Characterization of Electrospray Ionization (ESI) Parameters on In-ESI Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange of Carbohydrate-Metal Ion Adducts
- 620 Downloads
The conformations of glycans are crucial for their biological functions. In-electrospray ionization (ESI) hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) is a promising technique for studying carbohydrate conformations since rapidly exchanging functional groups, e.g., hydroxyls, can be labeled on the timeframe of ESI. However, regular application of in-ESI HDX to characterize carbohydrates requires further analysis of the in-ESI HDX methodology. For instance, in this method, HDX occurs concurrently to the analyte transitioning from solution to gas-phase ions. Therefore, there is a possibility of sampling both gas-phase and solution-phase conformations of the analyte. Herein, we differentiate in-ESI HDX of metal-adducted carbohydrates from gas-phase HDX and illustrate that this method analyzes solvated species. We also systematically examine the effects of ESI parameters, including spray solvent composition, auxiliary gas flow rate, sheath gas flow rate, sample infusion rate, sample concentration, and spray voltage, and discuss their effects on in-ESI HDX. Further, we model the structural changes of a trisaccharide, melezitose, and its intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding in solvents with different compositions of methanol and water. These molecular dynamic simulations support our experimental results and illustrate how an individual ESI parameter can alter the conformations we sample by in-ESI HDX. In total, this work illustrates how the fundamental processes of ESI alter the magnitude of HDX for carbohydrates and suggest parameters that should be considered and/or optimized prior to performing experiments with this in-ESI HDX technique.
KeywordsElectrospray ionization Hydrogen/deuterium exchange Mass spectrometry Carbohydrate Conformation
Glycans play important roles in many biological processes, such as cell-cell recognition , host-pathogen interactions , and disease progression [3, 4]. Currently, changes in glycosylation are used as biomarkers for detection of cancer [5, 6], liver disease , and other human disorders [8, 9]. Glycans are branched carbohydrates that result from multiple enzymatic reactions, yielding mixtures of heterogeneous structures containing stereoisomers, regioisomers, and different branching patterns . This structural diversity has made detailed characterization of glycans an important but challenging task. Currently, there are few methods for analyzing carbohydrate conformations, which are crucial for the biological functions of these molecules [11, 12, 13].
There are several techniques that are widely used to characterize the conformations of biological macromolecules, such as X-ray crystallography , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) [14, 15], ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) [16, 17], and hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) [18, 19, 20]. X-ray crystallography, which samples the lowest energy structures of molecules in a crystal lattice, has seen limited use in elucidating glycan structures due to the flexible glycosidic linkages, preventing glycans from crystalizing in repeating unit patterns . In comparison, IM-MS has seen increasing use in analyzing the averaged conformations of gas-phase glycans and carbohydrates [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26]. However, the gas-phase conformations of carbohydrates have been shown to contain different intramolecular hydrogen bonding compared to solvated carbohydrates, and thus, different three-dimensional conformations . HDX-MS and NMR are advantageous as they provide three-dimensional, dynamic conformations of biomolecules. However, a significant advantage of HDX-MS over current NMR approaches is the high sensitivity of MS, which allows for characterization of specific biomolecules in biologically relevant concentrations within complex mixtures . Additionally, in NMR, an average of all the solution-phase conformations is evaluated , whereas in HDX-MS, individual conformational states can be measured . Despite the advantages of HDX-MS, traditional, solution-phase HDX techniques are not applicable to carbohydrate analyses due to the rapid back exchange of deuterium labels on hydroxyls following reaction quenching in protic solvents .
HDX can also be performed in the gas-phase by introducing gaseous deuterating reagent into different regions in the mass spectrometer (e.g., the analyzer or trap) where deuterium-containing molecules exchange with gas-phase analyte ions [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. Because these reactions are performed under vacuum, back exchange does not occur. Gas-phase HDX has been applied to isomer differentiation of carbohydrates following collisional-induced activation and formation of oxonium ions . However, collisional activation increases the internal energy of the carbohydrate and can induce conformational changes, limiting the use of this method for characterizing the conformations of native carbohydrates and glycans.
HDX reactions can also be monitored by introducing deuterating reagent molecules to analytes during electrospray ionization (ESI) and/or ESI droplet evaporation, herein referred to as in-ESI HDX. In previous studies, D2O has been introduced into the source by adding D2O vapor through the sheath gas or nebulizing gas , introducing liquid D2O via a dual sprayer , or placing a droplet of D2O on a plate in the source that evaporates to form a D2O-saturated atmosphere . In-ESI HDX has also been considered advantageous as it can be carried out “on the fly” by coupling to LC systems . Since both the exchange reaction for hydroxyls and ESI droplet evaporation occurs on the microsecond to millisecond time scale , in-ESI HDX provides a suitable sampling window for analysis of these rapidly exchanging functional groups. Kostyukevich et al. have reported useful applications of in-ESI HDX, describing the effects of solvent and capillary desolvation temperature on carbohydrate conformations [43, 44]. Such in-ESI HDX approaches require little instrument modification, making this method simple to implement and compatible with many instrument platforms. However, to date, beyond these reported qualitative discussions on the influence of these parameters on in-ESI HDX, there has not been a comprehensive study on the impact of various experimental parameters on in-ESI HDX reactions of carbohydrates. Furthermore, when performing in-ESI HDX, Kostyukevich, et al. described the sampled carbohydrate structures as gas-phase conformations [43, 44], though more recent work by the Nikolaev and Kim groups suggest that in-ESI HDX occurs in solvent clusters [45, 46, 47]. Thus, further research should clarify the conformational state being sampled by these in-ESI HDX methods.
ESI is a complex process in which analyte molecules transition from solvated states to gas-phase ions and hence both gas- and solution-phase conformations could be sampled during in-ESI HDX. In general, the electrospray process begins when a potential difference exists between an analyte solution exiting a capillary and the MS source inlet, resulting in the formation of a Taylor cone and emission of charged droplets as a spray plume. As the droplets move toward the MS inlet, solvent evaporates, and the charge densities of the droplets increase. When the charge density on the droplet overcomes its surface tension, or at the Rayleigh limit, the droplet breaks into smaller, highly charged droplets. These processes of evaporation and droplet fission continue until highly charged nanodroplets form. Depending on the properties and sizes of molecules within these highly charged nanodroplets, ionization of analytes occurs by one of multiple presumed mechanisms . For instance, ionization of low molecular weight species, including protonated drugs and metabolites, can be described by the ion evaporation model (IEM) [48, 49, 50]. In IEM, solvated, charged analytes are released from nanodroplets as the droplet shape becomes distorted due to the opposing effects of coulombic repulsion (the droplet trying to push excess charge away) and ion solvation (the solvent pulling the ion back into the droplet) . These processes have been modeled by molecular dynamics and show that ejected ions are present in small clusters of solvent molecules .
Melezitose, sodium chloride (NaCl), and deuterated ammonia (ND3, 99 atom % D) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.96% purity) was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Tewksbury, MA). Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) was purchased from VWR International, Inc. (Radnor, PA). A hexapeptide (MFRYGG) was custom synthesized by Peptide 2.0, Inc. (Chantilly, VA). Potassium chloride (KCl) and all other materials were purchased from Fisher Scientific International, Inc. (Pittsburgh, PA). All chemicals were used without further purification. Nanopure water was acquired from a Purelab Flex 3 water purification system (Elga, Veolia Environment S. A., Paris, France).
Gas-Phase Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange
Carbohydrates ionize poorly in positive-ion mode ESI; thus, NaCl was added to carbohydrate samples to generate sodium-adduct ions. For gas-phase hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) experiments, solutions of melezitose and NaCl were prepared at a 2:1 M ratio in water. These samples were diluted in methanol (final solvent composition 99:1 (v/v) methanol:water) prior to ESI. Peptide (MFRYGG) was prepared in a solution of 49.95:49.95:0.1 (v/v/v) water:methanol:acetic acid at ~ 1 μM.
Gas-phase HDX-MS experiments were conducted on a modified Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) MS (formerly IonSpec Corp.—now a division of Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) equipped with an open-ended cylindrical Penning trap and a 9.4 T superconducting magnet (Cryomagnetics Inc., Oak Ridge, TN). An Analytica ESI source (Analytica of Branford Inc., Branford, CT) was utilized with an applied voltage of + 3 kV. For direct infusion of the sample, a Harvard PHD 2000 syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) was utilized at a flow rate of 5 μl/min. Following ionization and trapping, the sodiated-melezitose ion (m/z 527.1714) or protonated peptide ion (MFRYGG, m/z 730.3341) was isolated in the ICR cell using a two-step process (first: scanned isolation of a 0.750 m/z area within a 100 m/z window centered around the ion of interest; second: a stored waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT) ejection of the remaining ions outside the 100 m/z window of the first step). A high-speed pulse valve setup was used for ND3 (99 atom % D, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) introduction into the ICR cell. In short, a gas cylinder containing gaseous ND3 was used to charge an expansion volume to ~ 40 mTorr. A pulse valve (DC12 Miniature High Speed High Vacuum Dispense Valve; Parker Hannafin, Hollins, NH) was actuated by a high-voltage PWM signal generated from an Iota Drive (Parker Hannafin, Hollins, NH) at 100 Hz. This design allowed for easily adjustable and stable introduction of gas-phase deuterating reagents for reaction times in excess of 60 s. Gas pressures were recorded from readouts of a Granville-Phillips dual ion gauge controller (Helix Technology Corp., Longmont, CO) using series 274 Bayard-Alpert type ionization gauge tube outputs . Sodiated-melezitose was exposed to ND3 for 300 to 900 s at stable pressures ranging from ~ 10−8–10−7 Torr, while the hexapeptide was exposed to ND3 for 5 s at a pressure of ~ 10−8 Torr.
In-ESI Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange
Carbohydrates are most widely studied by MS as metal adducts; therefore, we analyzed sodiated, potassiated, and magnesiated metal-ion adducts for this study. Melezitose was combined with chloride salts of Mg2+, Na+, and K+ at a molar ratio of 2:1:1:1 in water. Samples were diluted into mixtures of methanol and water (containing final volumetric amounts of 1 to 100% water) with the final melezitose concentration varied from 62.5 to 500 μM while maintaining the same molar ratio to salts. Samples were infused at flow rates of 1 to 20 μl/min.
In-ESI HDX-MS experiments were conducted using an Ion Max source coupled to an Orbitrap Discovery MS (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). In-ESI HDX-MS experiments were performed by modifying a previously described protocol . Briefly, a 200-μl droplet of D2O was placed on an indentation (approximately 1.5 cm diameter) in a gold anodized aluminum plate. The plate was positioned approximately 3 cm below the spray needle and the droplet was approximately 2 cm from the ESI skimmer cone (see supplementary material, Fig. S1). Placing the droplet on the plate indentation allowed for reproducible positioning of the droplet for consecutive runs and ensured that the droplet was the same distance from the heated cone to generate reproducible D2O-saturated environments in the source. To ensure a consistent source environment for our analyses, we averaged spectra collected between 4.0 and 4.2 min, following positioning of the D2O droplet in the source and initiation of data acquisition, at which point, the D2O vapor concentration was consistent (see supplementary material, Fig. S2). Experiments utilized a desolvation capillary temperature of 300 °C (see supplementary material, Fig. S3). To characterize the effects of other source parameters on in-ESI HDX, the following electrospray parameters were individually modified; 0 to 1 arbitrary units for auxiliary gas (N2), 0 to 70 arbitrary units for sheath gas (N2), and + 2.5 to + 5.5 kV for ESI spray voltage. Details describing the source parameters for each experiment are provided in figure legends. After each sample run, the source was opened for 2 min to remove residual solvent vapors . Based on a hygrometer positioned near the MS instrument, the atmospheric humidity varied by approximately 5% throughout the course of a day.
Data Processing and Statistics
Unlike for the gas-phase HDX reactions, a single precursor ion could not be isolated for in-ESI HDX reactions. Hence, our calculations account for contributions from all naturally occurring carbon and oxygen isotopes. Equation (1) was employed to calculate weighted average masses (M values) of undeuterated and deuterated metal-adducted carbohydrates using experimental mass-to-charge values (m/z) and ion intensities (I).
As shown in Eq. (2), the average number of H/D exchanges for carbohydrate-metal adducts were determined by calculating the difference between the weighted average masses of deuterated (MDeuterated) and undeuterated (MUndeuterated) counterparts:
The number of H/D exchanges is presented as the average ± the standard deviation for a minimum of three replicates. Unless stated otherwise, reported data represents average values with error (and error bars) indicating standard deviation. All comparisons were made on data collected on the same day. Students’ t test at the 95% confidence interval was used for statistical analyses and group average comparisons.
The curve fitting application of MATLAB  (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA) was used to fit the distribution of peaks in the mass spectra following HDX. A custom code was used to visualize the component curves that fit the H/D exchange peak distributions. By fitting the data to one or more Gaussian distributions, the number of distinctive populations or conformations of the analyte present in the sample could be determined.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
We have performed a series of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the molecular conformations of melezitose under various solvation conditions at an atomic scale. All molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the GROMACS  program and the CHARMM36 all-atom forcefield  with parameters for carbohydrates. The optimized structures of melezitose and methanol were obtained from the ZINC 15 database . One melezitose molecule, 30 sodium ions, and 30 chloride ions were placed in a cubic box of 64 nm3 and solvated with explicit SPC/E water [56, 57] molecules. Four additional solvated systems were made by randomly populating the simulation box with sufficient methanol and water molecules to produce volumetric water compositions of 75, 50, 25, and 1%. Each melezitose-solvent system was modeled three times from independent configurations. Systems were first minimized using the steepest descent algorithm followed by temperature equilibration at 300 K. We then performed 1 ns isothermal-isobaric equilibrations using v-rescale thermostat  for temperature regulation and isotropic pressure coupling using a Parrinello-Rahman barostat [59, 60] at 1 atm. The systems were periodic in all dimensions and the verlet  cut-off scheme was employed with electrostatic and van der Waals cut-offs of 1.2 nm. Following all equilibrations, 30 ns production runs were performed. All systems were found to be stable within 2 ns of each production run. The equations of motion were integrated using the leapfrog algorithm with 1 fs time steps, and the LINCS  algorithm was used to constrain bonds.
Results and Discussion
Carbohydrate-Metal Adducts Do Not H/D Exchange in the Gas Phase
There are several factors that affect gas-phase HDX, including differences in the gas-phase basicities of the reactants and the mechanism of exchange [63, 64, 65, 66, 67]. If the gas-phase basicity difference between the deuterating reagent and the analyte is less than or equal to 85 kJ/mol, then proton and deuteron exchange can occur via an approximately thermoneutral reaction . The gas-phase basicity for melezitose (or its sodium-metal adduct) is unknown, but α-d-glucose has a known gas-phase basicity of 778.0 kJ/mol . ND3 has a gas-phase basicity of 853.5 kJ/mol . Thus, approximating the gas-phase basicity of melezitose to be similar to that of α-d-glucose, the difference in gas-phase basicities between melezitose and ND3 is 75.5 kJ/mol. For comparison, D2O has a gas-phase basicity of 696.6 kJ/mol . Thus, the difference in basicities between α-d-glucose and D2O would be 81.4 kJ/mol. We did not use D2O as the deuterating agent for these gas-phase HDX reactions. However, the energetic difference associated with ND3 as the deuterating reagent makes that reaction more feasible. Since the difference in gas-phase basicities is less than 85 kJ/mol for both these deuterating reagents, it is likely that the mechanism, rather than the difference in gas-phase basicities, is limiting the formation of deuterated product .
Peptides undergo gas-phase HDX by several mechanisms, including the onium and relay mechanisms, depending on the analyte and the deuterating reagent (Scheme S1) . For both mechanisms, the proximity of the protonated charge site to the potential exchange site is a crucial factor [63, 68]. For these experiments with carbohydrates, the charge carrier is the metal ion, which is immobilized in the adduct, likely preventing the formation of resonance structures to stabilize the transition state and minimizing HDX for these adducts in the gas-phase [63, 70]. Other gas-phase HDX mechanisms exist, including the flip-flop mechanism, which does not require charge migration (Scheme 1) . However, regardless of the mechanism, exchange is not observed for sodiated-melezitose adducts upon reaction with ND3. Our observations are consistent with observations made by the Brodbelt  and Guttman  groups when examining gas-phase HDX of flavonoids and collisionally activated oxonium ions, respectively. Similarly, slow H/D exchange (if any) has been observed with other metal-adducted species, such as platinum complexes of diethylenetriamine  and alkali-metal complexes of polyamines . Likewise, metal adduction to peptides has also been shown to result in slower rates of exchange in comparison to protonated peptides [74, 75]. Thus, these results suggest that the conformations sampled by in-ESI HDX represent carbohydrates in solvated states or solvent clusters as gas-phase HDX of these compounds is highly unfavorable.
Characterizing the Effects of Source Parameters on in-ESI HDX: Comparison of Spray Solvents
The observed number of deuteriums exchanged is governed by the forward and back exchange of the analyte. The forward exchange in solution is limited by the time it takes for ESI droplet desolvation to occur since carbohydrate-metal adducts do not exchange in the gas-phase (Figure 2). Water evaporates slower than methanol as it has a lower volatility and a higher surface tension than methanol, leading to an increase in the size of ESI droplets and a longer desolvation time for ESI droplets containing water compared to methanol [76, 77, 78, 79]. Therefore, changing the solvent from approximately 99% methanol to 100% water would result in an increase in the desolvation time and hence an increased number of forward H/D exchanges. In competition with forward exchange, back exchange causes the loss of deuterium labels when a labeled sample comes in contact with a protonated solvent. Increasing the percentage of water in the spray solvent would result in more back exchange as H2O in the droplets can react with labeled carbohydrates and remove deuterium labels. H2O contains twice as many exchangeable protons as methanol, and therefore can result in more back exchange. Additionally, residually accruing H2O vapor in the source atmosphere (from evaporation of ESI droplets) has been shown to accumulate in the source, saturate the environment, and promote additional in-ESI HDX reactions, including back exchange . Thus, the water and methanol evaporating from the ESI droplets could promote back exchange of hydroxyls. For up to 10% water in the spray solvent, the dominating factor appears to be the increase in number of H/D exchanges due to the increase in desolvation time. However, with more than 25% water in the spray solvent, the amount of back exchange seems to become the dominating factor, resulting in a net decrease in the number of H/D exchanges. Another important consideration is the change in the probability of the reaction resulting in a labeling event. For example, evaporated methanol from the solvent can undergo deuteration, resulting in CH3OD, which can then react with the carbohydrate analytes in the source. Additionally, water can be deuterated to give HDO, which would reduce the probability of a deuterating event by half in comparison to D2O. Thus, this interplay of solvent deuteration and forward and back exchange determines the total number of H/D exchanges observed.
Comparison of Gas Flow Rates
Based on the previously discussed observation that HDX for melezitose-metal adducts does not occur in the gas-phase (Figure 2), we assumed that exchange in ESI droplets is limited to solution-assisted HDX for carbohydrate-metal adducts. Thus, source parameters that affect the droplet lifetime by altering the rate of desolvation are likely to alter the reaction time for HDX and thus the number of exchange events that can occur. Nitrogen gas is used in two ways in the Ion Max source to aid in droplet evaporation. The sheath gas aids in nebulization of the droplet spray and is inner coaxial with the spray emitter, while the auxiliary gas is outer coaxial with the spray emitter.
When utilizing the auxiliary gas, solvent evaporation can occur more rapidly during ESI . As the auxiliary gas was varied from 0 to 1 arbitrary units, the number of H/D exchanges observed for sodiated-melezitose in 99% methanol decreased from 2.7 ± 0.3 D to 0.5 ± 0.2 D. Similar trends were observed for the potassium and magnesium adducts of melezitose. This significant decrease in the number of H/D exchanges with increased auxiliary gas flow is likely associated with the more rapid desolvation time. At higher auxiliary gas flow rates, analytes within the ESI solution transitioned to gas-phase at a more rapid rate, and thus the observed in-ESI HDX was minimal . Though the increase in auxiliary gas flow rate decreases the partial pressure of D2O in the source atmosphere, we hypothesize that the HDX reaction is initiated by D2O vapor condensing in the ESI droplets  and initiating exchange. Thus, the mechanism of exchange is not altered by changing the auxiliary gas flow rate or the D2O partial pressure.
When the auxiliary gas flow rate was 1 arbitrary unit and the percentage of water in the methanolic spray solvent was varied from 1 to 25%, the number of H/D exchanges increased from 0.5 ± 0.2 D to 3.4 ± 0.3 D. As the percentage of water was increased to 50% in a methanolic spray solvent, the number of H/D exchanges remained consistent (3.6 ± 0.2 D) with the number of H/D exchanges measured in 25% water. However, when the solvent was altered to 100% water, the number of H/D exchanges decreased to 2.6 ± 0.1 D (see supplementary material, Fig. S4). Representative mass spectra are shown in the supplementary material, Fig. S5. Thus, at higher percentages of water in the spray solvent, the data are consistent with the trends observed without auxiliary gas flow (Figure 3a). The observation that increasing the percentage of water increases the number of H/D exchanges at auxiliary gas 1 indicates that the presence of the auxiliary gas does not hinder D2O vapor from interacting with the ESI droplets. With the increasing percentage of water in the spray solvent, the effect of the auxiliary gas in desolvation of the droplets likely becomes less prominent because water has a lower volatility than methanol and therefore, the slower desolvation results in more time for in-ESI HDX to occur in the droplets. Additionally, with an increasing percentage of water, the droplet size could also increase due to the increased surface tension of the solvent. This would also yield a longer time for in-ESI HDX. For the sample in 100% water, an increase in back exchange likely results in lower deuterium uptake compared to the other solvent mixtures.
For a sample in 99% methanol, increasing the sheath gas flow from 0 to 24 arbitrary units resulted in an increase in the number of H/D exchanges for sodiated-melezitose from 1.9 ± 0.2 D to 3.1 ± 0.5 D (Figure 3b and supplementary material, Fig. S6). Further increasing the sheath gas flow rate to 70 arbitrary units resulted in a decrease in the number of H/D exchanges to 1.4 ± 0.3 D. The sheath gas affects both the rate of desolvation and the size of the ESI droplets . At low sheath gas flow rates, the droplets would be large and have a sufficient lifetime for exchange to occur. Increasing the sheath gas flow would result in smaller droplets with a greater surface area-to-volume ratio. We hypothesize that D2O vapor condenses on the surface of the droplets and diffuses through them, reacting with the analyte while it is solvated. The greater surface area-to-volume ratio of smaller droplets could result in more condensation and diffusion of D2O, enabling more HDX, and yielding a greater number of observed H/D exchanges . However, at higher sheath gas flow rates, the continued increase in the rate of desolvation could decrease the size, and thus the lifetime, of the droplets, yielding fewer H/D exchange events observed for melezitose-metal adducts. Additionally, at high sheath gas flow rates, it is expected that the ion spray stability would decrease, leading to greater run-to-run variability as evidenced by the higher standard deviation for replicate measurements at sheath gas flow rates of 24 arbitrary units or higher.
Comparison of Direct Infusion Sample Flow Rates
Modifying the sample infusion flow rate was anticipated to alter the ESI droplet size  and therefore the droplet lifetime, which as we have already seen, can alter the time available for in-ESI HDX. Therefore, we wanted to optimize the infusion flow rate for our system. The number of H/D exchanges was measured to be 1.5 ± 0.5 D, 2.2 ± 0.1 D, and 2.5 ± 0.2 D for samples infused at 1, 5, and 20 μl/min, respectively. A flow rate of 1 μl/min resulted in higher standard deviation compared to the faster flow rates, likely due to poor spray stability and ion transmission (with the other ESI parameters kept fixed, including spray voltage + 3.5 kV, sheath gas 12 arb units, auxiliary gas 0 arb units, capillary temperature 300 °C, and sample concentration 500 μM melezitose and 250 μM of each metal ion (Na+, K+, and Mg2+) in 99:1 (v/v) methanol:water). The number of H/D exchanges measured when infusing at 5 or 20 μl/min was similar, indicating that the carbohydrate analytes underwent in-ESI HDX for similar lengths of time.
Comparing HDX for Different Sample Concentrations
Concentration is an important factor in any reaction since limiting reactants result in incomplete reactions. We examined the relationship between sample concentration and deuterium uptake. As the concentration of melezitose was increased from 62.5 to 500 μM, while maintaining a constant molar ratio of melezitose to each metal ion, the number of H/D exchanges for sodiated-melezitose decreased from 5.8 ± 0.3 D to 2.8 ± 0.1 D (Figure 3c). The samples with concentrations of 62.5 and 125 μM melezitose exhibited similar levels of H/D exchange with 5.8 ± 0.3 D and 5.6 ± 0.2 D, respectively. However, the extent of exchange for the samples with 125 μM melezitose was statistically greater than that observed for samples with either 250 μM melezitose (3.5 ± 0.2 D) or 500 μM melezitose (2.8 ± 0.1 D). Similar results were observed for all three metal-ion adducts examined in this study. Representative mass spectra are shown in supplementary material, Fig. S7. Although multimers, such as dimers and trimers of melezitose adducted to a single metal ion, were observed in the undeuterated controls, changes in the intensity of these multimers were not observed when increasing the melezitose and metal ion concentrations. Therefore, the changes in the number of H/D exchanges are unlikely to be the result of structural differences due to multimer adduct formation.
There are two possible explanations for an increase in concentration resulting in a decrease in the number of H/D exchanges. Firstly, D2O vapor may be limiting in samples with higher concentrations, reducing the average number of H/D exchanges for each molecule. Secondly, changes in concentration would lead to changes in the distribution of melezitose molecules in ESI droplets and their lifetime as solvated species. Melezitose is a small molecule that is expected to be ionized and released into the gas-phase during electrospray via the IEM [48, 82]. Upon initial formation of ESI droplets, the molecular distribution is assumed to be similar to the bulk solution; thus, a higher analyte concentration would result in a larger number of melezitose molecules per droplet and thus more molecules would be distributed near the droplet surface. A higher concentration of analyte near the surface will likely result in a higher probability of the analytes being released into the gas-phase at early time points by IEM and would shorten the time available for these molecules to undergo in-ESI HDX. In contrast, lower concentrations will likely result in fewer melezitose molecules near the surface of the droplet since carbohydrates are expected to hydrogen bond to both methanol and water, lessen the number of melezitose molecules released into the gas-phase at early time points, and thus lengthen the time available for HDX since melezitose may stay solvated for a longer duration.
Comparison of Spray Voltages
During in-ESI HDX, small changes in electrospray conditions can have significant effects on HDX due to the fast exchanging nature of hydroxyl functional groups. Thus, we examined the effect of spray voltage on H/D exchange. Water requires a spray voltage of approximately + 4 kV  to form a stable Taylor cone due to the high surface tension of the liquid. Alternatively, methanol has lower surface tension and requires a spray voltage of approximately + 2.2 kV to generate a stable Taylor cone . However, for the 99% methanol, 50% water and 50% methanol, and 100% water solvents, the average number of H/D exchanges was similar for spray voltages between + 2.5 and + 5.5 kV (Figure 3d–f). Representative mass spectra are presented in the supplementary material as Figs. S8, S9, and S10. Thus, in this range, voltage had little effect on the magnitude of HDX. Yet, when comparing the different voltages, the magnitude of HDX was consistent with the percentage of water in the solvent.
Comparison of Melezitose Conformations in Different Spray Solvents
The Nikolaev group reported that solvent composition affects the number of carbohydrate conformations observed during in-ESI HDX [43, 44]. Their previous work focused on examining the number of distributions of peaks following in-ESI HDX for carbohydrates in a single solvent (water, acetonitrile, methanol, or ethanol) or a 50% mixture of water and methanol . They observed that two conformations with different exchange rates were present when samples were sprayed in methanol, ethanol, or a 50% mixture of water and methanol. Additionally, the population that exchanged more rapidly, and thus had a higher amount of H/D exchange, was more abundant at higher temperature. However, samples in water or acetonitrile resulted in a single carbohydrate conformation . In biological systems, glycans function in aqueous environments, though glycans and carbohydrates are often sprayed in mixtures of water and organic solvent for MS analyses. Thus, in an effort to characterize the biologically relevant conformations of carbohydrates, we wanted to examine how changing the percentage of methanol in a water-based solvent (a) modified the distribution of H/D exchange peaks, (b) altered the magnitude of H/D exchange, and (c) changed the carbohydrate structure.
Following in-ESI HDX, the distribution of H/D exchange peaks for each solvent mixture was fit to one or more Gaussian distributions to determine the number of sample populations with different exchange rates, and thus the number of conformers present (Figure 4 and supplementary material, Fig. S11). For samples containing, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100% H2O, the distribution of peaks was fit to a single Gaussian distribution (R2 of 0.9981, 0.9996, 0.9982, 0.9996, and 0.9946, respectively), indicating that a single carbohydrate conformation was present. The sample in 1% water had a broad set of peaks that best fit to two Gaussian distributions (R2 of 0.9996 for fitting to two Gaussian distributions and R2 of 0.9605 for fitting a single Gaussian distribution); thus, in 99% methanol two conformations, representing two differently exchanging populations, were observed. This data shows some differences compared to that reported by the Nikolaev group. In 100% methanol, they observed a single, slow exchanging conformation based on the single distribution of peaks for a dextran trisaccharide at capillary temperatures of 300 and 200 °C. However, at 400 °C, both a slow exchanging and a fast exchanging conformation were observed . In comparison, we used a spray solvent with 99% methanol and varied the capillary temperature from 250 to 350 °C (see supplementary material, Fig. S3). We observed an overall increase in the number of H/D exchanges with increasing temperature (2.7 ± 0.3 D to 3.5 ± 0.6 D). Temperatures higher than 350 °C were not used for our experiments as consecutive measurements in triplicate resulted in caramel formation on the sweep cone. Additionally, in the 99:1 (v/v) methanol:water solvent, we observed two conformations at all capillary temperatures (250, 300,and 350 °C), as the data was fit by two Gaussian distributions (R2 of 0.9997, 0.9991, and 0.9977, respectively).
MD Simulation of Carbohydrate Conformations in Varying Solvent Compositions
Since spray solvents that yield good ion signal often contain organic solvents , it is also crucial to observe how solvent mixtures affect the observed conformations of analytes. We performed MD simulations to examine how increasing the concentration of methanol in an aqueous solvent affected the conformation of melezitose.
Number of Hydrogen Bonds per Timeframe (NHB) and Coordination Numbers (Cnum) for Melezitose-Water and Melezitose-Methanol Intermolecular Hydrogen Bond (HB) Pairs in Solvents of Decreasing Water Composition at 300 K and 1 atm
Cnum to 1st minimuma
Cnum to 2nd minimuma
18.5 ± 0.1
1.51 ± 0.02
25.4 ± 0.07
15.2 ± 0.2
0.93 ± 0.04
18 ± 1
11.6 ± 0.1
0.65 ± 0.02
11.0 ± 0.1
6.9 ± 0.2
0.34 ± 0.02
6.8 ± 0.3
0.7 ± 0.1
0.020 ± 0.001
0.8 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.1
0.44 ± 0.03
6.0 ± 0.7
3.8 ± 0.1
0.64 ± 0.01
11.3 ± 0.4
6.3 ± 0.2
0.95 ± 0.06
14.6 ± 0.5
9.5 ± 0.4
1.28 ± 0.05
16.4 ± 0.5
gAB(r) is the particle density of type B around particle A at a distance of r, with 〈ρB〉local as the particle density of type B averaged over all spheres around particle A. By integrating the RDF until a specific distance, we obtained the coordination number (Cnum) of water or methanol within that distance (Table 1). Normalized RDFs for melezitose in different solvents are presented in the supplementary material, Fig. S12.
In this work, we have shown that the carbohydrate-metal adduct conformations characterized by in-ESI HDX are representative of solution-phase conformations. However, these species cannot currently be distinguished as either analytes that are fully solvated in droplets or analytes residing in solvent clusters following IEM (Figure 1). We have also highlighted how ESI parameters and processes (droplet formation, solvent evaporation, and ionization) affect H/D exchange of carbohydrate-metal adducts. This fundamental knowledge regarding the relationship between ESI and HDX provides a foundation for future applications of this methodology. We have not provided a set of optimized conditions since researchers interested in carbohydrate conformations may have different goals in performing in-ESI HDX experiments, and thus, may require the use of different conditions. However, this work suggests parameters that should be considered when analyzing carbohydrates or other analytes during rapid HDX reactions in ESI droplets, including spray solvent composition, sample concentration, and gas flow rates. These findings will play a significant role in the continued development and application of in-ESI HDX to carbohydrate conformational analyses.
O.T.L. and E.S.G. were supported by The Welch Foundation under award number AA-1899. M.R.B. and T.S. were supported by NSF IDBR award number 1455668. E.I.C. and K.L.S. were supported by the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy under Award Number DE-SC0019327. We thank the Baylor Mass Spectrometry Center (MSC) for providing instruments and resources used to collect the data presented here. We thank Baylor University’s High Performance and Research Computing Services (HPRCS) for technical support and access to the cluster (Kodiak). We thank H. Jamie Kim and Ian G. M. Anthony for assistance with solution-phase HDX experiments and data presentation software, respectively.
- 3.Freeze, H.H., Kinoshita, T., Varki, A.: Glycans in acquired human diseases. In: Varki, a., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., (Eds) Essentials of Glycobiology (3rd Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Chapter 46. (2017)Google Scholar
- 7.Ocho, M., Togayachi, A., Iio, E., Kaji, H., Kuno, A., Sogabe, M., Korenaga, M., Gotoh, M., Tanaka, Y., Ikehara, Y., Mizokami, M., Narimatsu, H.: Application of a Glycoproteomics-based biomarker development method: alteration in glycan structure on colony stimulating factor 1 receptor as a possible glycobiomarker candidate for evaluation of liver cirrhosis. J. Proteome Res. 13, 1428–1437 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bertozzi, C.R., Rabuka, D.: Structural basis of glycan diversity. In: Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Freeze, H.H., Stanley, P., Bertozzi, C.R., Hart, G.W., Etzler, M.E. (eds.) Essentials of Glycobiology (2nd Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, p. 2. Chapter, Cold Spring Harbor (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Kizuka, Y., Kitazume, S., Fujinawa, R., Saito, T., Iwata, N., Saido, T.C., Nakano, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Staufenbiel, M., Hatsuta, H., Murayama, S., Manya, H., Endo, T., Taniguchi, N.: An aberrant sugar modification of BACE1 blocks its lysosomal targeting in Alzheimer disease. EMBO Mol Med. 7, 175 (2015)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Thomas, W.A.: Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in conformational analysis. Annu. Rev. NMR Spectrosc., academic press, Cambridge. MA. 1, 43–89 (1968)Google Scholar
- 20.Gallagher, E.S., Hudgens, J.W.: Mapping protein–ligand interactions with proteolytic fragmentation, hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry in:Kelman, Z (eds.)methods in enzymology pg 357-404, academic press, Cambridge (MA). In: 566 (2016)Google Scholar
- 23.Clowers, B.H., Dwivedi, P., Steiner, W.E., Hill, H.H., Bendiak, B.: Separation of sodiated isobaric disaccharides and trisaccharides using electrospray ionization-atmospheric pressure ion mobility-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 16, 660–669 (2005)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 45.Zherebker, A., Kostyukevich, Y., Kononikhin, A., Roznyatovsky, V.A., Popov, I., Grishin, Y.K., Perminova, I.V., Nikolaev, E.: High desolvation temperature facilitates in ESI-source H/D exchange at non-labile sites of hydroxybenzoic acids and aromatic amino acids. Analyst. 141, 2426–2434 (2016)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.MATLAB: And statistics toolbox release 2016a, the MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts. United States.Google Scholar
- 55.Guvench, O., Mallajosyula, S.S., Raman, E.P., Hatcher, E., Vanommeslaeghe, K., Foster, T.J., Jamison, F.W., MacKerell, A.D.: CHARMM additive all-atom force field for carbohydrate derivatives and its utility in polysaccharide and carbohydrate–protein modeling. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 3162–3180 (2011)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 61.Verlet, L.: Computer "experiments" on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules. Phys. Rev. 159, 98–103 (1967)Google Scholar
- 63.Campbell, S., Rodgers, M.T., Marzluff, E.M., Beauchamp, J.L.: Deuterium exchange reactions as a probe of biomolecule structure. fundamental studies of gas phase H/D exchange reactions of protonated glycine oligomers with D2O, CD3OD, CD3CO2D, and ND3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 12840–12854 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 80.Kashiwagi, T., Yamada, N., Hirayama, K., Suzuki, C., Kashiwagi, Y., Tsuchiya, F., Arata, Y., Kunishima, N., Morikawa, K.: An electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry analysis of the pH-dependent dissociation and denaturation processes of a heterodimeric protein. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 54–61 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar