Structure and Reactivity of the N-Acetyl-Cysteine Radical Cation and Anion: Does Radical Migration Occur?
- First Online:
- 901 Downloads
The structure and reactivity of the N-acetyl-cysteine radical cation and anion were studied using ion-molecule reactions, infrared multi-photon dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The radical cation was generated by first nitrosylating the thiol of N-acetyl-cysteine followed by the homolytic cleavage of the S–NO bond in the gas phase. IRMPD spectroscopy coupled with DFT calculations revealed that for the radical cation the radical migrates from its initial position on the sulfur atom to the α-carbon position, which is 2.5 kJ mol–1 lower in energy. The radical migration was confirmed by time-resolved ion-molecule reactions. These results are in contrast with our previous study on cysteine methyl ester radical cation (Osburn et al., Chem. Eur. J.2011,17, 873–879) and the study by Sinha et al. for cysteine radical cation (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2010,12, 9794–9800) where the radical was found to stay on the sulfur atom as formed. A similar approach allowed us to form a hydrogen-deficient radical anion of N-acetyl-cysteine, (M – 2H)•–. IRMPD studies and ion-molecule reactions performed on the radical anion showed that the radical remains on the sulfur, which is the initial and more stable (by 63.6 kJ mol–1) position, and does not rearrange.
Key wordsRadical ions N-acetyl-cysteine Radical rearrangement Ion-molecule reactions IRMPD spectroscopy DFT calculations
There are numerous examples where radicals play key roles in the active site of enzymes [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. These radicals are normally located on a reactive amino acid side chain (cysteine , methionine, tyrosine, or tryptophan ) or on the peptide backbone, namely at the α-carbon positon of glycine . In some instances, it has also been shown that the radical migrates to different positions in the inactive form [4, 5, 9]. In those cases, the radical is relocated to the less reactive positions of the sulfur atom on a cysteine residue [4, 5, 9] or to the glycine α-carbon [6, 11]. In most enzymes, such radical rearrangement is considered to be a protective mechanism. Radicals in proteins can also be very destructive if they form at or migrate to the wrong place [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Once generated, the radicals can cause oxidative cleavage along the backbone of the protein [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19], which could cause the loss of function of the protein.
While multiple methods have been used to study radical location and reactivity in proteins , small model systems very often add detailed insights into relative stability of the radical site, and its reactivity towards specific targets and allow reaction kinetics to be studied . Radicals in amino acids, peptides, and their derivatives have been examined using various experimental [7, 8, 21] and computational techniques [13, 14, 15].
Mass spectrometry (MS) has recently emerged as a powerful tool for the generation of radical ions in the gas phase and their subsequent studies. Not counting the proteomics-targeted techniques of electron capture dissociation and electron transfer dissociation, which both produce hydrogen-rich radical cations (M+nH)•(n-1)+, a wide range of MS-based approaches have been developed to generate hydrogen-deficient radical cations M•+. With the advent of electrospray ionization, electron ionization methods, first reported by Andersson in 1958  have largely been supplanted by methods involving collision induced dissociation (CID) or UV photodissociation of peptide derivatives. Examples include CID of: (1) redox active metal complexes composed of a metal in a higher oxidation state (like Fe3+ or Cu2+), peptide or amino acid of interest, and an auxiliary ligand [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]; (2) an amino acid or peptide covalently modified to include a derivative with a weak bond that is susceptible to homolytic cleavage, such as peroxycarbamate derivatives to introduce a radical on lysine [24, 25] or the N-terminus of a peptide26 and serine nitrate esters to produce carbon centered radicals [27, 28]. Another method involves the UV photodissociation of iodotyrosine [29, 30] or modified phosphorylated serine and threonine . Unfortunately, none of these MS-based techniques has the ability to generate thiyl radicals on the cysteine side chain. Recently, our group has taken advantage of the labile nature of S-nitroso bond to generate radical cations of cysteine .
With the continuing progress in the area of generation of radical ions, there has been a greater interest in understanding their structure and reactivity. An emerging method for determining the structure of these radical ions is through infrared multiple photon dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy. Since the first study on the structure of histidine radical cation , two other studies were performed on the cysteine radical cation  and its methyl ester . Theoretical calculations have also been actively employed . The reactivity of radical ions in the gas phase can also provide vital information about the radical position and its possible rearrangement pathways. While radical migration is often accompanied by significant energy barriers, CID conditions (even at low-energy CID in ion traps) provide enough energy to overcome those barriers as has been shown by us [32, 37] and others . Ion-molecule reactions in the gas phase provide much less energetic reaction conditions and can be used as a probe of the radical structure [27, 28, 39, 40].
We have developed a robust approach to probe the structure of cysteine-based radical cations via ion-molecule reactions . Sulfur-based radicals display characteristic reactivity towards typical radical probe reagents such as dimethyl disulfide and allyl iodide. Carbon-based radicals, on the other hand, are unreactive towards those species, although they do react with dioxygen, NO, and NO2 [28, 41]. We used theoretical calculations and IRMPD spectroscopy to confirm our ion-molecule reaction results for the cysteine methyl ester radical cation . The focus of this study is on the structure and reactivity of the N-acetyl-cysteine (N-Ac-Cys) radical cation.
While the formation, gas phase chemistry, and structure of radical cations of amino acids and peptides are actively being explored, their negatively charged counterparts have been largely neglected. Exceptions include Chu and coworkers’ use of ternary metal complexes [42, 43] and the use of ion-ion reactions between multiply deprotonated peptides and cations . Being able to generate peptide radical anions is equally important, as many peptides are negatively charged in solution. For instance, the common radical scavenger glutathione (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly) carries a negative charge in solution . Furthermore, the relative stability of radical structures is greatly affected by the charge sign . In this work we exploit the utility of S-nitroso chemistry to generate for the first time the hydrogen-deficient radical anion of N-Ac-Cys and study its gas-phase reactivity and structure.
2.1 Chemicals and Reagents
All chemicals and reagents were used as received without any further purification. N-acetyl-L-cysteine, methanol (HPLC grade), tert-butylnitrite, dimethyl sulfide, allyl bromide, allyl iodide, and dimethyl disulfide were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA).
2.2 Ion-Molecule Reactions
Ion-molecule reactions were carried out using a Bruker Esquire 3000 quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) modified to conduct ion-molecule reactions as described previously . Nitrosylated N-Ac-Cys was generated by allowing a 1.5:1 mixture of tert-butylnitrite and a 1 mM solution of N-acetyl-cysteine (in 50/50 methanol:water with 1% acetic acid) to react for 10 min. at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted 100-fold using 50/50 methanol:water with 1% acetic acid and introduced into the ESI source of the mass spectrometer at a flow rate of 5 μL min–1. The sheath gas, capillary voltage, and temperature were adjusted to about 10 arbitrary units, 3.0 kV, and 250 °C, respectively. Radical cations and anions of N-Ac-Cys were produced either by either CID or in-source fragmentation. When using CID, the protonated (or deprotonated) S-nitrosylated N-Ac-Cys was mass selected and then subjected to CID using collision energy sufficient to dissociate the majority of the precursor ions. When using in-source fragmentation, the voltages at the source were optimized for the dissociation of the precursor ions without mass selection. The radical ion was then mass selected and allowed to react with the neutral reagent introduced into the trap via a pulsed valve (as previously described ) or through a leak valve. The pressure of neutrals was about 1 × 10–7 Torr in the ion trap region as estimated by fast ion-molecule reactions. The scan delay was varied from 0 to 7500 ms allowing the acquisition of mass spectra at different reaction time points.
2.3 Infrared Multiple-Photon Dissociation Spectroscopy
IRMPD spectroscopy studies were carried out at the free electron laser for infrared experiments (FELIX) facility located at the FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen in Nieuwegein (The Netherlands) . The nitrosylated acetyl-cysteine was generated as described above with the slight modification that its end concentration was 1 mM. Once generated, the nitrosylated precursor was introduced into a custom-built FT-ICR mass spectrometer  equipped with an orthogonal Z-spray electrospray ionization source. Operating parameters for ESI were optimized to maximize formation and transfer of ions to the ICR cell. A DC potential switch was applied to the octopole ion guide to trap the ions in the ICR cell without using a gas pulse , thus eliminating collisional heating of the ions. The formation of N-Ac-Cys radical ions from the protonated or deprotonated S-nitrosylated N-Ac-Cys was induced by raising the cone voltage to cause in-source fragmentation. The radical ion was isolated for IRMPD studies using a stored waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT) pulse. Infrared spectra were collected by monitoring the efficiency of IRMPD as a function of laser wavelength. To produce infrared spectra, the free electron laser was scanned in 0.02–0.04 μm increments between 5.5 and 8.5 μm and the product ion and precursor ion intensities were measured at each step using the excite/detect sequence of the FT-ICR-MS  after irradiation with FELIX . The IRMPD yield is determined by normalizing the fragment intensity to the total ion intensity, and linearly corrected for variations in FELIX power over the spectral range.
2.4 Density Functional Theory Calculations
All geometry optimizations and harmonic vibrational frequencies were calculated using the Gaussian 09 suite of programs  and the hybrid B3LYP functional. Initial geometry optimizations were performed using the relatively small 3-21 G* basis set. All minima located were re-optimized using the same functional and the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. All transition state calculations were performed using the QST2 function within Gaussian. In most cases, intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations were used to confirm that the transition states linked the correct minima that represent pre- and post-transformation structures. Vibrational frequency calculations were performed on the structures optimized at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory and used to determine whether optimized structures were true minima (no imaginary frequencies) or transition states (one imaginary frequency), to determine zero-point energy corrections to electronic energies (used unscaled), and to predict infrared spectra for comparison to experimental IRMPD spectra. For comparison of DFT spectra to IRMPD spectra, the computed frequencies were scaled by a factor of 0.98, which is known to be adequate at the current level of theory [53, 54]. Theoretical IR spectra from the Gaussian output were convoluted with a 20 cm–1 FWHM Lorentzian line shape. Theoretical and experimental spectra were normalized along the y-axis (relative intensity).
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Radical Cation of N-Acetyl-Cysteine
However, it is obvious that the radical ions generated by CID are much more reactive (close to collision rate) than those produced by in-source fragmentation. The behavior of the CID-generated species is consistent with the radical being located on the sulfur atom. When the radical cation was formed via in-source fragmentation and then isolated in the trap and allowed to react with dimethyl disulfide, there was a major decrease in reactivity. This suggests that the sulfur radical rearranged into an unreactive species. This difference in reactivity can be explained by the fact that when the radical is formed by CID it is immediately formed in the ion trap and does not have time to rearrange before it reacts with the neutral. In contrast, the radical formed by in-source fragmentation has time to undergo thousands of collisions in the ion guides before it enters the ion trap, thus allowing the radical more time and energy from collisions to rearrange before coming into contact with the dimethyl sulfide neutral. An alternative explanation is that the radical may rearrange via ion-molecule catalytic processes involving background ESI solvents present in high concentrations in the skimmer-cone (“in source”) region. A possible mechanism that might operate involves proton transport catalysis  which occurs via ion-molecule complexes. Such isomerization reactions have been observed for a large number of systems including enol/keto radical cation tautomers  and conventional radical cations/distonic ions .
To further assess the possibility of partial radical migration, kinetic plots of ion-molecule reactions were recorded (Figure 4c, d). The kinetic plot shows that for the radical generated by CID (Figure 4c) the reaction with dimethyl sulfide goes to completion which would be the case with the sulfur radical, as observed in our previous studies for CysOMe•+ reactivity . For the radical generated by in-source fragmentation the kinetics are not consistent with the simple exponential decay of the starting radical cation. Instead, the reaction stops after some period, indicating a possible radical migration, since α-carbon radicals were shown not to be reactive towards these neutrals . This type of kinetic study was also performed with the volatile neutral dimethyl disulfide with similar results (Figure S4).
Since the calculations done by us here and other groups in the past show that the α-carbon is the most stable radical position [14, 35, 55, 56], we determined the lowest energy pathway through which the N-Ac-Cys radical cation would have to go to rearrange. Figure S1 shows the lowest energy pathway calculated for the rearrangement. It is a single step process in which there are no conformational changes between the two structures but simply a transfer of the radical from the sulfur to the α-carbon through a hydrogen atom transfer. The energy required for this is 117 kJ mol–1, which is significantly less than the same transfer calculated for the cysteine methyl ester radical cation (171 kJ mol–1) . This decrease in energy to cross the barrier may be the result of the charge on the carbonyl oxygen of the acetyl group for N-acetyl cysteine. In contrast, in the cysteine methyl ester radical cation the sulfur-to-α-carbon migration requires not only the hydrogen atom transfer (radical migration) but also the proton (charge) migration from the amino group to the carbonyl oxygen, which leads to an extra step in the mechanism and increases the overall reaction barrier.
Other pathways were also explored to determine if they were potentially lower in energy (Figures S2, S3). In those two pathways, the key steps involve a five-membered (Figure S2) and a three-membered (Figure S3) transition state, but both of them are higher in energy (143 and 226 kJ mol–1, respectively). Several other pathways were calculated which involved less sterically strained intermediates, however, in each instance for hydrogen abstraction to occur the linearity of the α-carbon N-Ac-Cys cation stabilized by the resonance throughout the ion (see Scheme 1) would have to be disrupted which resulted in an even higher barrier (data not shown).
3.2 Radical Anion of N-Acetyl-Cysteine
We took advantage of the same S-nitroso chemistry to prepare the negative counterpart, the hydrogen deficient radical anion of N-Ac-Cys, (M-2H)•–. Figure 1b shows the formation of the acetyl-cysteine radical anion generated from the fragmentation of the deprotonated nitrosylated precursor via the loss of •NO (30 Da). This is the first example of forming a radical anion in the gas-phase from an S-nitroso derivative. Obviously, the homolytic cleavage of the weak S–NO bond dominates the CID process independent of the charge on the ion. This class of radical anions, (M – 2H)•–, should serve as the appropriate model for studying radical processes in proteins since it possesses the deprotonated carboxylate and the initial radical location on the sulfur atom, similar to the thiol protein/peptide radicals in solution.
It was shown that both hydrogen-deficient radical cations M•+ and radical anions (M – 2H)•–of cysteine derivatives can be generated in the gas phase via fragmentation of the S-nitrosylated precursors of these ions using electrospray ionization in either positive or negative ion mode. The way in which the radical is formed implies that the radical site is initially present on the sulfur atom.
The IRMPD and ion-molecule reactivity experiments strongly suggest that there is a substantial degree of radical migration from the sulfur to the α-carbon position in the radical cation of N-acetyl cysteine formed via in-source fragmentation. This is the first evidence of radical rearrangement that has been shown using IRMPD spectroscopy and ion-molecule reactions. On the other hand, the radical cation formed via CID in the ion trap has much higher population of the sulfur-based radical.
Based on IRMPD spectroscopy and ion-molecule reactions, the radical anion of N-acetyl cysteine retains its initial structure of the sulfur-based radical. This is not an unexpected result since DFT calculations indicate that the radical at the α-carbon position in the anion is much less stable, likely due to the absence of captodative stabilization as in the radical cation.
Studies are currently under way to detect radical rearrangement in small cysteine-containing peptides using the same approach presented here.
V.R. and S.O. acknowledge support from Northern Illinois University and a travel grant from the Center for Biochemical and Biophysical Studies of NIU. S.O. also acknowledges Michael Kullman for helping put together the computational set-up. R.A.J.O. thanks the ARC Centre of Excellence in Free Radical Chemistry and Biotechnology for financial support. J.O. and G.B. are supported by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). The authors gratefully acknowledge the skillful assistance of the FELIX staff.
- 3.Ehrenberg, A., Reichard, P.: Electron spin resonance of the iron-containing protein B2 from ribonucleotide reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 3485–3488 (1972)Google Scholar
- 4.Knauer, S., Buckel, W., Dobbek, H.: Structural basis for recutive radical formation and electron recycling in (R)-2-Hydroxyisocaproyl-CoA dehydratase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2011). doi:10.1021/ja1076537
- 8.Nauser, T., Casi, G., Koppenol, W., Schoneich, C.: Reversible intramolecular hydrogen transfer between cysteine thiyl radicals and glycine and alanine in model peptides: Absolute rate constants derived from pulse radiolysis and laser flash photolysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 15034–15044 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Davies, M., Dean, R.: Radical- mediated protein oxidation. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
- 27.Wee, S., Mortimer, A., Moran, D., Wright, A., Barlow, C.K., O’Hair, R.A.J., Radom, L., Easton, C.J.: Gas-phase regiocontrolled generation of charged amino acid and peptide radicals. Chem. Commun. 4233–4235 (2006)Google Scholar
- 40.Li, S., Fu, M., Habicht, S., Pates, G., Nash, J.J., Kenttamaa, H.: Phenyl Radical Induced Damage to Dipeptides. J. Org. Chem. 74, 7724–7732 (2009)Google Scholar
- 48.Valle, J., Eyler, J., Oomens, J., Moore, D., Van Der Meer, A., Von Helden, G., Meijer, G., Hendrickson, C., Marshall, A., Blakney, G.: Free electron laser-fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry facility for obtaining infrared multiphoton dissociation spectra of gaseous ions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 023103 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Frisch, M.J., Trucks, G.W., Schlegel, H.B., Scuseria, G.E., Robb, M.A., Cheeseman, J.R., Montgomery Jr., J.A., Vreven, T., Kudin, K.N., Burant, J.C., Millam, J.M., Iyengar, S.S., Tomasi, J., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Cossi, M., Scalmani, G., Rega, N., Petersson, G.A., Nakatsuji, H., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Klene, M., Li, X., Knox, J.E., Hratchian, H.P., Cross, J.B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R., Stratmann, R.E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A.J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J.W., Ayala, P.Y., Morokuma, K., Voth, G.A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg, J.J., Zakrzewski, V.G., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A.D., Strain, M.C., Farkas, O., Malick, D.K., Rabuck, A.D., Raghavachari, K., Foresman, J.B., Ortiz, J.V., Cui, Q., Baboul, A.G., Clifford, S., Cioslowski, J., Stefanov, B.B., Liu, G., Liashenko, A., Piskorz, P., Komaromi, I., Martin, R.L., Fox, D.J., Keith, T., Al-Laham, M.A., Peng, C.Y., Nanayakkara, A., Challacombe, M., Gill, P.M.W., Johnson, B., Chen, W., Wong, M.W., Gonzalez, C., Pople, J.A.: GAUSSIAN 03 (Revision D.01). Gaussian Inc., Wallingford (2004)Google Scholar
- 54.Polfer, N., Oomens, J., Dunbar, R.: Alkali metal complexes of the dipeptides PheAla and AlaPhe: IRMPD spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Chem. 9, 579–589 (2008)Google Scholar
- 55.Chu, I., Zhao, J., Xu, M., Siu, S., Hopkinson, A.C., Siu, K.W.M.: Are the radical centers in peptide radical cations mobile? The generation, tautomerism, and dissociation of isomeric α-carbon-centered triglycine radical cations in the gas phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7862–7872 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar