Korea-Australia Rheology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 175–180

# Validity of the equations for the contact angle on real surfaces

Article

## Abstract

The wetting property between liquid and solid is very important in many industries besides natural systems. The simplest method to determine the wetting property is just dropping a liquid drop on a solid surface and measuring a contact angle from the shape of the drop. Since the Young’s equation has been used as a basic equation to relate a contact angle and interfacial tensions over 200 years, it is important to understand a derivation and limits of the Young’s equation. We derived the Young’s equation following energy minimization with simple mathematics. By expanding the derivation, the modified forms of the Cassie-Baxter equation and the Wenzel equation were also derived. From analyses of the derivations, it was deduced that a contact angle on an ideal surface is only related to the infinitesimal region in the vicinity of contact line, not internal area surrounded by the contact line. Although the Cassie-Baxter model and the Wenzel model were not rigorously built, they have been widely used for a superhydrophobic surface, because the apparent forms are similar to those of rigorously derived models when the contact line can easily move on the surface.

### Keywords

Young’s equation Wenzel equation Cassie-Baxter equation contact angle energy minimization.

## Preview

### References

1. Alberti, G., and A. Desimone, 2005, Wetting of rough surfaces: a homogenization approach, Proceeding of the Royal Society A 461, 79–97.
2. Bachmann, J., G. Arye, M. Deurer, S.K. Woche, R. Horton, K.-H. Hartge, and Y. Chen, 2006, Universality of a surface tension-contact-angle relation for hydrophobic soils of different texture, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 169, 745–753.
3. Bachmann, J., and G. McHale, 2009, Superhydrophobic surfaces: a model approach to predict contact angle and surface energy of soil particles, European Journal of Soil Science 60, 420–430.
4. Bauer, J., G. Drescher, and M. Illig, 1996, Surface tension, adhesion and wetting of materials for photolithographic process, Journal of vacuum science and technology B 14, 2485–2492.
5. Bormashenko, E., 2009, A variational approach to wetting of composite surfaces: Is wetting o composite surfaces a onedimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon?, Langmuir 25(18), 10451–10454.
6. Byun, D., J. Hong, Saputra, J.H. Ko, Y.J. Lee, H.C. Park, B.-K, Byun, and J.R. Lukes, 2009, Wetting characteristic of insect wing surfaces, Journal of Bionic Engineering 6, 63–70.
7. Cassie, A.B.D., and S. Baxter, 1944, Wettability of porous surfaces, Transactions of the Faraday Society 40, 546–551.
8. Gao, L., and T.J. McCarthy, 2007, How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong, Langmuir 23, 3762–3765.
9. Gau, H., S. Herminghaus, P. Lenz, and R. Lipowsky, 1999, Liquid morphologies on structured surfaces: from microchannels to microchips, Science 283, 46–49.
10. Leng, B., Z. Shao, G. de With, and W. Ming, 2009, Superoleophobic cotton textiles, Langmuir 25, 2456–2460.
11. Li, J.S., E. Ueda, A. Nallapaneni, L.X. Li, and P.A. Levkin, 2012, Printable superhydrophilicsuperhydrophobic micropatterns based on supported lipid layers, Langmuir 28, 8286–8291.
12. Lodge, R.A., and B. Bhushan, 2006, Wetting properties of human hair by means of dynamic contact angle measurement, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 102, 5255–5265.
13. Murdan, S., C. Poojary, D.R. Patel, J. Fernandes, A. Haman, P.S. Saundh, and Z. Sheikh, 2012, In vivo measurement of the surface energy of human fingernail plates, International Journal of Cosmetic Science 34, 257–262.
14. Prakash, M., D. Quéré, and J.W.M. Bush, 2008, Surface tension transport of prey by feeding shorebirds: the capillary ratchet, Science 320, 931–934.
15. Quéré, D., 2005, Non-sticking drops, Reports on Progress in Physics 68, 2495–2532.
16. Song, J., A. Batra, J.M. Rego, and C.W.M. Macosko, 2011, Polyethylene/polyurethane blends for improved paint adhesion, Progress in Organic Coatings 72, 492–497.
17. Sun, M., G.S. Watson, Y. Zheng, J.A. Watson, and A. Liang, 2009, Wetting properties on nanostructured surfaces of cicada wings, The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 3148–3155.
18. Wagner, M., A. Mavon, H. Haidara, M.-F. Vallat, H. Duplan, and V. Roucoules, 2012, From contact angle titration to chemical force microscopy: a new route to assess the pH-dependent character of the stratum corneum, International Journal of Cosmetic Science 34, 55–63.
19. Wang, J.Z., Z.H. Zheng, H.W. Li, W.T.S. Huck, and H. Sirringhaus, 2004, Dewetting of conducting polymer inkjet droplets on patterned surfaces, Nature Materials 3, 171–176.
20. Wenzel R.N., 1936, Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 28, 988–994.
21. Whyman, G., E. Bormashenko, and T. Stein, 2008, The rigorous derivation of Young, Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon, Chemical Physics Letters 450, 355–359.
22. Xu, L., H. Zhu, H.E. Ozkan, W.E. Bagley, and C.R. Krause, 2011, Droplet evaporation and spread on waxy and hairy leaves associated with type and concentration of adjuvants, Pest Management Science 67, 842–851.
23. Xu, X., and X. Wang, 2010, Derivation of the Wenzel and Cassie equations from a phase field model for two phase flow on rough surface, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 70(8), 2929–2941.
24. Zahner, D., J. Abagot, F. Svec, J.M.J. Fréchet, and P.A. Levkin, 2011, A facile approach to superhydrophilic-superhydrophobic patterns in porous polymer films, Advanced Materials 23, 3030–3034.