Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 2799–2815 | Cite as

Developing an ISDM Adoption Decision Model Using Delphi and AHP

  • Yacine Rezgui
  • Adam Marks
  • Hamed AL-Hajri
  • Ian Wilson
Research Article - Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Abstract

Research on information systems development methodologies (ISDM) adoption has been widely undertaken to highlight the experience of developed countries. Studies concerned with the status of ISDM in developing economies including the factors that influence and motivate their use, current trends, difficulties, and barriers to adoption are lacking. This paper explores these issues in a developing economy, namely Oman, and proposes an ISDM adoption decision model using analytical hierarchy process analysis informed by a survey and Delphi consultation. The findings from the survey reveal a lack of knowledge of ISDM amongst Omani Information Systems developers and the reliance on ad-hoc software development methods. Conversely, analyzed data reveals a trend whereby a majority of Omani organizations are gradually moving towards increased ISDM adoption and deployment. This has motivated the development of an adoption decision model to assist software companies to select the right ISDM adapted to their organizational needs in Oman. This model has a generic dimension and can be adapted to other socio-organizational contexts.

Keywords

IS ISDM Delphi AHP 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avison, D.E.; Fitzgerald, G.:Where now for development methodologies. Commun. ACM 46(1), 78–82 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avison, D.E.; Fitzgerald, G.: Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques & Tools. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cockburn, A.: Agile Software Development, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karlsson, F.; Agerfalk, P.: Method configuration with development tracks and generic project types. In: The 6th CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modelling Methods in System Analysis and Design, Switzerland (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jayaratna, N.: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies. McGraw Hill Book Company, London (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huisman, H.; Iivari, J.: Adaptation and the deployment of systems development methodologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control Technologies, Tampa, Florida, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fitzgerald, B.; Russo, L.: Information system Development: Method in Action. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beynon-Davies, P.; Williams, D.M.: The diffusion of information system development methods. J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 12, 29–46 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wynekoop, J.; Russo, L.: Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods. Inf. Syst. J. 7, 47–65 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Business Monitor International: Oman Information Technology Report. London, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leonard-Barton, D.: Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy 17, 251–267 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vorakulpipat, C.; Rezgui, Y.: Exploring the influence of collectiveness on value creation adoption in an IT organization. In: León, G., Bernardos, A., Casar, J., Kautz, K., DeGross, J. (eds.) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Open IT-Based Innovation: Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion. Springer, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Archibugi, D.; Pietrobelli, C.: The Globalisation of Technology and its Implications for Developing Countries: Windows of Opportunity or Further Burden? Technol Forecast Social Change 70, 861–883 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cyamukungu, M.: Development strategies for an African computer network. Inf. Technol. Dev. 7, 91–94 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Straub, D.; Loch, K.; Hill, C.E.: Transfer of information technology to developing countries: a test of cultural influence modeling in the arab world. J. Global Inf. Manage. 9(4), 6–28 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Mandhary, F.R.: Future Prospects for the Establishment of an Information Technology Industry in the Sultanate of Oman. Al-Markazy (September/October 2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Central Bank of Oman. Annual Report 2003. AL-MARKAZI (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huisman, H.; Iivari, J.: The individual deployment of systems development methodologies. In: Lecture notes in Computer Science, vol. 2348, pp. 134–150. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vidgen, R.; Madsen, S.; Kautz, K.: Mapping the Information System Development Process. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 141/2004, 157–171. doi:10.1007/1-4020-8000-X_9 (2004)
  20. 20.
    Lycett, M.; Kanellis, P.; Paul, R.J.: Requirements modeling. In: IEEE International Symposium Requirement Engineering (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Westrup, C.: American Programmer. Information Systems Methodologies in Use. J. Inf. Technol. 8, 267–275 (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hardy, C.; Thompson, B.; Edwards, H.: The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study. Inf. Syst. J. 7(3), 201–212 (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iivari, J.; Maansaari, J.: The usage of systems development methods: are we stuck to old practices? Inf. Softw. Technol. 40(9), 501–510 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fitzgerald, B.: An empirical investigation into the adoption of system development methodologies. Inf. Manage. 34(6), 317–328 (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rahim, M.; Seyal, H.: Use of software system development methods. An empirical study in Brunei Darussalam. Inf. Softw. Technol. 39, 949–963 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yazrina, Y.; Maritay, M.; Yusof, Y.; Nazlia, O.: The use of information system development methodology in Malaysia. Jurnal Antarabangsa (Teknologi Maklumat) 2, 15–34 (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walsham. G.; Robey, D.; Sahay, S.: Special issue on information systems in developing countries. MIS Q 31(2), 317–326 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burns, T.; Deek, F.: A methodology tailoring model for practitioner based information systems development informed by the principles of general systems theory. J. Inf. Syst. Appl. Res. 4(2), 36–38 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maryati, M..; Yusof, Z.; Azlan, A.: A hybrid approach for selecting suitable information systems development methodology. Inf. Technol. J. 10, 1031–1037 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mursu, A.: Information Systems Development in Developing Countries: Risk Management and Sustainability Analysis in Nigerian Software Companies. University of Jyväskylä (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanford, C.; Bhattacherjee, A.: IT Implementation in a developing country municipality: a sociocognitive analysis. J. Global Inf. Manage 15(3) (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM). Strategic Review: The IT Industry in India (2007). Retrieved July 27, 2008. http://www.nasscom.org/
  33. 33.
    Carmel, E.: Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1999)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yadav, V.; Nath, D.; Adya, M.; Sridhar, V.: Investigating an agile-rigid approach in globally distributed requirements analysis. In: Proceedings: 11th Pacific-Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Auckland, New Zealand (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nath, D.; Sridhar, V.; Adya, M.; Malik, A.: Project quality of off-shore virtual teams engaged in software requirements analysis: an exploratory comparative study. J. Glabal Inf. Manage 16(4) (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Levary, R.; Han, D.: Choosing a Technological Forecasting Method, IM: 14-18 (1995)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Forman, H.; Selly, M.: Decision by objectives: how to convince others that you are right. Word Scientific, London (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dennis, A.; Wixom, B.H.; Roth, R.: Systems Analysis and Design. Wiley, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saaty, T.: Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1999)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Whitten, J.; Bentley, D.: Systems Analysis and Design Methods. McGraw Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kendall, K.; Kendall, J.: Systems Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dalkey, N.: The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (1969)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Khisty, J.: Soft-systems methodology as learning and management tools. J. Urban Plan. Dev. (1995)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fruhling, A.: Field Experiences with eXtreme Programming: Developing an Emergency Response System. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. Arch. 22(4), 181–185 (2006)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Saaty, T.; Vargas, G.: The allocation of intangible resources: the analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Socio-Econom. Plan. Sci. 37(3), 169–184 (2003)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Agresti, A.; Finlay, B.: Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1997)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Edwards, K.; Sridhar, V.: Collaborative software requirements engineering exercises in a distributed virtual team environment. In: Hunter, G., Tan, F. (eds.) Advanced Topics of Global Information Management, vol. 5, pp. 178–197. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sakthivel, S.: Development Methodology. International Resources Management Association International Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. May 21–24 (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yacine Rezgui
    • 1
  • Adam Marks
    • 2
  • Hamed AL-Hajri
    • 3
  • Ian Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDaytona BeachUSA
  3. 3.Royal ArmyMuscatOman

Personalised recommendations