Advertisement

Optimal PI and PID Temperature Controls for a Dehydration Process

  • Nicolás Cervantes-Escorcia
  • Omar-Jacobo Santos-Sánchez
  • Liliam Rodríguez-Guerrero
  • Hugo Romero-Trejo
  • Alberto González-Facundo
Research Article - Systems Engineering
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, the drying air temperature for an experimental platform of sliced tomatoes dehydration is optimally regulated by using the very well-known integral control approach which could be equivalent to the PI control when the output system is the whole state. In a first stage, the chosen controller is a PI because the plant step response does not present oscillations with low damping. However, obtained experimental results, applying this controller, present some oscillations in the closed-loop transient response. So, in a second stage, a discrete PID controller is applied and its gains are computed by using a numerical optimization algorithm based on the hill climbing method, which considers a quadratic performance index; the proposed procedure assumes an input delayed discrete model of the plant; therefore, the stability is verified by the closed-loop poles location. The reason to apply an optimal control strategy is motivated by the energy saving and the preserving of a desired closed-loop performance of the process. In order to contrast the advantages to use an optimal controller, the obtained experimental results are compared with a PID controller tuned with the improved Ziegler–Nichols rules, which is optimized only considering a criterion depending on the error (the energy consumption it is not involved). Moreover, the performance given by optimal PI control is also compared with an optimal state feedback control. The synthesized controllers (computed gains) are programmed in an industrial programmable logic controller Siemens S7-1200, and they are applied to a sliced tomato dehydration plant. According to the obtained results, when the optimally tuned PID controller is applied, it produces energy saving rates, more uniform drying conditions for the product and a better closed-loop plant performance (shorter settling time and nonovershoot, which are desired features in this type of process), with respect to other tested controllers. The presented experimental results by using the PI and PID optimized controllers allow to verify the feasibility of our proposal.

Keywords

Optimal PID control Hill climbing method Dehydration process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CONACYT-MEXICO, Project: 239371.

References

  1. 1.
    Astrom, K.J.; Hagglund, T.: PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning, 2nd edn. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dey, C.; Mudi, R.K.: An improved auto-tuning scheme for PID controllers. ISA Trans. 48(4), 396–409 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pan, I.; Das, S.; Gupta, A.: Tuning of an optimal fuzzy PID controller with stochastic algorithms for networked control systems with random time delay. ISA Trans. 50(1), 28–36 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bialkowski, W.L.: Dreams versus reality: a view from both sides of the gap: manufacturing excellence with come only through engineering excellence. Pulp Pap. Can. 94(11), 19–27 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ender, D.B.: Process control performance: not as good as you think. Control Eng. 40(10), 180–190 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Astrom, K.J.; Hagglund, T.: Revisiting the Ziegler Nichols step response method for PID control. J. Process Control 14(6), 635–650 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhuang, M.; Atherton, D.P.: Automatic tuning of optimum PID controllers. IEE Proc. D Control Theory Appl. 140(3), 216–224 (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ziegler, J.G.; Nichols, N.B.: Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME 64(11), 759–768 (1942)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mujumdar, A.S.: Guide to Industrial Drying: Principles, Equipment and New Developments. Colour Publications Pvt. Limited, Mumbai (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dufour, P.: Control engineering in drying technology: review and trends. Dry. Technol. 24(7), 889–904 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodríguez-Guerrero, L.; Santos-Sánchez, O.; Mondié, S.: A constructive approach for an optimal control applied to a class of nonlinear time delay systems. J. Process Control 40, 35–49 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodríguez-Guerrero, L.; Santos-Sánchez, O.J.; Cervantes-Escorcia, N.; Romero, H.: Real-time discrete suboptimal control for systems with input and state delays: experimental tests on a dehydration process. ISA Trans. 71, 448–457 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olmos, A.; Trelea, I.C.; Courtois, F.; Bonazzi, C.; Trystram, G.: Dynamic optimal control of batch rice drying process. Dry. Technol. 20(7), 1319–1345 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jin, X.; Van der Sman, R.G.M.; Van Straten, G.; Boom, R.M.; Van Boxtel, A.J.B.: Energy efficient drying strategies to retain nutritional components in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). J. Food Eng. 123, 172–178 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Santos-Sánchez, O.J.; Romero, H.; Garrido-Aranda, E.: On the effects of the temperature control at the performance of a dehydration process: energy optimization and nutrients retention. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86(9–12), 3157–3171 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He, J.B.; Wang, Q.G.; Lee, T.H.: PI/PID controller tuning via LQR approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55(13), 2429–2439 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Srivastava, S.; Misra, A.; Thakur, S.K.; Pandit, V.S.: An optimal PID controller via LQR for standard second order plus time delay systems. ISA Trans. 60, 244–253 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di Ruscio, D.: Discrete LQ optimal control with integral action: a simple controller on incremental form for MIMO systems. Model. Identif. Control 33(2), 35 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gutiérrez-Arias, J.M.; de León-Puig, N.I.P.; P érez-Osorio, G.; Flores-Mena, E.; Castaneda-Camacho, J.: Optimal control law for the concentration of carbon dioxide in a tomato greenhouse and optimal-tuning PI control as LQR for the automatic device. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. 5(4), 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sungthonga, A.; Assawinchaichote, W.: Particle swam optimization based optimal PID parameters for air heater temperature control system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 86, 108–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Santos, O.; Sanchez-Diaz, G.: Suboptimal control based on hill-climbing method for time delay systems. IET Control Theory Appl. 1(5), 1441–1450 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Visioli, A.: Practical PID control. Springer, Berlin (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gerry, J.; Shinskey, F.G.: PID Controller Specification (White Paper). ExperTune Inc. (2000). http://www.expertune.com/PIDspec.aspx. Accessed on October 2017
  24. 24.
    Kirk, D.E.: Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction. Courier Corporation, Chelmsford (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khalil, H.K.: Noninear Systems. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1996)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Åström, K.J.; Hägglund, T.: Advanced PID control. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neimark, J.: D-subdivisions and spaces of quasipolynomials. Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 13(5), 349–80 (1949)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Michiels, W.; Niculescu, S.I.: Stability and Stabilization of Time-Delay Systems: An Eigenvalue-Based Approach, 1st edn. SIAM, Philadelphia (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams, H.B.; Andrew, W.G.; Zoss, L.M.: Applied Instrumentation in the Process Industry. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston (1979)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Urwaye, A.P.: New Food Engineering Research Trends. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siemens: System Manual. S7-1200 Programmable Controller. Siemens AG, Munich (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chua, K.J.M.; Hawladera, N.A.; Choua, S.K.; Hoa, J.C.: On the study of time-varying temperature drying-effect on drying kinetics and product quality. Dry. Technol. Int. J. 20(7), 1559–1577 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Valadez-Blanco, R.; Gómez-G ómez, M.S.; Pérez-Herrera, A.; Salas-Coronado, R.: Effect of rotating tray drying on antioxidant components, color and rehydration ratio of tomato saladette slices. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 46(1), 298–304 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CITIS-ICBIAutonomous University of Hidalgo StateMineral de la ReformaMexico
  2. 2.Electrical and Electronic Engineering DepartmentMinatitlan Institute of TechnologyMinatitlanMexico

Personalised recommendations