Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 9, pp 4649–4657 | Cite as

Design and Implementation of a Force Dynamometer for Friction Stir Welding

  • J. Y. Sheikh-Ahmad
  • Dima Ali
  • Fanyu Meng
Research Article - Mechanical Engineering


The locations of the strain nodes on the extended octagonal ring force transducer (EOR) have been examined by many studies in the literature. However, there is a considerable lack of agreement between the different studies due to different assumptions and approaches used to define nodal locations. Because an exact solution for the stress and strain distributions in the octagonal ring does not exist, some researchers used the solution of the classical circular ring as a first approximation. Others used the finite element method to obtain a solution. But very few studies attempted to investigate the effect of geometry of the ring itself on the solution. In this work, the stress and strain distributions in an EOR transducers of varying geometries have been investigated by the finite element method and the locations of strain nodes and those of maximum sensitivity were determined and compared with the literature. It was found that strain node locations vary with ring geometry, but do not generally coincide with the classical solution of the circular ring. The strain node locations are also not coinciding with maximum sensitivity locations for horizontal force measurement. An EOR dynamometer was fabricated based on the results of this study. The dynamometer was calibrated and tested in friction stir welding. It was shown that the dynamometer response is highly linear and with very small cross talk.


Extended octagonal ring Strain node Cross talk Sensitivity Finite element analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O’Dogherty, M.J.: The design of octagonal ring dynamometers. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 63, 9–18 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kheiralla, A.F.; Yahya, A.; Zohadie, M.; Ishak, W.: Design and development of a three-point auto hitch dynamometer for an agricultural tractor. AJSTD 20(3&4), 271–288 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Afzalinia, S.; Roberge, M.: An extended octagonal ring transducer for the compression chamber of a large square baler. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 11, 377–389 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y.; Khanramaki, M.: Design, construction and calibration of triaxial dynamometer for measuring forces and moments applied on tillage implements in field conditions. J. Metrol. Soc. India 28(2), 119–127 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loewen, E.G.; Cook, N.H.: Metal cutting measurements and their interpretation. Proc. Sot. Exp. Stress Anal. 13(3), 57 (1956)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korkut, I.: Adynamometer design and its construction for milling operation. Mater. Des. 24, 631–637 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yaldiz, S.; Ünsacar, F.; Sağlam, H.; Isik, H.: Design, development and testing of a four component milling dynamometer for the measurement of cutting force and torque. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21, 1499–1511 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karabay, S.: Design criteria for electro-mechanical transducers and arrangement for measurement of strains due to metal cutting forces acting on dynamometers. Mater. Des. 28, 496–506 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dandage, R.V.; Bhatwadekar, S.G.; Bhagwat, M.M.: Design, development and testing of a four component milling tool dynamometer. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Technol. 2(1), 45–50 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroencke, M.; Hull, M.L.: A Method for designing multiload component dynamometers incorporating octagonal strain rings. Exp. Mech. 29(2), 195–204 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, Y.; McLaughlin, N.B.; Tessier, S.: Double extended octagonal ring (DEOR) drawbar dynamometer. Soil Tillage Res. 93, 462–471 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nalavade, P.; Salokhe, V.; Niyamapa, T.: Strain node identification by FEM and measurement of disc forces by double extended octagonal ring transducer. J. Food Agric. Environ. 8(2), 730–735 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shishvan, S.H.; Akdeniz, R.C.; Gilandeh, Y.A.; Akkus, G.: The evaluation and comparison of stress node on extended octagonal ring transducer by strain energy theory and finite element method. J. Agric. Mach. Sci. 7(3), 299–303 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, S.; Zhou, G.: A high performance sensor for triaxial cutting force measurement in turning. Sensors 15, 7969–7984 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uddin, M.S.; Songyi, D.: On the design and analysis of an octagonal-ellipse ring based cutting force measuring transducer. Measurement 90, 168–177 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Girma, G.: Multicomponent dynamometer for measurement of forces on plough bodies. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 42, 85–96 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Godwin, R.J.; Reynolds, A.J.; O’Dogherty, M.J.; Al-Ghazal, A.A.: A triaxial dynamometer for force and moment measurements on tillage implements. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 55, 189–205 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Petroleum InstitutePart of Khalifa University of Science and TechnologyAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations