Advertisement

Proposed Sustainability Composite Index of Highway Infrastructure Projects and Its Practical Implications

  • Amr M. El-KholyEmail author
  • Ahmed Y. Akal
Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Highway infrastructure projects always have negative impacts on the sustainable development objectives. However, the construction of these projects will not be stopped due to their importance for the fulfillment of the nations’ economic, social and civilization development. Hence, it is necessary to find solutions for improving their performance toward the sustainability approach. One of these solutions is to quantify the highway projects’ sustainability before starting in their execution. This will guide the decision-makers to adopt the suitable alternative and policy for the development of sustainable highway infrastructure. Previous studies did not adequately integrate the sustainable development dimensions in the construction of highway infrastructure projects, which represents an obstacle to the effective evaluation of highway projects’ sustainability. Addressing this issue, this research proposes an integrated index capable of appraising the sustainability performance of highway projects. The research data were collected from a questionnaire survey conducted with Egyptian experts with lengthy experience in the construction of highway infrastructure projects. Fuzzy set theory and the analytic hierarchy process were utilized to develop the composite highway sustainability index (CHSI). A case study was conducted to elucidate application of CHSI. The study offers the decision-makers an effective methodology to assess the sustainability of their highway infrastructure projects in early planning phases.

Keywords

Sustainability criteria Sustainable development Sustainability index Triple-bottom line Highway projects Fuzzy theory Analytical hierarchy process Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process 

References

  1. 1.
    Montgomery, R.; Schirmer, H.; Hirsch, A.: Improving environmental sustainability in road projects. World Bank Group, Report No. 93903-LAC (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vu, H.; Wang, J.; Min, L.; Mai, S.; Nguyen, H.: Research on cost overrun risk of construction phase of Vietnam highway international contracting project. Engineering 8(3), 86–99 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handayani, F.; Setyawan, A.; Prammesti, F.; Wibowo, M: Strategy toward sustainable local road network infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum, Soul, South Korea (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kokkaew, N.; Rudjanakanoknad, J.: Green assessment of Thailand’s highway infrastructure: a green growth index approach. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21(7), 2526–2537 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abu El-Maaty, A.; Akal, A.; and El-Hamrawy, S.: The iron triangle of projects management: quality, schedule and cost of road infrastructure projects in Egypt. In: Proceedings of the 1st GeoMEast International Congress and Exhibition, Egypt 2017 on Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, Egypt (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hapuarachchi, H.; Jayawickrama, T.: Assessing sustainability of road projects in Sri Lanka. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Construction Symposium, Colombo, Sri Lanka (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samiadel, A.; Golroo, A.: Developing an index to measure sustainability of road related projects over the life cycle. Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. 3(2), 71–80 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Bank: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation in Road Construction and Rehabilitation: A Toolkit for Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kehagia, F.: The implementation of sustainability in highway projects. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 4(1), 61–69 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhakal, K.; Oh, J.: Integrating sustainability into highway projects: sustainability indicators and assessment tool for Michigan roads. In: Proceedings of the 1st Congress of Transportation and Development Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdel-Raheem, M.; Ramsbottom, C.: Factors affecting social sustainability in highway projects in Missouri. Procedia Eng. 145, 548–555 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.: Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 136(6), 441–451 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alam, S.; Kumar, A.; Dawes, L.: Sustainability assessment of road infrastructure using sustainability index. Infrastruct. Asset Manag. 5(1), 3–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu, M.; Zhu, F.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Sun, X.: Integrating sustainability into construction engineering projects: perspective of sustainable project planning. Sustainability 10(3), 1–17 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dobrovolskiiene, N.: Tamosiuniene, R: an index to measure sustainability of a business project in the construction industry: Lithuanian case. Sustainability 8(1), 1–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Umer, A.: Sustainability evaluation of transportation infrastructure under uncertainty: a fuzzy-based approach. M.S. Thesis, College of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia, Columbia (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marzouk, M.; Abdelkader, E.; El-Zayat, M.; Aboushady, A.: Assessing environmental impact indicators in road construction projects in developing countries. Sustainability 19(5), 1–21 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Othman, A.; Nadim, W.: Towards establishing an international sustainability index for the construction industry: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainability and the Future, British University in Cairo, Egypt (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yunus, R.; Yang, J.: Sustainability criteria for industrialised building systems (IBS) in Malaysia. Procedia Eng. 14, 1590–1598 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amiril, A.; Nawawi, A.; Takim, R.; Ab. Latif, S.: Transportation infrastructure project sustainability factors and performance. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 153, 90–98 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aboushady, A.; El-Sawy, S.: Qualitative assessment framework to evaluate sustainability indicators affecting infrastructure construction projects in developing countries using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 179, 1309–1320 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mathew, L.; Varghese, R.: Factors influencing sustainability of infrastructure projects. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 4(3), 14–17 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martens, L.; Carvalho, M.: Key factors of sustainability in project management context: a survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35(6), 1084–1102 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tahon, A.; Abd Elshakour, H.; Elyamany, A.: Sustainability concept and knowledge analysis in construction industry. Int. J. Eng. Manag. Res. 7(5), 307–315 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anisurrahman, M.; Alshuwaikhat, H.: Determining sustainability assessment indicators for the Holy city of Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03772-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dobrovolskiiene, N.; Tamosiuniene, R.; Banaitis, A.; Ferreira, F.; Banaitiene, N.; Taujanskaite, K.; Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, L.: Developing a composite sustainability index for real estate projects using multiple criteria decision making. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(3), 617–635 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goh, C.; Yang, J.: Responding to sustainability challenge and cost implications in highway construction projects. In: Proceedings of the CIB 2010 World Congress (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thorpe, D.: Evaluating factors in sustainable road construction and management—a life cycle approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kokkaew, N.; Rudjanakanoknad, J.: A framework of green growth assessment for Thailand’s highway infrastructure developments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, Orlando, Florida, United States (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rooshdi, R.; Ab Rahman, M.; Baki, N.; Majid, M.; Ismail, F.: An evaluation of sustainable design and construction criteria for green highway. Procedia Environ. Sci. 20, 180–186 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rooshdi, R.; Abd Majid, M.; Sahamir, S.: Weightage factor for criteria of design and construction for green highway. Chem. Eng. Trans. 56, 355–360 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Umer, A.; Hewage, K.; Haider, H.; Sadiq, R.: Sustainability assessment of roadway projects under uncertainty using green proforma: an index-based approach. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5(1), 604–619 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosa, L.; Haddad, A.: Assessing the sustainability of existing buildings using the analytic hierarchy process. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 1(1), 24–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yunus, R.; Yang, J.: Critical sustainability factors in industrialised building systems. Constr. Innov. Inf. Process. Manag. 12(4), 447–463 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dabirian, S.; Khanzadi, M.; Taheriattar, R.: Qualitative modeling of sustainability performance in construction projects considering productivity approach. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 15(8), 1143–1158 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shen, L.; Hao, J.; Tam, V.; Yao, H.: A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 13(4), 273–281 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Enshassi, A.; Kochendoerfer, B.; Al Ghoul, H.: Factors affecting sustainable performance of construction projects during project life cycle phases. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol. 7(1), 50–68 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yuan, J.; Li, W.; Guo, J.; Zhao, X.; Skibniewski, M.: Social risk factors of transportation PPP projects in China: a sustainable development perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(3), 1–25 (2018)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ruqaishi, M.; Bashir, H.: Causes of delay in construction projects in the oil and gas industry in the Gulf cooperation council countries: a case study. J. Manag. Eng. 31(3), 1–8 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jang, W.; Lee, S.; Han, S.: Sustainable performance index for assessing the green technologies in urban infrastructure projects. J. Manag. Eng. 34(2), 1–10 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Olejnik, S.: Planning educational research: determining the necessary sample size. J. Exp. Educ. 53(1), 40–48 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    El-Hamrawy, S.; Abu El-Maaty, A.; Akal, A.: Proposed models to measure the quality of highway projects: regression analysis vs statistical–fuzzy approach. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 24(6), 988–1003 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baker, S. W.: Risk management in major projects. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (1997)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Azhar, S.; Lukkad, M.; Ahmad, I.: An investigation of critical factors and constraints for selecting modular construction over conventional stick-built technique. Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 9(3), 203–225 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cronbach, L.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Asmuni, H.; Burke, E.; Garibaldi, J.; McCollum, B.: Fuzzy multiple heuristic ordering for examination timetabling. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling V, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Elmousalami, H.; Elyamany, A.; Ibrahim, A.: Evaluation of cost drivers for field canals improvement projects. Water Resour. Manag. 32(1), 53–65 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Abu El-Maaty, A.; El-Kholy, A.M.; Akal, A.: Modeling schedule overrun and cost escalation percentages of highway projects using fuzzy approach. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 24(5), 809–827 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kazemi, A.; Katebl, A.; Kazemi, M.: Identifying causes of delay in oil and gas construction projects using fuzzy Delphi method. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Actual Economic and Social Problems in Modern Globalization, Tbilisi, Georgia (2018)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Manoliadis, O.: The assessment of construction project risks with the use of Fuzzy Delphi methodology-case study photovoltaic project in Greece. Int. J. Manag. Fuzzy Syst. 4(1), 7–14 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shen, Y.; Chang, S.; Lin, G.; Yu, H.: A hybrid selection model for emerging technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 77(1), 151–166 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rahmani, A.; Lotfi, F.; Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M.; Allahviranloo, T.: A new method for defuzzification and ranking of fuzzy numbers based on the statistical beta distribution. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 1–8 (2016)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dakro, A.; Chan, A.; Ameyaw, E.; Owusu, E.; Parn, E.; Edwards, D.: Review of application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in construction management. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 19(5), 436–452 (2019)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ahmad, N.; Laplante, P.: Software project management tools: making a practical decision using AHP. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop SEW-30, Columbia, MD, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zhang, G.; Zou, P.: Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process risk assessment approach for joint venture construction projects in China. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 133(10), 771–779 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting. McGraw Hill International Book, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Isik, Z.; Aladag, H.: A fuzzy AHP model to assess sustainable performance of the construction industry from urban regeneration perspective. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 23(4), 499–509 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dikmen, I.; Birgonul, M.; Ozorhon, B.; Sapci, N.: Using analytic network process to assess business failure risks of construction firms. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 17(4), 369–386 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Abu El-Maaty, A.; El-Hamrawy, S.; Akal, A.: Success factors of highway construction projects in Egypt: AHP. KICEM J. Constr. Eng. Proj. Manag. 6(4), 7–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Buckley, J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17(3), 233–247 (1985)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Chang, D.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95(3), 649–655 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhou, L.; Tokos, H.; Krajnc, D.; Yang, Y.: Sustainability performance evaluation in industry by composite sustainability index. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 14(5), 789–803 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kaliba, C.; Muya, M.; Mumba, K.: Cost escalation and schedule delays in road construction projects in Zambia. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 27(5), 522–531 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sobotka, A.; Jaskowski, P.; Czarnigowska, A.: Optimization of aggregate supplies for road projects. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 48, 838–846 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Awaad, R.; El Shouki, O.; Jabbour, M.: Construction safety practices and challenges in a Middle Eastern developing country. Saf. Sci. 83, 1–16 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Enshassi, A.: Factors affecting safety on construction projects. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Project Management Systems: The Challenge of Integration, Rotterdam, Netherlands (2003)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    WHO: Global Status Report on Road Safety, Time for Action. World Health Organization, Geneva (2009)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hashim, I.: Measures to improve road safety with specific reference to developing countries. Unpublished, (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringBeni - Suef UniversityBeni SuefEgypt
  2. 2.Civil Engineering DepartmentHigher Institute of Engineering and TechnologyKafrelsheikhEgypt

Personalised recommendations