Non-disclosing students with disabilities or learning challenges: characteristics and size of a hidden population
- 555 Downloads
Internationally, university students with disabilities (SWD) are recognised as being under-represented in higher education. They face significant problems accessing appropriate accommodations for their disability. Academic outcomes for this group are lower in terms of achievement and graduation rates. The true size of the SWD group at university is suggested to be different to that reported due to students not disclosing their disability for a variety of reasons including stigma, fear of discrimination, past negative experiences, and gaps in knowledge about available institutional support and accommodations. Research suggests that students do not consider their issues to fall under the term disability, resulting in a hidden population of students who could be better supported by their university. Using an Australian regional university as a case study, this paper examines the SWD population by identifying both disclosed and non-disclosed SWD populations within the domestic undergraduate population as well as information on the nature of students’ diagnoses or assessment, not previously captured. Using an anonymous online survey which reframed disability using the non-deficit language of learning challenge, the population of those dealing with learning challenges, disclosed and non-disclosed, was identified and a population estimate calculated. Student characteristics that predicted non-disclosure and specific information on the nature of students’ diagnoses were made and have the potential to develop targeted institutional support for a population that is currently difficult to access.
KeywordsDisability Students with disabilities Student experience Learning Survey Undergraduate Higher education
We acknowledge the support and research grant from the equity unit of the university. The university executive unit provided support and access to the students of the institution, and granted permission to publish the results of the survey. Professor Mardi Dungey, University of Tasmania, was generous with expertise regarding the use of the DSE methodology.
- Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Aronin, S., & Smith, M. (2016). One in four students suffer from mental health problems. Retrieved from https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/08/09/quarter-britains-students-are-afflicted-mental-hea/.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2010). ABS sources of disability information: Australia 2003-2008 Information Paper. Cat. No. 4431.0.55.002 Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Estimates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, June 2011. Cat. No. 3238.0 Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2004). Children with disabilities in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2014). Towards a performance measurement framework for equity in higher education. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cole, E. V., & Cawthon, S. W. (2015). Self-disclosure decisions of university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 28(2), 163–179.Google Scholar
- Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York: National Centre for Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
- Fossey, E., Chaffey, L., Venville, A., Ennals, P., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2015). Supporting tertiary students with disabilities: individualised and institution-level approaches in practice. Adelaide: NCVER.Google Scholar
- Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2011). Opening up access to higher education: Implications and challenges. Raanana: The Open University of Israel.Google Scholar
- Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2015a). First year UK domicilied HE students by level of study, sex, mode of study and disability 2013/14. Retrieved September 1, 2015 from www.hesa.ac.uk.
- Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2015b). HESA UK new classifications for student disability by code. Retrieved August 19, 2015 from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/collection/c14051/a/disable/.
- Kilpatrick, S., Johns, S., Barnes, R., McLennan, D., Fischer, S., & Magnussen, K. (2016). Exploring the retention and success of students with disability. Hobart: University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
- Koshy, P., & Seymour, R. (2015). Student equity performance in Australian Higher Education: 2007–2014. Perth: Curtin University.Google Scholar
- Laerd Statistics. (2015). Binomial logistic regression using SPSS Statistics: Statistical tutorials and software guides. Statistical tutorials and software guides. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com.
- Lightner, K. L., Kipps-Vaughan, D., Schulte, T., & Trice, A. D. (2012). Reasons university students with a learning disability wait to seek disability services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(2), 145–159.Google Scholar
- Luzeckyj, A., King, S., Scutter, S., & Brinkworth, R. (2011). The significance of being first: A consideration of cultural capital in relation to “first in family” student’s choices of university and program. A Practice Report. The International Journal of the First Year Higher Education, 2(2), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McAllister, M., Wynaden, D., Happell, B., Flynn, T., Walters, V., Duggan, R., et al. (2014). Staff experiences of providing support to students who are managing mental health challenges: A qualitative study from two Australian universities. Advances in Mental Health, 12(3), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Naylor, R., Baik, C., & James, R. (2013). Developing a critical intervention framework for advancing equity in Australian higher education. Melbourne: Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education.Google Scholar
- Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A.-M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., et al. (2011). The post-secondary school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). (NCSER 2011–3005). Menlo Park, CA: National Center for Special Education Research.Google Scholar
- Payne, T., & Irons, E. (2003). Learning disabilities resource package: Tools for assessing learning disability and supporting students with learning disability in Australian universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
- Reid, D. P. (2014). Stuck between a rock and a hard place: Exploring the lived experiences of college students who did not request accommodations. (Doctorate), Chapman University, College of Educational Studies Dissertations. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/ces_dissertations/1.
- US Department of Education. (2011). Transition of students with disabilities to postsecondary education: A guide for high school students. Retrieved 21 October 16 from www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/transitionguide.html.