uprootings/Regroundings: Questions of home and migration (pp. 23–40). New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  41. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2004). Whitening race: Essays in social and cultural criticism. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  42. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The white possessive: Property, power, and Indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  43. Moreton-Robinson, A. (Ed.). (2016). Critical Indigenous studies: Engagements in First World locations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  44. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2017). Relationality: A key presupposition of an Indigenous social research paradigm. In C. Andersen, & J. M. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources and methods in Indigenous studies (pp. 69–77). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Moreton-Robinson, A., Singh, D., Kolopenuk, J., & Robinson, A. (2012). Learning the lessons?: Pre- service teacher preparation for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.Google Scholar
  46. Nakata, M. (2006). Australian Indigenous studies: A question of discipline. Australian Journal Of Anthropology, 17(3), 265–275.Google Scholar
  47. Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 7–14.Google Scholar
  48. Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S., & Bolt, R. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for Indigenous studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 120–140.Google Scholar
  49. National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples. (2016). The Redfern Statement. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Author.Google Scholar
  50. Nicola-Richmond, K., Pépin, G., Larkin, H., & Taylor, C. (2017). Threshold concepts in higher education: A synthesis of the literature relating to measurement of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 101–114.Google Scholar
  51. Pachucki, M. A., & Breiger, R. L. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 205–224.Google Scholar
  52. Page, S. (2014). Exploring new conceptualisations of old problems: Researching and reorienting teaching in Indigenous studies to transform student learning. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  53. Partridge, E. (2013). Caught in the same frame? The language of evidence-based policy in debates about the Australian Government ‘Intervention’ into Northern Territory Aboriginal communities. Social Policy & Administration, 47(4), 399–415.Google Scholar
  54. Pascoe, B. (2014). Dark Emu: Black seeds: Agriculture or accident?. Broome, WA: Magabala Books.Google Scholar
  55. Patrick, R., & Moodie, N. (2016). Indigenous education policy discourses in Australia: Rethinking the “problem”. In T. Barkatsos, & A. Bertram (Eds.), Global learning in the 21st century (pp. 165–184). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2017). Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 745–756.Google Scholar
  57. Puchner, L., & Markowitz, L. (2016). Using an adult development model to help explain pre-service teacher resistance to learning about race. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(5), 1043–1062.Google Scholar
  58. Quince, S. (2012). Coral secondary school. In N. Burridge, F. Whalan, & K. Vaughn (Eds.), Indigenous education: A learning journey for teachers, schools and communities (pp. 49–62). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Reconciliation Australia. (2016). 2016 Australian Reconciliation Barometer. Kingston, ACT: Reconciliation Australia.Google Scholar
  60. Rowse, T. (2013). Rethinking social justice: From ‘peoples’ to ‘populations’. Canberra, ACT: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sanders, W. (2010). Ideology, evidence and competing principles in Australian Indigenous affairs: From Brough to Rudd via Pearson and the NTER. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45(3), 307–331.Google Scholar
  62. Savage, G. C., & Lingard, B. (2018). Changing modes of governance in Australian teacher education policy. In N. Hobbel, & B. L. Bales (Eds.), Navigating the common good in teacher education policy: Critical and international perspectives (pp. 64–80). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Schulz, S., & Fane, J. (2015). A healthy dose of race? White students’ and teachers’ unintentional brushes with whiteness. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11), 137–154.Google Scholar
  64. United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. A/RES/61/295 (13 September 2007). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.
  65. University of South Australia. (2013). Respect, Relationships Reconciliation (the 3Rs)Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education: Resources for pre-service teachers, University of South Australia, Adelaide. Retrieved June 16, 2018, from https://rrr.edu.au/
  66. Verbos, A., & Humphries, M. (2014). A Native American relational ethic: An Indigenous perspective on teaching human responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  67. Walter, M. (2009). An economy of poverty? Power and the domain of Aboriginality. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 2(1), 2–14.Google Scholar
  68. Walter, M. (2010). The politics of the data: How the Australian statistical Indigene is constructed. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 3(2), 45–56.Google Scholar
  69. Walter, M., & Butler, K. (2013). Teaching race to teach Indigeneity. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 397–410.Google Scholar
  70. Yap, M., & Eu, E. (2016). Data sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia. In T. Kukutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (pp. 233–251). Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  71. Zepke, N. (2013). Threshold concepts and student engagement: Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 97–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Political Sciences, Faculty of ArtsThe University of MelbourneVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations