Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 191–211 | Cite as

Is SES really that important for educational outcomes in Australia? A review and some recent evidence

  • Gary N. MarksEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the emphasis on students’ socioeconomic status (SES) in research and policy circles in Australia is unwarranted. The bivariate relationships between SES and educational outcomes are only moderate and the effects of SES are quite small when taking into account cognitive ability or prior achievement. These two influences have much stronger relationships with students’ outcomes than SES and their effects cannot be attributed to the influence of SES at earlier points of time. The theoretical explanations for socioeconomic inequalities in education (e.g. schools and cultural factors) are problematic and are not supported by empirical work. The much weaker than assumed effects of SES has implications for research and policy.

Keywords

SES Family income Student achievement Educational outcomes 

References

  1. ABS. (2011). Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA): Cat. No. 2033.0.55.001. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. AIFS. (2015). Longitudinal Study of Australian Children data user guide-November 2015. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Ainley, J., Graetz, B., Long, M., & Batten, M. (1995). Socioeconomic status and school education. Canberra: Department of Employment Education and Training.Google Scholar
  4. Ainley, J., & Long, M. (1995a). Measuring student socioeconomic status. In J. Ainley, B. Graetz, M. Long, & M. Batten (Eds.), Socioeconomic status and school education (pp. 52–76). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Ainley, J., & Long, M. (1995b). Other aspects of area-based indexes. In J. Ainley, B. Graetz, M. Long, & M. Batten (Eds.), Socioeconomic status and school education (pp. 77–90). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  6. Ainley, J., & Sheret, M. (1992). Progress through high school: A study of senior secondary schooling in New South Wales (Vol. 23). Hawthorn: ACER.Google Scholar
  7. Andersen, I. G., & Jæger, M. M. (2015). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. Social Science Research, 50, 177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Aschaffenburg, K., & Maas, I. (1997). Cultural and educational careers: The dynamics of social reproduction. American Sociological Review, 62, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker, L. A., Treloar, S. A., Reynolds, C. A., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (1996). Genetics of educational attainment in Australian twins: Sex differences and secular changes. Behavior Genetics, 26, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative analysis. Sociology, 40, 1039–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernstein, B. (Ed.). (1971). Class, codes and control: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language (Vol. 1). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Blanden, J. (2013). Cross-country rankings in intergenerational mobility: A comparison of approaches from economics and sociology. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 38–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00690.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150–197). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K., Samuelsson, S., Corley, R., Willcutt, E. G., et al. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on aspects of literacy and language in early childhood: Continuity and change from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calvin, C. M., Fernandes, C., Smith, P., Visscher, P. M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Sex, intelligence and educational achievement in a national cohort of over 175,000 11-year-old school children in England. Intelligence, 38, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Jha, N. (2013). Educational achievement and the allocation of school resources (Melbourne Institute working paper series no. 22/13). Melbourne: Melbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
  20. Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Crook, C. (1997). Cultural practices and socioeconomic attainment. The Australian experience. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  22. Daraganova, G., & Sipthorp, B. E. M. (2013). Using national assessment program—Literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN) data in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) (LSAC Technical Paper No. 8). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, J. A. (1982). Achievement variables and class cultures: Family, schooling, job, and forty-nine dependent variables in the cumulative GSS. American Sociological Review, 47, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Broucker, P., & Underwood, C. (1998). International education mobility: An international comparison with a focus on post-secondary education. Education Quarterly Review, 5, 30–51.Google Scholar
  25. de Graaf, N. D., de Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73, 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dockery, A. M., Seymour, R., & Koshy, P. (2016). Promoting low socio-economic participation in higher education: A comparison of area-based and individual measures. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1692–1714. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1020777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dumais, S. A. (2006). Early childhood cultural capital, parental habitus, and teachers’ perceptions. Poetics, 34, 83–107. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Kolosi, T. (1992). Images of class: Public perceptions in Hungary and Australia. American Sociological Review, 57, 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Sikora, J. (2014). Scholarly culture and academic performance in 42 nations. Social Forces, 92, 1573–1605. doi: 10.1093/sf/sou030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  32. Grasby, K. L., & Coventry, W. L. (2016). Longitudinal stability and growth in literacy and numeracy in Australian school students. Behavior Genetics. doi: 10.1007/s10519-016-9796-0.Google Scholar
  33. Grasby, K. L., Coventry, W. L., Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., & Medland, S. E. (2016). Genetic and environmental influences on literacy and numeracy performance in Australian school children in grades 3, 5, 7, and 9. Behavior Genetics. doi: 10.1007/s10519-016-9797-z.Google Scholar
  34. Heath, A. F., Mills, C., & Roberts, J. (1992). Towards meritocracy? Recent evidence on an old problem. In C. Crouch & A. Heath (Eds.), Social research and social reform (Vol. 30, pp. 217–243). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  35. Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2010). Prior achievement, effort, and mathematics attitude as predictors of current achievement. Australian Educational Researcher, 37, 41–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03216921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill, P., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hyman, H. H. (1966). The value systems of different classes: A social psychological contribution to the analysis of stratification. In R. Bendix & S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Class, status and power: Social stratification in comparative perspective (2nd ed., pp. 488–499). New York: Free.Google Scholar
  38. Jackson, M., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Yaish, M. (2007). Primary and secondary effects in class differentials in educational attainment. Acta Sociologica, 50, 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jæger, M. M. (2011). Does cultural capital really affect academic achievement? New evidence from combined sibling and panel data. Sociology of Education, 84, 281–298. doi: 10.1177/0038040711417010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Justman, M., & Ryan, C. (2013). What’s wrong with the Gonski report: Funding reform and student achievement? (Melbourne Institute Policy Briefs No. 2/13). Melbourne: Melbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
  41. Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Race, cultural capital, and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kingston, P. W. (2000). The classless society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kingston, P. W. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of cultural capital theory. Sociology of Education, 74, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kovas, Y., Voronin, I., Kaydalov, A., Malykh, S. B., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Literacy and numeracy are more heritable than intelligence in primary school. Psychological Science, 24, 2048–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out. Melbourne: Centre for International Research on Education Systems, Victoria University.Google Scholar
  46. Le, A. T., Miller, P. W., Slutske, W. S., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Opportunity and educational outcomes in Australia. Economic Record, 87, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1996). Maths and science on the line: Australian junior secondary school students ‘ performance in the third international mathematics and science study (Vol. 1). Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  48. Lu, L., & Rickard, K. (2014). Value added models for NSW government schools. Sydney: Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, Education and Communities.Google Scholar
  49. Marks, G. N. (2009). Modernization theory and changes over time in the reproduction of socioeconomic inequalities in Australia. Social Forces, 88, 917–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marks, G. N. (2010a). Meritocracy, modernization and students’ occupational expectations: Cross-national evidence. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marks, G. N. (2010b). What aspects of schooling are important? School effects on tertiary entrance performance in Australia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marks, G. N. (2011). Issues in the conceptualisation and measurement of socioeconomic background: Do different measures generate different conclusions? Social Indicators Research, 104, 225–251. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9741-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marks, G. N. (2014a). Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement over the school career. Australian Journal of Education, 58, 223–247. doi: 10.1177/0004944114537052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marks, G. N. (2014b). The size, stability, and consistency of school effects: Evidence from Victoria. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26, 397–414. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2014.964264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marks, G. N. (2015a). Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Review of Education, 41, 122–144. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2015.1006613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marks, G. N. (2015b). Do catholic and independent schools “add-value” to students’ tertiary entrance performance? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Australian Journal of Education, 59, 133–157. doi: 10.1177/0004944115586658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marks, G. N. (2015c). School sector differences in student achievement in Australian primary and secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of School Choice, 9, 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marks, G. N. (2016). The relative effects of socio-economic, demographic, non-cognitive and cognitive influences on student achievement in Australia. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marks, G. N., & McMillan, J. (2007). Changes in socioeconomic inequalities in university participation in Australia. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparative study (pp. 351–373). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Marks, G. N., & Mooi-Reci, I. (2016). The declining influence of family background on educational attainment in Australia: The role of measured and unmeasured influences. Social Science Research, 55, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McGaw, B., Long, M., Morgan, G., & Rosier, M. J. (1988). Literacy and numeracy in Victorian schools (Vol. 34). Hawthorn: ACER.Google Scholar
  62. McMillan, J., Beavis, A., & Jones, F. L. (2009). The AUSEI06: A new socioeconomic index for Australia. Journal of Sociology, 45, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miller, P. W., Mulvey, C., & Martin, N. G. (2001). Genetic and environmental contributions to educational attainment in Australia. Economics of Education Review, 20, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mullan, K., & Redmond, G. (2011). Validating income in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC Technical Paper No. 7). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  65. Nghiem, H. S., Nguyen, H. T., Khanam, R., & Connelly, L. B. (2015). Does school type affect cognitive and non-cognitive development in children? Evidence from Australian primary schools. Labour Economics, 33, 55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. OECD. (2001). Knowledge And Skills For Life. First results from the OECD programme for international student assessment. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  67. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  68. OECD. (2007). Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (Vol. 2). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  69. OECD. (2010a). Economic policy reforms: Going for growth. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. II). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  71. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010a). School socio-economic composition and student outcomes in Australia: Implications for educational policy. Australian Journal of Education, 54, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010b). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112, 1137–1162.Google Scholar
  74. Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2014). Genetics and intelligence differences: Five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.105.Google Scholar
  75. Pokropek, A. (2014). Phantom effects in multilevel compositional analysis: Problems and solutions. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 677–705. doi: 10.1177/0049124114553801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pokropek, A., & Sikora, J. (2015). Heritability, family, school and academic achievement in adolescence. Social Science Research, 53, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ranasinghe, R. (2015). The transmission of education across generations: Evidence from Australia. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 15(4), 1893–1917.Google Scholar
  78. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Samuelsson, S., Olson, R., Wadsworth, S., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C., Willcutt, E., et al. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on prereading skills and early reading and spelling development in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia. Reading and Writing, 20, 51–75. doi: 10.1007/s11145-006-9018-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sheppard, J., & Biddle, N. (2015). Social class in Australia: Beyond the working and middle classes. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  82. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytical review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Teachman, J., & Paasch, K. (1998). The family and educational aspirations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 704–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Televantou, I., Marsh, H. W., Kyriakides, L., Nagengast, B., Fletcher, J., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2015). Phantom effects in school composition research: Consequences of failure to control biases due to measurement error in traditional multilevel models. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26, 75–101. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2013.871302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013). PISA 2012: How Australia measures up. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  87. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  88. Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wainwright, M. A., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., Luciano, M., & Martin, N. G. (2004). Genetic and environmental sources of covariance between reading tests used in neuropsychological assessment and IQ subtests. Behavior Genetics, 34, 673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41, 19–27.Google Scholar
  91. White, K. R. (1982). The relationship between socio-economic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. White, S. B., Reynolds, P. D., Thomas, M. M., & Gitzlaff, N. J. (1993). Socioeconomic status and achievement revisited. Urban Education, 28, 328–343. doi: 10.1177/0042085993028003007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wildhagen, T. (2009). Why does cultural capital matter for high school academic performance? An empirical assessment of teacher-selection and self-selection mechanisms as explanations of the cultural capital effect. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 173–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.01137.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Westmead: Saxon House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Government, Policy and Strategy, The Vice-ChancelleryAustralian Catholic UniversityEast MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.FitzroyAustralia

Personalised recommendations