Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 2679–2698 | Cite as

Some Generalized Complex Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making Process

  • Harish GargEmail author
  • Dimple Rani
Research Article - Systems Engineering

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript is to present some generalized weighted averaging aggregation operators for aggregating the different complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets using t-norm operations. In the existing studies of fuzzy and its extension, the uncertainties present in the data are handled with the help of degrees of membership which are the subset of real numbers, which may loose some useful information and hence consequently affect on the decision results. As a modification to these, complex intuitionistic fuzzy set handles the uncertainties with the degrees whose ranges are extended from real subset to the complex subset with the unit disk and hence handle the two-dimensional information in a single set. Thus, motivated by this, we developed some new averaging aggregation operators, namely complex intuitionistic fuzzy (CIF) weighted averaging, CIF ordered weighted averaging and CIF hybrid averaging in conjunction with their desirable properties. Then, we utilized these operators to propose a multicriteria decision-making approach and illustrated a numerical example to demonstrate the working of the proposed approach. Finally, the proposed results are compared with existing approaches results.

Keywords

Complex fuzzy set Complex intuitionistic fuzzy set Averaging operators Multicriteria decision-making t-norm operations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that helped us in improving the paper significantly. Also, the second author (Dimple Rani) would like to thank the University Grant Commission, NewDelhi, India, for providing financial support during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: An advanced study on the similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the set pair analysis theory and their application in decision making. Soft. Comput. 22(15), 4959–4970 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3202-1 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu, Z.S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 1179–1187 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arora, R.; Garg, H.: Prioritized averaging/geometric aggregation operators under the intuitionistic fuzzy soft set environment. Sci. Iran. 25(1), 466–482 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atanassov, K.; Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31, 343–349 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar, K.; Garg, H.: Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making. Appl. Intell. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1067-0 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, X.; Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some electre methods. Omega Int. J. Manag. Sci. 36, 45–63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: Some aggregation operators for linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and its application to group decision-making process using the set pair analysis. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43(6), 3213–3227 (2018)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, J.Y.: Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27, 505–513 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, S.M.; Chang, C.H.: Fuzzy multiattribute decision making based on transformation techniques of intuitionistic fuzzy values and intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators. Inf. Sci. 352–353, 133–149 (2016)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goyal, M.; Yadav, D.; Tripathi, A.: Intuitionistic fuzzy genetic weighted averaging operator and its application for multiple attribute decision making in E-learning. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9(1), 1–15 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg, H.: Some robust improved geometric aggregation operators under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making process. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 14(1), 283–308 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, S.M.; Cheng, S.H.; Tsai, W.H.: Multiple attribute group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and transformation techniques of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf. Sci. 367–368(1), 418–442 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaur, G.; Garg, H.: Multi-attribute decision-making based on bonferroni mean operators under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Entropy 20(1), 65 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/e20010065 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, W.; Liu, X.: The multi-attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted geometric operator. Comput. Math. Appl. 66, 1845–1856 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garg, H.: Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42(12), 5275–5290 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arora, R.; Garg, H.: A robust correlation coefficient measure of dual hesitant fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision making. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 72, 80–92 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, S.; Garg, H.: Distance measures between type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to multicriteria decision-making process. Appl. Intell. 46(4), 788–799 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar, K.; Garg, H.: TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput. Appl. Math. 37(2), 1319–1329 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garg, H.: A linear programming method based on an improved score function for interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 26(1), 67–80 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garg, H.: A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 38, 988–999 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18(1), 183–190 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, Z.S.; Yager, R.R.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 35, 417–433 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu, Z.S.; Yager, R.R.: Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 41(2), 568–578 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, W.; Liu, X.: Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(5), 923–938 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    He, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhau, L.; Liu, J.; Tao, Z.: Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interaction averaging operators and their application to multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 259, 142–159 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garg, H.: Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 101, 53–69 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garg, H.: Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 60, 164–174 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wei, G.; Wang, X.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (2007), pp. 495–499Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaur, G.; Garg, H.: Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471
  32. 32.
    Ye, J.: Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators for the decision-making of mechanical design schemes. Appl. Intell. 47, 743–751 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Garg, H.; Singh, S.: A novel triangular interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2018.3559 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ramot, D.; Milo, R.; Fiedman, M.; Kandel, A.: Complex fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10(2), 171–186 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramot, D.; Friedman, M.; Langholz, G.; Kandel, A.: Complex fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 11(4), 450–461 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Alkouri, A.; Salleh, A.: Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, vol. 1482. In: 2nd International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 2012, pp. 464–470Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alkouri, A.U.M.; Salleh, A.R.: Complex Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy relation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/287382
  38. 38.
    Kumar, T.; Bajaj, R.K.: On complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with distance measures and entropies. J. Math. (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/972198
  39. 39.
    Rani, D.; Garg, H.: Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications to the decision-making process. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 7(5), 423–439 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rani, D.; Garg, H.: Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making. Expert Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12325
  41. 41.
    Klir, G.J.; Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhou, W.; Xu, Z.: Extreme intuitionistic fuzzy weighted aggregation operators and their applications in optimism and pessimism decision-making processes. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32, 1129–1138 (2017)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dey, A.; Pal, A.: Prim’s algorithm for solving minimum spanning tree problem in fuzzy environment. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 12(3), 419–430 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Garg, H.: New exponential operational laws and their aggregation operators for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(3), 653–683 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Garg, H.: Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multiattribute decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(6), 1234–1263 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dey, A.; Pal, A.; Pal, T.: Interval type 2 fuzzy set in fuzzy shortest path problem. Mathematics 4(4), 62 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3390/math4040062 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dey, A.; Pal, T.; Mondal, S.: Robust and minimum spanning tree in fuzzy environment. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Math. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSM.2017.10008767 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dey, A.; Pal, A.: Computing the shortest path with words. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Paradig. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAIP.2018.10007917 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Garg, H.; Arora, R.: Novel scaled prioritized intuitionistic fuzzy soft interaction averaging aggregation operators and their application to multi criteria decision making. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 71C, 100–112 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Garg, H.; Arora, R.: Dual hesitant fuzzy soft aggregation operators and their application in decision making. Cogn. Comput. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9569-6 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsThapar Institute of Engineering and Technology (Deemed University)PatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations