Neurocognitive impairment in patients randomized to second-line lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy vs. lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy
- First Online:
- 253 Downloads
We compared rates of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) among 93 Thai adults failing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) before and after switching to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (mLPV/r) vs. tenofovir/lamivudine/LPV/r (TDF/3TC/LPV/r). Participants completed the Color Trails 1 and 2, Digit Symbol, and Grooved Pegboard at weeks 0, 24, and 48. We calculated z-scores using normative data from 451 healthy HIV-negative Thais. We defined NCI as performance of <-1 SD on ≥2 tests. The Thai depression inventory was used to capture depressive symptoms. Lumbar puncture was optional at week 0 and 48. At baseline, median (IQR) age was 36.9 (32.8–40.5) years, and 46 % had primary school education or lower. The median CD4 count was 196 (107–292) cells/mm3, and plasma HIV RNA was 4.1 (3.6–4.5) log10 copies/ml. Almost all (97 %) had circulating recombinant CRF01_AE. At baseline, 20 (47 %) of the mLPV/r vs. 22 (44 %) of TDF/3TC/LPV/r arms met NCI criteria (p = 0.89). The frequency of NCI at week 48 was 30 vs. 32 % (p = 0.85) with 6 vs. 7 % (p = 0.85) developing NCI in the mLPV/r vs. TDF/3TC/LPV/r arms, respectively. Having NCI at baseline and lower education each predicted NCI at week 48. Depression scores at week 48 did not differ between arms (p = 0.47). Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA of <50 copies/ml at 48 weeks was observed in five out of seven in mLPV/r vs. three out of four in TDF/3TC/LPV/r arm. The rates of NCI and depression did not differ among cases failing NNRTI-based cART who received mLPV/r compared to LPV/r triple therapy.
KeywordsLopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy Neurocognitive impairment Central nervous system penetration effectiveness score Depression
- Agsalda M, Kusao I, Troelstrup D, Velasco V-N, Shikuma C, Valcour V et al (2012) Monocytes with an inflammatory profile and high HIV DNA copy numbers characterize patients with neurocognitive deficits. Poster number 460. The 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2012), Seattle, WA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Bunupuradah T, Chetchotisakd P, Ananworanich J, Munsakul W, Jirajariyavej S, Kantipong P et al (2012) A randomized comparison of second-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. tenofovir/lamivudine/lopinavir/ritonavir in patients failing NNRTI-regimens: the HIV STAR study. Antivir Ther. doi:10.3851/IMP2222
- Clotet B, Gomez JL (2011) Clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus darunavir/ritonavir monotherapies as simplification switching strategies of PI/NNRTI-triple therapy based-regimens. NCT00994344. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00994344?term=darunavir+monotherapy&rank=1. Accessed 5 Dec 2011.
- Paton N et al. (2011) A randomized controlled trial of a strategy of switching to boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy versus continuing combination antiretroviral therapy for the long-term management of HIV-1 infected patients who have achieved sustained virological suppression on highly-active antiretroviral therapy. ISRCTN04857074. http://controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN04857074/pivot. Accessed 5 Dec 2011.