Advertisement

Isobaric Vapour–Liquid Equilibrium Data Measurement for a Binary System of Green Solvent 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran and Acetic acid at 101.3 kPa

  • Vyomesh M. Parsana
  • Sachin P. Parikh
Research Article - Chemical Engineering
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Green solvents are eco-friendly solvents that can play significant role in the reduction in health hazard and safety issues caused by classical solvents. The use of green solvents can be supported and enhanced by providing the data banks of these solvents, particularly vapour–liquid equilibrium (VLE) data that are required for the design of separation systems. A dynamic VLE still based on the Raal modification of Yerazunis et al. (1964) apparatus was employed in the measurement of isobaric VLE data. The VLE still was maintained at 101.3 kPa pressure. The thermodynamic consistency of the measured VLE data was confirmed by Herington’s area test and Van Ness’s point-to-point test. The correlation of VLE data was established by excess Gibbs energy models NRTL, Wilson and UNIQUAC and the result showed that all three models were in good agreement with the experimental data. The absolute average deviation in temperature was 0.3953 K, 0.3823 K, 0.3977 K and the absolute average deviation in vapour-phase composition was 0.0053, 0.0052, 0.0053 for NRTL, Wilson and UNIQUAC models, respectively. The relative volatility chart of 2-MeTHF/Acetic acid versus 2-MeTHF liquid mole fraction showing \(\pm \,5\%\) deviation of experimental data from Wilson model data was also depicted. The comparison of the experimental VLE data with the data predicted by UNIFAC and modified UNIFAC Dortmund methods was made. The VLE data were generated through binary interaction parameters from Aspen Hysys for Wilson, NRTL and UNIQUAC models and compared with the experimental data.

Keywords

Green solvents Vapour liquid equilibria Dynamic VLE still 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran Acetic acid 

List of symbols

\({A}_{i}, {B}_{i}, {C}_{i}\)

Antoine equation constants

\({g}_{{ij}}\)

Energy parameter characteristic of the ij interaction in the NRTL equation

\({u}_{{ij}}\)

Adjustable interaction parameter in the UNIQUAC equation

\(V_i \)

Molar volume of component i

\({x}_{{i}}\)

Liquid-phase mole fraction of component i

\({y}_{i}\)

Vapour-phase mole fraction of component i

N

Number of data points

Greek Symbols

\(\alpha _{{ij}}\)

Nonrandomness parameter in the NRTL equation

\(\gamma _{i} \)

Activity coefficient of component i

\(\varLambda _{ij} \)

Two adjustable parameters of the Wilson equation

\(\lambda _{ij} \)

Energies of interaction between molecules i and j in the Wilson equation

\(\phi _i \)

Fugacity coefficient of component i or segment fraction

Abbreviations

CPME

Cyclopentyl methyl ether

GSK

GlaxoSmithKline

2-MeTHF

2-Methyltetrahydrofuran

NRTL

Nonrandom two liquid

%AAD

Percentage average absolute deviation

Pt-100

Platinum RTD (resistance temperature detector) with a resistance of 100 \(\Omega \) at \(0\,{^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\)

UNIQUAC

Universal quasi-chemical

JGCM

Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology

Subscripts

Cal

Calculated values

Exp

Experimental values

i, j, k

Component identity

lit

Literature values

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has been supported financially by Gujarat Council on Science and Technology (GUJCOST), Gandhinagar by awarding minor research project (MRP) grant to this project. The infrastructural support provided by the V.V.P. Engineering College, Rajkot is also highly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Kirk–Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 22, pp. 529–571, 4th edn. Wiley, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capello, C.; Fischer, U.; Hungerbühler, K.: What is a green solvent? A comprehensive framework for the environmental assessment of solvents. Green Chem. 9, 927–934 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, H.; Liu, G.; Li, C.; Zhang, L.: Liquid–liquid equilibria of water + acetic acid + cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) system at different temperatures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 57, 2942–2946 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1021/je300676w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aycock, D.F.: Solvent applications of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran in organometallic and biphasic reactions. Org. Process Res. Dev. 11, 156–159 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1021/op060155c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comanita, B.: 2-MeTHF for greener processes, Speciality Chemicals Magazine, October 2006. www.pennakem.com/pdfs/methfpenngreenchemistry.pdf (2015). Accessed 21 Dec 2015
  6. 6.
    Henderson, R.K.; Jiménez-González, C.; Constable, D.J.C.; Alston, S.R.; Inglis, G.G.A.; Fisher, G.; Sherwood, J.; Binks, S.P.; Curzons, A.D.: Expanding GSK’s solvent selection guide—embedding sustainability into solvent selection starting at medicinal chemistry. Green Chem. 13, 854–862 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0gc00918k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antonucci, V.; Coleman, J.; Ferry, J.B.; Johnson, N.; Mathe, M.; Scott, J.P.; Xu, J.: Toxicological assessment of 2-methyltetrahyetdrofuran and cyclopentyl methyl ether in support of their use in pharmaceutical chemical process development. Org. Process Res. Dev. 15, 939–941 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Comanita, B.; Aycock, D.: Industrie Pharma Magazine, vol. 17, pp. 54–56 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anastas, PT.: Sustainable (green) chemistry green solvents. Green Chem. 45–9. www.carloerbareagenti.com/Repository/Download/pdf/Catalogue/EN/catchem100_sez2_gree n_en.pdf (2015). Accessed 25 Jan 2015
  10. 10.
    Kirk–Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 1, pp. 121–137, 4th edn. Wiley, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parsana, V.M.; Parikh, S.P.: Isobaric vapour–liquid equilibrium data prediction for a binary system of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and acetic acid using group contribution methods. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research and Entrepreneurship, 5–6 Jan 2016, RK University, Rajkot, India, pp. 1750–1764. ISBN: 978-93-5254-061-7Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parsana, V.M.; Parikh, S.P.: Need for vapour–liquid equilibrium data generation of systems involving green solvents. Int. J. Eng. Res. App. 5 6(3), 56–62 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raal, J.D.; Muhlbauer, A.L.: Phase Equilibria Measurement Computation, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, Thames (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurihara, K.; Hori, H.; Kojima, K.: Vapor–liquid equilibrium data for acetone + methanol + benzene, chloroform + methanol + benzene, and constituent binary systems at 101.3 kPa. J. Chem. Eng. Data 43, 264–268 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1021/je970231u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    JCGM 100:2008: Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1st edn. www.bipm.org (2008). Accessed 15 Apr 2018
  16. 16.
    Herington, E.F.G.: Tests for the consistency of experimental isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium data. J. Inst. Pet. 37, 457–470 (1951)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Jian, C.; Wang, W.: Experimental isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium for the binary and ternary systems with methanol, methyl acetate and dimethyl sulfoxide at 101.3 kPa. Fluid Phase Equilib. 408, 52–57 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mustain, A.; Suharti, P.H.; Hartanto, D.; Khoiroh, I.: Isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium of 2-propanone + 2-butanol system at 101.325 kPa: experimental and molecular dynamics simulation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34, 1–8 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0089-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prausnitz, J.M.; Lichtenthaler, R.N.; Azevedo, E.G.: Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wisniak, J.: The Herington test for thermodynamic consistency. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33, 177–180 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00025a025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    VanNess, H.C.; Byer, S.M.; Gibbs, R.E.: Vapor–liquid equilibrium: part 1. An appraisal of data reduction methods. AlChE J. 19, 238–244 (1973).  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690190206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, H.; Xia, S.; Wu, M.; Ma, P.: Isobaric (vapour + liquid) equilibria of binary systems containing butyl acetate for the separation of methoxy aromatic compounds (anisole and guaiacol) from biomass fast pyrolysis oil. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 87, 141–146 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2015.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poling, B.E.; Prausnitz, J.M.; O’Connell, J.P.: The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 5th edn, pp. 8–23. The McGraw-Hill Company Limited, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson, G.M.; Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium, X.I.: A new expression for the excess free energy of mixing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 127–130 (1964).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01056a002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Renon, H.; Prausnitz, J.M.: Local compositions in thermodynamics excess functions for liquids mixtures. AIChE J. 14, 135–144 (1968).  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690140124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mathias, P.M.: Guidelines for the analysis of vapour–liquid equilibrium data. J. Chem. Eng. Data 62, 2231–2233 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.7b00582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parsana, V.M.: Studies in vapour–liquid equilibrium of systems involving Green solvents. Ph.D. Thesis, RK University, Rajkot, India (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringV.V.P. Engineering College, Gujarat Technological UniversityAhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringL.D. College of Engineering, Gujarat Technological UniversityAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations