Acta Theriologica

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 157–168 | Cite as

Lessons from the use of non-invasive genetic sampling as a way to estimate Eurasian otter population size and sex ratio

Original Paper

Abstract

Given the difficulties in establishing population parameters of elusive animals in the wild by traditional methods, such as trapping, much attention has been given in recent years to non-invasive genetic sampling. Our work compared estimates of population size and sex ratio derived from genetic sampling with the known number and sex of animals released during an otter reintroduction and reports on the pitfalls and opportunities that may be encountered in studies of this kind. This study makes use of 121 samples of otter spraints (faeces) collected over 7 months during a reintroduction in the Upper Thames (UK) where a total of 17 otters was released in two consecutive phases. Spraints were processed with a multiple tubes approach and seven microsatellites were used. Of all collected samples, 19 % were complete for at least five loci, the minimum required for discrimination between individuals. Six out of nine of the otters that were released in the first phase were detected, four males and two females, while none of the otters released in the second phase was detected probably due to a combination of sampling pitfalls and otter behaviour. In particular, the specific sex (mostly females) and dominance composition (lower) of the individuals in the second release group may explain our failure to detect individuals in this group. Taken together, our results add further evidence that genetic sampling approaches represent a potentially accurate and non-invasive route to census populations of otters but that the sampling design should take into account factors like the sex ratio and dominance composition of the population in order to maximise detection and minimise error.

Keywords

Non-invasive genetic sampling Lutra lutra Scent marking Population size Sex ratio Monitoring Reintroduction 

References

  1. Arrendal J, Walker CW, Sundqvist AK, Hellborg L, Vila C (2004) Genetic evaluation of an otter translocation program. Conserv Genet 5:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrendal J, Vilà C, Björklund M (2007) Reliability of noninvasive genetic census of otters compared to field censuses. Conserv Genet 8:1097–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonesi L, Macdonald DW (2004) Impact of released Eurasian otters on a population of American mink: a test using an experimental approach. Oikos 106:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broquet T, Petit E (2004) Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics. Mol Ecol 13:3601–3608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broquet T, Menard N, Petit E (2007) Noninvasive population genetics: a review of sample source, diet, fragment length and microsatellite motif effects on amplification success and genotyping error rates. Conserv Genet 8:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchan JC, Archie EA, van Horn RC, Moss CJ, Albert SC (2005) Locus effects and sources of error in noninvasive genotyping. Mol Ecol Notes 5:680–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coxon K E, Chanin P, Dallas J F, Sykes T (1999) The use of DNA fingerprinting to study the population dynamics of otters (Lutra lutra) in Southern Britain: a feasibility study. R&D Technical Report W202, Environment Agency, BristolGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawford A (2003) Fourth otter survey of England 2000–2002. Environment Agency, Bristol. p. 88Google Scholar
  9. Creel S, Spong G, Sands JL, Rotella J, Zeigle J, Joe L, Murphy KM, Smith D (2003) Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes. Mol Ecol 12:2003–2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dallas JF, Piertney SB (1998) Microsatellite primers for the Eurasian otter. Mol Ecol 7:1247–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dallas JF, Bacon PJ, Carss DN, Conroy JWH, Green R, Jefferies DJ, Kruuk H, Marshall F, Piertney SB, Racey PA (1999) Genetic diversity in the Eurasian otter, Lutra lutra, in Scotland. Evidence from microsatellite polymorphism. Biol J Linn Soc 68:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dallas JF, Carss DN, Marshall F et al (2000) Sex identification of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra by PCR typing of spraints. Conserv Genet 1:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dallas JF, Coxon KE, Sykes T, Chanin PRF, Marshall F, Carss DN, Bacon PJ, Piertney SB, Racey PA (2003) Similar estimates of population genetic composition and sex ratio derived from carcasses and faeces of Eurasian otter Lutra lutra. Mol Ecol 12:275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrando A, Lecis R, Domingo-Roura X, Ponsà M (2008) Genetic diversity and individual identification of reintroduced otters (Lutra lutra) in north-eastern Spain by DNA genotyping of spraints. Conserv Genet 9:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frantz AC, Pope LC, Carpenter PJ, Roper TJ, Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ, Burke T (2003) Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA. Mol Ecol 12:1649–1661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Georgiev D G (2008) Seasonality in marking activity of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Southern Bulgaria. In: Proceedings of the Anniversary Scientific Conference of Ecology Plovdiv. pp 236–240. Available from http://web.uni-plovdiv.bg/ecology/files/ASCE2008/236-240_Georgiev_%282008%29_ASCE.pdf.
  17. Gerloff U, Scholötterer C, Rassmann C, Tautz D (1995) Amplification of hypervariable simple sequence repeats (microsatellites) from excremental DNA of wild living bonobos (Pan paniscus). Mol Ecol 4:515–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hájková P, Zemanová B, Bryja J, Hájek B, Roche K, Tkadlec E, Zima J (2006) Factors affecting success of PCR amplification of microsatellite loci from otter faeces. Mol Ecol Notes 6:559–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hájková P, Pertoldi C, Zemanová B, Roche K, Hájek B, Bryja J, Zima J (2007) Genetic structure and evidence for recent population decline in Eurasian otter populations in the Czech and Slovak Republics: implications for conservation. J Zool (Lond) 272:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hájková P, Zemanová B, Roche K, Hájek B (2009) An evaluation of field and noninvasive genetic methods for estimating Eurasian otter population size. Conserv Genet 10:1667–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen H, Ben-David M, McDonald DB (2008) Effects of genotyping protocols on success and errors in identifying individual river otters (Lontra canadensis) from their faeces. Mol Ecol Resour 8:282–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang CC, Hsu YC, Lee LL, Li SH (2005) Isolation and characterization of tetramicrosatellite DNA markers in the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra). Mol Ecol Notes 5:314–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hung CM, Li SH, Lee LL (2004) Faecal DNA typing to determine the abundance and spatial organisation of otters (Lutra lutra) along two stream systems in Kinmen. Anim Conserv 7:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jansman HAH, Chanin PRF, Dallas JF (2001) Monitoring otter populations by DNA typing of spraints. IUCN Otter Specialist Group Bull 18:11–18Google Scholar
  25. Janssens X (2006) Monitoring and predicting elusive species colonisation. Application to the otter in the Cévennes National Park (France). Ph.D. thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.Google Scholar
  26. Janssens X, Fontaine FM, Michaux RJ, Libois R, de Kerbanon J, Defourny P, Baret PB (2008) Genetic pattern of the recent recovery of European otters in southern France. Ecography 31:176–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordan NR, Manser MB, Mwanguhya F, Kyabulima S, Rüedi P, Cant MA (2011) Scent marking in wild banded mongooses: 1. Sex-specific scents and overmarking. Anim Behav 81:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalz B, Jewgenow K, Fickel J (2006) Structure of an otter (Lutra lutra) population in Germany—results of DNA and hormone analyses from faecal samples. Mamm Biol 71:321–335Google Scholar
  29. Koelewijn HP, Pérez-Haro M, Jansman HAH, Boerwinkel MC, Bovenschen J, Lammertsma DR, Niewold FJJ, Kuiters AT (2010) The reintroduction of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) into the Netherlands: hidden life revealed by noninvasive genetic monitoring. Conserv Genet 11:601–614Google Scholar
  30. Kohn MH, York EC, Kamradt DA, Haugt G, Sauvajot RM, Wayne RK (1999) Estimating population size by genotyping faeces. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 266:657–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kranz A (2000) Otters (Lutra lutra) increasing in Central Europe: from the threat of extinction to locally perceived overpopulation? Mammalia 64:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kruuk H (1992) Scent marking by otters (Lutra lutra): signalling the use of resources. Behav Ecol 3:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kruuk H (2006) Otters: ecology, behaviour and conservation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Kruuk H, Conroy JWH, Glimmerveen U, Ouwerkrek EJ (1986) The use of spraints to survey populations of otters Lutra lutra. Biol Conserv 35:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kruuk H, Moorhouse A, Conroy JWH, Durbin L, Frears S (1989) An estimate of numbers and habitat preferences of otters Lutra lutra in Shetland, UK. Biol Conserv 49:241–245Google Scholar
  36. Kruuk H, Carss DN, Conroy JWH, Durbin L (1993) Otter (Lutra lutra) numbers and fish productivity in rivers in North-East Scotland. Symp Zool Soc Lond 65:171–191Google Scholar
  37. Lampa S, Gruber B, Henle K, Hoehn M (2008) An optimisation approach to increase DNA amplification success of otter faeces. Conserv Genet 9:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lanszki J, Hidas A, Szentes K, Révay T, Lehoczky I, Weiss S (2008) Relative spraint density and genetic structure of otter (Lutra lutra) along the Drava River in Hungary. Mamm Biol 73:40–47Google Scholar
  39. Lanszki J, Hidas A, Szentes K, Révay T, Lehoczky I, Jeney Z, Weiss S (2010) Genetic structure of otter (Lutra lutra) populations from two fishpond systems in Hungary. Mamm Biol 75:447–450Google Scholar
  40. Liu Q, Sommer SS (1998) Subcycling-PCR for multiplex long-distance amplification of regions with high and low GC content: application to the inversion hotspot in the factor VIII gene. BioTecniques 25:1022–1028Google Scholar
  41. Lucchini V, Fabbri E, Marucco F, Ricci S, Boitani L, Randi E (2002) Noninvasive molecular tracking of colonizing wolf (Canis lupus) packs in the western Italian Alps. Mol Ecol 11:857–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luikart G, Ryman N, Tallmon DA, Schwartz MK, Allendorf FW (2010) Estimation of census and effective population sizes: the increasing usefulness of DNA-based approaches. Conserv Genet 11:355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Macdonald S, Mason C (1987) Seasonal marking in an otter population. Acta Theriologica 32:449–461Google Scholar
  44. Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP (2005) A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark-recapture data. Mol Ecol 14:1991–2005, Accessed 2 July 2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mills LS, Citta JJ, Lair KP, Schwartz MK, Tallmon DA (2000) Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecol Appl 10:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mucci N, Arrendal J, Ansorge H, Bailey M, Bodner M, Delibes M, Ferrando A, Fournier P, Fournier C, Godoy JA, Hájková P, Hauer S, Heggberget TM, Heidecke D, Kirjavainen H, Krueger H-H, Kvaloy K, Lafontaine L, Lanszki J, Lemarchand C, Liukko U-M, Loeschcke V, Ludwig G, Madsen AB, Mercier L, Ozolins J, Paunovic M, Pertoldi C, Piriz A, Prigioni C, Santos-Reis M, Luis TS, Stjernberg T, Schmid H, Suchentrunk F, Teubner J, Tornberg R, Zinke O, Randi E (2010) Genetic diversity and landscape genetic structure of otter (Lutra lutra) populations in Europe. Conserv Genet 11:583–599Google Scholar
  47. Parsons KM, Dallas JF, Claridge DE, Durban JW, Balcomb KC, Thompson PM (1999) Amplifying dolphin mitochondrial DNA from faecal plumes. Mol Ecol 8:1766–1768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pertoldi C, Hansen MM, Loeschcke V, Madsen AB, Jacobsen L, Baagoe H (2001) Genetic consequences of population decline in the European otter (Lutra lutra): an assessment of microsatellite DNA variation in Danish otters from 1883 to 1993. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 268:1775–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Philcox CK, Grogan AL, Macdonald DW (1999) Patterns of otter Lutra lutra road mortality in Britain. J Appl Ecol 36:748–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prigioni C, Remonti L, Balestrieri A (2006a) Otter Lutra lutra movements assessed by genotyped spraints in southern Italy. Hystrix 17:91–96Google Scholar
  52. Prigioni C, Remonti L, Balestrieri A, Sgrosso S, Priore G, Mucci N, Randi E (2006b) Estimation of European otter (Lutra lutra) population size by fecal DNA typing in southern Italy. J Mammal 87:855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rostain RR, Ben-David M, Groves P, Randall JA (2004) Why do river otters scent-mark? An experimental test of several hypotheses. Anim Behav 68:703–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruiz-Olmo J (1995) Visual Eurasian otter census in fresh-waters: a new method. Habitat 11:125–130Google Scholar
  55. Ruiz-Olmo J, Delibes M, Zapata SC (1998) External morphometry, demography and mortality of the otter Lutra lutra (Linneo, 1758) in the Iberian Peninsula. Galemys 10:239–251Google Scholar
  56. Ruiz-Olmo J, Loy A, Cianfrani C, Yoxon P, Yoxon G, de Silva P K, Roos A, Bisther M, Hájková P, Zermanova B ( 2008) Lutra lutra. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2012.1. Available from www.iucnlist.org.
  57. Saavedra D (2002) Reintroduction of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Muga and Fluvia’ Basins (North-Eastern Spain): viability, development, monitoring and trends of the new populations. Departament de Ciènces Ambientals, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.Google Scholar
  58. Sjöåsen T (1997) Movements and establishment of reintroduced European otters Lutra lutra. J App Ecol 34:1070–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strachan R, Jefferies D (1996) Otter survey of England 1991–1994. Vincent Wildlife Trust, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goossens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N, Waits LP, Bouvet J (1996) Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3189–3194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taberlet P, Camarra JJ, Griffin S, Uhres E, Hanotte O, Waits LP, Dubois-Paganon C, Burke T, Bouvet J (1997) Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population. Mol Ecol 6:869–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379Google Scholar
  63. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson W, Wills D, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waits JL, Leberg PL (2000) Biases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging. Anim Conserv 3:191–199Google Scholar
  65. Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Bonesi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marie Hale
    • 2
  • David W. Macdonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordTubneyUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.c/o Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations