Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 6555–6565 | Cite as

Performance of Relative Permeability and Two-Phase Flow Parameters Under Net Effective Stress in Water Wet Porous Media: A Comparative Study of Water–Oil Versus Silica Nanofluid–Oil

  • Caspar Daniel Adenutsi
  • Zhiping Li
  • Wilberforce Nkrumah Aggrey
  • Bello Lawal Toro
Research Article - Petroleum Engineering
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

While studies on the stress sensitivity of relative permeability using conventional fluids have varying and inconclusive results, the effect of stress on relative permeability using nanofluids has not been reported. In this study, the effect of net effective stress on relative permeability and two-phase flow parameters using conventional and nanofluid was investigated. Nanoparticle retention in pores was examined by changes in nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation time distribution. Nanoparticle deposition affected big pores more than small pores. As net effective stress was increased during water flooding, end-point oil and water saturations increased and end-point oil relative permeability decreased. Nanofluid–oil relative permeability showed contrasting results depending on whether the sample had adsorbed nanoparticles prior to relative permeability measurements. For the sample that had adsorbed nanoparticles prior to subsequent stress increments, the effect of stress was dominated by the effect of nanoparticle adsorption. However, the effect of stress took precedence over nanoparticle adsorption in samples that had no nanoparticle deposition prior to relative permeability experiments. A comparison of water–oil and nanofluid–oil relative permeabilities showed similar initial water saturations and end-point oil relative permeability changes but differing residual oil saturations and end-point water relative permeability. Mobility ratio increased in water flooding as stress increased but decreased after an initial increase in nanofluid flooding. Displacement efficiency decreased with increased stress for both water and nanofluid flooding. The results provide insights into the effect of stress on relative permeability using conventional fluids and silica nanofluid.

Keywords

Fluid flow Silica nanoparticles Relative permeability Stress sensitivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

13369_2018_3296_MOESM1_ESM.docx (987 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (docx 987 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Ojha, S.P.; Misra, S.; Tinni, A.; Sondergeld, C.; Rai, C.: Relative permeability estimates for Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford shale samples from oil, gas and condensate windows using adsorption-desorption measurements. Fuel 208, 52–64 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bravo, M.C.; Araujo, M.: Analysis of the unconventional behavior of oil relative permeability during depletion tests of gas-saturated heavy oils. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 34, 447–460 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akhlaghinia, M.; Torabi, F.; Chan, C.W.: Experimental investigation of temperature effect on three-phase relative permeability isoperms in heavy oil systems. Fuel 118, 281–290 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, X.; Alvarado, V.: Analysis of capillary pressure and relative permeability hysteresis under low-salinity waterflooding conditions. Fuel 180, 228–243 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, C.; Lee, J.: Experimental study on the variation of relative permeability due to clay minerals in low salinity water-flooding. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 151, 292–304 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Babadagli, T.; Ren, X.; Develi, K.: Effects of fractal surface roughness and lithology on single and multiphase flow in a single fracture: an experimental investigation. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 68, 40–58 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fatt, I.: The effect of overburden pressure on relative permeability. J. Petrol. Technol. 5, 15–16 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, J.: Determination of relative permeability under simulated reservoir conditions. AIChE J. 2, 94–100 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas, R.D.; Ward, D.C.: Effect of overburden pressure and water saturation on gas permeability of tight sandstone cores. J. Petrol. Technol. 24, 120–124 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ali, H.; Al-Marhoun, M.; Abu-Khamsin, S.; Celik,M.: The effect of overburden pressure on relative permeability. In: Fifth Middle East Oil Show, vol. 15730, pp. 338–340. SPE, Manama, Bahrain (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, C.; Al-Quraishi, A.; Somerville, J.; Hamilton, S.: Stress Sensitivity of Saturation and End-Point Relative Permeabilities. Society of Core Analysts, Edinburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Quraishi, A.; Khairy, M.: Pore pressure versus confining pressure and their effect on oil–water relative permeability curves. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 48, 120–126 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gawish, A.; Al-Homadhi, E.: Relative permeability curves for high pressure, high temperature reservoir conditions. Oil Gas Bus 2, 23 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan, H.: Shear Induced Relative Permeability Change in Uncemented Sands. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oldakowski, K.: Stress Induced Permeability Changes of Athabasca Oil Sands. University of Alberta, Edmonton (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamoud, M.; Chalaturnyk, R.; Leung, J.: Influence of geomechanical processes on relative permeability. In: Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Edmonton, Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheraghian, G.: Effects of nanoparticles on wettability: a review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery. Int. J. Nano Dimens. 6, 443 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheraghian, G.; Hendraningrat, L.: A review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery part A: effects of nanoparticles on interfacial tension. Int. Nano Lett. 6, 129–138 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheraghian, G.; Hendraningrat, L.: A review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery part B: effects of nanoparticles on flooding. Int. Nano Lett. 6, 1–10 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G.; Gai, Z.: Application of nanoparticles in enhanced oil recovery: a critical review of recent progress. Energies 10, 345 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giraldo, J.; Benjumea, P.; Lopera, S.; Cortés, F.B.; Ruiz, M.A.: Wettability alteration of sandstone cores by alumina-based nanofluids. Energy Fuels 27, 3659–3665 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Amedi, H.; Ahmadi, M.-A.: Experimental investigation the effect of nanoparticles on the oil–water relative permeability. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 1–8 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu, T.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.: Enhanced oil recovery of low-permeability cores by SiO\(_2\) nanofluid. Energy Fuels 31, 5612–5621 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parvazdavani, M.; Masihi, M.; Ghazanfari, M.H.: Monitoring the influence of dispersed nano-particles on oil–water relative permeability hysteresis. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 124, 222–231 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ju, B.; Dai, S.; Luan, Z.; Zhu, T.; Su, X.; Qiu, X.: A study of wettability and permeability change caused by adsorption of nanometer structured polysilicon on the surface of porous media. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ju, B.; Fan, T.: Experimental study and mathematical model of nanoparticle transport in porous media. Powder Technol. 192, 195–202 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ju, B.; Fan, T.; Li, Z.: Improving water injectivity and enhancing oil recovery by wettability control using nanopowders. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 86, 206–216 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hassler, G.; Brunner, E.: Measurement of capillary pressures in small core samples. Trans. AIME 160, 114–123 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gupta, R.; Maloney, D.R.: Intercept method—a novel technique to correct steady-state relative permeability data for capillary end effects. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 19, 316–330 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anderson, W.G.: Wettability literature survey part 5: the effects of wettability on relative permeability. J. Petrol. Technol. 39, 1,453–451,468 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abdallah, W.; Buckley, J.S.; Carnegie, A.; Edwards, J.; Herold, B.; Fordham, E.; Graue, A.; Habashy, T.; Seleznev, N.; Signer, C.: Fundamentals of wettability. Technology 38, 268 (1986)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peters, E.J.: Advanced Petrophysics: Dispersion, Interfacial Phenomena/Wettability, Capillarity/Capillary Pressure, Relative Permeability, vol. 2. Greenleaf Book Group, Austin (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li, S.; Kaasa, A.T.; Hendraningrat, L.; Torsæter, O.: Effect of silica nanoparticles adsorption on the wettability index of Berea sandstone. Paper SCA2013-059 Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts Held in Napa Valley, California, USA, pp. 16–19 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hendraningrat, L.; Torsæter, O.: Effects of the initial rock wettability on silica-based nanofluid-enhanced oil recovery processes at reservoir temperatures. Energy Fuels 28, 6228–6241 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Torsater, O.; Engeset, B.; Hendraningrat, L.; Suwarno, S.: Improved oil recovery by nanofluids flooding: an experimental study. In: SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wasan, D.T.; Nikolov, A.D.: Spreading of nanofluids on solids. Nature 423, 156 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chengara, A.; Nikolov, A.D.; Wasan, D.T.; Trokhymchuk, A.; Henderson, D.: Spreading of nanofluids driven by the structural disjoining pressure gradient. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 280, 192–201 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caspar Daniel Adenutsi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhiping Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wilberforce Nkrumah Aggrey
    • 3
  • Bello Lawal Toro
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Energy ResourcesChina University of GeosciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geology Evaluation and Development EngineeringBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Petroleum EngineeringKwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyKumasiGhana

Personalised recommendations