Advertisement

Acta Theriologica

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 223–231 | Cite as

Genetic structuring of northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) at multiple spatial scales

  • Joshua B. JohnsonEmail author
  • James H. Roberts
  • Timothy L. King
  • John W. Edwards
  • W. Mark Ford
  • David A. Ray
Original Paper

Abstract

Although groups of bats may be genetically distinguishable at large spatial scales, the effects of forest disturbances, particularly permanent land use conversions on fine-scale population structure and gene flow of summer aggregations of philopatric bat species are less clear. We genotyped and analyzed variation at 10 nuclear DNA microsatellite markers in 182 individuals of the forest-dwelling northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) at multiple spatial scales, from within first-order watersheds scaling up to larger regional areas in West Virginia and New York. Our results indicate that groups of northern myotis were genetically indistinguishable at any spatial scale we considered, and the collective population maintained high genetic diversity. It is likely that the ability to migrate, exploit small forest patches, and use networks of mating sites located throughout the Appalachian Mountains, Interior Highlands, and elsewhere in the hibernation range have allowed northern myotis to maintain high genetic diversity and gene flow regardless of forest disturbances at local and regional spatial scales. A consequence of maintaining high gene flow might be the potential to minimize genetic founder effects following population declines caused currently by the enzootic White-nose Syndrome.

Keywords

Microsatellite Myotis septentrionalis New York Northern myotis Population genetics West Virginia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Dobony, K. Cunningham, and field technicians for collecting wing punches at Fort Drum, New York. J. Rodrigue graciously provided field assistance at Fernow EF. M. Crockett, K. Sturm, and their staff at the Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge provided field assistance and access to the Refuge. We thank H. Pagan, N. Platt, J. Smith, and M. Thompson of West Virginia University, and M. Eackles, R. Johnson, B. Lubinski, M. Springmann, and Dr. J. Switzer at the USGS Leetown Science Center for assistance with lab procedures and data analysis. The USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Joint Venture Agreement 06-JV-11242300-140 provided primary funding for our study from the National Fire Plan to West Virginia University, Division of Forestry and Natural Resources. Funding for prescribed burning was provided by a grant from Florida Power and Light and BHE Environmental to the U.S. Forest Service Northern Research Station through Collection Agreement 06-CO-112331-034. We thank two anonymous reviewers for improving the quality of this manuscript.

References

  1. Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) (2007) Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J Mammal 88:809–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold BD (2007) Population structure and sex-biased dispersal in the forest dwelling vespertilionid bat, Myotis septentrionalis. Am Midl Nat 157:374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashley MV, Willson MF, Pergams ORW, O’Dowd DJ, Gende SM, Brown JS (2003) Evolutionarily enlightened management. Biol Conserv 111:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin JD, Jelks HL, Tate B, Johnson AR, Jordan F (2011) Population genetic structure and conservation genetics of threatened Okaloosa darters (Etheostoma okaloosae). Conserv Genet 12:981–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Behr M, Meteyer CU, Berlowski-Zier BM, Buckles EL et al (2009) Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Sci 323:227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burland TM, Worthington Wilmer J (2001) Seeing in the dark: molecular approaches to the study of bat populations. Biol Rev 76:389–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burland TM, Barratt EM, Beaumont MA, Racey PA (1999) Population genetic structure and gene flow in a gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Ser 266:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caceres MC, Barclay RMR (2000) Myotis septentrionalis. Mammal Species 634:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castella B, Ruedi M (2000) Characterization of highly variable microsatellite loci in the bat Myotis myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Mol Ecol 9:1000–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coltman DW (2008) Molecular ecological approaches to studying the evolutionary impact of selective harvesting in wildlife. Mol Ecol 17:221–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobony CA, Rainbolt RE (2008) American woodcock on Fort Drum Military Installation, New York. Northeast Nat 15:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin version 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinforma Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  13. Fenton MB (1969) Summer activity of Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) at hibernacula in Ontario and Quebec. Can J Zool 47:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleming TH, Eby P (2003) Ecology of bat migration. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp 156–208Google Scholar
  15. Frick WF, Pollock JF, Hicks AC, Langwig KE, Reynolds DS, Turner GG, Butchkoski CM et al (2010) An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Sci 329:679–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gompper ME, Gittleman JL, Wayne RK (1997) Genetic relatedness, coalitions and social behaviour of white-nosed coatis, Nasua narica. Anim Behav 53:781–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22(7):1–9Google Scholar
  18. Goudet J (2002) FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversity and fixation indices. http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm Accessed 3 January 2013
  19. Griffin DR (1945) Travels of banded cave bats. J Mammal 26:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henderson LE, Farrow LJ, Broders HG (2008) Intra-specific effects of forest loss on the distribution of the forest-dependent northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). Biol Conserv 141:1819–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson JB, Edwards JW, Ford WM, Gates JE (2009) Roost tree selection by northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) maternity colonies following prescribed fire in a Central Appalachian Mountains hardwood forest. For Ecol Manag 258:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson JB, Ford WM, Edwards JW (2012) Roost networks of northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) in a managed landscape. For Ecol Manag 266:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson JB, Gates JE, Ford WM (2008) Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural–urban gradient. Urban Ecosyst 11:227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerth G, Kiefer A, Trappmann C, Weishaar M (2003) High gene diversity at swarming sites suggest hot spots for gene flow in the endangered Bechstein's bat. Conserv Genet 4:491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerth G, Mayer F, Konig B (2000) Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) reveals that female Bechstein's bats live in closed societies. Mol Ecol 9:793–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kerth G, Mayer F, Petit E (2002a) Extreme sex-biased dispersal in the communally breeding nonmigratory Bechstein's bat (Myotis bechsteinii). Mol Ecol 11:1491–1498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerth G, Safi K, Konig B (2002b) Mean colony relatedness is a poor predictor of colony structure and female philopatry in the communally breeding Bechstein's bat (Myotis bechsteinii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kochenderfer JN, Adams MB, Miller GW, Helvey J D (2007) Factors affecting large peak flows on Appalachian watersheds: lessons from the Fernow Experimental Forest. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research Paper NRS-3, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurta A, Murray SW (2002) Philopatry and migration of banded Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) and effects of radio transmitters. J Mammal 83:585–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kurta TH, Murray SW, Miller DH (2002) Roost selection and movements across the summer landscape. In: Kurta A, Kennedy J (eds) The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, pp 118–129Google Scholar
  31. Li G, Hubert S, Bucklin K, Ribes V, Hedgecock D (2003) Characterization of 79 microsatellite DNA markers in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Mol Ecol Notes 3:228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Longmire JL, Maltbie M, Baker RJ (1997) Use of “lysis buffer” in DNA isolation and its implication for museum collections. Occas Pap Mus Texas Tech Univ 163:1–3Google Scholar
  33. Lowe A, Harris S, Ashton P (2004) Ecological genetics: design, analysis, and application. Blackwell, Malden, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  34. Madarish DM, Rodrigue JL, Adams MB (2002) Vascular flora and macroscopic fauna on the Fernow Experimental Forest. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report GTR-NE-291, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Menzel MA, Owen SF, Ford WM, Edwards JW, Wood PB, Chapman BR, Miller KV (2002) Roost tree selection by northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) maternity colonies in an industrial forest of the central Appalachian mountains. For Ecol Manag 155:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metheny JD, Kalcounis-Rueppell MC, Willis CKR, Kolar KA, Brigham RM (2008) Genetic relationships between roost-mates in a fission–fusion society of tree-roosting big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1043–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myers RF (1964) Ecology of three species of Myotine bats in the Ozark Plateau. Dissertation, University of MissouriGoogle Scholar
  38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genet 155:945–959Google Scholar
  39. R Development Core Team (RDCT) (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  40. Racey PA, Entwistle AC (2003) Conservation ecology of bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp 156–208Google Scholar
  41. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evol 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schuler TM (2004) Fifty years of partial harvesting in a mixed mesophytic forest: composition and productivity. Can J For Res 34:985–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P (2004) RepeatMasker Open v 3.0. http://www.repeatmasker.org Accessed 3 January 2013
  44. Thomas DW, Fenton MB, Barclay RMR (1979) Social behavior of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus, I. Mating behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trujillo RG, Amelon SK (2009) Development of microsatellite markers in Myotis sodalis and cross-species amplification in M. grisescens, M. leibii, M. lucifugus, and M. septentrionalis. Conserv Genet 10:1965–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2007) Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) draft recovery plan: first revision. USFWS, Region 3, Fort Snelling, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Veith M, Beer N, Kiefer A, Johannesen J, Seitz A (2004) The role of swarming sites for maintaining gene flow in the brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus). Hered 93:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vonhof MJ, Strobeck C, Fenton MB (2008) Genetic variation and population structure in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus): is female dispersal important? J Mammal 89:1411–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Worthington Wilmer J, Moritz C, Hall L, Toop J (1994) Extreme population structuring in the threatened ghost bat, Macroderma gigas: evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Ser 257:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua B. Johnson
    • 1
    • 7
    Email author
  • James H. Roberts
    • 2
  • Timothy L. King
    • 3
  • John W. Edwards
    • 1
  • W. Mark Ford
    • 4
  • David A. Ray
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of Forestry and Natural ResourcesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Fish and Wildlife ConservationVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyLeetown Science Center-Aquatic Ecology BranchKearneysvilleUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Geological Survey Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife ConservationVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  6. 6.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  7. 7.Pennsylvania Game CommissionHarrisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations