Advertisement

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 3213–3227 | Cite as

Some Aggregation Operators for Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and its Application to Group Decision-Making Process Using the Set Pair Analysis

  • Harish GargEmail author
  • Kamal Kumar
Research Article - Systems Engineering

Abstract

Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set (LIFS) is the better way to deal with the uncertain and imprecise information in group decision-making problems. On the other hand, the set pair analysis (SPA) theory provides a quantitative analysis to integrate the certainty and uncertainties as a combined system by defining the connection number corresponding to it. In the present paper, we have enhanced the LIFS with the SPA theory and hence defined the linguistic connection number (LCN) and its various operational laws. Based on it, we have developed various aggregation operators, namely LCN weighted geometric, LCN ordered weighted geometric, and LCN hybrid geometric operators with LIFS environment. Also, the shortcoming of the existing operators under LIFS environment has been highlighted and overcomes by the proposed operators. Few properties of these operators have been also investigated. Further, a group decision-making approach has been presented, based on these operators, which has been illustrated by a numerical example to show the effectiveness and validity of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Set pair analysis Linguistic terms Linguistic connection number Intuitionistic fuzzy sets Group decision-making problems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atanassov, K.; Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31, 343–349 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu, Z.S.; Yager, R.R.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen Syst 35, 417–433 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, Z.S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 1179–1187 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garg, H.: Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 101, 53–69 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garg, H.: Some series of intuitionistic fuzzy interactive averaging aggregation operators. SpringerPlus 5(1), 999 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2591-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garg, H.: Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 60, 164–174 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, Z., Chen, J.: On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. In: Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD 2007, vol. 2, pp. 466–471, (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2007.427
  10. 10.
    Garg, H.; Arora, R.: A nonlinear-programming methodology for multi-attribute decision-making problem with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets information. Appl. Intell. 1–16 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1035-8
  11. 11.
    Garg, H.: Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 42(12), 5275–5290 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9.
  12. 12.
    Garg, H.: A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(9), 886–920 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg, H.: A robust ranking method for intuitionistic multiplicative sets under crisp, interval environments and its applications. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput. Intell. 1(5), 366–374 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garg, H.; Arora, R.: Generalized and group-based generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with applications in decision-making. Appl. Intell. 1–14 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0981-5
  15. 15.
    Garg, H.; Agarwal, N.; Tripathi, A.: Some improved interactive aggregation operators under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment and its application to decision making process. Sci. Iran. E 24(5), 2581–2604 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nancy, Garg H.: Novel single-valued neutrosophic decision making operators under frank norm operations and its application. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 6(4), 361–375 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, X.; Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some electre methods. Omega Int. J. Manag. Sci. 36, 45–63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu, Z.; Zhao, N.: Information fusion for intuitionistic fuzzy decision making: an overview. Inf. Fusion 28, 10–23 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu, Z.S.: An overview of methods for determining owa weights. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 20, 843–865 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: part-1. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–251 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: part-2. Inf. Sci. 8, 301–357 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herrera, F.; Martínez, L.: A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybernetics) 31(2), 227–234 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu Z (2005) An approach based on similarity measure to multiple attribute decision making with trapezoid fuzzy linguistic variables. In: International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp 110–117Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, Z.: A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf. Sci. 166(1), 19–30 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu, Z.: Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Inf. Sci. 168(1), 171–184 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen, Z.; Liu, P.; Pei, Z.: An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(4), 747–760 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, H: Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in MAGDM. J. Appl. Math. Article ID 432,092, p. 11 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peng, H.G.; Wang, J.Q.; Cheng, P.F.: A linguistic intuitionistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on the Frank Heronian mean operator and its application in evaluating coal mine safety. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0630-z Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao, K.: Set pair and set pair analysis—a new concept and systematic analysis method. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on System Theory and Regional Planning, pp. 87–91 (1989)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Yang, A.: The fundamental operation on connection number and its applications. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Tech. 49(2), 618–623 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lü, W.S.; Zhang, B.: Set pair analysis method of containing target constraint mixed interval multi-attribute decision-making. Appl. Mech. Mater. Trans. Tech. Publ. 226, 2222–2226 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, R.; Jiao, Y.: On interval arithmetic method of connection number a+bi. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 6(3), 225–229 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao, K.; Xuan, A.: Set pair theory—a new theory method of non-define and its applications. Syst. Eng. 14(1), 18–23 (1996)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xie, Z.; Zhang, F.; Cheng, J.; Li, L.: Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods based on improved set pair analysis. Sixth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, vol. 2, pp. 386–389 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cao, Y.X.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.Q.: An approach to interval-valued intuitionistic stochastic multi-criteria decision-making using set pair analysis. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0589-9 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fu, S.; Zhou, H.: Triangular fuzzy number multi-attribute decision-making method based on set-pair analysis. J. Softw. Eng. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3923/jse.2016 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kumar, K.; Garg, H.: TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput. Appl. Math. 1–11 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-016-0402-0
  38. 38.
    Kumar, K.; Garg, H.: Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making. Appl. Intell. 1–8 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1067-0
  39. 39.
    Chaokai, H.; Meng, W.: A new reputation model for P2P network based on set pair analysis. Open Cybern. Syst. J. 9, 1393–1398 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations