Advertisement

Acta Theriologica

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 443–448 | Cite as

Geographical variation of antler morphology of moose (Alces alces) in Russia

  • Viacheslav Vasiljevich Kolesnikov
  • Ivan Stanislavovich Kozlovskii
Original Paper

Abstract

We attempt to identify geographical subdivisions within the range of moose according to antler size for a more correct trophy evaluation in the СIC system (The International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation). Traditionally, this division coincides with subspecific division of trophy animal species. That is why we partially touch upon the problem of the geography of moose subspecies in Eurasia. Catalogs of hunters’ trophies that were available to us served as the research material (1,047 trophies in total). We were choosing the same measurements for moose antlers evaluated by different methods. They are overall spread, circumference of beam, width of palm, and number of tines. We applied multivariate statistic methods to the findings, enlarging the geographical division groups step by step. As a result, we suggest four geographical groups: European, Siberian, the north of the Far East, and the south of the Far East. In principle, this division corresponds to the subspecies: European (Alces alces alces L., 1758), east Siberian (A. a. pfizenmayeri Zukowsky, 1910), Chukotka or Kolyma (A. a. buturlini Chernyavski et. Zhelesnov, 1982), and Ussuri (А. а. cameloides Milne-Edwards, 1867). We consider it incorrect to draw the line between the European and Siberian groups along the river Yenisei. It is more correct to move it to the Urals.

Keywords

Antler size Geographical variation Phenotypic variation 

References

  1. Bowyer RT, Stewart KM, Pierce BM, Hundertmark KJ, Gasaway WC (2002) Geographical variation in antler morphology of Alaskan moose: putative effects of habitat and genetics. Alces 38:155–165Google Scholar
  2. Danilkin AA (2010) Biological basis of the hunting trophy case. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., Moscow (In Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Groves D, Grubb P (2011) Ungulate taxonomy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  4. International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation (1986a) Medal categories for the game animals of the world. Nicolas Franco-Strips Editores, S. A, MadridGoogle Scholar
  5. International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation (1986b) The game-trophies of the world. International formula for the measurement and evaluation of trophies. Nicolas Franco-Strips Editores, S. A, MadridGoogle Scholar
  6. Kozlovskii IS, Kolesnikov VV (2010) Polozhenie ob ohotnich’ih trofejah v Rossijskoj Federacii. M. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Landete-Castillejos T, Gomez S, Gallego L, Garcia A, Ceacero F (2012) From diagnosing and monitoring deer populations to explaining human osteoporosis: research in composition, mechanics and histology of antlers. Recent problems of nature use, game biology and fur farming: Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Russian Research Institute of Game Management and Fur Farming (May 22–25, 2012)/VNIIOZ, RAAS, KirovGoogle Scholar
  8. Odum E. 1975. Fundamentals of Ecology. Mir Publishers, Moscow, p 740. (In Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Pavlinov IJ (2006) Sistematika sovremennyh mlekopitajushhih. - M.:Izd-vo MGU (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Peterson RL (1952) A review of the living representatives of the genus Alces. Contrib Roy Ont Mus Zool Palaeontol (Toronto) 34:1–30Google Scholar
  11. Saether B-E, Haagenrud H (1985) Geographical variation in the antlers of Norwegian moose in relation to age and size. J Wildl Manag 49:983–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Gasaway WC (2000) Antler size relative to body mass in moose: tradeoffs associated with reproduction. Alces 36:77–83Google Scholar
  13. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2003) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viacheslav Vasiljevich Kolesnikov
    • 1
  • Ivan Stanislavovich Kozlovskii
    • 1
  1. 1.State Scientific Institution, Prof. B. M. Zhitkov Russian Research Institute of Game Management and Fur FarmingRussian Agriculture Academy of SciencesKirovRussia

Personalised recommendations