Education research Australia: a changing ecology of knowledge and practice
- 557 Downloads
Processes of national research assessment, such as Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) are a type of audit technology that confronts and steers established institutional identities and traditions. This nexus between policy and practice drives boundary work that diffracts prevailing policy logics, organisational practices, and habits of mind. We use this notion of ‘boundary work’ as an analytical lens for understanding the nature and effects of ERA in the Australian educational research space. This paper explains the methodology that informed the AARE–ACDE research reported in Strategic Capacity Building for Australian Educational Research. It documents the policy logic of ERA and the way it cuts across the established ecology of educational research, revealing social and symbolic work that is remaking the boundaries of educational research. We report on the historical trajectory of Australian educational research, the way ERA codes research outputs, and how educational researchers are repositioning in this shifting research space. We argue that there are specific loci of boundary work where capacity building in Australian educational research can make a difference to future educational knowledge building.
KeywordsEducational research ERA Research assessment Knowledge-based regulatory tools Social ecology Boundary work
We thank Ruth Morton, Joce Nuttall, Michele Simons and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful contributions to this paper.
- ABS (2008). A new research classification for a new century, Media Release, 31/3/2008. Retrieved May 13, 2013, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/1297.0Media%20Release12008?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=1297.0&issue=2008&num=&view.
- ABS (2013). 1297.0-Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC), 2008. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/1297.0Main%20Features32008?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=1297.0&issue=2008&num=&view.
- ARC (2010). Excellence in Research for Australia, Evaluation Guidelines. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA2010_eval_guide.pdf.
- ARC (2011). ERA 2010 National Report. Retrieved July 9, 2012, from http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_2010/outcomes_2010.htm.
- ARC (2013). ERA 2012 Journal List. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_2012/era_journal_list.htm.
- Ashcroft, C. (2005). Performance based research funding: A mechanism to allocate funds or a tool for academic promotion? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 40, 113–129.Google Scholar
- Austen, S. (2008). Australia’s research quality framework and gender equity. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 9, 31–40.Google Scholar
- Bennett, D., Genoni, P., & Haddow, G. (2011). FoR codes pendulum: Publishing choices within Australian research assessment. Australian Universities’ Review, 53, 88–98.Google Scholar
- Bessant, B., & Holbrook, A. (1995). Reflections on educational research in Australia: A history of the Australian association for research in education. Coldstream, VIC: AARE.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Connell, W. F. (1962). Foundations of Education. Sydney: Novak.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (1993). Schools and social justice. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (1997). Schools, markets, justice: Education in a fractured world. Forum of Education, 52(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Curtis, B. Phibbs, S. & Meager, Z. (2011). Exploring the underperformance of female academics in the Performance-Based Research Fund, paper presented at the TASA conference, University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, J. (1988). Higher education policy. A policy statement. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
- Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Frascati Manual. (2002). Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris Cedex, France: OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).Google Scholar
- Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Furlong, J., & Lawn, M. (2011). Disciplines of education: Their role in the future of educational research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. J. & Randolph, L. M. (1997). Modest-_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan-Meets_OncoMouse : Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hassner, P. (1997). Obstinate and obsolete: Non-territorial transnational forces versus the European territorial state. In O. Tunander, et al. (Eds.), Geopolitics in the post-wall Europe: Security, territory and identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kwok, J. K., (2013). Impact of ERA research assessment on university behaviour and their staff. Melbourne: NTEU National Policy and Research Unit. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://www.erawatch.org.au/2013_nteu_report.
- Larkins, F. (2013). ERA 2012 (Part 1): University responses and performances compared with ERA 2010, L.H. Martin Institute, Melbourne University (Downloaded via UWS, 26/4/13).Google Scholar
- Larkins, F. (2013). ERA 2012 (Part 2): Discipline research profile changes 2010 to 2012, L.H.Martin Institute, Melbourne University. Retrieved April 26, 2013, from http://www.lhmartininstitute.edu.au/insights-blog/2013/03/118-era-2012-part-2-discipline-research-profile-changes-from-2010-to-2012.
- Lee, A., Goodyear, P., Seddon, T., & Renshaw, P. (2011). Position paper submitted to AARE and ACDE executives. September 2011.Google Scholar
- Maroy, C. (2012). Towards post-bureaucratic modes of governance: A European perspective. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), Policy borrowing and lending in education, 2012 world yearbook of education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H., Smith, B., King, M., & Evans, T. (2012). A new era for research education in Australia? Australian Universities’ Review, 54, 83–93.Google Scholar
- Newman, D. (2003). Boundaries). In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography. Malden, USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Pons, X. & VAN Zanten, A. (2007). Knowledge circulation, regulation and governance, KnowandPol project, deliverable 4, R&D EU Sixth Framework program. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from www.knowandpol.eu.
- Sassen, S. (2013). When the global arises from inside the national. In T. Seddon & J. Levin (Eds.), Educators, professionalism and politics: Global transitions, national spaces, and professional projects, 2012 world yearbook of education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seddon, T. L. (1988). The transition in New South Wales schooling: From federation to keynesian settlement. Education Research and Perspectives, 15(1), 60–69.Google Scholar
- Seddon, T. (Forthcoming). Making educational spaces through boundary work: Territorialisation and ‘boundarying’, Globalisation, Societies and Education.Google Scholar
- Seddon, T., Bennett, D., Bobis, J., Bennett, S., Harrison, N., Shore, S., Smith, E. & Chan, P. (2012). Living in a 2.2 world: ERA, capacity building and the topography of Australian educational research. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from http://www.aare.edu.au/pages/page116.asp.
- Shulman, L. S. (1988). Disciplines of inquiry in Education: An overview. In R. M. Jaeger (ed). Contemporary Methods for Research in Education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Yates, L. (2004). What does good education research look like? Situating a field and its practices. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar