Advertisement

LCC Optimization of Different Insulation Materials and Energy Sources Used in HVAC Duct Applications

  • Dileep KumarEmail author
  • Intizar Ali
  • Muhammad Hakeem
  • Awais Junejo
  • Khanji Harijan
Research Article - Mechanical Engineering
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) ducts distribute the conditioned air to different zones. They are installed outside in a harsh environment which escalates the energy loss due to heat transfer. This study aims to estimate the economically feasible and environmental amiable insulation thickness for HVAC duct using life cycle cost (LCC) and environmental assessment method. It deems five insulation materials for the duct and eight energy sources for chiller operation in selected countries. It uses the design and operating parameters of the duct installed in a renowned pharmaceutical company at Jamshoro/Pakistan. An apropos mathematical model is developed using the collected parameters to calculate optimum insulation thickness (OIT), LCC, maximum energy savings (ES) at minimum payback period (PP) and emission reduction in the insulated duct. It examines the effect of insulation thickness on economic and environmental outcomes using the linear slope line regression method. The results revealed that the use of EP and natural gas has minimum LCC of 13.66 $/m-year (− 0.484), 95% ES (0.248) corresponding to OIT (64.64 mm) with minimum PP of 1.2 years (decreasing at a rate of − 3.69 with insulation thickness). Fuel consumption reduces dramatically (− 0.79) and once OIT is achieved, further increasing insulation thickness has a negligible impact on fuel savings (− 0.041). Higher fuel cost produces maximum ES in the duct and reduces PP of insulation cost in selected countries but they do not affect the variation in fuel consumption and CO, \(\hbox {CO}_{2}\) and \(\hbox {SO}_{2}\) emission. Additionally, OIT of EP for duct reduces CO and \(\hbox {CO}_{2}\) emission at a maximum rate of -0.134 in case LPG (96%) and − 0.484 (95%) in the case of natural gas, respectively.

Keywords

Optimum insulation thickness Energy saving Life cycle cost analysis HVAC duct Energy Sources 

List of Symbols

A

Duct’s external surface area \((\hbox {m}^{2})\)

C

Cost (US$)

d

Diameter of the duct (m)

H

Height of the duct (m)

h

Convective heat transfer coefficient (\(\hbox {W/m}_{2}\hbox { K}\))

K

Thermal conductivity (W/m K)

L

Length of the duct (m)

\(\dot{m}\)

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

Nu

Nusselt number (–)

Pr

Prandtl number (–)

\(\dot{Q}\)

Heat gain (W)

Re

Reynolds number (–)

r

Radius (m)

R

Thermal resistance (K/W)

T

Temperature (\(^{\circ }\hbox {C}\))

V

Velocity (m/s)

W

Width of the duct (m)

t

Thickness (m)

u

Quantity of insulation material (\(\hbox {m}^{3}\))

Greek Letters

\(\vartheta \)

Kinematic viscosity (\(\hbox {m}^{2}/\hbox {s}\))

\(\eta \)

Efficiency (%)

\({\ddot{\varvec{\iota }}}\)

inflation rate (–)

\({\acute{\iota }}\)

Interest rate (–)

\(\mathcal {C}\)

Cost (USD/m-year)

\(\hbox {SV}\)

Salvage value (–)

\(\Delta {T}\)

Operating hours (h)

\(\hbox {MR}\)

Ratio of maintenance cost to initial investment (–)

Abbreviations

DPR

Date palm residue

EES

Engineering equation solver

EP

Expanded polystyrene

FG24

Fiberglass (24 \(\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {kg}\))

FG48

Fiberglass (48 \(\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {kg}\))

FO

Fuel oil

ES

Energy saving (%)

HV

Heating value (kJ/kg or \(\hbox {kJ/m}^{3}\))

LPG

Liquefied petroleum gas

LT

Life time (years)

NG

Natural gas

OIT

Optimum insulation thickness (mm)

PP

Payback period (years)

RH

Rice husk

Subscripts

a

Average

d

Duct

e

Exit

E

Energy

F

Fuel

h

Hydraulic

i

Inlet

I

Investment cost

ins

Insulation

ins, opt

Optimum insulation

o

Outside, exit or surrounding

s

Surface

T

Total

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Engr. Sanjay Kumar and Engr. Muhammad Haris Khan, Lecturer, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MUET Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Campus Khairpur Mir’s and Engr. Rasikh Tariq Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Av. Industrias No Contaminantes por Anillo Periférico Norte, Apdo. Postal 150, Cordemex, Mérida, Yucatán 97000, Mexico, for their help to revise this manuscript. The authors would like to thank the reviewer for their wise suggestion to enhance the quality of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Safarova, S.; Halawa, E.; Campbell, A.; Law, L.; Hoof, Jv: Pathways for optimal provision of thermal comfort and sustainability of residential housing in hot and humid tropics of Australia—a critical review. Indoor Built Environ. 27, 1022–1040 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X17701805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaikh, P.H.; Nor, N.B.M.; Nallagownden, P.; Elamvazuthi, I.; Ibrahim, T.: A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 34, 409–429 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pe’rez-Lombard, L.; Ortiz, J.; Pout, C.: A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy Build. 40, 394–398 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim, T.S.; Schaefer, L.; Kim, J.T.; Kim, G.: Energy benefit of the underfloor air distribution system for reducing air-conditioning and heating loads in buildings. Indoor Built Environ. 21, 62–70 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X11419345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vakiloroaya, V.; Samali, B.; Fakhar, A.; Pishghadam, K.: A review of different strategies for HVAC energy saving. Energy Conversat. Manag. 77, 738–754 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozyogurtcu, G.; Mobedi, M.; Ozerdem, B.: Economical assessment of different HVAC systems for an operating room: case study for different Turkish climate regions. Energy Build. 43, 1536–1543 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mageshwaran, G.; Joseph, G.Britto; Sivaji, Tallapaneni; Teja, Vulchi Ravi; Nithiyanantham, R.B.D.; Maruthairaja, : Energy saving in an air conditioning system using modified HVAC unit as an energy reducer. Int. J. Ambient Energy 39, 719–725 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2017.1318790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siddhartha, M.B.: Energy audit case studies II—air conditioning (cooling) systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 20, 297–307 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(99)00021-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bichiou, Y.; Krarti, M.: Optimization of envelope and HVAC systems selection for residential buildings. Energy Build. 43, 3373–3382 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaynakli, O.: Parametric investigation of optimum thermal insulation thickness for external walls. Energies 4, 913–927 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.3390/en4060913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    del Coz Díaz, J.J.; Nieto, P.J.García; Sierra, J.L.Suárez; Biempica, C.Betegón: Nonlinear thermal optimization of external light concrete multi-holed brick wall by the finite element method. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 51, 1530–1541 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.07.029 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    del Coz Díaz, J.J.; Nieto, P.J.García; Biempica, C.Betegón; Prendes, M.B.: GeroAnalysis and optimization of the heat-insulating light concrete hollow brick walls design by the finite element method. Appl. Therm. Eng. 27(8), 1445–1456 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaki, G.M.; Al-Turki, A.M.: Optimization of multilayer thermal insulation for pipelines. Heat Transf. Eng. 21, 63–70 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630050144514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sahin, A.Z.: Optimal insulation of ducts in extraterrestrial applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 28, 195–203 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.961 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bahadori, A.; Vuthaluru, H.B.: A simple method for the estimation of thermal insulation thickness. Appl. Energy 87, 613–9 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.012 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozturk, I.T.; Karabay, H.; Bilgen, E.: Thermo-economic optimization of hot water piping systems: a comparison study. Energy 31, 2094–107 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaynakli, O.: Economic thermal insulation thickness for pipes and ducts: a review study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 184–94 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, Y.F.; Chow, W.K.: Optimum insulation-thickness for thermal and freezing protection. Appl. Energy 80, 23–33 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soponpongpipat, N.; Jaruyanon, P.; Nanetoe, S.: The thermo-economics analysis of the optimum thickness of double-layer insulation for air conditioning duct. Energy Res. J. 1(2), 146–51 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.3844/erjsp.2010.146.151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yildiz, A.; Ersöz, M.A.: The effect of wind speed on the economical optimum insulation thickness for Duct applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55, 1289–300 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar, D.; Memon, R.A.; Memon, A.G.; Ali, I.; Junejo, A.: Critical analysis of the condensation of water vapor at external surface of the duct. Heat Mass Transf. 54(7), 1937–1950 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2256-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar, D.; Memon, A.G.; Memon, R.A.; Ali, I.; Nord, N.: Parametric study of condensation at heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning duct’s external surface. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 39(3), 328–34 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624417743119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keçebas, A.; Alkan, M.A.; Bayhan, M.: Thermo-economic analysis of pipe insulation for district heating piping systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 31, 3929–37 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.07.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keçebas, A.: Determination of insulation thickness by means of exergy analysis in pipe insulation. Energy Convers. Manag. 58, 76–83 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kayfeci, M.: Determination of energy saving and optimum insulation thicknesses of the heating piping systems for different insulation materials. Energy Build. 69, 278–84 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yildiz, A.; Ersoz, M.A.: Determination of the economical optimum insulation thickness for VRF (variable refrigerant flow) systems. Energy 89, 835–844 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Daşdemir, A.; Ural, T.; Ertürk, M.; Keçebaş, A.: Optimal economic thickness of pipe insulation considering different pipe materials for HVAC pipe applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 121, 242–254 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Comaklı, K.; Yuksel, B.: Environmental impact of thermal insulation thickness in buildings. Appl. Therm. Eng. 24, 933–40 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arslan, O.; Kose, R.: Thermoeconomic optimization of insulation thickness considering condensed vapor in buildings. Energy Build. 38, 1400–1408 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dombaycı, O.A.: The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings. Build. Environ. 4(2), 3855–3859 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ucar, A.; Balo, F.: Determination of environmental impact and optimum thickness of insulation for building walls. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 30, 113–22 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kurt, H.: The usage of air gap in the composite wall for energy saving and air pollution. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 30, 450–8 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Başoğul, Y.; Keçebaş, A.: Economic and environmental impacts of insulation in district heating pipelines. Energy 36(10), 6156–64 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar, D.; Memon, R.A.; Memon, A.G.: Energy analysis of selected air distribution system of heating, ventilation and air conditioning system: a case study of pharmaceutical company. Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 36, 446–456 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.1703.29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baloch, M.H.; Kaloi, G.S.; Memon, Z.A.: Current scenario of the wind energy in Pakistan challenges and future perspectives: a case study. Energy Rep. 2, 201–10 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2016.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Memon, A.G.; Memon, R.A.: Parametric based economic analysis of a trigeneration system proposed for residential buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 34, 144–158 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sundaram, A.S.; Bhaskaran, A.: Optimum insulation thickness of walls for energy-saving in hot regions of India. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 33, 213–226 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2012.759573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arslan, O.; Ozgur, M.A.; Yildizay, H.D.; Kose, R.: Fuel effects on optimum insulation thickness: an exergitic approach. Energy Sour. Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 32(2), 128–147 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030903196327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Solmaz, A.S.: Optimisation of energy performance and thermal comfort of an office building. GRAĐEVINAR 70, 581–592 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2136.2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ertürk, M.: Optimum insulation thicknesses of pipes with respect to different insulation materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Energy 113, 991–1003 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hou, W.-S.; Chuang, T.-F.; Hsieh, E.-C.; Chang, Y.-H.: An analysis of heat insulation efficiency of building outer skins used for green building. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 33, 407–22 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624411418153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ahmad, E.H.: Cost analysis and thickness optimization of thermal insulation materials used in residential buildings in Saudi Arabia. In: The 6th Saudi Engineering Conference, KFUPM, Dhahran, vol. 1, pp. 21–32 (2002)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shah, N.A.; Animasaun, I.L.; Ibraheem, R.O.; Babatunde, H.A.; Pop, N.Sandeep I.: Scrutinization of the effects of Grashof number on the flow of different fluids driven by convection over various surfaces. J. Mol. Liq. 249, 980–990 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyKhairpur Mir’sPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering TechnologyThe Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University of Technology and Skill DevelopmentKhairpur Mir’sPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan

Personalised recommendations