Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 6119–6131 | Cite as

Comparison of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in Optimization of Aegle marmelos Oil Extraction for Biodiesel Production

  • S. Sindhanai Selvan
  • P. Saravana Pandian
  • A. Subathira
  • S. Saravanan
Research Article - Chemical Engineering
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Non-edible feedstock is attaining importance due to authentic concerns behind the utilization of food crops for fuel production. Aegle marmelos seed is one such feedstock with high oil content portraying a better entrant among other non-edible feedstock. In this study, optimization of oil extraction, and biodiesel production from Aegle marmelos seeds had been reported. Oil extraction performed with n-hexane was optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). The influence of five parameters on oil extraction, namely particle size, acid concentration, solvent-to-seed ratio, extraction time and temperature were investigated. A comparison of performance evaluation between RSM and ANN was executed. The lower value of coefficient of determination (\(R^{2} = 0.998\)), root mean square error (\({ RMSE} = 0.2784\)), standard error of prediction (\({ SEP} = 0.7068\)) and absolute average deviation (\({ AAD} = 0.3425\)) for ANN compared to those of \(R^{2}\) (0.9769), RMSE (0.5349), SEP (1.3326) and AAD (1.1072) for RSM showed the prediction competence of the ANN was much better than RSM. Among the process parameters studied, solvent-to-seed ratio was the most influential variable on oil yield. The maximum oil yield of 45.99 wt% was obtained at optimum conditions, with an acid value of 18.92 mg KOH \(\hbox {g}^{-1}\). Hence, a dual-stage acid-base transesterification was employed to produce biodiesel. It was followed by \(^{1}\)H NMR spectroscopy study and fuel properties analysis. The highest conversion of 98% was ascertained using \(^{1}\)H NMR spectroscopy, and the biodiesel fuel properties were found to comply with ASTM standards.

Keywords

Aegle marmelos Artificial neural network Biodiesel Modeling Response surface methodology Oil extraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atabani, A.E.; Badruddin, I.A.; Masjuki, H.H.; Chong, W.T.; Lee, K.T.: Pangium edule Reinw: a promising non-edible oil feedstock for biodiesel production. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40, 583–594 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma, P.C.; Bhatia, V.; Bansal, N.; Sharma, A.: A review on bael tree. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 6, 171–178 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meziane, S.; Kadi, H.; Daoud, K.; Hannane, F.: Application of experimental design method to the oil extraction from olive cake. J. Food Process. Preserv. 33, 176–185 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meziane, S.: Optimization of oil extraction from olive pomace using response surface methodology. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 19, 315–322 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Betiku, E.; Adepoju, T.F.; Omole, A.K.; Aluko, S.E.: Statistical approach to the optimization of oil extraction from beniseed ( Sesamum indicum) oilseeds. J. Food Sci. Eng. 2, 351–357 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Betiku, E.; Adepoju, T.F.: Sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) seed oil extraction optimization and quality characterization. Am. Chem. Sci. J. 3, 449–458 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bagheri, H.; Abdul Manap, M.Y.B.; Solati, Z.: Response surface methodology applied to supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Piper nigrum L. essential oil. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 57, 149–155 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, Z.; Mei, L.; Wang, Q.; Shao, Y.; Tao, Y.: Optimization of subcritical fluid extraction of seed oil from Nitraria tangutorum using response surface methodology. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 56, 168–174 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chuah, L.F.; Bokhari, A.; Yusup, S.; Klemeš, J.J.; Abdullah, B.; Akbar, M.M.: Optimisation and kinetic studies of acid esterification of high free fatty acid rubber seed oil. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 41, 2515–2526 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basri, M.; Rahman, R.N.Z.R.A.; Ebrahimpour, A.; Salleh, A.B.; Gunawan, E.R.; Rahman, M.B.A.: Comparison of estimation capabilities of response surface methodology (RSM) with artificial neural network (ANN) in lipase-catalyzed synthesis of palm-based wax ester. BMC Biotechnol. 7, 53 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rajendra, M.; Jena, P.C.; Raheman, H.: Prediction of optimized pretreatment process parameters for biodiesel production using ANN and GA. Fuel 88, 868–875 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Betiku, E.; Taiwo, A.E.: Modeling and optimization of bioethanol production from breadfruit starch hydrolyzate vis-a-vis response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Renew. Energy 74, 87–94 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Betiku, E.; Omilakin, O.R.; Ajala, S.O.; Okeleye, A.A.; Taiwo, A.E.; Solomon, B.O.: Mathematical modeling and process parameters optimization studies by artificial neural network and response surface methodology: a case of non-edible neem ( Azadirachta indica) seed oil biodiesel synthesis. Energy. 72, 266–273 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Betiku, E.; Ajala, S.O.: Modeling and optimization of Thevetia peruviana (yellow oleander) oil biodiesel synthesis via Musa paradisiacal (plantain) peels as heterogeneous base catalyst: a case of artificial neural network vs response surface methodology. Ind. Crops Prod. 53, 314–322 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mason, R.L.; Richard, F.; Gunst, R.F.; Hess, J.L.: Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments with Applications to Engineering and Science. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marchitan, N.; Cojocaru, C.; Mereuta, A.; Duca, G.; Cretescu, I.; Gonta, M.: Modeling and optimization of tartaric acid reactive extraction from aqueous solutions: a comparison between response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Sep. Purif. Technol. 75, 273–285 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akintunde, A.M.; Ajala, S.O.; Betiku, E.: Optimization of Bauhinia monandra seed oil extraction via artificial neural network and response surface methodology: a potential biofuel candidate. Ind. Crop. Prod. 67, 387–394 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarve, A.N.; Varma, M.N.; Sonawane, S.S.: Response surface optimization and artificial neural network modeling of biodiesel production from crude mahua (Madhuca indica) oil under supercritical ethanol conditions using CO2 as co-solvent. RSC Adv. 5, 69702–69713 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bas, D.; Boyaci, I.H.: Modeling and optimization II: comparison of estimation capabilities of response surface methodology with artificial neural networks in a biochemical reaction. J. Food Eng. 78, 846–854 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sarve, A.; Sonawane, S.S.; Varma, M.N.: Ultrasound assisted biodiesel production from sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) oil using barium hydroxide as a heterogeneous catalyst: Comparative assessment of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). Ultrason. Sonochem. 26, 218–228 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garson, G.D.: Interpreting neural network connection weights. Artif. Intell. Expert 6, 47–51 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fadhil, A.B.; Ahmed, K.M.; Dheyab, M.M.: Silybum marianum L. seed oil: a novel feedstock for biodiesel production. Arab. J. Chem. 10, S683–S690 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Gerpen, J.: Biodiesel processing and production. Fuel Process. Technol. 86, 1097–1107 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chongkhong, S.; Tongurai, C.; Chetpattananondh, P.; Bunyakan, C.: Biodiesel production by esterification of palm fatty acid distillate. Biomass Bioenergy 31, 563–568 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sampath, K.P.; Umadevi, M.; Bhowmik, D.; Singh, D.M.; Dutta, A.S.: Recent trends in medicinal uses and health benefits of Indian traditional herbs Aegle marmelos. Pharma Innov. 1, 57–65 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bharti, R.K.; Srivastava, S.; Thakur, I.S.: Extraction of extracellular lipids from chemoautotrophic bacteria Serratia sp. ISTD04 for production of biodiesel. Bioresour. Technol. 165, 201–204 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kakati, J.; Gogoi, T.K.; Pakshirajan, K.: Production of biodiesel from Amari (Amoora Wallichii King) tree seeds using optimum process parameters and its characterization. Energy Convers. Manag. 135, 281–290 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shambhu, V.B.; Bhattacharya, T.K.; Chaudhary, S.K.; Das, S.: Compatibility of Jatropha oil bio-diesel and petro diesel as an engine fuel based on their characteristic fuel properties. Agric. Mech. Asia Africa Lat. Am. 43(2), 43–49 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sivakumar, P.; Sindhanaiselvan, S.; Gandhi, N.N.; Devi, S.S.; Renganathan, S.: Optimization and kinetic studies on biodiesel production from underutilized Ceiba Pentandra oil. Fuel 103, 693–698 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mani, S.; Jaya, S.; Vadivambal, R.: Optimization of solvent extraction of Moringa (Moringa Oleifera) Seed Kernel Oil Using response surface methodology. Food Bioprod. Process. 85, 328–335 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rhazi, N.; Hannache, H.; Oumam, M.; Sesbou, A.; Charrier, B.; Pizzi, A.; Charrier-El Bouhtoury, F.: Green extraction process of tannins obtained from Moroccan Acacia mollissima barks by microwave: modeling and optimization of the process using the response surface methodology RSM. Arab. J. Chem. 12, 3745–3758 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Acikel, U.; Ersan, M.; Sag Acikel, Y.: Optimization of critical medium components using response surface methodology for lipase production by Rhizopus delemar. Food Bioprod. Process. 88, 31–39 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taghavifar, H.; Mardani, A.: Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of traction performance parameters. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 13, 35–43 (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamed, M.M.; Khalafallah, M.G.; Hassanien, E.A.: Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ. Model. Softw. 19, 919–928 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holubar, P.; Zani, L.; Hager, M.; Fröschl, W.; Radak, Z.; Braun, R.: Advanced controlling of anaerobic digestion by means of hierarchical neural networks. Water Res. 36, 2582–2588 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eryilmaz, T.; Yesilyurt, M.K.; Taner, A.; Celik, S.A.: Prediction of kinematic viscosities of biodiesels derived from edible and non-edible vegetable oils by using artificial neural networks. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40, 3745–3758 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gasim, H.A.; Kutty, S.R.M.; Hasnain Isa, M.; Alemu, L.T.: Optimization of anaerobic treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater using artificial neural networks. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 6, 2077–2082 (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vani, S.; Sukumaran, R.K.; Savithri, S.: Prediction of sugar yields during hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass using artificial neural network modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 188, 128–135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sharma, A.; Kumari, S.; Wongputtisin, P.; Nout, M.J.R.; Sarkar, P.K.: Optimization of soybean processing into kinema, a Bacillus-fermented alkaline food, with respect to a minimum level of antinutrients. J. Appl. Microbiol. 119, 162–176 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salehi, I.; Shirani, M.; Semnani, A.; Hassani, M.; Habibollahi, S.: Comparative study between response surface methodology and artificial neural network for adsorption of crystal violet on magnetic activated carbon. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 41, 2611–2621 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Prakash Maran, J.; Sivakumar, V.; Thirugnanasambandham, K.; Sridhar, R.: Artificial neural network and response surface methodology modeling in mass transfer parameters predictions during osmotic dehydration of Carica papaya L. Alex. Eng. J. 52, 507–516 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bokhari, A.; Yusup, S.; Ahmad, M.M.: Optimization of the parameters that affects the solvent extraction of crude rubber seed oil using response surface methodology (RSM). Recent Adv. Eng. 28–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Knothe, G.: Analyzing biodiesel: standards and other methods. Jaocs 83, 823–33 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations