Advertisement

Acta Theriologica

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 245–250 | Cite as

Space use and resting site selection of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) living near villages and small towns in Southern Germany

  • Christof JankoEmail author
  • Wolfgang Schröder
  • Stefan Linke
  • Andreas König
Original Paper

Abstract

In 2005–2008, we radio-tracked 17 foxes in rural areas of Southern Germany. The mean home range size was 76.6 ha (95% MCP) or 138.9 ha (95% fixed kernel), and the built-up area formed an integral part of the home range. Home ranges of juvenile foxes were significantly smaller than home ranges of adult foxes. Gender-specific differences among adult foxes were not established. A minimum population density of 2.7 foxes per km2 and summer densities of up to 13.4 foxes per km2 were calculated. Therefore, the fox density was three to eight times higher than that of strictly rural foxes. Daytime resting sites of foxes were mostly found in forests (62.2%) and reedbed areas (20.6%). Of the resting sites, 14.8% were situated inside settlements, in fallow gardens or gardens of residents. During the day, foxes exhibited habitat preferences for forests and reedbed areas. A habitat structure that offers plenty of cover or dense vegetation is essential for its selection as a safe resting site. If this basic requirement is fulfilled, foxes also choose resting sites within settlements, and are not disturbed by human presence.

Keywords

Carnivore Home range Habitat selection Urban wildlife 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all collaborators, field helpers and the communities of Andechs, Herrsching and Seefeld. Special thanks to the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung for furthering this work with a personal scholarship. Additionally, we would like to thank several companies for financial contributions that enabled us to purchase telemetry equipment and collars.

References

  1. Adams CE, Lindsey KJ (2010) Urban wildlife management. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins CA, Stott P (1998) Home ranges, movements and habitat associations of red foxes Vulpes vulpes in suburban Toronto, Ontario. J Zool 244:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RF (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aitchison J (1982) The statistical analysis of compositional data. J R Stat Soc 44:139–177Google Scholar
  5. Ansorge H (1991) Die Ernährungsökologie des Rotfuchses, Vulpes vulpes, in der Oberlausitz während des Winterhalbjahres. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Görlitz 65:1–24Google Scholar
  6. Atwood TC, Weeks HP, Gehring TM (2004) Spatial ecology of coyotes along a suburban-to-rural gradient. J Wildl Manag 68:1000–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berghout M (2000) The ecology of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the central tablelands of New South Wales. Dissertation, University of CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavallini P, Lovari S (1994) Home range, habitat selection and activity of the red fox in a Mediterranean coastal ecotone. Acta Theriologica 39:279–287Google Scholar
  10. Contesse P, Hegglin D, Gloor S, Bontadina F, Deplazes P (2004) The diet of urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and the availability of anthrophogenic food in the city of Zürich, Switzerland. Mamm Biol 69:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies NB, Houston AI (1984) Territory economics. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 148–169Google Scholar
  12. Dekker J, Stein A, Heitkönig I (2001) A spatial analysis of a population of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in a Dutch coastal dune area. J Zool 255:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gloor S (2002) The rise of urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Switzerland and ecological and parasitological aspects of a fox population in the recently colonised city of Zürich. Dissertation, Universität ZürichGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris S (1977) The food of suburban foxes (Vulpes vulpes), with special reference to London. Mamm Rev 11:151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris S (1978) Age determination in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)—an evaluation of technique efficiency as applied to a sample of suburban foxes. J Zool 184:91–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris S (1980) Home range and patterns of distribution of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an urban area, as revealed by radio tracking. In: Amlaner CJ, Macdonald DW (eds) A handbook on biotelemetry and radiotracking. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 685–690Google Scholar
  17. Harris S (1981) The food of suburban foxes (Vulpes vulpes), with special reference to London. Mamm Rev 11:151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris S, Rayner JMV (1986) Urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations estimates and habitat requirements in several British cities. J Anim Ecol 55:575–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris S, Smith GC (1987) Demography of two urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations. J Appl Ecol 24:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forrde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woolard T, Wray S (1990) Home range analysis using radio-tracking data—a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mamm Rev 20:97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herr J, Schley L, Roper J (2009) Socio-spatial organization of urban stone martens. J Zool 277:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heydon MJ, Reynolds JC, Short MJ (2000) Variation in abundance of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) between three regions of rural Britain, in relation to landscape and other variables. J Zool 251:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janko C (2003) Habitatnutzung des Rotfuchses (Vulpes vulpes) in Dörfern und Kleinstädten. Diploma thesis, Universität HohenheimGoogle Scholar
  24. Janko C, König A (2011) Disappearance rate of praziquantel- containing baits around villages and small towns in southern Bavaria, Germany. J Wildlife Diseases 47:373–38Google Scholar
  25. Janko C, Börner K, König A, Schneider R (2011) Fang, Immobilisation und Besenderung von Rotfüchsen (Vulpes vulpes L.) - ein Erfahrungsbericht aus der Praxis. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung 36:265–275Google Scholar
  26. Kelt DA, Van Vuren DH (2001) The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am Nat 156:637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keuling O, Greiser G, Grauer A, Strauß E, Bartel-Steinbach M, Klein R, Wenzelides L, Winter A (2010) The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003–2007 in Germany. Eur J Wildl Res. doi: 10.1007/s10344-010-0403-z
  28. Kenward R (1987) Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kidawa D, Kowalczyk R (2011) The effects of sex, age, season and habitat on diet of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in northeastern, Poland. Acta Theriol 56:209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. König A (2005) Neue Untersuchungsergebnisse zur Ausbreitung des Kleinen Fuchsbandwurms (Echinococcus multilocularis) im Großraum München. In: Bayerische Akademie d. Wissenschaften (ed), Rundgespräche der Kommission für Ökologie, Band 29: Zur Ökologie von Infektionskrankheiten: Borreliose, FSME und Fuchsbandwurm. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, pp. 71–84Google Scholar
  31. König A (2008) Fears, attitudes and opinions of suburban residents with regards to their urban foxes. Eur J Wildl Res 54:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kowalczyk R, Zalewski A (2011) Adaption to cold and predation—shelter use by invasive raccoon dogs Nyctereutes procyonoides in Bialowieza primeval forest (Poland). Eur J Wildl Res 57:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krebs CJ (1985) Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Macdonald DW (1981) Resource dispersion and the social organization of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). In: Worldwide Furbearer Conference 2, pp. 918–949Google Scholar
  35. Macdonald DW (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marks CA, Bloomfield TE (2006) Home-range size and selection of natal den and diurnal shelter sites by urban red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Melbourne. Wildl Res 33:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (2001) Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohr CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am Midl Nat 37:223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poulle ML, Artois M, Roeder JJ (1994) Dynamics of spatial relationships among members of a fox group (Vulpes vulpes: Mammalia: Carnivora). J Zool 233:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prange S, Gehrt SD, Wiggers EP (2004) Influences of anthropogenic resources on raccoon (Procyon lotor) movements and spatial distribution. J Mammal 85:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reynolds JC, Tapper SC (1995) The ecology of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in relation to small game in rural southern England. Wildl Biol 1:105–119Google Scholar
  42. Riley SPD, Sauvajot RM, Fuller TK, York EC, Kamradt DA, Bromley C, Wayne RK (2002) Effects of urbanization and habitat fragmentation on bobcats and coyotes in Southern California. Conserv Biol 17:566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stiebling U (2000) Untersuchungen zur Habitatnutzung des Rotfuchses, Vulpes vulpes (L. 1758), in der Agrarlandschaft als Grundlage für die Entwicklung von Strategien des Natur- und Artenschutzes sowie der Tierseuchenbekämpfung. Dissertation, Humboldt- Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Thoma D (2008) Untersuchungen zum urbanen Übertragungszyklus von Echinococcus multilocularis. Dissertation, Universität HohenheimGoogle Scholar
  45. Trewhella WJ, Harris S, McAllister FE (1988) Dispersal distance, home-range size and population density in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes): a quantitative analysis. J Appl Ecol 25:423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vos A (1995) Population dynamics of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) after the disappearance of rabies in county Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany, 1987–1992. Ann Zool Fennici 32:93–97Google Scholar
  47. Weber JM, Meia JS (1996) Habitat use by the red fox Vulpes vulpes in a mountainous area. Ethol Ecol Evol 8:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White JG, Gubiani R, Smallman N, Snell K, Morton A (2006) Home range, habitat selection and diet of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in a semi-urban riparian environment. Wildl Res 33:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wiesner H (1998) Tierschutzrelevante Neuentwicklungen zur Optimierung der Distanzimmobilisation. Tierärztliche Praxis 26:225–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christof Janko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wolfgang Schröder
    • 1
  • Stefan Linke
    • 1
  • Andreas König
    • 1
  1. 1.Wildlife Biology and Management Unit, Animal Ecology, Center of Life Sciences WeihenstephanTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany

Personalised recommendations