Mammal Research

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 13–24 | Cite as

One, no one, or one hundred thousand: how many wolves are there currently in Italy?

  • Marco Galaverni
  • Romolo Caniglia
  • Elena Fabbri
  • Pietro Milanesi
  • Ettore Randi
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Large carnivores in Italy and other European countries are protected by law to ensure their long-term conservation. Estimates of abundance and demographic trends of their populations are crucial for implementing effective conservation and management strategies. However, it is challenging to obtain basic demographic parameters for elusive species such as the wolf (Canis lupus). Monitoring wolf populations by standard field methods or non-invasive genetic approaches requires huge human efforts and may be exceedingly expensive on a nation-wide scale. Aiming to obtain a first approximate estimate of wolf distribution and abundance in Italy, we developed a systematic review procedure to analyze published data obtained from a variety of sources. We deduced relevant information on wolf presence and numbers from 20 peer-reviewed studies or official reports, and from 241 Standard Data Forms of Natura 2000 sites in Italy, referring to the period 2009–2013. We estimated the species abundance by combining the number of individuals reported in each study area with the values obtained by multiplying the estimated number of packs for the average pack size. Comparing our estimates with those previously reported, we evaluated the qualitative trend of the population for each of the two management units: Alps and Apennines. Results showed the occurrence of approximately 321 wolf packs in Italy, corresponding to 1269–1800 wolves, possibly still underestimated. The Apennine sub-population seems to be almost the double in size (with ca. 1212–1711 wolves in the period 2009–2013) compared to previous estimates (600–800 wolves between 2006 and 2011). The Alpine sub-population, despite its ongoing eastwards expansion, appears rather stable (with 57–89 wolves). Overall, the current wolf population size and trends seem favorable, although the species is still locally threatened by widespread poaching and accidents. These results represent the first estimate of abundance for the whole Italian wolf population in the last 40 years. Such information can be used to implement sound conservation strategies, especially in critical human-dominated landscapes, where conflicts with human activities and increasing rates of hybridization with free-ranging domestic dogs call for updated management plans.

Keywords

Canis lupus Wolf Italy Distribution Population size estimate Conservation Management 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Supplementary material

13364_2015_247_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (126 kb)
Online Resource 1 (PDF 125 kb)
13364_2015_247_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (170 kb)
Online Resource 2 (PDF 170 kb)

References

  1. Antonucci A (2014) Il lupo del Parco Nazionale della Majella. Ufficio Monitoraggio e Gestione Biodiversità, Parco Nazionale della Majella [in Italian]Google Scholar
  2. Apollonio M, Mattioli L, Scandura M et al (2004) Wolves in the Casentinesi Forests: insights for wolf conservation in Italy from a protected area with a rich wild prey community. Biol Conserv 120:249–260. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apollonio et al (2013) Monitoraggio del lupo in Regione Toscana, relazione anno 2013 [in Italian]Google Scholar
  4. Barea-Azcón JM, Virgós E, Ballesteros-Duperón E et al (2006) Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods. Biodivers Conserv 16:1213–1230. doi: 10.1007/s10531-006-9114-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassi E, Willis SG, Passilongo D, Mattioli L, Apollonio M (2015) Predicting the spatial distribution of wolf (Canis lupus) breeding areas in a mountainous region of Central Italy. PLoS ONE 10, e0124698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124698 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boitani L (1984) Genetic considerations on wolf conservation in Italy. Bolletino di Zool 51:37–41. doi: 10.1080/11250008409439476 Google Scholar
  7. Boitani L (1992) Wolf research and conservation in Italy. Biol Conserv 61:125–132. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91102-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boitani L (2000) Action plan for the conservation of wolves in Europe (Canis lupus). No. 18–113. Council of Europe Press, Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. Boitani L (2003) Wolf conservation and recovery. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 317–340Google Scholar
  10. Boitani L, Ciucci P, Raganella-Pelliccioni E (2011) Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation? Wildl Res 37:722–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen-Jones E, Entwistle A (2002) Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx 36:189–195. doi: 10.1017/S0030605302000261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braschi C, Boitani L (2013) Risultati delle analisi genetiche. Relazione Finale, Azione A3 – Caratterizzazione genetica e morfologica degli ibridi. LIFE10NAT/IT/265 IBRIWOLF. http://www.ibriwolf.it/it/file/256/. Accessed on 4 April 2015 [in Italian]
  13. Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Greco C et al (2010) Forensic DNA against wildlife poaching: identification of a serial wolf killing in Italy. Forensic Sci Int 4:334–338. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Cubaynes S et al (2012) An improved procedure to estimate wolf abundance using non-invasive genetic sampling and capture-recapture mixture models. Conserv Genet 13:53–64. doi: 10.1007/s10592-011-0266-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Greco C et al (2013) Black coats in an admixed wolf × dog pack: is melanism an indicator of hybridization in wolves? Eur J Wildl Res 59:543–555. doi: 10.1007/s10344-013-0703-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Galaverni M et al (2014) Noninvasive sampling and genetic variability, pack structure, and dynamics in an expanding wolf population. J Mammal 95:41–59. doi: 10.1644/13-MAMM-A-039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Capitani C, Bertelli I, Varuzza P (2004) A comparative analysis of wolf (Canis lupus) diet in three different Italian ecosystems. Mamm Biol 69:1–10Google Scholar
  18. Chapron G, Kaczensky P, Linnell JDC et al (2014) Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346:1517–1519. doi: 10.1126/science.1257553 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ciucci P, Boitani L (1998) Il Lupo, elementi di biologia, gestione, ricerca. Documenti tecnici 23. Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, Ozzano dell’Emilia, Italy [in Italian]Google Scholar
  20. Ciucci P, Boitani L (2004) Progetto per la ricerca e conservazione del lupo (Canis lupus) nel Parco Nazionale del Pollino. Relazione finale delle attività di ricerca (1999–2003). Parco Nazionale del Pollino, Italy [in Italian]Google Scholar
  21. Ciucci, Boitani (2009) Conservation of large carnivores in Abruzzo: a research project integrating Species, Habitat and Human Dimension. Annual report 2009Google Scholar
  22. Ciucci P, Chapron G, Guberti V (2007) Estimation of mortality parameters from (biased) samples at death: are we getting the basics right in wildlife field studies? A response to Lovari et al. J Zool 273:125–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00379.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ciucci P, Reggioni W, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2009) Long-distance dispersal of a rescued wolf from the Northern Apennines to the Western Alps. J Wildl Manag 73:1300–1306. doi: 10.2193/2008-510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Convivere con il lupo: conoscere per preservare (2014) Il sistema dei Parchi nazionali dell’Appennino meridionale per lo sviluppo di misure coordinate di protezione per il lupo. Final report [in Italian]Google Scholar
  25. Corsi F, Duprè E, Boitani L (1999) A large‐scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning. Conserv Biol 13:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Creel S, Spong G, Sands JL et al (2003) Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes. Mol Ecol 12:2003–2009. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01868.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ebert C, Knauer F, Storch I, Hohmann U (2010) Individual heterogeneity as a pitfall in population estimates based on non-invasive genetic sampling: a review and recommendations. Wildl Biol 16:225–240. doi: 10.2981/09-108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fabbri E, Miquel C, Lucchini V et al (2007) From the Apennines to the Alps: colonization genetics of the naturally expanding Italian wolf (Canis lupus) population. Mol Ecol 16:1661–1671. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03262.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fabbri E, Caniglia R, Kusak J et al (2014) Genetic structure of expanding wolf (Canis lupus) populations in Italy and Croatia, and the early steps of the recolonization of the Eastern Alps. Mamm Biol 79:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2013.10.002 Google Scholar
  31. Fabrizio M (2010) In: Fabrizio M, D’Amico S, Lucci V (eds). Proceedings of the conference “Bentornato lupo: convegno sul lupo appenninico”. 23 agosto 2008—Pettorano sul Gizio (AQ). I quaderni del Centro Studi per le Reti Ecologiche. Volume 2, 36 pp [in Italian]Google Scholar
  32. Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Tempio G, Boitani L, Ciucci P (2013) Modeling the potential distribution for a range-expanding species: wolf recolonization of the Alpine range. Biol Conserv 158:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Genovesi P (2002) Piano d’azione nazionale per la conservazione del Lupo (Canis lupus). Quad Cons Nat 13, Min. Ambiente—INFS, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy [in Italian]Google Scholar
  34. Genovesi P, Angelini P, Bianchi E, Dupré E, Ercole S, Giacanelli V, Ronchi F, Stoch F (2014). Specie e habitat di interesse comunitario in Italia: distribuzione, stato di conservazione e trend. Serie Rapporti 194/2014, ISPRA [in Italian]Google Scholar
  35. Gervasi V, Brøseth H, Gimenez O et al (2014) The risks of learning: confounding detection and demographic trend when using count-based indices for population monitoring. Ecol Evol 4:4637–4648. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1258 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giacchini P (2012) Il lupo nella Regione Marche. Relazione 2012. Regione Marche [in Italian]Google Scholar
  37. Glikman JA, Vaske JJ, Bath AJ et al (2012) Residents’ support for wolf and bear conservation: the moderating influence of knowledge. Eur J Wildl Res 58:295–302. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0579-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Groff et al. [a cura di] (2013) Rapporto Orso 2012 del Servizio Foreste e fauna della Provincia Autonoma di Trento. http://www.orso.provincia.tn.it/binary/pat_orso/rapporto_orso/Rapporto_Orso_2012.1362642771.pdf. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  39. Hayes RD, Harestad AS (2000) Demography of a recovering wolf population in the Yukon. Can J Zool 78:36–48. doi: 10.1139/cjz-78-1-36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ISPRA data; Canis database, update 2014Google Scholar
  41. Kaczensky P, Chapron G, Von Arx M et al (2013) Status, management and distribution of large carnivores—bear, lynx, wolf & wolverine—in Europe. Report to the EU Commission, 272. http://www.lcie.org/Publications.aspx. Accessed on 2 April 2015
  42. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2003) Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med 96:118–121. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kohn MH, York EC, Kamradt DA et al (1999) Estimating population size by genotyping faeces. Proc Biol Sci 266:657–663. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0686 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liberg O, Aronson Å, Sand H et al (2012a) Monitoring of wolves in Scandinavia. Hystrix 23:29–34. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-23.1-4670 Google Scholar
  45. Liberg O, Chapron G, Wabakken P et al (2012b) Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:910–915. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. LIFE 07NAT/IT/000502 – EX-TRA (2013) Final Report. http://www.lifextra.it/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=189&Itemid=30&lang=it. Accessed on 2 April 2015
  47. Linnell JDC, Boitani L (2011) Building biological realism into wolf management policy: the development of the population approach in Europe. Hystrix 23:80–91Google Scholar
  48. Lovari S, Sforzi A, Scala C, Fico R (2007) Mortality parameters of the wolf in Italy: does the wolf keep himself from the door? J Zool 272:117–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00260.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lucchini V, Galov A, Randi E (2004) Evidence of genetic distinction and long-term population decline in wolves (Canis lupus) in the Italian Apennines. Mol Ecol 13:523–536. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02077.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luikart G, Ryman N, Tallmon DA et al (2010) Estimation of census and effective population sizes: the increasing usefulness of DNA-based approaches. Conserv Genet 11:355–373. doi: 10.1007/s10592-010-0050-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marucco F, Avanzinelli E (2011) Stato, distribuzione e dimensione della popolazione di lupo in regione Piemonte. Rapporto Progetto Lupo Regione Piemonte 1999-2010 - Aggiornamento inverno 2010-2011. Regione Piemonte [in Italian]Google Scholar
  52. Marucco F, Boitani L (2012) Wolf population monitoring and livestock depredation preventive measures in Europe. Hystrix 23:1–4. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-23.1-6364 Google Scholar
  53. Marucco F, McIntire EJB (2010) Predicting spatio-temporal recolonization of large carnivore populations and livestock depredation risk: wolves in the Italian Alps. J Appl Ecol 47:789–798. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01831.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marucco F, Avanzinelli E, Colombo M (2012) Il Monitoraggio del lupo in regione Piemonte I dati raccolti nell’inverno 2011–2012. Regione Piemonte [in Italian]Google Scholar
  55. Marucco F, Boitani L, Pletscher DH, Schwartz MK (2010) Bridging the gaps between non-invasive genetic sampling and population parameter estimation. Eur J Wildl Res 57:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10344-010-0477-7
  56. Marucco F, Pletscher DH, Boitani L et al (2009) Wolf survival and population trend using non-invasive capture-recapture techniques in the Western Alps. J Appl Ecol 46:1003–1010. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01696.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mattioli L, Capitani C, Gazzola A, Scandura M, Apollonio M (2011) Prey selection and dietary response by wolves in a high-density multi-species ungulate community. Eur J Wildl Res 57:909–922. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0503-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mattioli L, Forconi P, Berzi D, Perco F (2014) Wolf population estimate in Italy and monitoring perspectives.http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/article/download/10096/pdf_10096. Accessed 4 Apr 2015 [in Italian]
  59. Meriggi et al. (2011) Monitoraggio delle popolazioni di grandi carnivori nel parco delle Orobie bergamasche. Final report [in Italian]Google Scholar
  60. Meriggi et al. (2012) Distribuzione, consistenza ed impatto del lupo in Liguria. Strategia di convivenza e gestione dei conflitti [in Italian]Google Scholar
  61. Morini P (2010) In: Fabrizio M, D’Amico S, Lucci V (eds). Proceedings of the conference “Bentornato lupo: convegno sul lupo appenninico”. 23 agosto 2008—Pettorano sul Gizio (AQ). I quaderni del Centro Studi per le Reti Ecologiche. Volume 2, 36 pp [in Italian]Google Scholar
  62. Parco Naturale Regionale dei Monti Simbruini (2012) Monitoraggio e gestione del lupo nella Provincia di Roma. Final report [in Italian]Google Scholar
  63. Parco Regionale della Lessinia - CFS Veneto (2014) Online report. http://www.corpoforestale.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/9731. Accessed on 4 April 2015
  64. Randi E (2011) Genetics and conservation of wolves Canis lupus in Europe. Mamm Rev 41:99–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00176.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Randi E, Hulva P, Fabbri E et al (2014) Multilocus detection of wolf x dog hybridization in Italy, and guidelines for marker selection. PLoS One 9:e86409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086409 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Regione Basilicata, Dipartimento Ambiente, Territorio e Politiche della Sostenibilità, Ufficio Tutela della Natura—31 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites. http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  67. Regione Calabria, Dipartimento Politiche dell’Ambiente—59 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites. http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  68. Regione Campania, Assessorato all’Ecologia e alla Tutela dell’Ambiente, AGC 05, Settore Ecologia—23 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites. http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  69. Regione Lazio Direzione Ambiente—36 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites. http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  70. Regione Molise Direzione Generale VI Servizio Conservazione della Natura—20 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites. http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  71. Regione Puglia, Assessorato alla Qualità del Territorio, Settore Ecologia, Ufficio Parchi e Riserve Naturali—3 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  72. Regione Umbria, Direzione Agricoltura e Foreste, servizio XI—69 Standard Data Forms for Natura 2000 sites http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/. Accessed on 1 November 2014
  73. Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2012) Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction. Biol Conserv 145:205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL et al (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scandura M, Iacolina L, Capitani C et al (2011) Fine-scale genetic structure suggests low levels of short-range gene flow in a wolf population of the Italian Apennines. Eur J Wildl Res 57:949–958. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0509-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Servizio scientifico Parco Nazionale Gran Paradiso (2013) Relazione annuale di servizio. Piano performance 2013. Servizio sanitario e della ricerca scientifica. PNGP, 2013, Arch. PNGP [in Italian]Google Scholar
  77. Solberg K, Bellemain E, Drageset O et al (2006) An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size. Biol Conserv 128:158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor BL, Dizon AE (1999) First policy then science: why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Mol Ecol 8:S11–S16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ufficio Caccia e Pesca—Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano (2012) Online document. http://www.provincia.bz.it/foreste/fauna-caccia/2875.asp. Accessed on 4 April 2015
  80. Wilson GJ, Frantz AC, Pope LC et al (2003) Estimation of badger abundance using faecal DNA typing. J Appl Ecol 40:658–666. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00835.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woods JG, Paetkau D, Lewis D, McLellan BN, Proctor M, Strobeck C (1999) Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears. Wildl Soc Bull 27:616–627Google Scholar
  82. Zimen E, Boitani L (1975) Number and distribution of wolves in Italy. Z fur Saugetierkunde 40:102–112Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Galaverni
    • 1
  • Romolo Caniglia
    • 1
  • Elena Fabbri
    • 1
  • Pietro Milanesi
    • 1
  • Ettore Randi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratorio di GeneticaIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA)Ozzano dell’EmiliaItaly
  2. 2.Department 18/ Section of Environmental EngineeringAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations