Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 1247–1255 | Cite as

The Effect of Microstructural Features and Thickness on Fracture Toughness of Ti–6Al–4V ELI Thin Sheets

Research Article - Mechanical Engineering
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Thin plates made of Ti–6Al–4V ELI alloy are extremely useful and applicable material of implants industries. The present research is focused on the fracture toughness of Ti–6Al–4V ELI thin sheets through the mechanical and microstructural analyses. The load displacement curves resulted from tear testing methodologies in addition to tensile test were provided for both lamellar and equiaxed microstructures with three different thicknesses. Unit initiation and propagation energies, as an indication of fracture toughness, associated with tear strength were calculated from the curves. Furthermore, the influence of heat treatment’s soaking time for equiaxed microstructure and cooling rate for lamellar microstructure on tear testing, unit initiation and propagation energies was studied. In respect of the equiaxed microstructure, grain growth evolved from the extended soaking time was resulted in destructive effect on crack initiation resistance with increasing thickness, though it marginally affected the crack propagation resistance and fracture toughness. Regarding the lamellar microstructure, thinning the lamellas encouraged crack initiation and propagation resistance for thin sections. However, crack propagation resistance was reduced for thicker sections which contrasts with increasing crack initiation resistance by rising sample thickness. On overall view, increasing sample thickness associated with reducing the grain size was beneficial for crack resistance in equiaxed microstructure. In respect of the lamellar microstructures, thin lamellae particularly in thin sections was superior in terms of crack resistance.

Keywords

Titanium microstructure Fracture toughness Unit propagation energy Notched tensile test Tear test Lamellar microstructure 

List of symbols

\(\hbox {MR}_{p}\)

Mean yield strength

\(\hbox {MR}_{m}\)

Mean tensile strength

\(R_{m}\)

Tensile strength

\(R_{p}\)

Yield strength at 0.2% offset

\(P_{\mathrm{max}}\)

Maximum load

Abbreviations

UIE

Unit initiation energy

UPE

Unit propagation energy

FC

Furnace cooling

CM

Cooling media

ELI

Extra low impurity

ts

Tear strength

TYR

Tear-to-yield strength ratio

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, T.L.: Fracture Mechanics: Fundamental and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lujering, G.; Williams, J.C.: Titanium. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asserin-Lebert, A.; Besson, J.; Gourgues, A.F.: Fracture of 6056 aluminum sheet materials: effect of specimen thickness and hardening behavior on strain localization and toughness. Mater Sci. Eng. A 395, 186–94 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaji, E.M.; K.alidindi, S.R.; Doherty, R.D.: Plain strain fracture toughness of MP35N in aged and unaged conditions measured using modified CT specimens. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. 340, 163–169 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cvijovic’, A.; Gubeljak, N.; Rakin, M.; Cvijovic’, Z.; Geric’, K.: Microstructural morphology effects on fracture resistance and crack tip strain distribution in Ti–6Al–4V alloy for orthopedic implants. Mater. Des. 53, 870–80 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nasiri-Abarbekoh, H.; Ekrami, A.; Ziaei-Moayyed, A.A.: Effects of thickness and texture on mechanical properties anisotropy of commercially pure titanium thin sheets. Mater. Des. 44, 528–562 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rack, H.J.; Qazi, J.I.: Titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 26, 1269–1277 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lutjering, G.: Influece of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (a + b) titanium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 243, 32–45 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Filip, R.; Kubiak, K.; Ziaja, W.; Sieniawski, J.: The effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of two-phase titanium alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 133, 84–89 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghonem, H.: Microstructure and fatigue crack growth mechanisms in high temperature titanium alloys. Int. J. Fatigue 32, 1448–1460 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding, R.; Guo, Y.X.; Wilson, A.: Microstructural evolution of a Ti–6Al–4V alloy during thermo-mechanical processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 327, 233–245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, R.D.-G.; Lee, S.; Lee, C.S.; Hur, S.: Effects of microstructural factors on quasi-static and dynamic deformation behaviors of Ti-6Al-4V alloys with Widmanstatten structures. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34A, 2541–2548 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peters, J.O.; Lutjering, G.: Comparison of the fatigue and fracture of a + b and b titanium alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32A, 2805–18 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Campbell, J.P.; Ritchie, R.O.: Mixed-mode, high-cycle fatigue-crack-growth thresholds in Ti–6Al–4V: role of bimodal and lamellar microstructures. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32A, 497–503 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nalla, R.K.; Boyce, B.L.; Campbell, J.P.; Peters, J.O.; Ritchie, R.O.: Influence of microstructure on high-cycle fatigue of Ti–6Al–4V: bimodal vs. lamellar structures. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33A, 899–918 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whittaker, M.T.; Evans, W.J.; Lancaster, R.; Harrison, W.; Webster, P.S.: The effect of microstructure and texture on mechanical properties of Ti6-4. Int. J. Fatigue 31, 2022–2030 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richards, N.L.: Quantitative evaluation of fracture toughness-microstructural relationships in alpha-beta titanium alloys. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 13(2), 218–25 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horiya, T.; Kishi, T.: Relationship between fracture toughness and crack extension resistance curves (R curves) for Ti–6Al–4V alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 29A, 781–789 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katani, S.; Madadi, F.; Atapour, M.: Micromechanical modeling of damage behavior of Ti–6Al–4V. Mater. Des. 49, 1016–1021 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gunawarman, A.; Niinomi, M.; Fukunaga, K.-I.; Eylon, D.; Fujishiro, S.; Ouchi, C.: Fracture characteristics and microstructural factors in single and duplex annealed Ti–4.5Al–3V–2Mo–2Fe. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 308, 216–24 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASTM, B 871: Standard test method for tear testing of aluminum alloy products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ASTM E8/E8M-16a.: Designation: E 8. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sen, I.; Tamirisakandala, S.; Miracle, D.B.; Ramamurty, U.: Microstructural effects on the mechanical behavior of B-modified Ti–6Al–4V alloys. Acta Mater. 55, 4983–4993 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM E1820-11.: Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Esfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations