MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Neuronal Cell Cultures

  • Tyler A. Zimmerman
  • Stanislav S. Rubakhin
  • Jonathan V. SweedlerEmail author
Research Article


Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides the ability to detect and identify a broad range of analytes and their spatial distributions from a variety of sample types, including tissue sections. Here we describe an approach for probing neuropeptides from sparse cell cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MSI—at single cell spatial resolution—in both MS and tandem MS modes. Cultures of Aplysia californica neurons are grown on an array of glass beads embedded in a stretchable layer of Parafilm M. As the membrane is stretched, the beads/neurons are separated physically and the separated beads/neurons analyzed via MALDI TOF MS. Compared with direct MS imaging of samples, the stretching procedure enhances analyte extraction and incorporation into the MALDI matrix, with negligible analyte spread between separated beads. MALDI tandem MSI using the stretched imaging approach yields localization maps of both parent and fragment ions from Aplysia pedal peptide, thereby confirming peptide identification. This methodology represents a flexible platform for MSI investigation of a variety of cell cultures, including functioning neuronal networks.

Key words

MSI MALDI Aplysia Cell cultures 

1 Introduction

Experiments using cell cultures are widespread in fundamental [1, 2], applied [3, 4], and clinical/diagnostic [5, 6, 7] research. Detection of known and unknown endogenous analytes and determination of their levels at cellular and subcellular resolutions aid many experiments involving cell cultures. As with biological tissues, analyte detection in cultured cells utilizes a variety of targeted approaches that include immunocytochemistry [8], molecular information-rich spectroscopic methodologies such as infrared spectroscopy [9, 10], and mass spectrometry (MS) [11, 12], each having inherent drawbacks and benefits. Immunochemistry, for example, requires pre-selection of the analyte(s) of interest; in contrast, MS allows identification of a range of analytes without pre-selection, but does not provide spatial and localization details. However, spatial information can be obtained from cell cultures by combining MS with imaging technologies, specifically, mass spectrometry imaging (MSI).

MSI has emerged as a powerful tool for investigation of biological specimens; it simultaneously provides chemical and spatial distribution information on many analytes [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) was the first MS-based imaging approach [19], and is capable of investigating chemically complex surfaces such as tissue slices or cell cultures with submicron spatial resolution [20, 21]. Unfortunately, the limited mass range of SIMS restricts its ability to detect many peptides and proteins. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) MS extends the mass range and is well suited for localizing larger analytes to specific cultured cells [22, 23, 24, 25], as are several other laser desorption approaches [26, 27]. MALDI MSI has also been used for profiling the spatial distributions of analytes in cultured cells [23, 28, 29]. In MALDI MSI, data acquisition is often performed using an ordered array of positions to allow the creation of two-dimensional ion distribution maps [30], although other data acquisition approaches are available [31, 32, 33]. When seeking single cell resolution from MALDI MSI investigations of peptides, challenges can arise due to several factors. These include the inherent biochemical complexity of the cell cultures, the close and random proximity of adjacent cells, significant differences in peptide content among neighboring cells, the possibility of mechanical damage to cells during removal of the extracellular media, and the small amount of peptide present in many cell types. When a peptide is near the detection threshold in MSI, the amount per pixel is often in the low attomole range, an estimate based on prior Aplysia microanalyses [34, 35]. We address many of these issues by using a sample preparation technique known as the stretched imaging method [36, 37, 38], which has been applied to characterize peptide distributions in tissue slices from both invertebrate and mammalian models. Briefly, a thin tissue slice is placed onto a monolayer of beads embedded in a stretchable layer of Parafilm M. This substrate is manually stretched and as the beads separate from each other, the tissue is fragmented into thousands of spatially and chemically isolated bead islands that contain one or a few cells [37]. After stretching, the hydrophobic nature of the intervening membrane between bead/cell positions prevents analyte redistribution when the MALDI matrix is applied, allowing extended extraction periods [30]. This separation of cells permits small, spatially isolated samples to be characterized, at the same time offering increased analyte extraction from the tissue, thereby providing enhanced analyte signals. The stretched imaging protocol thus minimizes the potential difficulties outlined above for MALDI MSI experiments.

For this study, we created MSI images from cultured Aplysia californica neurons with well-characterized peptide contents [34, 36, 39] that allow protocol validation; future applications will examine a broader range of samples. Although MSI can generate chemical and spatial information from analytes in cell cultures, it is sometimes difficult to identify compounds detected from a cell with single stage MS [35]. It is therefore helpful to employ tandem MS (MS/MS) for analyte identification, including de novo peptide sequencing. The success of MS/MS sample fragmentation depends on the amount of analyte available for analysis. The stretched imaging method aids the investigation by allowing independent optimization of the imaging parameters as well as enhancing the analyte extraction and MALDI matrix incorporation process, thus allowing the MS/MS experiments to be tailored for small-volume samples. Here, we used the method to generate both MS and MS/MS reconstructed ion images of high quality from Aplysia neuronal cultures. The ability to provide chemical, spatial, and amino acid sequence information via automated image acquisition makes the newly adapted stretched imaging method well suited for the study of cell cultures from a variety of model organisms.

2 Experimental

2.1 Chemicals

Reagents used in the study were from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, except where specifically noted.

2.2 Substrate Creation and Cell Isolation

Substrates comprised of a hexagonally-packed layer of glass beads embedded in a Parafilm M layer (Pechiney, Neenah, WI, USA) were created as previously described [37], with the exception that the ~40 μm glass beads (Mo-Sci Corp., Rolla, MO, USA) used here were made from borosilicate instead of barium/titanium. The borosilicate beads on the substrate were coated with poly-L- or poly-D-lysine. Individual neurons were isolated from the Aplysia central nervous system after its dissection and enzymatic treatment with protease IX for 30–60 min at 34 °C. The neurons were distributed onto the bead array. The cell culture was allowed to develop overnight at 14 °C in artificial sea water (ASW) containing (in mM): 460 NaCl, 10 KCl, 10 CaCl2, 22 MgCl2, 6 MgSO4, and 10 N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′ − 2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) (pH 7.8) [37] supplemented with antibiotics: 100 units/mL penicillin G, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 100 μg/mL gentamicin and a saturated concentration of amphotericin B.

2.3 Sample Preparation for Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy

Visualization of neurites and other small features such as regions of contact between the cells and beads using conventional transmission or reflection light microscopy is difficult when cell cultures are developed on a Parafilm M-bound glass bead array. Thus, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) was employed to image cultured cells on the bead array because it provides the level of spatial resolution needed to observe neurites. For ESEM, cell cultures were fixed using a 4 h treatment of a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cocadilate buffer. The samples were then washed for 15 min in 0.1 M sodium cocadilate buffer and dehydrated in a series of 37%, 67%, 95%, and 100% ethanol solutions. A Samdri-PVT-3D critical point dryer (Tousimis Research Corp.; Rockville, MD, USA) was employed to remove the ethanol from the samples. The samples were removed from the critical point dryer and placed onto two-sided tape (3 M Corporation, St. Paul, MN, USA), which was then mounted onto a sample stage. A Desk II Turbo Sputter Coater (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ, USA) was used to coat the samples with Au/Pd for 65 s, achieving ~15 nm thickness of the metal layer. The samples were then placed in a desiccator overnight. ESEM images were taken with an XL30-ESEM-FEG (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) scanning electron microscope that includes a field-emission electron gun.

2.4 Sample Preparation for MSI

Cell cultures on the bead substrates were stabilized for 10–20 min by replacement of the ASW with a 33% glycerol:67% ASW (vol:vol) solution, followed by removal of the extracellular media. A small amount of the glycerol/ASW solution remained on the samples, which is acceptable for MALDI MS detection of peptides. The directional orientation of the samples before stretching was marked with a magic marker. Digital optical images were obtained via a stereo microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA), followed by manual stretching of the samples and placing them on conductive indium tin-oxide (ITO)-coated glass slides as previously reported [36]. The glass slides were inserted into a Bruker MTP Slide Adapter (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Alternatively, samples used for acquiring both MS and MS/MS images were stretched and placed onto metal TLC MALDI plates (Bruker Daltonics).

Immediately following, a MALDI matrix containing 30 mg/mL of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 50:50 methanol/water was applied to the surface of the stretched samples using an artist’s spray brush (Thayer and Chandler, Kenosha, W, USA) at a distance of ~30 cm, as in a manner previously reported [40]. For samples placed on the ITO glass slides, after matrix application a razor blade was used to remove the Parafilm M from the surface near the edges of the slide to improve electrical contact with the metal MTP Slide Adapter (Bruker Daltonics). Optical images were taken of all samples after stretching. Where multiple images were needed to capture the entire sample area, these subsidiary images were stitched together using Photoshop CS2 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.5 MSI of Stretched Samples

For the samples placed on the glass ITO slides, the bead positions after sample stretching were automatically located by light thresholding, and an in-house written Java-based ( geometry file creation code was used to create sample-tailored geometry files [36]. For metal plates, transmission-based light thresholding was not possible and, so, the cells were located manually, the cell pixel coordinates recorded, and the bead location geometry file creation code modified to correspond to cell locations and the dimensions of the Bruker metal TLC plate adaptor. The original and modified source codes are freely available at

The mass spectrometric acquisition was automated using the geometry files loaded into the AutoXecute feature of FlexControl 3.0 software (Bruker Daltonics) on an UltrafleXtreme MALDI time-of-flight (TOF)-TOF MS instrument (Bruker Daltonics), with the laser spot size set to ~100 μm in diameter. For samples on ITO glass slides, at each position 100 spectra were accumulated at 1000 Hz using a mass range of 600–4000 Da. For samples on the solid metal targets, 100 spectra were accumulated at each point and 400 spectra accumulated in Bruker LIFT mode (MS/MS) at 1000 Hz at the points for which peaks were automatically selected by the software for MS/MS acquisition. Parent ions were automatically selected and fragmented in LIFT mode. The parameters of the process were specified in a FlexAnalysis (Bruker Daltonics) method loaded into AutoXecute in the Bruker FlexControl 3.0 software. The thresholds for accepting detected signals were a peak intensity of greater than 400 counts and a signal-to-noise ratio of better than 10. Mass calibration was done with Peptide Calibration Standard II (Bruker Daltonics). For samples on the glass slides, the entire area containing ~1200 beads was imaged in ~40 min. For samples on the metal targets, only positions containing cells were interrogated so that acquisition time was greatly reduced; the time to acquire MS and MS/MS spectra from a total of 28 cell positions was 6 min.

The spectra in the Bruker .fid files were baseline subtracted, smoothed, and converted into spectra-containing text files using a batch conversion script written in the FlexAnalysis 3.3 software (Bruker Daltonics). These files were then able to be read by the previously described Java-based image reconstruction software [36]. For all samples, this code created selected MS ion images based on the m/z ratio of the analyte of interest. For the samples on the metal target, the code was modified to produce MS/MS ion images. The original image reconstruction portion of the code was unaltered, but the portion that creates the ion images was adapted to produce reconstructed MS/MS ion images. This code is freely available at

The MS/MS results for the peptide parent ion at m/z 1540 were analyzed by BioTools 3.0 (Bruker Daltonics), where the assignment of the amino acid sequence was generated automatically and searched against a peptide database using Mascot software (Matrix Science Inc., Boston, MA, USA) to reveal the identity of the peptide. Collections of prohormone genes from a variety of model organisms including Aplysia are available at

3 Results and Discussion

A variety of MALDI MSI experiments can be devised to probe neuronal cultures. By combining MALDI-MSI with the stretched imaging method, we can investigate sparse neuronal cell cultures at cellular (and we believe eventually at subcellular) levels to provide details on peptide distributions and changes in their expression during the formation of networks. These investigations may also shed light on network formation and repair, as well as changes in the distributions of peptides [23, 41, 42]. However, to accomplish these neuronal stretched imaging experiments, several enhancements to the existing stretched imaging protocols were necessary. As detailed below, these included a switch to poly-lysine-coated borosilicate beads so that the cells would attach to the substrate and grow on it, the use of a metal MALDI target to reduce charging and enable MS/MS imaging, high spatial resolution ESEM verification of cell-bead attachment for cultured neurons, and updated software to allow automated runs of the MS and MS/MS imaging. The optimized stretched imaging method, applied here to a sample of cultured Aplysia neurons, facilitates the creation of reconstructed ion images that show the distributions of neuropeptides and peptide fragments.

Initially, when creating the bead substrate and shortly after plating, the Aplysia neurons detached from the barium/titanium glass beads previously used with the stretched sample method for ~20-μm-thick tissue sections [36, 37]. Alternatively, we found that ~40 μm borosilicate glass beads coated with poly-L- or D-lysine placed onto the Parafilm M layer provided an improved substrate for neuronal growth; the cultured neurons remained attached to this substrate, an expected result given the reported use of borosilicate [43, 44, 45] and lysine coating [46, 47] for neuronal cell culture. Not only is the composition of this substrate ideal for the cells to attach and grow, so also is the relatively uniform three-dimensional surface of the bead monolayer with patterned topography. The extending processes of cultured neurons respond favorably to topographic cues on this scale [48, 49, 50] and, so, culturing neurons on beads served to enhance neuronal growth.

After the neuronal cultures were developed on the new bead substrate, we verified that the cells were attaching to the beads; attachment is necessary for successful spatial separation of cultured cells as the underlying support membrane is stretched. Previously, we used optical microscopy to visualize the attachment of neurons and their processes to the beads. However, ESEM was employed here because it can reveal smaller features such as neurites and growth cones of cultured neurons. ESEM confirmed that the curved topography of the lysine-coated borosilicate bead monolayer provided a suitable substrate along which the cultured Aplysia neurons could extend their processes (Figure 1). As seen in Figure 1a, the neuron and its neurites, (i.e., projections) are well attached to the beads. There are extending zones of adhesion atop the beads, including a growth cone-like structure terminating the neurites. The neurites often covered multiple beads with many smaller extensions (filopodia), with some forming fine submicrometer bridges to neighboring beads. Intriguingly, smaller neurites that spanned the gaps between beads did so at positions where the beads were not touching, indicating these outgrowths likely “jumped” from bead to bead. Small, ~2 μm enlargements in the extending processes, often termed varicosities [51] (putatively containing secretory vesicles), have been detected along the smallest branches that stem off from the main processes. Manual sample stretching separates adjacent beads and cells, and may also separate the neurites and varicosities from the cell bodies during the stretch. While single cell measurements are possible—because no more than a single cell appears on most beads—subcellular MALDI MSI measurements may also be possible using this approach. However, development of additional verification steps will be required before identification of subcellular origins of signal can be achieved.
Figure 1

Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) imaging of cultured Aplysia neurons and neurites on the bead array reveals the attachment and growth of neurons on this topologically complex surface. (a) A cultured neuron is attached to beads that are embedded in a layer of Parafilm M. The neuronal process extends away from the cell body over the length of several beads. The sample preparation procedure for ESEM caused some beads to be removed from the sample surface. The cell body, extending neurite, and growth cone are labeled. Scale bar is 100 μm. (b) Close-up view of the center region of the left image. The sample stretching may lead to mechanical separation of subcellular regions, which would be available for analysis using MSI. The points of neurite-bead contact and the fine filopodia are labeled. Scale bar is 20 μm

Aplysia neurons from both the pedal and cerebral ganglia were used to extend the stretched imaging method to MSI investigation of cell cultures. An optical image was taken of the cell cultures before stretching (Figure 2a). Several cell bodies are visible in the image, with some neurons located in close proximity to each other. Overlays of three reconstructed ion images (Figure 2b–d) onto the initial sample image show minimal analyte redistribution and that the ion signals are confined to the area of cell somas (i.e., cell bodies); the image of the m/z 635 ion distribution (presumably a membrane lipid, Figure 2b) contains a signal strong enough to highlight locations of the majority of the cell somas within the field of view. Two of the most intense detected ion signals are assigned to well-known Aplysia peptides, FRFa [GenBank accession number GU263310] (Figure 2c) and pedal peptide [accession number AAV84473.1] (Figure 2d). Many of the signals from individual cells have similar intensities (Figure 2b), which is not surprising as cells may have similar peptide levels and many of the studied neurons are of similar size.
Figure 2

Overlaid optical and reconstructed ion images created by the stretched imaging method from a neuronal culture from different ganglia of Aplysia CNS. About 1200 total beads were probed. (a) An optical image of the sample showing the cultured neurons on a substrate of borosilicate glass beads embedded in a Parafilm M layer. In (b)(d), the reconstructed ion images overlay the original optical image to show the selected analyte distributions, with (b) showing m/z 635, (c) m/z 1238, and (d) m/z 1540, which have been assigned as a membrane lipid, FRFa peptide, and pedal peptide, respectively. The squares represent the bead positions that have the appropriate m/z signal with their grey color matching the intensity scale bar on the right. In each image, the intensity has been scaled to the maximum level. The analyte distributions are confined to individual cell somas in many cases. Scale bar is 500 μm

How are the peptide identifications made? Typically, the observed peptide signals from an MSI image are first tentatively identified based on their m/z and compared with lists of known peptides, as well as from co-localization with other peptides known to be expressed in these cells, such as multiple peptides derived from the same prohormone. For example, an MSI spectrum from a cultured neuron sample is shown in Figure S1, Supplementary Information (on-line resource). Signals can then be identified using MS/MS, either off-line with liquid chromatography-MS/MS of homogenates or, in this case, during the same experiment via MALDI-MS/MS imaging.

The ability to identify peptides by MS/MS sequencing allows peak assignments to be confirmed [52, 53, 54]. Several adjustments to the stretched sample method enable MALDI-MS/MS sequencing from stretched samples of cultured neurons; these include the use of a metal MALDI target and adapting the stretched imaging software to facilitate automated MS/MS imaging runs. The use of a metal MALDI target had not been necessary as ITO slides allowed peptide signals to be detected from stretched neuronal cultures in MS mode (Figure 3). However, ITO slides did not work for automated acquisition of MS/MS spectra. Attempts to reproducibly acquire MS/MS spectra from stretched samples on ITO slides led to unreliable accuracy of the parent ion m/z measurements. Shifts of up to 30 Da in the m/z ratio were observed, even after increasing the sample conductivity with a thin metal coating [55]. These mass calibration issues prevented automated ion fragmentation. However, placing the stretched sample onto a solid metal Bruker TLC MALDI plate ameliorated these issues, possibly because of the increased electrical conductivity and improved heat dissipation afforded by the solid metal target.
Figure 3

MALDI-TOF detects strong neuropeptide signals in MS and MS/MS modes from cell culture samples prepared using the stretched imaging method. The mass spectrum of the peptide profile of a selected cultured pedal neuron is shown; the automatically generated MS/MS peak assignment for m/z 1540 yields the sequence that corresponds to the known amino acid sequence for Aplysia pedal peptide, PLDSVYGTHGMSGFA

The geometry file creation and image reconstruction software, as created for imaging of stretched thin tissue sections [36], has been adapted here for MS/MS profiling of stretched samples containing cultured neurons on metal plates. For the ITO glass slides, light thresholding was used with the optical images, allowing the automatic determination of the X-Y coordinates of the beads with this information used to create a geometry file containing the locations where the MS spectra were to be collected. However, when using optically opaque metal plates for MS/MS imaging, transmission-based optical imaging of the samples was not possible. As a future enhancement, it may be possible to use light thresholding for the creation of geometry files on metal targets via reflection-based optical images; here, we obtained MS/MS data from cell somas at manually determined positions. As currently implemented, the new target geometry file now works with the Bruker TLC targets and enables one to obtain MS/MS spectra from preselected cell somas. This software is easily adaptable to a range of other targets and applications. As before, acquisition of the MS/MS spectra from the specified locations precedes image reconstruction using the free transform process in Photoshop [36]. Lastly, the image reconstruction code now reads data from the MS/MS spectra generated by the Bruker mass spectrometer in LIFT mode. The software, with graphical user interfaces, is freely available online along with example datasets and step-by-step guidance for geometry file creation at

Figure 3 shows an MS/MS spectrum from a stretched sample of cultured Aplysia neurons placed onto the solid metal MALDI plate, as shown for the parent mass ion of m/z 1540. This MS/MS spectrum was taken from an automated imaging run and is labeled with de novo peak assignments generated by the Bruker BioTools 3.0 software. Most peaks corresponded to fragments of Aplysia pedal peptide. Loading of the results into the Mascot search engine produced a hit with a highest Mascot score of 112 for Aplysia pedal peptide. The quality of the MS/MS spectra automatically acquired from single cells using the stretched imaging method allows for sequencing and identification of peptides with high confidence from a sample of cultured neurons. In addition, the distributions of the parent peptide and its fragment peptides are able to be simultaneously mapped.

Earlier in this study, the stretched imaging method was used to acquire MS images from all positions containing beads (Figure 2). We also imaged selected regions from a different stretched sample that contained neurons, to obtain both MS and MS/MS ion profiles. These reconstructed MALDI-MS/MS ion distribution maps are shown in Figure 4. Because the locations of the neuron somas were easily visible in the optical images in Figure 4 taken both before and after stretching, their locations were manually recorded. Subsequently, a geometry file containing only these cell positions was used to guide the acquisition of MS and MS/MS mode ion images solely at the cell locations.
Figure 4

Reconstructed MS and MS/MS ion images of m/z 1540 and 1200 parent ions. The background is an optical image of the sample taken before stretching where the cultured neurons are visible and labeled, with the gray/black boxes representing the MS ion image data (i.e.; cells). (a) Reconstructed MS ion image of parent ion m/z 1540 that corresponds to pedal peptide. Reconstructed MS/MS ion images of pedal peptide fragments ions are shown in (b) m/z 419 and (c) m/z 1245. (d) Reconstructed MS ion image of parent ion m/z 1200 corresponding to a putative but unidentified peptide. Reconstructed MS/MS fragment ion images are shown in (e) m/z 219 and (f) m/z 922 [fragments in (e) and (f) are currently unidentified]. Only some neurons were selected for acquisition of MS/MS spectra because not all neurons contain the analyte of interest. Scale bar is 500 μm

A similar approach can be applied for characterization and imaging of specific peptide(s) of interest after MSI by first manually creating a mass list of detected peptide parent ions with corresponding spatial coordinates and then optimizing the MS/MS parameters and precursor ion selection window for the analyte(s) of interest for the subsequent MS/MS imaging scan. An advantage to only imaging the beads that contain neurons (and not empty beads or membrane) is a significant reduction in image acquisition time and resulting data. MALDI-MSI with the specific TOF-TOF instrumental platform used here does not allow rapid transitions from MS to MS/MS mode. Therefore, independent scans in MS and MS/MS modes were performed in tandem, thereby reducing the time for complete MS imaging and analyte identification. The stretched imaging method does not deplete the sample significantly during acquisition, even from individual cells under culture conditions, thus allowing repeat scans. Depending on the needs of the experiment, sample locations containing peptides of interest can be examined in the manual, semiautomatic, or automatic mode.

Figure 4a shows a reconstructed ion image in MS mode for the parent ion at m/z 1540 that corresponds to pedal peptide with the sequence of PLDSVYGTHGMSGFA. Based on the quality of the MS mode peaks from the different positions in the sample-tailored geometry file, the AutoXecute feature of the Bruker FlexControl software automatically selects position/peak combinations for the acquisition of MS/MS spectra after the MS scan is finished. In this case, the thresholds for MS/MS acquisition were set so that the peak intensity must be higher than 400 counts and the signal-to-noise >10. The spatial distributions for two fragment ions corresponding to the parent ion at m/z 1540 are shown in Figure 4b, m/z 419, corresponding to the amino sequence PLDS with loss of ammonia and Figure 4c, m/z 1245, corresponding to the sequence PLDSVYGTHGMS with loss of water. Not all of the neurons in this sample satisfied the signal quality requirements to produce MS/MS spectra from the parent ion of m/z 1540, but the thresholds can be easily changed. Of course, many of the neurons used here would not contain appreciable amounts of pedal peptide and so would not be selected for MS/MS imaging; such cell-cell heterogeneity is one of the reasons that such individual cell assays are required.

Similarly, fragment ion distributions for a separate unidentified parent ion, m/z 1200, are shown in Figure 4e, f. This unknown compound was difficult to fragment and MS/MS sequencing resulted in the generation of only a few fragments that were not identified. As the ability to fragment the compound at m/z 1200 varied between cells, perhaps this peak represents several isobaric analytes or effects of signal suppression by other cellular compounds. We have not identified this analyte, although the spatial distributions of the parent and fragment ions have been determined. Obtaining the spatial distributions of fragment ions allows detection and identification of the products of cell-specific enzymatic processing that often varies spatially, even among neighboring neurons [56]. Also, monitoring of specific cells producing MS/MS fragments can be important for imaging of the distribution of isobaric compounds.

Acquisition of analyte signals from neuronal somas cultured on bead substrates furthers the study of neuronal networks, including those cultured under different physicochemical conditions. The stretched imaging method protocols demonstrated here can be adapted to study neuronal network formation in a range of culturing conditions and from a variety of other model organisms. We will continue to refine these methods, significantly increasing their utility, as we extend our efforts toward collecting subcellular information from neuronal processes.



The authors thank C. Mark Bee, Sergei Dikler, Scott J. Robinson, Kevin R. Tucker, and Xiying Wang for discussions and experimental assistance. The project described was supported by Award nos. P30 DA018310 and 5RO1 DA017940 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Award no. 5RO1 DE018866 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) and the Office of Director (OD), National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIDA, NIDCR, or NIH.

Supplementary material

13361_2011_111_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (36 kb)
Figure S1 MALDI MS spectrum from a neuron cultured on the poly-lysine-coated borosilicate beads with pedal peptide labeled, along with the m/z values of several other intense peaks. The culturing media contains high salt levels and, so, analyte-salt adducts are observed; these can be minimized via a condensation chamber that slowly condenses water onto the sample surface causing physiologic salts to crystallize separately from the analyte, effectively reducing salt adducts in the mass spectra [1]. Not surprisingly, as the pedal ganglion is the source of the neurons, a high intensity peak corresponding to pedal peptide2 (1540 m/z) is observed. (PDF 35 kb)


  1. 1.
    Rahman, A.: The Role of Adenosine in Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 7, 207–216 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kawane, K., Nagata, S.: Nucleases in Programmed Cell Death. Methods Enzymol. 442, 271–287 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barar, J., Asadi, M., Mortazavi-Tabatabaei, S.A., Omidi, Y.: Ocular Drug Delivery; Impact of In Vitro Cell Culture Models. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 4, 238–252 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirkpatrick, C.J., Fuchs, S., Hermanns, M.I., Peters, K., Unger, R.E.: Cell Culture Models of Higher Complexity in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Biomaterials 28, 5193–5198 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogilvie, M.: Molecular Techniques Should Not Now Replace Cell Culture in Diagnostic Virology Laboratories. Rev. Med. Virol. 11, 351–354 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Athey, D., Shah, D.S.H., Phillips, S.R., Lakey, J.H.: A Manufacturable Surface-Biology Platform for Nano Applications; Cell Culture, Analyte Detection. Diagnostics Sensors. Ind. Biotechnol. 1, 185–189 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakudo, A., Nakamura, I., Ikuta, K., Onodera, T.: Recent Developments in Prion Disease Research: Diagnostic Tools and In Vitro Cell Culture Models. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 69, 329–337 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gu, Y., Wang, J., Ding, F., Hu, N., Wang, Y., Gu, X.: Neurotrophic Actions of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells on Primary Culture of Dorsal Root Ganglion Tissues and Neurons. J. Mol. Neurosci. 40, 332–341 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petiot, E., Bernard-Moulin, P., Magadoux, T., Gény, C., Pinton, H., Marc, A.: In Situ Quantification of Microcarrier Animal Cell Cultures Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Process Biochem. 45, 1427–1431 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sellick, C.A., Hansen, R., Jarvis, R.M., Maqsood, A.R., Stephens, G.M., Dickson, A.J., Goodacre, R.: Rapid Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by Mammalian Cell Cultures Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 106, 432–442 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lage, H.: Proteomics in Cancer Cell Research: An Analysis of Therapy Resistance. Pathol. Res. Pract. 200, 105–117 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woolley, J.F., Al-Rubeai, M.: The Application of SELDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry to Mammalian Cell Culture. Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 177–184 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zimmerman, T.A., Monroe, E.B., Tucker, K.R., Rubakhin, S.S., Sweedler, J.V.: Chapter 13: Imaging of Cells and Tissues with Mass Spectrometry: Adding Chemical Information to Imaging. Methods Cell Biol. 89, 361–390 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Francese, S., Dani, F.R., Traldi, P., Mastrobuoni, G., Pieraccini, G., Moneti, G.: MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging, from Its Origins up to Today: The State of the Art. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 12, 156–174 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rubakhin, S.S., Jurchen, J.C., Monroe, E.B., Sweedler, J.V.: Imaging Mass Spectrometry: Fundamentals and Applications to Drug Discovery. Drug Discov. Today 10, 823–837 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andersson, M., Groseclose, M.R., Deutch, A.Y., Caprioli, R.M.: Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Peptides: 3D Volume Reconstruction. Nat. Methods 5, 101–108 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoeckli, M., Chaurand, P., Hallahan, D.E., Caprioli, R.M.: Imaging Mass Spectrometry: A New Technology for the Analysis of Protein Expression in Mammalian Tissues. Nat. Med. 7, 493–496 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chaurand, P., Schwartz, S.A., Reyzer, M.L., Caprioli, R.M.: Imaging Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Potentials. Toxicol. Pathol. 33, 92–101 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castaing, R., Slodzian, G.: Microanalyse Par Émission Ionique Secondaire. J. Microscop. 1, 395–410 (1962)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heien, M.L., Piehowski, P.D., Winograd, N., Ewing, A.G.: Lipid Detection, Identification, and Imaging Single Cells with SIMS. Methods Mol. Biol. 656, 85–98 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chandra, S.: Quantitative Imaging of Chemical Composition in Single Cells by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: Cisplatin Affects Calcium Stores in Renal Epithelial Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 656, 113–130 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ishida, Y., Madonna, A.J., Rees, J.C., Meetani, M.A., Voorhees, K.J.: Rapid Analysis of Intact Phospholipids from Whole Bacterial Cells by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Combined with On-Probe Sample Pretreatment. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16, 1877–1882 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rubakhin, S.S., Greenough, W.T., Sweedler, J.V.: Spatial Profiling with MALDI MS: Distribution of Neuropeptides within Single Neurons. Anal. Chem. 75, 5374–5380 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Claydon, M.A., Davey, S.N., Edwards-Jones, V., Gordon, D.B.: The Rapid Identification of Intact Microorganisms Using Mass Spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 1584–1586 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bergquist, J.: Cells on the Target Matrix-Assisted Laser-Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass-Spectrometric Analysis of Mammalian Cells Grown on the Target. Chromatographia 49(Suppl. 1), S41–S48 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Northen, T. R.; Yanes, O.; Northen, M. T.; Marrinucci, D.; Uritboonthai, W.; Apon, J.; Golledge, S. L.; Nordström, A.; Siuzdak, G. Clathrate Nanostructures for Mass Spectrometry. Nature 2007, 1033–1036Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kruse, R.A., Rubakhin, S.S., Romanova, E.V., Bohn, P.W., Sweedler, J.V.: Direct Assay of Aplysia Tissues and Cells with Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry on Porous Silicon. J. Mass Spectrom. 36, 1317–1322 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shimma, S., Sugiura, Y., Hayasaka, T., Hoshikawa, Y., Nodae, T., Setou, M.: MALDI-Based Imaging Mass Spectrometry Revealed Abnormal Distribution of Phospholipids in Colon Cancer Liver Metastasis. J. Chromatogr. B 855, 98–103 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang, H.J., Sugiura, Y., Ikegami, K., Setou, M.: Imaging of Cultured Cells by Mass Spectrometry. In: Setou, M. (ed.) Imaging Mass Spectrometry: Protocols for Mass Microscopy, pp. 159–168. Springer, Japan (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rohner, T.C., Staaba, D., Stoeckli, M.: MALDI Mass Spectrometric Imaging of Biological Tissue Sections. Mech. Age Dev. 126, 177–185 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Klerk, L.A., Altelaar, A.F.M., Froesch, M., McDonnell, L.A., Heeren, R.M.A.: Fast and Automated Large-Area Imaging MALDI Mass Spectrometry in Microprobe and Microscope Mode. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 285, 19–25 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hazama, H., Aokib, J., Nagaoa, H., Suzukia, R., Tashima, T., Fujiic, K.-I., Masudad, K., Awazua, K., Toyodab, M., Naito, Y.: Construction of a Novel Stigmatic MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 1257–1263 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sherrod, S.D., Castellana, E.T., McLean, J.A., Russell, D.H.: Spatially Dynamic Laser Patterning Using Advanced Optics for Imaging Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 262, 256–262 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hummon, A.B., Amare, A., Sweedler, J.V.: Discovering New Invertebrate Neuropeptides Using Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25, 77–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rubakhin, S.S., Sweedler, J.V.: Quantitative Measurements of Cell − Cell Signaling Peptides with Single-Cell MALDI MS. Anal. Chem. 80, 7128–7136 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zimmerman, T.A., Rubakhin, S.S., Romanova, E.V., Tucker, K.R., Sweedler, J.V.: MALDI Mass Spectrometric Imaging Using the Stretched Sample Method to Reveal Neuropeptide Distributions in Aplysia Nervous Tissue. Anal. Chem. 81, 9402–9409 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Monroe, E.B., Jurchen, J.C., Koszczuk, B.A., Losh, J.L., Rubakhin, S., Sweedler, J.V.: Massively Parallel Sample Preparation for the MALDI MS Analyses of Tissue. Anal. Chem 78, 6832 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zimmerman, T.A., Rubakhin, S.S., Sweedler, J.V.: Mass Spectrometry Imaging Using the Stretched Sample Approach. Methods Mol. Biol. 656, 465–479 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li, L., Moroz, T.P., Garden, R.W., Floyd, P.D., Weiss, K., Sweedler, J.V.: Mass Spectrometric Survey of Interganglionically Transported Peptides in Aplysia. Peptides 19, 1425–1433 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zimmerman, T.A., Monroe, E.B., Sweedler, J.V.: Adapting the Stretched Sample Method from Tissue Profiling to Imaging. Proteomics 8, 3809–3815 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rubakhin, S.S., Hatcher, N.G., Monroe, E.B., Heien, M.L., Sweedler, J.V.: Mass Spectrometric Imaging of the Nervous System. Curr. Pharm. Des. 13, 3325–3334 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schmidt, C.E., Leach, J.B.: Neural Tissue Engineering: Strategies for Repair and Regeneration. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 5, 293–347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Saito, T., Hayashib, H., Kameyama, T., Hishida, M., Nagai, K., Teraoka, K., Kato, K.: Suppressed Proliferation of Mouse Osteoblast-Like Cells by a Rough-Surfaced Substrate Leads to Low Differentiation and Mineralization. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 30, 1–7 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kratje, R.B., Reimann, A., Hammer, J., Wagner, R.: Cultivation of Recombinant Baby Hamster Kidney Cells in a Fluidized Bed Bioreactor System with Porous Borosilicate Glass. Biotechnol. Prog. 10, 410–420 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Collazos-Castro, J.E., Cruz, A.M., Carballo-Vila, M., Lira-Cantú, M., Abad, L., Pino, Á.P.D., Fraxedas, J., Juan, A.S., Fonseca, C., Pêgo, A.P., Casañ-Pastor, N.: Neural Cell Growth on TiO2 Anatase Nanostructured Surfaces. Thin Solid Films 518, 160–170 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wei, H., Li, H., Gao, D., Lin, J.-M.: Multi-Channel Microfluidic Devices Combined with Electrospray Ionization Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Applied to the Monitoring of Glutamate Release from Neuronal Cells. Analyst 135, 2043–2050 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Atashi, A., Nadri, S., Hafizi, M., Soleimani, M.: Role of Poly-L-Lysine-Coated Plates and Fetal Calf Serum Concentration in Sheep Chondroprogenitor Cell Culturing. J. Artif. Organs 12, 118–122 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hanson, J.N., Motola, M.J., Heien, M.L., Gillette, M., Sweedler, J.V., Nuzzo, R.G.: Textural Guidance Cues for Controlling Process Outgrowth of Mammalian Neurons. Lab Chip 9, 122–131 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang, J., Venkataramani, S., Xua, H., Song, Y.-K., Song, H.-K., Palmore, G.T.R., Fallonc, J., Nurmikko, A.V.: Combined Topographical and Chemical Micropatterns for Templating Neuronal Networks. Biomaterials 27, 5734–5739 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yu, L.M.Y., Leipzig, N.D., Shoicheta, M.S.: Promoting Neuron Adhesion and Growth. Mater. Today 11, 36–43 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hatada, Y., Wu, F., Silverman, R., Schacher, S., Goldberg, D.J.: En Passant Synaptic Varicosities Form Directly from Growth Cones by Transient Cessation of Growth Cone Advance but Not of Actin-Based Motility. J. Neurobiol. 41, 242–251 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chen, R., Jiang, X., Conaway, M.C.P., Mohtashemi, I., Hui, L., Viner, R., Li, L.: Mass Spectral Analysis of Neuropeptide Expression and Distribution in the Nervous System of the Lobster Homarus americanus. J. Proteome Res. 9, 818–832 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Drexler, D.M., Garrett, T.J., Cantone, J.L., Diters, R.W., Mitroka, J.G., Conaway, M.C.P., Adams, S.P., Yost, R.A., Sanders, M.: Utility of Imaging Mass Spectrometry (IMS) by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) on an Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer in the Analysis of Drugs and Metabolites in Biological Tissues. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 55, 279–288 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Verhaert, P.D.E.M., Pinkse, M.W.H., Strupat, K., Conaway, M.C.P.: Imaging of Similar Mass Neuropeptides in Neuronal Tissue by Enhanced Resolution MALDI MS with an Ion Trap-Orbitrap Hybrid Instrument. Methods Mol. Biol. 656, 433–449 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Scherl, A., Zimmermann-Ivol, C.G., Dio, J.D., Vaezzadeh, A.R., Binz, P.-A., Amez-Droz, M., Cochard, R., Sanchez, J.-C., Glückmann, M., Hochstrasse, D.F.: Gold Coating of Nonconductive Membranes Before Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometric Analysis Prevents Charging Effect. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19, 605–610 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Romanova, E.V., McKay, N., Weiss, K.R., Sweedler, J.V., Koester, J.: Autonomic Control Network Active in Aplysia During Locomotion Includes Neurons that Express Splice Variants of R15-Neuropeptides. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 481–491 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tyler A. Zimmerman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stanislav S. Rubakhin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan V. Sweedler
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Beckman InstituteUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations