Maximal covers of chains of prime ideals

Original Paper

Abstract

Suppose \(f:S \rightarrow R\) is a ring homomorphism, with S and R not necessarily commutative and f not necessarily unitary. We study the connections between chains in \(\text {Spec} (S)\) and \(\text {Spec} (R)\). We focus on the properties lying over, incomparability, going down (GD), going up (GU) and strong going between (SGB). We prove necessary and sufficient conditions for f to satisfy each of the properties GD, GU and SGB, in terms of maximal \(\mathcal D\)-chains, where \({\mathcal {D}} \subseteq \text {Spec} (S)\) is a nonempty chain. We show that if f satisfies all of the above properties, then every maximal \(\mathcal D\)-chain is a maximal 1:1 cover of \(\mathcal D\). We also present an important example from quasi-valuation theory in which all of the above properties are satisfied. Moreover, we give equivalent conditions for the following property: for every chain \(\mathcal D \subseteq \text {Spec} (S)\) and for every maximal \(\mathcal D\)-chain \(\mathcal C \subseteq \text {Spec} (R)\), \(\mathcal C\) and \(\mathcal D\) are of the same cardinality.

Keywords

Prime spectrum Going up Incomparability Going down Strong going between Lying over Maximal \({\mathcal {D}}\)-chains Maximal covers Layer n property 

Mathematics Subject Classification

16P70 13B21 16D25 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the referee for his/her careful reading and helpful comments.

References

  1. Arnold, J.: Krull dimension in power series rings. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 177, 299–304 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgess, W.D., Lashgari, A., Mojiri, A.: Elements of minimal prime ideals in general rings. Trends in Mathematics, Advances in Ring Theory, pp. 69–81 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Dobbs, D.E., Hetzel, A.J.: Going-down implies generalized going-down. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 35, 479–484 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Dietrich Jr., W.E.: Prime ideals in uniform algebras. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 42, 171–174 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dietrich Jr., W.E.: Ideals in convolution algebras on Abelian groups. Pacific J. Math. 51, 75–88 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobbs, D.E.: On the strong going-between and generalized going down properties of ring homomorphism. Focus on Commutative Rings Research. Nova Science Pub Inc, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Dobbs, D.E., Picavet, G.: On strong going-between, going-down and their universalizations. Rings, Modules, Algebras, and Abelian Groups. Dekker, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  8. Fornasiero, A., Kuhlmann, F.V., Kuhlmann, S.: Towers of complements to valuation rings and truncation closed embeddings of valued fields. J. Algebra 323(3), 574–600 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrero, M., Matczuk, J.: Skew polynomial rings with wide family of prime ideals. Interactions between ring theory and representations of algebras (Murcia). Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 210, pp. 169–178. Dekker, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  10. Greenfeld, B., Rowen, L.H., Vishne, U.: Union of chains of primes. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 220(4), 1451–1461 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. Heinicke, A.G., Robson, J.C.: Normalizing extensions: prime ideals and incomparability. J. Algebra 72, 237–268 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang, B.G., Loper, K.A., Lucas, T.G., Park, M.H., Toan, P.T.: The Krull dimension of power series rings over non-SFT rings. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 217(2), 254–258 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplansky, I.: Adjacent prime ideals. J. Algebra 20, 94–97 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, B.G., Oh, D.Y.: Lifting up a tree of prime ideals to a going-up extension. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 182, 239–252 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Krull, W.: Beitrage zur Arithmetik kommutativer Integrititsbereiche, III Zum Dimensionsbegriff der Idealtheorie. Math. Zeit. 42, 745–766 (1937)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Loper, K.A., Lucas, T.G.: Constructing chains of primes in power series rings. J. Algebra 334, 175–194 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsumura, H.: Commutative algebra. Mathematics Lecture Note Series, vol. 56, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings, Reading (1980)Google Scholar
  18. Picavet, G.: Universally going-down rings, 1-split rings and absolute integral closure. Commun. Algebra 31, 4655–4681 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Ratliff Jr., L.J.: Going between rings and contractions of saturated chains of prime ideals. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 7, 777–787 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Robson, J.C., Small, L.W.: Liberal extensions. Proc. London Math. Sot. 42(3), 87–103 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarussi, S.: Quasi-valuations extending a valuation. J. Algebra 372, 318–364 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarussi, S.: Quasi-valuations and algebras over valuation domains (2017). arXiv:1308.4743
  23. Sarussi, S.: Quasi-valuations—topology and the weak approximation theorem. In: EMS Series of Congress Reports, pp. 464–473 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. Stephens, R.: On the Krull dimensions of the Steenrod algebra. Commun. Algebra 40(10), 3859–3866 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Wehrung, F.: Monoids of intervals of ordered abelian groups. J. Algebra 182(1), 287–328 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Managing Editors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sce CollegeAshdodIsrael

Personalised recommendations