Journal of Applied Genetics

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 231–241 | Cite as

Linkage disequilibrium and functional analysis of PRE1 insertion together with SNPs in the promoter region of IGFBP7 gene in different pig breeds

  • Qingyan Wu
  • Hao Yu
  • Wenzhen Wei
  • Yunyun Cheng
  • Shan Huang
  • Hongyu Shi
  • Songcai Liu
  • Jichao Xia
  • Hongyao Jia
  • Linlin Hao
Animal Genetics • Original Paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Polymorphisms in regions upstream of transcription initiation site may modify the transcriptional activity of target genes by changing promoter activity. This study aims to determine whether or not polymorphisms at porcine IGFBP7 promoter region affect gene expression. In this study, eight SNPs and one PRE1 insertion in this region were first confirmed. The PRE1 insertion was widespread in 20 Chinese indigenous breeds, but was not observed in three commercial breeds. A perfect linkage disequilibrium, consisting of six of those SNPs and a PRE1, was observed with two haplotypes (h1 and h2) in five pig breeds. The h1 haplotype had an overwhelming superiority distribution in Large White, Landrace, and Bama mini-pig; in turn, the h2 only existed in the PRE1 presence breeds. As the haplotypes and PRE1 were located at gene promoter regions, we further investigated the transfection of plasmids with three different fragments of IGFBP-7 promoter region (H1, H2, RF). The CMV promoter of the pEGFP-N1 was substituted by these three different fragments, respectively. Different transcriptional and translational activities of EGFP in PK-15 cells were observed in these three recombinant plasmids by quantitative real-time PCR and flow cytometric analysis. The results indicated that H1 had the higher transcriptional and translational activities of EGFP as compared to the H2 (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). As compared to the RF group, EGFP mRNA expression level was significantly higher in H1 groups (P < 0.05). The IGFBP-7 promoter polymorphisms detected in this study may be important functional variants and potential genetic markers for pig population genetic study.

Keywords

PRE1 SNP LD Haplotype Promoter activity 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

13353_2018_430_Fig6_ESM.gif (61 kb)
Fig. S1

Schematic representations of recombinant plasmids and fragments. (A) The CMV promoter of pEGFP-N1 was removed by using Ase I and Xoh I restriction enzymes and replaced by the different porcine IGFBP7 promoter haplotypes or recombinant fragments, respectively. The difference between H1/H2 haplotype and h1/h2 haplotype was that the H1 and H2 haplotypes contained the SNP of g.-318 A > G, this is because the genotype of g.-318 A > G was GG in all the PRE1 presence individuals, while only AA and AG genotypes were found in the PRE1 absence individuals as well as the AA genotype was the dominant haplotype. (B) Over lapextension PCR amplification of recombinant fragment (RF). (GIF 60 kb)

13353_2018_430_MOESM1_ESM.tif (12.4 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 12707 kb)
13353_2018_430_Fig7_ESM.gif (542 kb)
Fig. S2

The distribution of the PRE1 insertion +/− polymorphism in the promoter region of IGFBP7 in individuals from eight pig breeds. (Lane M: 2000 bp DNA marker, Lane 1–3: Tibetan pig, Lane 4–6: Northeast wild boar, Lane 7–9: Jinhua pig, Lane 10: Bama mini-pig, Lane 11: Luchuan pig . Lane 12: Large White, Lane 13: landrace, Lane 14: Duroc, −/− homozygous for the absence of the insertion (1057 bp); +/+ homozygous for the presence of the insertion (1356 bp); +/− heterozygous for the presence/absence of the insertion (1356 bp and 1057 bp). (GIF 541 kb)

13353_2018_430_MOESM2_ESM.tif (53.1 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 54369 kb)
13353_2018_430_Fig8_ESM.gif (167 kb)
Fig. S3

Inserting the PRE1 SINE into the porcine IGFBP-7 promoter region generates a novel CpG island. Islands highlighted by light blue background were identified by the MethPrimer software. Red bars show CpG dinucleotides. (A) The CpG island prediction of haplotype H1. CpG island (208 bp): nucleotides −264 to −57. (B) The CpG island prediction of haplotype H2. CpG island (277 bp): nucleotides −332 to −56; CpG island (275 bp): nucleotides −911 to −637. The inverted insertion of a PRE1 SINE located in the nucleotide position from −985 to −687. The flanking set of 15 bp short intact direct repeats, AAAAGCCCGTTATTC, one being part of the PRE1 insertion, the other being adjacent to the PRE1 insertion, is displayed by gray arrows. (GIF 166 kb)

13353_2018_430_MOESM3_ESM.tif (16.8 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 17202 kb)
13353_2018_430_MOESM4_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Ahmed S, Yamamoto K, Sato Y, Ogawa T, Herrmann A, Higashi S, Miyazaki K (2003) Proteolytic processing of IGFBP-related protein-1 (TAF/angiomodulin/mac25) modulates its biological activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 310:612–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Batzer MA, Deininger PL (2002) Alu repeats and human genomic diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:370–379.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg798 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Batzer MA, Stoneking M, Alegria-Hartman M, Bazan H, Kass DH, Shaikh TH et al (1994) African origin of human-specific polymorphic Alu insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(25):12288–12292CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen J et al (2016) Functional analysis of SNPs in the ERCC5 promoter in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Medicine 95:e3652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Criscione SW, Zhang Y, Thompson W, Sedivy JM, Neretti N (2014) Transcriptional landscape of repetitive elements in normal and cancer human cells. BMC Genomics 15(1):583.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-583 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Estécio MR, Gallegos J, Dekmezian M, Lu Y, Liang S, Issa JP (2012) SINE retrotransposons cause epigenetic reprogramming of adjacent gene promoters. Mol Cancer Res 10:1332–1342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Evdokimova V et al (2012) IGFBP7 binds to the IGF-1 receptor and blocks its activation by insulin-like growth factors. Sci Signal 5:ra92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fontanesi L, Scotti E, Buttazzoni L, Dall’Olio S, Russo V (2014) Investigation of a short interspersed nuclear element polymorphic site in the porcine Vertnin gene: allele frequencies and association study with meat quality, carcass and production traits in Italian large white pigs. Ital J Anim Sci 13(1):3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaut BS, Long AD (2003) The lowdown on linkage disequilibrium. Plant Cell 15:1502–1506.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.150730 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Haberle V, Lenhard B (2016) Promoter architectures and developmental gene regulation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 57:11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Han SH, Shin KY, Lee SS, Ko MS, Oh HS, Cho IC (2012) Porcine SPP1 gene polymorphism association with phenotypic traits in the Landrace × Jeju (Korea) Black pig F2 population. Mol Biol Rep 39:7705–7709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hancks DC, Kazazian HH (2016) Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease. Mob DNA 7(1):9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-583 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hwa V, Oh Y, Rosenfeld RG (1999) The insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) superfamily. Endocr Rev 20:761–787.  https://doi.org/10.1210/er.20.6.761 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ichiyanagi K (2013) Epigenetic regulation of transcription and possible functions of mammalian short interspersed elements, SINEs. Genes Genet Syst 88:19–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang SY, Ramachandran S (2013) Genome-wide survey and comparative analysis of LTR retrotransposons and their captured genes in rice and sorghum. PLoS One 8(7):e71118.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071118 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kapitonov VV, Jurka J (2003) A novel class of SINE elements derived from 5S rRNA. Mol Biol Evol 20:694–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kramerov DA, Vassetzky NS (2011) Origin and evolution of SINEs in eukaryotic genomes. Heredity 107:487–495.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2011.43 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Krayev AS, Kramerov DA, Skryabin KG, Ryskov AP, Bayev AA, Georgiev GP (1980) The nucleotide sequence of the ubiquitous repetitive DNA sequence B1 complementary to the most abundant class of mouse fold-back RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:1201–1215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Li LC, Dahiya R (2002) MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics 18:1427–1431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li W et al (2005) Isolation of differentially expressed genes in double-muscling large white pig by SSH and Q-PCR strategy. Prog Biochem Biophys 32:353–358Google Scholar
  21. Liu JJ, Ran XQ, Li S, Feng Y, Wang JF (2009) Polymorphism in the first intron of follicle stimulating hormone beta gene in three Chinese pig breeds and two European pig breeds. Anim Reprod Sci 111:369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Longo MS, Brown JD, Zhang C, O’Neill MJ, O’Neill RJ (2015) Identification of a recently active mammalian SINE derived from ribosomal RNA. Genome Biol Evol 7:775–788CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lunyak VV, Atallah M (2011) Genomic relationship between SINE retrotransposons, pol III–pol II transcription, and chromatin organization: the journey from junk to jewel. Biochem Cell Biol 89:495–504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Magotra A, Naskar S, Das B, Ahmad T (2015) A comparative study of SINE insertion together with a mutation in the first intron of follicle stimulating hormone beta gene in indigenous pigs of India. Mol Biol Rep 42:465–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mathelier A et al (2016) JASPAR 2016: a major expansion and update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D110–D115.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1176 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mikawa S et al (2011) Identification of a second gene associated with variation in vertebral number in domestic pigs. BMC Genet 12:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oh Y, Nagalla SR, Yamanaka Y, Kim HS, Wilson E, Rosenfeld RG (1996) Synthesis and characterization of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-7 recombinant human mac25 protein specifically binds IGF-I and -II. J Biol Chem 271:30322–30325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohshima K, Okada N (2005) SINEs and LINEs: symbionts of eukaryotic genomes with a common tail. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Perna NT, Batzer MA, Deininger PL, Stoneking M (1992) Alu insertion polymorphism: a new type of marker for human population studies. Hum Biol 64:641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Prestridge DS (1991) SIGNAL SCAN: a computer program that scans DNA sequences for eukaryotic transcriptional elements. Comput Appl Biosci 7:203–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shimamura M et al (1997) Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature 388:666–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Singer DS, Parent LJ, Ehrlich R (1987) Identification and DNA sequence of an interspersed repetitive DNA element in the genome of the miniature swine. Nucleic Acids Res 15:2780CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Ullu E, Tschudi C (1984) Alu sequences are processed 7SL RNA genes. Nature 312:171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wajapeyee N, Serra RW, Zhu X, Mahalingam M, Green MR (2008) Oncogenic BRAF induces senescence and apoptosis through pathways mediated by the secreted protein IGFBP7. Cell 132:363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamanaka Y, Wilson EM, Rosenfeld RG, Oh Y (1997) Inhibition of insulin receptor activation by insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. J Biol Chem 272:30729–30734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang S, Li X, Li K, Fan B, Tang Z (2014) A genome-wide scan for signatures of selection in Chinese indigenous and commercial pig breeds. BMC Genet 15(1):7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang X, Wang D, Han Y, Duan F, Lv Q, Li Z (2014) Altered imprinted gene expression and methylation patterns in mid-gestation aborted cloned porcine fetuses and placentas. J Assist Reprod Genet 31:1511–1517CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qingyan Wu
    • 1
  • Hao Yu
    • 1
  • Wenzhen Wei
    • 1
  • Yunyun Cheng
    • 1
  • Shan Huang
    • 1
  • Hongyu Shi
    • 1
  • Songcai Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jichao Xia
    • 3
  • Hongyao Jia
    • 4
  • Linlin Hao
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Animal ScienceJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Five-Star Animal Health Pharmaceutical FactoryChangchunChina
  3. 3.Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneCarltonAustralia
  4. 4.First hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations