No reliable gene expression biomarkers of current or impending neurocognitive impairment in peripheral blood monocytes of persons living with HIV

  • Austin Quach
  • Steve Horvath
  • Natasha Nemanim
  • Dimitrios Vatakis
  • Mallory D. Witt
  • Eric N. Miller
  • Roger Detels
  • Peter Langfelder
  • Paul Shapshak
  • Elyse J. Singer
  • Andrew J. Levine
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Events leading to and propagating neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in HIV-1-infected (HIV+) persons are largely mediated by peripheral blood monocytes. We previously identified expression levels of individual genes and gene networks in peripheral blood monocytes that correlated with neurocognitive functioning in HIV+ adults. Here, we expand upon those findings by examining if gene expression data at baseline is predictive of change in neurocognitive functioning 2 years later. We also attempt to validate the original findings in a new sample of HIV+ patients and determine if the findings are HIV specific by including HIV-uninfected (HIV−) participants as a comparison group. At two time points, messenger RNA (mRNA) was isolated from the monocytes of 123 HIV+ and 60 HIV− adults enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and analyzed with the Illumina HT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip. All participants received baseline and follow-up neurocognitive testing 2 years after mRNA analysis. Data were analyzed using standard gene expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis with correction for multiple testing. Gene sets were analyzed for GO term enrichment. Only weak reproducibility of associations of single genes with neurocognitive functioning was observed, indicating that such measures are unreliable as biomarkers for HIV-related NCI; however, gene networks were generally preserved between time points and largely reproducible, suggesting that these may be more reliable. Several gene networks associated with variables related to HIV infection were found (e.g., MHC I antigen processing, TNF signaling, interferon gamma signaling, and antiviral defense); however, no significant associations were found for neurocognitive function. Furthermore, neither individual gene probes nor gene networks predicted later neurocognitive change. This study did not validate our previous findings and does not support the use of monocyte gene expression profiles as a biomarker for current or future HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment.

Keywords

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders neuroHIV Monocyte WGCNA Gene expression Biomarker 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants and staff of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study in Los Angeles. This study was primarily funded by the National Institute for Drug Abuse [R01DA030913 (Levine and Horvath)]. The Los Angeles site of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [U01-AI-35040 (Detels)], Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute CTSI [UL1TR001881], and NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI [UL1TR000124].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13365_2018_625_MOESM1_ESM.docx (256 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1 Agreement of probe-GNF correlations from different sample sets. In order to assess reproducibility of the differential expression at the single probe level, correlations between the gene expression probe levels in peripheral monocytes and global neurocognitive function (GNF) from different sample sets were plotted against each other in order to assess inter-set agreement. Each point on the scatterplot represents a single gene expression probe with the correlation coefficient with GNF denoted on the x- and y-axes. Correlation coefficients are listed above each scatterplot. A) Correlations in the time point 1 HIV+ samples (n = 61) were plotted against correlations in time point 2 HIV+ samples (n = 62). B) Probe-GNF correlations in all HIV+ samples (n = 123) were plotted against correlations in all HIV− samples (n = 60). The HIV+ individuals with repeat measurements at both time points were excluded to avoid artificial inflation of agreement. (DOCX 256 kb)
13365_2018_625_MOESM2_ESM.docx (46 kb)
Supplemental Figure 2 Module preservation statistics between different HIV+ sample sets. The preservation of gene co-expression modules from time point 1 HIV+ samples were assessed by comparing in-group proportion of modules from time point 2 HIV+ samples versus permutated gene expression values to arrive at a permutation p-value. Points on the scatter plot represent modules as denoted by their color and label, where their vertical position denotes increasing negative log-scaled significance and their horizontal position indicates the number of genes in the module. The blue and red dotted lines represent nominal (p = 0.05) and Bonferroni significance (p = 0.00015) levels respectively. Ten thousand permutations were used in the computation, leading to achievable maximum significance of p = 0.0001, which was attained by a number of modules aligned horizontally at the top of the graph. (DOCX 46 kb)
13365_2018_625_MOESM3_ESM.docx (182 kb)
Supplemental Figure 3 Correlation to determine level of agreement of gene expression profiles within all samples. We found strong consistency between the gene expression profiles within and between individuals. Inter-individual variation was greater than the variation between repeat measurements on the same individual between time points, however even then the lowest inter-sample correlation was strong (r = 0.93). (DOCX 181 kb)
13365_2018_625_MOESM4_ESM.docx (96 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 (DOCX 96.4 kb)
13365_2018_625_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (7.7 mb)
Supplementary Table 2 GO term enrichment of gene modules. The top 20 enriched GO terms for all module gene sets are presented. The horizontal portions of the table correspond to the modules as labeled on the left. Enrichment statistics are reported in the rightmost columns including Fisher’s exact test p-values. (XLSX 7866 kb)
13365_2018_625_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (69 kb)
Supplementary Table 3 (XLSX 68 kb)

References

  1. Adle-Biassette H, Chretien F, Wingertsmann L, Hery C, Ereau T, Scaravilli F, Tardieu M, Gray F (1999) Neuronal apoptosis does not correlate with dementia in HIV infection but is related to microglial activation and axonal damage. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 25:123–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Harthi L (2012) Interplay between Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and HIV: virologic and biologic consequences in the CNS. J NeuroImmune Pharmacol 7:731–739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ancuta P, Moses A, Gabuzda D (2004) Transendothelial migration of CD16+ monocytes in response to fractalkine under constitutive and inflammatory conditions. Immunobiology 209:11–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, Brew BJ, Byrd DA, Cherner M, Clifford DB, Cinque P, Epstein LG, Goodkin K, Gisslen M, Grant I, Heaton RK, Joseph J, Marder K, Marra CM, McArthur JC, Nunn M, Price RW, Pulliam L, Robertson KR, Sacktor N, Valcour V, Wojna VE (2007) Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology 69:1789–1799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Boven LA (2000) Macrophages and HIV-1-associated dementia. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 48:273–279Google Scholar
  6. Devlin KN, Gongvatana A, Clark US, Chasman JD, Westbrook ML, Tashima KT, Navia B, Cohen RA (2012) Neurocognitive effects of HIV, hepatitis C, and substance use history. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 18:68–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellery PJ, Tippett E, Chiu YL, Paukovics G, Cameron PU, Solomon A, Lewin SR, Gorry PR, Jaworowski A, Greene WC, Sonza S, Crowe SM (2007) The CD16+ monocyte subset is more permissive to infection and preferentially harbors HIV-1 in vivo. J Immunol 178:6581–6589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Glass JD, Fedor H, Wesselingh SL, McArthur JC (1995) Immunocytochemical quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus in the brain: correlations with dementia. Ann Neurol 38:755–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heaton RK, Franklin DR, Ellis RJ, McCutchan JA, Letendre SL, Leblanc S, Corkran SH, Duarte NA, Clifford DB, Woods SP, Collier AC, Marra CM, Morgello S, Mindt MR, Taylor MJ, Marcotte TD, Atkinson JH, Wolfson T, Gelman BB, McArthur JC, Simpson DM, Abramson I, Gamst A, Fennema-Notestine C, Jernigan TL, Wong J, Grant I (2011) HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: differences in rates, nature, and predictors. J Neuro-Oncol 17:3–16Google Scholar
  10. Horvath S, Dong J (2008) Geometric interpretation of gene coexpression network analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kallianpur AR, Levine AJ (2014) Host genetic factors predisposing to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 11(3):336–352Google Scholar
  12. Kaul M, Lipton SA (2006) Mechanisms of neuronal injury and death in HIV-1 associated dementia. Curr HIV Res 4:307–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kedzierska K, Crowe SM (2002) The role of monocytes and macrophages in the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection. Curr Med Chem 9:1893–1903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kraft-Terry SD, Buch SJ, Fox HS, Gendelman HE (2009) A coat of many colors: neuroimmune crosstalk in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Neuron 64:133–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kusdra L, Mcguire D, Pulliam L (2002) Changes in monocyte/macrophage neurotoxicity in the era of HAART: implications for HIV-associated dementia. AIDS 16:31–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Langfelder P, Horvath S (2007) Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between co-expression modules. BMC Syst Biol 1:54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinf 9:559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langfelder P, Zhang B, Horvath S (2008) Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the dynamic tree cut package for R. Bioinformatics 24:719–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Langfelder P, Luo R, Oldham MC, Horvath S (2011) Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1001057CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Letendre S (2011) Central nervous system complications in HIV disease: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Top Antivir Med 19:137–142PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Levine AJ, Horvath S, Miller EN, Singer EJ, Shapshak P, Baldwin GC, Martinez-Maza O, Witt MD, Langfelder P (2013) Transcriptome analysis of HIV-infected peripheral blood monocytes: gene transcripts and networks associated with neurocognitive functioning. J Neuroimmunol 265:96–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine AJ, Panos SE, Horvath S (2014a) Genetic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic studies of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 65:481–503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine AJ, Reynolds S, Cox C, Miller EN, Sinsheimer JS, Becker JT, Martin E, Sacktor N, Neuropsychology Working Group of the Multicenter, A. C. S (2014b) The longitudinal and interactive effects of HIV status, stimulant use, and host genotype upon neurocognitive functioning. J Neuro-Oncol 20:243–257Google Scholar
  25. Levine AJ, Martin E, Sacktor N, Munro C, Becker J (2017) Predictors and impact of self-reported suboptimal effort on estimates of prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. JAIDS 75(2):203–210Google Scholar
  26. Lindl KA, Akay C, Wang Y, White MG, Jordan-Sciutto KL (2007) Expression of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response marker, BiP, in the central nervous system of HIV-positive individuals. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 33:658–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nguyen TP, Soukup VM, Gelman BB (2010) Persistent hijacking of brain proteasomes in HIV-associated dementia. Am J Pathol 176:893–902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Peluso R, Haase A, Stowring L, Edwards M, Ventura P (1985) A Trojan horse mechanism for the spread of visna virus in monocytes. Virology 147:231–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pulliam L, Gascon R, Stubblebine M, McGuire D, McGrath MS (1997) Unique monocyte subset in patients with AIDS dementia. Lancet 349:692–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Quach A, Levine ME, Tanaka T, Lu AT, Chen BH, Ferrucci L, Ritz B, Bandinelli S, Neuhouser ML, Beasley JM, Snetselaar L, Wallace RB, Tsao PS, Absher D, Assimes TL, Stewart JD, Li Y, Hou L, Baccarelli AA, Whitsel EA, Horvath S (2017) Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors. Aging 9(2):419–446Google Scholar
  31. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reas ET, Laughlin GA, Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E, McEvoy LK (2016) Moderate, regular alcohol consumption is associated with higher cognitive function in older community-dwelling adults. J Prev Alzheimer's Dis 3:105–113Google Scholar
  33. Reddy PV, Agudelo M, Atluri VS, Nair MP (2012) Inhibition of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 exacerbates HIV-1 gp120-induced oxidative and inflammatory response: role in HIV associated neurocognitive disorder. Neurochem Res 37:1697–1706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sacktor N, Skolasky RL, Seaberg E, Munro C, Becker JT, Martin E, Ragin A, Levine A, Miller E (2016) Prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in the Multicenter AIDS cohort study. Neurology 86:334–340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Martinez-Maza O, Aziz N, Kolberg JA, Yeghiazarian T, Shen LP, Fahey JL (1997) Relationship of plasma HIV-RNA levels and levels of TNF-alpha and immune activation products in HIV infection. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 84:36–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shay AH, Choi R, Whittaker K, Salehi K, Kitchen CM, Tashkin DP, Roth MD, Baldwin GC (2003) Impairment of antimicrobial activity and nitric oxide production in alveolar macrophages from smokers of marijuana and cocaine. J Infect Dis 187:700–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun B, Abadjian L, Rempel H, Calosing C, Rothlind J, Pulliam L (2010) Peripheral biomarkers do not correlate with cognitive impairment in highly active antiretroviral therapy-treated subjects with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Neuro-Oncol 16:115–124Google Scholar
  38. Woods SP, Rippeth JD, Frol AB, Levy JK, Ryan E, Soukup VM, Hinkin CH, Lazzaretto D, Cherner M, Marcotte TD, Gelman BB, Morgello S, Singer EJ, Grant I, Heaton RK (2004) Interrater reliability of clinical ratings and neurocognitive diagnoses in HIV. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 26:759–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang B, Horvath S (2005) A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 4:Article17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of NeuroVirology, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Austin Quach
    • 1
  • Steve Horvath
    • 1
    • 2
  • Natasha Nemanim
    • 3
  • Dimitrios Vatakis
    • 4
  • Mallory D. Witt
    • 5
    • 6
  • Eric N. Miller
    • 7
  • Roger Detels
    • 5
    • 8
  • Peter Langfelder
    • 1
  • Paul Shapshak
    • 9
  • Elyse J. Singer
    • 10
  • Andrew J. Levine
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of Human GeneticsDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, National Neurological AIDS BankDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical CenterTorranceUSA
  7. 7.Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral ScienceDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  8. 8.Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  9. 9.Department of Medicine (Division of Infectious Disease and International Medicine), Morsani College of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  10. 10.Department of NeurologyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations