The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 161–190 | Cite as

Representations of childcare in the Australian print media: An exploratory corpus-assisted discourse analysis



While an increasing body of Australian and international research has explored the relationship between media and education, few studies have examined this relationship in the context of early childhood education. This paper contributes to this research gap by reporting on a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of how childcare is represented in 801 newspaper texts from six Australian newspapers. As a foundational paper of a broader study investigating public and political influences on parents’ childcare choices, the paper details the use and utility of corpus linguistic tools for exploring the discourse construction of childcare in a large corpus of media texts. It also highlights the value of analysing media corpora via media ownership, focusing on the two dominant Australian media organisations, Fairfax and News Corp. Analyses reveal similarities but also key differences in the representation of childcare in Fairfax and News Corp newspapers. In Australia, print media still sets the daily media agenda and reflects the dominant discourse constructions surrounding major public issues. Accordingly, the beliefs, practices and decision-making of current and potential parent users of formal childcare may be differentially influenced depending not just on their (direct or indirect) access to print media, but by the format (tabloid or broadsheet) and thus ownership (Fairfax or News Corp).


Child care Media Discourse analysis Corpus linguistic tools Early childhood education 


  1. Albanese, P., & Rauhala, A. (2015). A decade of disconnection: Childcare policies in changing economic times in the Canadian context. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 6(2), 252–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). 4240.0Preschool Education, Australia, 2015.
  3. Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32, 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, P., Hardie, A., & McEnery, T. (2006). A glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2016). Counting and comparing school performance: An analysis of media coverage of PISA in Australia, 2000–2014. Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1252856.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Blackmore, J., & Thomson, P. (2004). Just ‘good and bad news’? Disciplinary imaginaries of head teachers in Australian and English print media. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 301–320. doi:10.1080/0268093042000207638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackmore, J., & Thorpe, S. (2003). Media/ting change: The print media’s role in mediating education policy in a period of radical reform in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 577–595. doi:10.1080/0268093032000145854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, C., & Wright, T. (2011). The rush toward universal public pre-K: A media analysis. Educational Policy, 25(1), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnard, L. (Ed.). (2007). Reference guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition).
  11. Burnard, L. (2009). What is the BNC?
  12. COAG. (2009). National partnership agreement on the national quality agenda for early childhood education and care.
  13. Cohen, J. L. (2010). Teachers in the news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper’s discourse on education, 2006–2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 105–119. doi:10.1080/01596300903465450.Google Scholar
  14. Dalton, B., & Wilson, R. (2009). Improving quality in Australian childcare: The role of the media and non-profit providers. In D. King & G. Meagher (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices (pp. 203–230). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Degotardi, S., Sweller, N., Fenech, M. & Beath, A. (under review). Influences on parents’ childcare choices: A comparative analysis of preschool and long day care users. International Journal of Early Childhood.Google Scholar
  16. Dorfman, L., & Woodruff, K. (1999). Childcare coverage in U.S. newspapers (Issue 7). Berkeley Media Studies Group.
  17. Fairfax Media. (2014). Brisbane Times audience persona.
  18. Fenech, M. & Sweller, N. (in press). Problematising Australia’s Nanny Pilot Program as evidence-based policy: A reconstruction of the problem of child care. Australian Journal of Social Issues.Google Scholar
  19. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hayden, J. (1996). Beyond Mr Bubbles: An analysis of the public image of early childhood care and education in Western Sydney. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, J., & Graham, C. (2013). Shifting patterns in Australian newspaper writing styles: Results of a longitudinal study. Australian Journalism Review, 35(2), 118–131.Google Scholar
  22. Kunkel, D., Smith, S., Suding, P., & Biely, E. (2002). Coverage in context: How thoroughly the news media report five key children’s issues. Commissioned by the Casey Journalism Center on Children and Families. Casey Journalism Center on Children and Families, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  23. Lonne, B., & Gillespie, K. (2014). How do Australian print media representations of child abuse and neglect inform the public and system reform? Child Abuse and Neglect, 38, 837–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McManus, J., & Dorfman, L. (2002). Silent revolution: How U.S. newspapers portray child care (Issue 11).
  25. Meagher, G., & Wilkins, D. (2012). How interests shape problem formulation in elder care reform: An Australian case study using corpus linguistics methods. In Paper presented at the conference of Research Committee 19 of the International Sociological Association, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  26. Mockler, N. (2013). Reporting the ‘education revolution’: in the print media. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.698860.Google Scholar
  27. Morley, J. (2009). Introduction: A description of CorDis. In J. Morley & P. Bayley (Eds.), Corpus assisted discourse studies on the Iraq conflict: Wording the war (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Nicholas, J., & Price, J. (1998). Advanced studies in journalism. Cheltenham: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
  29. O’Connell, M., Fox, S., Hinz, B., & Cole, H. (2016). Quality early education for all: Fostering, entrepreneurial, resilient and capable leaders. Mitchell Institute policy paper No. 01/2016.
  30. Penn, H. (2011). Policy rationales for early childhood services. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 5(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/2288-6729-5-1-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Potts, A., Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2015). How can computer-based methods help researchers to investigate news values in large datasets? A corpus linguistic study of the construction of newsworthiness in the reporting on Hurricane Katrina. Discourse & Communication, 9(2), 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Productivity Commission. (2015). Report on government services 2015: Child care, education and training (Vol. B). Retrieved February 10, 2015 from:
  33. Richardson, B. (2011). A matter of choice: A critical discourse analysis of ECEC policy in Canada’s 2006 federal election. Occasional Paper No. 25. Toronto: Childcare Resource and Research Unit.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, B. (2015). Mass media, public opinion and policy (in)action: A meta-synthesis of literature examining childcare policy representation in Canadian newspapers in light of Habermas and Lippmann. In Paper presented at Media and Policy panel at 2nd international conference on public policy, Milan.
  35. Roy Morgan. (2015). Australian newspaper readership, 12 months to March 2015.
  36. Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words—and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott, M. (2012). WordSmith tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, M. (2015). WordSmith tools manual. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
  39. Sparks, C. (2000). Introduction: The panic over tabloid news. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 1–40). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  40. Stack, M. (2006). Testing, testing, read all about it: Canadian press coverage of the PISA results. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne De L Éducation, 29(1), 49–69. doi:10.2307/20054146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takami, S. (2004). A corpus-driven identification of distinctive words ‘Tabloid Adjectives’ and ‘Broadsheet Adjectives’. In J. Nakamura, N. Inoue, & T. Tabata (Eds.), English corpora under Japanese eyes (pp. 116–135). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. (2013). Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The Newspaper Works. (12 May, 2014). Total newspaper readership reaches a new high.
  44. Thomas, S. (2003). The trouble with our schools’: A media construction of public discourses on Queensland schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(1), 19–33. doi:10.1080/01596300303030.Google Scholar
  45. Tiffen, R. (2011). Has the gap between qualities and tabloids increased? Changes in Australian newspapers 1956–2006. Australian Journal of Communication, 38(2), 33–52.Google Scholar
  46. Tiffen, R., Jones, P. K., Rowe, D., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., et al. (2014). Sources in the news. Journalism Studies, 15(4), 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ulmer, J. B. (2016). Re-framing teacher evaluation discourse in the media: An analysis and narrative-based proposal. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 43–55. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.921756.Google Scholar
  48. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wall, G. (2013). ‘Putting family first’: Shifting discourses of motherhood and childhood in representations of mothers’ employment and child care. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Windle, J. (2011). From academia to media: Staging the public career of critical literacy. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(3), 311–327. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0030-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yemini, M., & Gordon, N. (2015). Media representations of national and international standardized testing in the Israeli education system. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1105786.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
  2. 2.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations