Transferring Ions from Solution to the Gas Phase: The Two Basic Principles

Critical Insight
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The efficient formation of gaseous ions is the crucial step in all successful mass spectrometric experiments. The invention of electrospray ionization (ESI) has strongly facilitated this step by transferring preformed ions directly from solution to the gas phase – thereby circumventing the need to first convert analytes to the gas phase and then ionize them – and therefore ESI has become an extremely useful and widely applied MS technique. The invention of sonic spray ionization (SSI) has also allowed for the transfer of ions from solution into the gas phase, but without the assistance of a voltage or heating. Numerous ionization techniques, using similar principles to those applied in either ESI or SSI, have subsequently been developed. Although experimental conditions used in such techniques vary markedly, herein we argue that they are all based on either one of two basic principles by which ions can be transferred from solution to the gas phase, that is: via (1) neutralizing the counter ion, or (2) separating the ions. We have selected 35 such techniques and categorized them accordingly. This article thereby aims to establish the basic principles by which gaseous ions can be obtained from solvated ions. We further propose that any new ionization technique used to transfer solvated ions to the gas phase will similarly fall into one of these two mechanistic categories.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Electrospray ionization Sonic spray ionization Mass spectrometry Solution Gas phase 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Brazilian Science Foundations, FAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (process no. 2016/01683-2) and CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Karas, M., Hillenkamp, F.: Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10000 daltons. Anal. Chem. 60, 2299–2301 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fenn, J.B., Mann, M., Meng, C.K., Wong, S.F., Whitehouse, C.M.: Electrospray ionization for mass-spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 246, 64–71 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirabayashi, A., Sakairi, M., Koizumi, H.: Sonic spray ionization method for atmospheric-pressure ionization mass-spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 66, 4557–4559 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    VanBerkel, G., Zhou, F., Aronson, J.: Changes in bulk solution pH caused by the inherent controlled-current electrolytic process of an electrospray ion source. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 162, 55–67 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilm, M.: Principles of electrospray ionization. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 10 (7), M111.009407 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman, S.: Interpretation of carrier mobility spectra of liquids electrified by bubbling and spraying. Phys. Rev. 54, 528–533 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanchard, D.: Electrically charged drops from bubbles in sea water and their meteorological significance. J. Meteorol. 15, 383–396 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luo, Z., He, J., Chen, Y., He, J., Gong, T., Tang, F., Wang, X., Zhang, R., Huang, L., Zhang, L., Lv, H., Ma, S., Fu, Z., Chen, X., Yu, S., Abliz, Z.: Air flow-assisted ionization imaging mass spectrometry method for easy whole-body molecular imaging under ambient conditions. Anal. Chem. 85, 2977–2982 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takats, Z., Wiseman, J.M., Gologan, B., Cooks, R.G.: Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science. 306, 471–473 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozdemir, A., Chen, C.-H.: Electrode-assisted desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 45, 1203–1211 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roach, P.J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A.: Nanospray desorption electrospray ionization: an ambient method for liquid-extraction surface sampling in mass spectrometry. Analyst. 135, 2233–2236 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chipuk, J.E., Brodbelt, J.S.: Transmission mode desorption electrospray ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1612–1620 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forbes, T.P., Brewer, T.M., Gillen, G.: Desorption electro-flow focusing ionization of explosives and narcotics for ambient pressure mass spectrometry. Analyst. 138, 5665–5673 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan, C.-C., Bolgar, M.S., Miller, S.A., Attygalle, A.B.: Desorption ionization by charge exchange (DICE) for sample analysis under ambient conditions by mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21, 1554–1560 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, J., Tang, F., Luo, Z., Chen, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, R., Wang, X., Abliz, Z.: Air flow assisted ionization for remote sampling of ambient mass spectrometry and its application. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 25, 843–850 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hiraoka, K., Nishidate, K., Mori, K., Asakawa, D., Suzuki, S.: Development of probe electrospray using a solid needle. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 21, 3139–3144 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kerian, K.S., Jarmusch, A.K., Cooks, R.G.: Touch spray mass spectrometry for in situ analysis of complex samples. Analyst. 139, 2714–2720 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mandal, M.K., Yoshimura, K., Saha, S., Ninomiya, S., Rahman, M.O., Yu, Z., Chen, L.C., Shida, Y., Takeda, S., Nonami, H., Hiraoka, K.: Solid probe assisted nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry for biological tissue diagnostics. Analyst. 137, 4658–4661 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, H., Liu, J., Cooks, R.G., Ouyang, Z.: Paper spray for direct analysis of complex mixtures using mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 49, 877–880 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paine, M.R.L.: Paint spray mass spectrometry for the detection of additives from polymers on conducting surfaces. Mass Spectrom. Lett. 3, 25–28 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, J.J., Wang, H., Cooks, R.G., Ouyang, Z.: Leaf Spray: Direct chemical analysis of plant material and living plants by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 83, 7608–7613 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pervukhin, V.V., Sheven, D.G., Kolomiets, Y.N.: Ionization of solutions using mechanical spray in collison nebulizer: a new simple ion source for mass-spectrometric analysis. Talanta. 138, 123–129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wleklinski, M., Li, Y., Bag, S., Sarkar, D., Narayanan, R., Pradeep, T., Cooks, R.G.: Zero volt paper spray ionization and its mechanism. Anal. Chem. 87, 6786–6793 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Santos, V.G., Regiani, T., Dias, F.F.G., Romao, W., Jara, J.L.P., Klitzke, C.F., Coelho, F., Eberlin, M.N.: Venturi easy ambient sonic-spray ionization. Anal. Chem. 83, 1375–1380 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen, T.Y., Lin, J.Y., Chen, J.Y., Chen, Y.C.: Ultrasonication-assisted spray ionization mass spectrometry for the analysis of biomolecules in solution. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21, 1547–1553 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heron, S.R., Wilson, R., Shaffer, S.A., Goodlett, D.R., Cooper, J.M.: Surface acoustic wave nebulization of peptides as a microfluidic interface for mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82, 3985–3989 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhu, H., Li, G., Huang, G.: Screening of complicated matrixes with paper assisted ultrasonic spray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 935–942 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schaefer, K.-C., Denes, J., Albrecht, K., Szaniszlo, T., Balog, J., Skoumal, R., Katona, M., Toth, M., Balogh, L., Takats, Z.: In vivo, in situ tissue analysis using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 48, 8240–8242 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pagnotti, V.S., Chubatyi, N.D., McEwen, C.N.: Solvent assisted inlet ionization: an ultrasensitive new liquid introduction ionization method for mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 83, 3981–3985 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blakley, C.R., Carmody, J.J., Vestal, M.L.: Liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer for analysis of non-volatile samples. Anal. Chem. 52, 1636–1641 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cristoni, S., Bernardi, L.R., Biunno, I., Guidugli, F.: Analysis of protein ions in the range 3000–12000 Th under partial (no discharge) atmospheric pressure chemical ionization conditions using ion trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16, 1153–1159 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cristoni, S., Rubini, S., Bernardi, L.R.: Development and applications of surface-activated chemical ionization. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 26, 645–656 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheng, S.-C., Cheng, T.-L., Chang, H.-C., Shiea, J.: Using laser-induced acoustic desorption/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to characterize small organic and large biological compounds in the solid state and in solution under ambient conditions. Anal. Chem. 81, 868–874 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dixon, R.B., Sampson, J.S., Muddiman, D.C.: Generation of multiply charged peptides and proteins by radio frequency acoustic desorption and ionization for mass spectrometric detection. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 597–600 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lin, J.-Y., Chen, T.-Y., Chen, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C.: Multilayer gold nanoparticle-assisted thermal desorption ambient mass spectrometry for the analysis of small organics. Analyst. 135, 2668–2675 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wu, C., Siems, W.F., Hill, H.H.: Secondary electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry/mass spectrometry of illicit drugs. Anal. Chem. 72, 396–403 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen, H., Wortmann, A., Zenobi, R.: Neutral desorption sampling coupled to extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for rapid differentiation of bilosamples by metabolomic fingerprinting. J. Mass Spectrom. 42, 1123–1135 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saha, S., Chen, L.C., Mandal, M.K., Hiraoka, K.: Leidenfrost phenomenon-assisted thermal desorption (LPTD) and its application to open ion sources at atmospheric pressure mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 24, 341–347 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neidholdt, E.L., Beauchamp, J.L.: Compact ambient pressure pyroelectric ion source for mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 79, 3945–3948 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chubatyi, N., Wang, T., McEwen, C.: More inclusive or selective ionization for mass spectrometry using obstructive sonic spray ionization and voltage polarity switching. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 26, 2763–2769 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lubin, A., Geerinckx, S., Bajic, S., Cabooter, D., Augustijns, P., Cuyckens, F., Vreeken, R.J.: Enhanced performance for the analysis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using a new atmospheric pressure ionization source. J. Chromatogr. A. 1440, 260–265 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takyi-Williams, J., Liu, C.F., Tang, K.: Ambient ionization MS for bioanalysis: recent developments and challenges. Bioanalysis. 7, 1901–1923 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Klampfl, C.W., Himmelsbach, M.: Direct ionization methods in mass spectrometry: an overview. Anal. Chim. Acta. 890, 44–59 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Haddad, R., Sparrapan, R., Eberlin, M.N.: Desorption sonic spray ionization for (high) voltage-free ambient mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 20, 2901–2905 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Robb, D.B., Blades, M.W.: State-of-the-art in atmospheric pressure photoionization for LC/MS. Anal. Chim. Acta. 627, 34–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Balog, J., Sasi-Szabo, L., Kinross, J., Lewis, M.R., Muirhead, L.J., Veselkov, K., Mirnezami, R., Dezso, B., Damjanovich, L., Darzi, A., Nicholson, J.K., Takats, Z.: Intraoperative tissue identification using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 194ra93 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bajic, S.: An aerodynamic perspective on impactor API sources. ASMS: http://www.waters.com (2016)

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ThoMSon Mass Spectrometry LaboratoryUniversity of Campinas–UNICAMPCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations