Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going

Article

Abstract

We have known for a long time that a relationship exists between how learning is assessed and the learning processes and strategies students employ when engaged in those assessments. Black and Wiliam pointed out in 1998 that self-regulated learning should be a primary goal of formative assessment (FA). Since then, a growing body of research on this relationship has been produced. The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss keystone publications that inform our current understandings of the relationship between FA and self-regulated learning. The result is a roadmap of the development of the field and directions for future research.

Keywords

Self-regulated learning Coregulated learning Classroom assessment Formative assessment Assessment for learning Self-assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author’s research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) under the Ramón y Cajal program (Reference Number: RYC-2013-13469) and National R+D Call (Convocatoria Excelencia) project reference EDU2016-79714-P.

References

  1. Allal, L. (2010). Assessment and the regulation of learning. In E. B. P. Peterson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 348–352). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allal, L. (2016). The co-regulation of student learning in an assessment for learning culture. In L. Allal & D. Laveault (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 259–273). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Allal, L., & Lopez, L. M. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French (pp. 241–264). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms.Google Scholar
  4. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. J. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Andrade, H. L. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillian (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 17–34). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In L. Allal & D. Laveault (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293–309). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (Under review). Classroom assessment and the co-regulation of learning.Google Scholar
  8. Andrade, H., Brookhart, S. M., Allal, L., Azevedo, R., Wiliam, D., & Winne, P. (2014). Toward a theory of classroom assessment as the regulation of learning. In Symposium presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Andrade, H., & Cizek, G. J. (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baas, D. (2017). Assessment for learning: More than a tool. Ph.D., University of Maastrich.Google Scholar
  12. Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2014). The relation between Assessment for Learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 36–46.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12058.Google Scholar
  13. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408–425). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Brookhart, S. M. (2005). Research on formative classroom assessment: State-of-the-Art. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
  18. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of motivation theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 35–54). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343–368.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.929565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., et al. (2016). A century of grading research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 3(2014), 22–30.  https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24.Google Scholar
  23. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2016). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2012). Distinguishing formative assessment from other educational assessment labels. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/FASTLabels.pdf.
  27. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practice on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dinsmore, D. L., & Wilson, H. E. (2016). Student participation in assessment: Does it influence self-regulation? In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment (pp. 145–168). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A metaanalysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199–208.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605300301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.  https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: A catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 42(8), 1181–1192.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Effects of formative assessments to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students: Results from a randomized controlled intervention. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 51, 126–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 155–175.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2202_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicol, D., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422.Google Scholar
  38. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576.  https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales De Psicologia, 30(2), 450–462.  https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221.Google Scholar
  40. Panadero, E., & Broadbent, J. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: A self-regulated learning perspective. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing evaluative judgement: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016a). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311–326). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Panadero, E., Klug, J., & Järvelä, S. (2016b). Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: When measurement and intervention come hand in hand. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 723–735.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Penuel, W. R., & Shepard, L. A. (2016). Social models of learning and assessment. In A. A. Rupp & J. P. Leighton (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and assessment: Frameworks, methodologies, and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  47. Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 85–102.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In J. Eccles & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43–97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  50. Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830120074206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reinholz, D. L. (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 301–315.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 225–250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00117714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tay, H. Y. (2015). Setting formative assessments in real-world contexts to facilitate self-regulated learning. Educational Research for Policy and Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9172-5.Google Scholar
  58. Veenman, M. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 205–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiliam, D. (2017). Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1401526.Google Scholar
  61. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, California: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performances. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de PsicologíaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.University at Albany, State University of New YorkAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.Duquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations