Advertisement

Applied Entomology and Zoology

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 347–353 | Cite as

Function of plant odors in oviposition behaviors of the yellow peach moth Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

  • Zhixin Luo
  • Hiroshi Honda
Original Research Paper

Abstract

The effect of plant odors on the oviposition behaviors of Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) female moths was explored in wind tunnel tests. The complete behavioral process leading to egg-laying was divided into five behavioral components: takeoff from the release point, halfway flight, hovering close to the source, landing and egg-laying on substrates. Host plant odors accelerated takeoff, increased orientation to the stimulus source by hovering before landing and triggered egg-laying. Never did non-host turnip taproot odors accelerate takeoff, even though behavioral components were all induced. Shortly sustained egg-laying under turnip taproot odors indicated involvement of different chemicals from those for other behavioral components. Odors from potato tubers and leaves as an absolute non-host plant never triggered oviposition responses. The detailed effects of plant odor stimuli on each behavioral component of oviposition were investigated by transient odor manipulations in a wind tunnel. A full supply of host plant odors resulted in a longer time for egg-laying, but showed no effect on the time for the laying of each egg, whereas odor cessation at specific behavioral components (e.g., takeoff) interrupted subsequent responses. Even when plant odors were removed just after halfway flight, female moths showed catenated behavioral components from hovering to egg-laying. Suitable and continuous plant olfactory stimulations are necessary to complete the oviposition process by enhancing host-finding efficiency in terms of both speed and accuracy and stimulating sustained egg-laying after landing as final oviposition site acceptance.

Keywords

Conogethes punctiferalis Oviposition Behavioral components Host plant odor Wind tunnel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Ryo Ohsawa for his advice on statistics and Prof. DeMar Taylor for his critical reading and comments on the manuscript. We are also grateful to Prof. Junko Sugaya and Mr. Rikio Satoh for supplying young peach fruits and codlings, respectively.

References

  1. Anfora G, Tasin M, De Cristofaro A, Ioriatti C, Lucchi A (2009) Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and field bioassays. J Chem Ecol 35:1054–1062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brévault T, Quilici S (2009) Oviposition preference in the oligophagous tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Entomol Exp Appl 133:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brévault T, Quilici S (2010a) Interaction between visual and olfactory cues during host finding in the tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens. J Chem Ecol 36:249–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brévault T, Quilici S (2010b) Flower and fruit volatiles assist host-plant location in the Tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens. Physiol Entomol 35:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cha DH, Nojima S, Hesler SP, Zhang A, Linn CE, Roelofs WL, Loeb GM (2008) Identification and field evaluation of grape shoot volatiles attractive to female grape berry moth (Paralobesia viteana). J Chem Ecol 34:1180–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Moraes CM, Mescher MC, Tumlinson JH (2001) Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females. Nature 410:577–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Green TA, Prokopy RJ, Hosmer DW (1994) Distance of response to host tree models by female apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae): interaction of visual and olfactory stimuli. J Chem Ecol 20:2393–2413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heinz CA (2008) Host plant odor extracts with strong effects on oviposition behavior in Papilio polyxenes. Entomol Exp Appl 128:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Honda H, Matsumoto Y (1984) Oviposition responses of the fruit-feeding type of yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 28:82–86 (in Japanese with English summary)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Honda H, Kaneko J, Konno Y, Matsumoto Y (1979) A simple method for mass-rearing of the yellow peach moth, Dichocrosis punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), on an artificial diet. Appl Entomol Zool 14:464–468Google Scholar
  11. Kaneko J (1978) Abdominal constriction in the copulated female of yellow peach moth, Dichocrosis punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 13:131–133Google Scholar
  12. Luo Z, Honda H (2015) Olfactory and biophysical assessment of the oviposition stimulating potential of host and non-host plants for the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl Entomol Zool (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Masante-Roca I, Anton S, Delbac L, Dufour MC, Gadenne C (2007) Attraction of the grapevine moth to host and non-host plant parts in the wind tunnel: effects of plant phenology, sex, and mating status. Entomol Exp Appl 122:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nguyen DT, Hodges RJ, Belmain SR (2008) Do walking Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) locate cereal hosts by chance? J Stored Prod Res 44:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phelan PL, Roelofs CJ, Youngman RR, Baker TC (1991) Characterization of chemicals mediating ovipositional host-plant finding by Amyelois transitella females. J Chem Ecol 17:599–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed Dec 2014
  17. Sekiguchi K (1974) Morphology, biology and control of the yellow peach moth, Dichocrosis punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull Ibaraki Hort Expt Stn Special Issue: 2–6 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  18. Tasin M, Bäckman AC, Bengtsson M, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P (2006) Essential host plant cues in the grapevine moth. Naturwissenschaften 93:141–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tasin M, Bäckman AC, Coracini M, Casado D, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P (2007) Synergism and redundancy in a plant volatile blend attracting grapevine moth females. Phytochemistry 68:203–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tasin M, Lucchi A, Ioriatti C, Mraihi M, De Cristofaro A, Boger Z, Anfora G (2011) Oviposition response of the moth Lobesia botrana to sensory cues from a host plant. Chem Senses 36:633–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tingle FC, Mitchell ER (1991) Effect of oviposition deterrents from elderberry on behavioral responses by Heliothis virescens to host-plant volatiles in flight tunnel. J Chem Ecol 17:1621–1631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Tilborg M, Sabelis MW, Roessingh P (2004) State-dependent and odour-mediated anemotactic responses of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis in a wind tunnel. Exp Appl Acarol 32:263–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Waterhouse DF (1993) The major arthropod pests and weeds of agriculture in southeast Asia: distribution, importance and origin. ACIAR Monogr No. 21. ACIAR, Camberra, pp 40–44, 49–52, 81–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Applied Entomology and Zoology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations