‘To be numerate is to be someone…’: Tracing the doings of students labelled ‘at risk’
Scores from the Australian National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) identify students ‘at risk’ of not meeting minimum standards deemed necessary for future success in school and employment. The NAPLAN tests include items related to numeracy but also mathematics content and skills. Research in the area of mathematics education examining the effectiveness of pedagogical interventions in improving student scores on NAPLAN and other international measures is not only shaped by the standardised testing regime, it also effectively corrals the problem within the school context. As such, it is unable to answer questions related to other factors implicated in the lives of those who continue to ‘fail’ in relation to numeracy outcomes. This paper critically examines the type of funded research being done in relation to numeracy and mathematics education, the ‘social’ turn and the disconnect between this research and the widening ‘gap’ in NAPLAN numeracy outcomes. It argues for a research approach informed by institutional ethnography that begins with the ‘doings’ of individual students labelled ‘at risk’.
KeywordsNumeracy At risk NAPLAN Sociological theory Institutional ethnography
- ACARA. (2013). NAP: National Assessment Program. Retrieved December 22, 2014 from http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html.
- ACARA. (2014). NAPLAN Achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National Report for 2014. NAP: National Assessment Program. Retrieved February 04, 2015 from http://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/national-reports.html.
- Anderson, J. (2016). Misconceptions about numeracy standards. Staff Bulletin. Retrieved from https://wordvine.sydney.edu.au/files/1336/12202/#!1yna6fa-in-the-media-misconceptions-about-numeracy-standards.
- ARC. (2015). Grants Data Set. Australian Research Council. Retrieved March 05, 2015 from http://www.arc.gov.au/grants-dataset.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- COAG. (2008a). Closing the gap in indigenous disadvantage. Retrieved February 04, 2015 from https://www.coag.gov.au/closing_the_gap_in_indigenous_disadvantage.
- COAG. (2008b). National Numeracy Review Report. Australia: Australian Government Retrieved February 04, 2015 from https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/national_numeracy_review.pdf.
- Connell, R. W., Ashendon, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Daniel, Y. (2004). The discursive effects of policy texts: An institutional ethnography of funding special education in Ontario. (PhD thesis), Toronto, ON: York University.Google Scholar
- DEETYA. (1997). Numeracy = Everyone’s Business, The Report of the Numeracy Education Strategy Development Conference May 1997. Adelaide, SA: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.Google Scholar
- DEWA. (2001). Students at Educational Risk. Perth, WA: The Government of Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Doig, B. (2001). Summing up: Australian numeracy performances, practices, programs and possibilities. Retrieved February 04, 2015 from http://research.acer.edu.au/literacy_numeracy_reviews/2.
- Goos, M., Lincoln, D., Coco, A., Frid, S., Galbraith, P., Horne, M., & Gholan, M. (2004). Home, school and community partnerships to support children’s numeracy. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- Griffith, A. I., & Smith, D. E. (Eds.). (2014). Under new public management: Institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Jorgensen, R. (2010). Structured failing: Reshaping a mathematical future for marginalised learners. In: Paper presented at the MERGA33—2010 Shaping the Future of Mathematics Education Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Freemantle, WA.Google Scholar
- Jorgensen, R. (2014). Social theories of learning: A need for a new paradigm in mathematics education. Paper presented at the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Kerr, L. (2011). The educational production of students at risk. (Doctoral Thesis), Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Makar, K. (2012). The pedagogy of mathematics inquiry. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
- McDonald, H. (2005). Supporting Indigenous students as “smart, not good” knowers and learners: The practices of two teachers. In: Paper presented at the AARE International Education Research 2004 Conference, Melbourne, VIC: AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Mulligan, J., & English, L. (2014). Developing young students’ meta-representational competence through integrated mathematics and science investigations. In: Paper presented at the Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 493–500), Sydney.Google Scholar
- NSWDEC. (2014). Early Action for Success 2014 Implementation Plan. NSW Government: Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for the people. Oxford: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. E., & Turner, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Incorporating texts into institutional ethnographies. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Talbot, D. (2015). Tracing complexities of teacher professional learning to evidence of transformed practice. (PhD thesis), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- VICDET. (2015). Identifying students at risk. Retrieved May 05, 2015 from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/principals/participation/Pages/disengagedrisk.aspx.
- Watters, J., & Diezmann, C. (2013). Community partnerships for fostering student interest and engagement in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 47–55.Google Scholar
- Willis, S. (1998). Which numeracy? Unicorn, 24(2), 32–42.Google Scholar