Student, home, and school socio-demographic factors: links to school, home, and community arts participation
- 654 Downloads
This study explored the role of student (e.g., age, language background, gender), home (e.g., parent/caregiver education), and school (e.g., school type, size) socio-demographic factors in students’ school (e.g., in-school arts tuition, arts engagement), home (e.g., parent/caregiver–child arts interaction), and community (e.g., arts attendance, arts tuition) arts participation. The sample comprised 1172 elementary and secondary school students from 15 schools. Findings revealed that student and home socio-demographic factors were the most salient in predicting arts participation across school, home, and community contexts. Age, gender, and prior achievement were the key student socio-demographic factors, while parent/caregiver education and occupation were also associated with students’ arts participation. Implications for practice and intervention pertinent to young people’s arts participation are discussed.
KeywordsArts participation Socio-demographics School Home Community Youth
The authors would like to thank all participating schools, the Australian Research Council, and the Australia Council for the Arts for their assistance in this research.
- Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Engagement and opportunity to learn. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 39–41). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Anderson, J. C., Funk, J. B., Elliott, R., & Smith, P. H. (2003). Parental support and pressure and children’s extracurricular activities: Relationships with amount of involvement and affective experience of participation. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 241–257. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(03)00046-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ark, T. V. (2002). The case for small schools. Educational Leadership, 59, 55–59.Google Scholar
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). My school. www.myschool.edu.au.
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). National assessment program in literacy and numeracy, NAPLAN. Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.Google Scholar
- Bamford, A. (2006). The WOW factor: Global research compendium on the impact of the arts in education. New York: Waxmann Munster.Google Scholar
- Bamford, A., Newitt, R., Irvine, J., & Darell, R. (2004). Promoting the value of the arts. Sydney: University of Technology and New South Wales Department of Education and Training.Google Scholar
- Barber, B. L., Stone, M. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2010). Protect, prepare, support, and engage: The roles of school-based extracurricular activities in students’ development. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 366–378). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Barker, R., & Gump, R. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Barrett, M., & Smigiel, H. (2003). Awakening the ‘sleeping giant’? The arts in the lives of Australian families. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 4, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Baum, S. M., & Owen, S. V. (2002). Using art processes to enhance academic self-regulation. In R. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 64–65). Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership.Google Scholar
- Benson, P. L., & Saito, R. N. (2000). The scientific foundations of youth development. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.Google Scholar
- Blomfield, C. J., & Barber, B. L. (2011). Developmental experiences during extracurricular activities and Australian adolescents’ self-concept: Particularly important for youth from disadvantaged schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence: A Multidisciplinary Research Publication, 40, 582–594. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9563-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Catterall, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompsan, G. (2012). The arts and achievement in at-risk youth: Findings from four longitudinal studies. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.Google Scholar
- Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Australia 2020 summit: Initial summit report. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from www.australia2020.gov.au/.
- Darling, N., Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, R. (2005). Participation in school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Leisure Research, 37, 51–76.Google Scholar
- Deasy, R. (Ed.). (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership.Google Scholar
- Ewing, R. (2010). The arts and Australian education: Realising potential. Australian Education Review. Camberwell: ACER Press/Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Ewing, R. (2012). Drama improves literacy and confidence. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from www.what-matters.sydney.edu.au/.
- Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Harland, J., Kinder, K., Lord, P., Stott, A., Schagen, I., Haynes, J., et al. (2002). Arts education in secondary schools: Effects and effectiveness. In R. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 76–77). Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hunter, M. (2005). Education and the arts: Research overview. A summary report prepared for the Australia Council for the Arts. Canberra: Australian Government and Australia Council for the Arts.Google Scholar
- Kang, C. (2007). Does money matter? The effect of private educational expenditures on academic performance. Departmental Working Paper WP0704. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lerner, R. M. (2005, September). Promoting positive youth development: Theoretical and empirical bases. White Paper Prepared for Workshop on the Science of Adolescent Health and Development, National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.) & P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–102). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Martin, A. J. (2012). Motivation enhancement. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2339–2342). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Martin, A. J., Mansour, M., Anderson, M., Gibson, R., Liem, G. A. D., & Sudmalis, D. (2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and non-academic outcomes: A longitudinal study of school, home, and community factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 709–727. doi: 10.1037/a0032795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, K. E., Sabo, D. F., Farrell, M. P., Barnes, G. M., & Melnick, M. J. (1999). Sports, sexual behavior, contraceptive use, and pregnancy among female and male high school students: Testing cultural resource theory. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 366–387.Google Scholar
- O’Toole, J., Stinson, M., & Moore, T. (2009). Drama and the curriculum: A giant at the door. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Student questionnaire for PISA 2000. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from www.oecd.org/.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Student questionnaire for PISA 2006. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from www.oecd.org/.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Quality time for students: Learning in and out of school. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from www.oecd.org/.
- Oskala, A., Keaney, E., Chan, T. W., & Bunting, C. (2009). Encourage children today to build audience for tomorrow: Evidence from the taking part survey on how childhood involvement in the arts affects arts engagement in adulthood. London: Arts Council England.Google Scholar
- Rabkin, N., & Hedberg, E. C. (2011). Arts education in America: What the declines mean for arts participation. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.Google Scholar
- Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Seidel, S., Tishman, S., Winner, E., Hetland, L., & Palmer, P. (2009). The qualities of quality: Understanding excellence in arts education. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education and The Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Upitis, R. (2011). Arts education for the development of the whole child. Toronto, ON: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.Google Scholar
- Willms, J. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112, 1008–1037.Google Scholar