Acta Theriologica

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 257–262 | Cite as

Prey refuges as predator hotspots: ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) attraction to agouti (Dasyprocta punctata) dens

  • Willem-Jan Emsens
  • Ben T. Hirsch
  • Roland Kays
  • Patrick A. Jansen
Original Paper

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that prey refuges attract predators, leading to elevated predator activity in the vicinity of refuges. We used camera traps to determine whether the spatial activity of a predator, the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis), was biased toward refuge locations of its principal prey, the agouti (Dasyprocta punctata). We radio-tracked agoutis at night to locate active refuges and compared the activity of ocelots between these refuges and surrounding control grid locations. We found that ocelots visited the area near agouti refuges significantly more often and for longer periods of time than control locations, and that they actively investigated the refuge entrances. Both occupied and unoccupied refuges were visited, but the duration of inspection was longer at occupied refuges. As the ocelots could probably not see the agoutis within the refuges, olfaction likely cued foraging ocelots. Two refuges were repeatedly visited by the same ocelots on different days, suggesting spatial memory. Overall, our results suggest that predators can be attracted to prey refuges or refuging prey. The benefits to prey of staying nearby a refuge would thus be counterbalanced by higher likelihoods of predator encounter. This should stimulate prey to use multiple refuges alternatingly and to not enter or exit refuges at times of high predator activity.

Keywords

Agouti Behavior Movement Ocelot Predation Refuge 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MPG 58898 kb)

References

  1. Aliaga-Rossel E, Moreno RS, Kays R, Giacalone J (2006) Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) predation on agouti (Dasyprocta punctata). Biotropica 38:691–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks PB, Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (2000) Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility. P Roy Soc Lond B 267:1621–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumstein DT (1998) Quantifying predation risk for refuging animals: a case study with golden marmots. Ethology 104:501–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camp MJ, Rachlow JL, Woods BA, Johnson TR, Shipley LA (2012) When to run and when to hide: the influence of concealment, visibility, and proximity to refugia on perceptions of risk. Ethology 118:1010–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowlishaw G (1994) Vulnerability to predation in baboon populations. Behaviour 131:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig CL, Freeman CR (1991) Effects of predator visibility on prey encounter: a case study on aerial web weaving spiders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day RT, Elwood RW (1999) Sleeping site selection by the golden-handed tamarin Saguinus midas midas: the role of predation risk, proximity to feeding sites, and territorial defence. Ethology 105:1035–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillon A, Kelly M (2008) Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping. J Zool 275:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emmons LH (1988) A field-study of ocelots (Felis pardalis) in Peru. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 43:133–157Google Scholar
  11. Emsens W-J, Suselbeek L, Hirsch BT, Kays R, Winkelhagen AJS, Jansen PA (2013) Effects of food availability on space and refuge use by a neotropical scatter-hoarding rodent. Biotropica 45:88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hammond JI, Luttbeg B, Sih A (2007) Predator and prey space use: dragonflies and tadpoles in an interactive game. Ecology 88:1525–1535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Silver SC, Ostro LET, Doncaster CP (2011) Jaguar and puma activity patterns in relation to their main prey. Mamm Biol 76:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heymann EW (1995) Sleeping habits of tamarins, Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis (Mammalia, Primates, Callitrichidae), in North-Eastern Peru. J Zool 237:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes NK, Price CJ, Banks PB (2010) Predators are attracted to the olfactory signals of prey. PLoS One 5:e13114PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kays R, Tilak S, Kranstauber B, Jansen PA, Carbone C, Rowcliffe M, Fountain T, Eggert J, He Z (2011) Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Wireless Sensor Networks 1:19–29Google Scholar
  17. Kramer DL, Bonenfant M (1997) Direction of predator approach and the decision to flee to a refuge. Anim Behav 54:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lambert TD, Kays RW, Jansen PA, Aliaga-Rossel E, Wikelski M (2009) Nocturnal activity by the primarily diurnal Central American agouti (Dasyprocta punctata) in relation to environmental conditions, resource abundance and predation risk. J Trop Ecol 25:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leigh EG (1999) Tropical forest ecology: a view from Barro Colorado Island. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Maffei L, Noss AJ, Cuellar E, Rumiz DI (2005) Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping. J Trop Ecol 21:349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moreno RS, Kays RW, Samudio R (2006) Competitive release in diets of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and puma (Puma concolor) after jaguar (Panthera onca) decline. J Mammal 87:808–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peinke DM, Brown CR (2005) Burrow utilization by springhares (Pedetes capensis) in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr Zool 40:37–44Google Scholar
  23. Phillips ML, Clark WR, Nusser SM, Sovada MA, Greenwood RJ (2004) Analysis of predator movement in prairie landscapes with contrasting grassland composition. J Mammal 85:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodriguez-Duran A (1996) Foraging ecology of the Puerto Rican boa (Epicrates inornatus): Bat predation, carrion feeding, and piracy. J Herpetol 30:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roth TC, Lima SL (2007) Use of prey hotspots by an avian predator: purposeful unpredictability? Am Nat 169:264–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sih A (1984) The behavioral-response race between predator and prey. Am Nat 123:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smythe N (1978) The natural history of the Central American agouti (Dasyprocta punctata). Smithson Contr Zool 257:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sonerud GA, Fjeld PE (1987) Long-term memory in egg predators—an experiment with a hooded crow. Ornis Scand 18:323–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stephens D, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  30. Sunquist M, Sunquist F (2002) Wild cats of the world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner DC, Patrick P, Bateson B (2000) The domestic cat: the biology of its behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Ylonen H, Sundell J, Tiilikainen R, Eccard JA, Horne T (2003) Weasels' (Mustela nivalis nivalis) preference for olfactory cues of the vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Ecology 84:1447–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem-Jan Emsens
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 7
  • Ben T. Hirsch
    • 1
    • 4
  • Roland Kays
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • Patrick A. Jansen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI)BalboaPanama
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Ecosystem Management Research GroupUniversity of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium
  4. 4.School of Environment and Natural ResourcesOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  5. 5.North Carolina Museum of Natural SciencesRaleighUSA
  6. 6.Program of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation BiologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  7. 7.Antwerp UniversityWilrijk AntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations