Journal of Applied Genetics

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 151–159 | Cite as

The genetics of aniridia — simple things become complicated

Open Access
Human Genetics • Review
  • 378 Downloads

Abstract

Aniridia is a rare, panocular disorder characterized by a variable degree of hypoplasia or the absence of iris tissue associated with additional ocular abnormalities. It is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, with high penetrance and variable expression even within the same family. In most cases the disease is caused by haploinsufficiency truncating mutations in the PAX6 gene; however, in up to 30% of aniridia patients, disease results from chromosomal rearrangements at the 11p13 region. The aim of this review is to present the clinical and genetic aspects of the disease. Furthermore, we present a molecular diagnostic strategy in the aniridia patients. Recent improvement in the genetic diagnostic approach will precisely diagnosis aniridia patients, which is essential especially for children with aniridia in order to determine the risk of developing a Wilms tumor or neurodevelopmental disorder. Finally, based on the previous studies we describe the current knowledge and latest research findings in the topic of pathogenesis of aniridia and possible future treatment.

Keywords

Aniridia PAX6 11p13 microdeletions MLPA High-resolution array-CGH 

Introduction

Aniridia (OMIM 106210) is a congenital panocular disorder characterized by complete or partial iris hypoplasia presenting in early infancy. Clinical expression is highly variable between families and even in the same family. Foveal hypoplasia resulting in reduced visual acuity, as well as cataract, keratopathy, and glaucoma that sometimes develop in the second or third decade, contribute to visual morbidity (Fig. 1). Visual acuity is variable, it is usually 20/100-20/200, but in some affected individuals it can be better than 20/60 especially when nystagmus is not present (Hingorani et al. 2012). Refractive errors, strabismus and ptosis may also be present in the affected eye (Kokotas and Petersen 2010).
Fig. 1

A typical phenotype of a complete aniridia with polar posterior cataract (white arrow) and peripheral iris remnants (black arrow)

Some aniridia patients have been reported to present with non-ocular, sensory, and neurological abnormalities. Reduced olfaction seems to be the most common functional deficit (Sisodiya et al. 2001; Hingorani et al. 2012). Neurological abnormalities such as autism and intellectual disability have been described by several authors (Davis et al. 2008; Hu et al. 2015). MRI studies showed irregularities of the anterior commissure, anterior cingulate cortex, cerebellum, temporal and occipital lobes, corpus callosum, pineal gland and olfactory bulb (Sisodiya et al. 2001; Mitchell et al. 2003; Bamiou et al. 2007). Abnormal interhemispheric transfer results in central auditory processing deficits, what can cause hearing difficulties (Bamiou et al. 2007).

Aniridia is an autosomal dominant condition with an incidence of approximately one in 40,000-100,000 live births worldwide (Kokotas and Petersen 2010; Hingorani et al. 2012). About two-thirds of aniridia cases are familial with nearly complete penetrance, the remaining one-third are sporadic and result from de novo mutations (Hingorani et al. 2012). Aniridia can occur either as an isolated malformation or as a part of a syndrome. The best known syndromic form is WAGR syndrome (OMIM 194072) — a contiguous genes deletion syndrome of the 11p13 region (encompassing the PAX6 and WT1 genes). It is characterized by Wilms tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, and intellectual disability. Patients have 50-70% risk to develop Wilms tumor, which is the most common form of kidney cancer in children. Approximately 30% of patients with the sporadic form of aniridia suffer from this syndrome (Fischbach et al. 2005). Another known form of aniridia is Gillespie syndrome (OMIM 206700) — a rare disorder characterized by non-progressive cerebellar ataxia, intellectual disability, and iris hypoplasia. Gillespie syndrome is estimated to account for about 2% of aniridia-like cases (Gillespie 1965; Ansari et al. 2016). The PAX6 gene mutations were identified in only two individuals described as Gillespie syndrome but with atypical features like corectopia and ptosis (Ticho et al. 2006). In 2016, Gerber et al. identified mutations in the ITPR1 gene in patients affected with Gillespie syndrome (Gerber et al. 2016); however, in most cases the genetic cause of the disease remains unclear.

Structure and function of the PAX6 gene and its protein

The PAX6 gene (OMIM 607108) was the first homeobox gene discovered to play a crucial role in eye development (Glaser et al. 1992). In 1991 it was identified by positional cloning as a causative gene for congenital aniridia (Ton et al. 1991; Glaser et al. 1992).

The PAX6 gene is located on chromosome 11p13, contains 14 exons including an alternatively spliced exon 5a. It is abundantly expressed in the forebrain, early eye structures, ventral spinal cord, and endocrine pancreas (Lauderdale et al. 2000). The PAX6 protein as a transcriptional factor plays a crucial role in embryonic development and organogenesis, including neuro- and oculogenesis (Lang et al. 2007; Kokotas and Petersen 2010). The protein contains two functional domains: paired domain (PD) and homeodomain (HD), separated by the proline/serine/threonine-rich transactivation domain (PST). The paired domain comprises two structurally distinct DNA-binding subdomains: the N-terminal subdomain (NTS) and the C-terminal subdomain (CTS) (Kokotas and Petersen 2010) (Fig. 2). The PAX6 gene produces two alternatively spliced isoforms, with a distinct structure of the PD domain: a 422 amino acid and an alternatively spliced 436 amino acid PAX6 protein (including exon 5a). The insertion, into the NTS subdomain, of 14 additional amino acids encoded by exon 5a abolishes the DNA-binding activity of the NTS and unmasks the DNA-binding ability of the CTS. Thus, exon 5a appears to function as a molecular switch that specifies target genes (Azuma et al. 1999).
Fig. 2

The PAX6 cDNA, horizontal rectangles represent PAX6 protein domains including: PD-paired domain, LNK-linker region, HD-homeodomain, PST-proline/serine/threonine rich region. Exon 5a is an alternatively spliced exon in the PD domain. The most frequent mutations in the PAX6 gene described in LOVD database are presented above the diagram

Heterozygous PAX6 gene point mutations

To date, more than 400 heterozygous variants of the PAX6 gene have been identified and recorded in the Human PAX6 Allelic Variant Database (Leiden Open Variation Database, LOVD). Of all intragenic point mutations in the PAX6 gene, 94% result in premature termination codon (PTC), C-terminal extensions (CTE) or amino-acid substitutions (missense mutations) (Hingorani et al. 2012). Most of the reported PAX6 gene heterozygous mutations including nonsense and splicing mutations, insertions, and deletions, introduce premature termination codons into the PAX6 open reading frame, resulting in haploinsufficiency. The level of the protein expression from a single functional allele is not sufficient to produce biologically active PAX6 protein (50% reduction in overall activity) (Kokotas and Petersen 2010). The dosage-dependance of the PAX6 gene was supported by studies in naturally occuring rodent models with heterozygous Pax6 mutations (Matsuo et al. 1993; Kokotas and Petersen 2010; Cvekl and Callaerts 2017). Heterozygous mutations in the Pax6 gene cause mouse smalleye (Sey) phenotype demonstrating dosage sensitivity (Hill et al. 1991).

Truncating mutations activate the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) process, by which mRNA containing premature termination codons are degraded before they produce truncated proteins (Baker and Parker 2004).

C-terminal extension mutations (dominant negative mutations) in the PAX6 gene result from frameshift or point mutations that change the stop codon of the C-terminus to cause run-on translation into 3’UTR. Nonsense-mediated decay is not predicted for CTE transcripts and an extended abnormal protein is produced (Tzoulaki et al. 2005). This type of mutation is usually associated with severe phenotype with pronounced iris hypoplasia and profound visual impairment (Aggarwal et al. 2011).

Single amino acid substitutions (missense mutations) produce a full-length protein that may fold and function abnormally, causing phenotypes ranging from mild iris defects to more severe including optic nerve malformations, Peters anomaly and microphthalmia (Hanson et al. 1994; Grønskov et al. 2001; Azuma et al. 2003).

Heterozygous PAX6 gene mutations account for approximately two-thirds of all aniridia cases (Robinson et al. 2008). The most frequent mutations in the PAX6 gene are present in Fig. 2.

Compound heterozygous PAX6 gene mutations

Families of aniridic parents with heterozygous PAX6 gene mutations were reported in the literature. Affected parents have a 25% risk that they would give birth to a child with both alleles having PAX6 gene mutations. Compound heterozygosity in the PAX6 gene was thought to be lethal, resulting in severe malformations of the fetuses. However, in 1994, Glaser et al. reported the first patient with compound heterozygous PAX6 gene mutations. Two nonsense mutations inherited from the aniridic parents were identified in a newborn with anophthalmia, severe craniofacial, and central nervous system defects. The pattern of malformations was similar to that observed in homozygous Sey mouse (Glaser et al. 1994). Compound heterozygosity was also reported in two fetuses whose parents were affected with aniridia. Both fetuses showed severe brain malformations with increased germinal proliferation, gross disturbances of migration, and organization of the central nervous system (Schmidt-Sidor et al. 2009).

Finally, Solomon et al. reported a patient, who suffered from trisomy 21 and additionally was a compound heterozygote for one missense and one nonsense mutations in the PAX6 gene, inherited from the parents. The presence of both mutations resulted in severe ophthalmological, neurological, and endocrinological disturbances. This four year old patient suffers from microphthalmia, neonatal diabetes mellitus, hypopituitarism, and a complex structural brain anomaly. This was the first reported patient who survived the neonatal period (Solomon et al. 2009).

11p13 microdeletions

In 30% or even in higher proportion of aniridia patients (Wawrocka et al. 2013), the disease results from genomic rearrangements at the 11p13 region including PAX6 whole-gene deletions, microdeletions affecting only the 3′ regulatory enhancers (excluding the PAX6 gene) or contiguous genes deletions of the PAX6 and other neighboring genes, especially WT1 (WAGR syndrome) (Crolla and van Heyningen 2002; Robinson et al. 2008).

Microdeletions comprising the PAX6 gene and the adjacent genes

Microdeletions encompassing the PAX6 and the neighboring genes have been described by several authors (Fantes et al. 1992; Crolla and van Heyningen 2002; Hu et al. 2015). Identified deletions were noted even though the PAX6 gene usually harbors doublecortin domain-containing protein 1 (DCDC1), elongation factor protein (ELP4), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), beta polypeptide of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSHB), reticulocalbin 1 (RCN1), partial IMP1 inner-mitochondrial membrane (IMMP1L) (Wawrocka et al. 2013; Hu et al. 2015) and WT1 gene (Crolla and van Heyningen 2002). Sporadic aniridia cases with a deletion of both PAX6 and WT1 genes have been determined in a number of studies (Grønskov et al. 2001; Muto et al. 2002). Deletions including the PAX6 gene and other neighboring genes do not change the clinical expression of the disease in relation to mutation limited only to PAX6. However, for larger deletions encompassing PAX6 and WT1 genes, separated by 700 kb, patients with aniridia represent a more severe phenotype — WAGR syndrome with intellectual disability and high risk of Wilm’s tumor development.

Microdeletions excluding the PAX6 gene — position effect

In 1995, Fantes et al. described two aniridia families with genomic rearrangements at the 11p13 region, that did not include the PAX6 gene sequence and proposed that the causative mechanism of the disease in these families is a “position effect” (Fantes et al. 1995). Thereafter, submicroscopic rearrangements that do not disrupt the PAX6 gene sequence in the aniridia patients were described by several authors. Lauderdale et al. presented two de novo deletions of 11p13, located more than 11 kb downstream of the PAX6 gene. Using human–mouse cell hybrids they showed that the PAX6 gene expression is restricted to normal allele, unambiguously indicating that 3′ regulatory elements are essential for the PAX6 gene expression (Lauderdale et al. 2000). Davis et al. identified in a patient with aniridia, autism and intellectual disability a 1.3 Mb deletion, situated approximately 35 kb downstream of the PAX6 gene, comprising the ELP4, DPH4, DCDC1, DCDC5, MPPED2, and IMMP1L genes (Davis et al. 2008). Genomic rearrangements downstream of the PAX6 gene identified so far in aniridia patients are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Deletions in the 11p13 region, downstream of the PAX6 gene reported previously in the literature

Deleted genes (whole or partially)

Distance from the 3′ of PAX6

Genomic coordinates (hg19)

Size of deletion

Phenotype

References

Aniridia or aniridia and other malformations

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5

22.1 kb

ND

975 kb

aniridia

(Lauderdale et al. 2000)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5

11.6 kb

ND

1105 kb

aniridia

ELP4

5 kb

ND

ND

aniridia, cataracts, glaucoma

(D’Elia et al. 2007)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5, MPPED2

35 kb

chr11:30,448,178-31,802,357

1.3 Mb

aniridia, autism, mental retardation

(Davis et al. 2008)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

140 kb

chr11:31,260,340-31,666,340

406 kb

aniridia

(Bayrakli et al. 2009)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

123 kb

chr11:31,117,827-31,683,687

566 kb

aniridia

(Cheng et al. 2011)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

1 kb

chr11:31,280,628-31,805,329

525 kb

aniridia

(Zhang et al. 2011)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

85 kb

chr11:31,122,161-31,721,030

599-652 kb

partial aniridia

(Wawrocka et al. 2012)

ELP4

8 kb

chr11:31,706,160-31,755,245 bp

49 kb

aniridia, developmental delay, a submucous cleft palate, ventriculoseptal defect

Simoni et al. 2012

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

96 kb

chr11:31,118,027-31,710,576

593 kb

Rieger anomaly, aniridia

(Addis et al. 2015)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

31 kb

chr11:31,172,410-31,775,457

603 kb

aniridia

ELP4

23 kb

chr11:31,605,859-31,783,590

178 kb

partial aniridia

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5

108 kb

chr11:30,918,066-31,698,257

780 kb

aniridia

(Ansari et al. 2016)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5

59 kb

chr11:31,010,424-31,747,424

737 kb

aniridia

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

113 kb

chr11:31,152,003-31,693,266

541 kb

aniridia

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24

54 kb

chr11:31,422,424-31,751,424

329 kb

aniridia

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

11 kb

chr11:31,277,819-31,795,239

517 kb

partial aniridia, ataxia, developmental delay

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

91 kb

chr11:31,147,306-31,714,853

567 kb

aniridia

(Blanco-Kelly et al. 2017)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

108 kb

chr11:31,186,493-31,698,208

512 kb

aniridia

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1

101 kb

chr11:31,083,877-31,704,548

620 kb

aniridia

Ocular malformations and/or neurodevelopmental disorders without aniridia

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5

114 kb

chr11:31,010,914-31,692,238

681 kb

ocular coloboma

(Guo et al. 2013)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24

191 kb

chr11:31,452,082-31,615,319

163 kb

intellectual disability, speech abnormalities, autistic behaviors

(Balay et al. 2016)

ELP4, IMMP1L, DNAJC24, DCDC1, DCDC5

242 kb

chr11:30,991,456-31,564,708

573 kb

focal epilepsy with cortical dysplasia, mild developmental delay, ADHD, neurinomas, squint, ptosis, fine motor dyspraxia

 

ELP4, IMMP1L

260 kb

chr11:31,495,260-31,546,276

51 kb

cognitive delay, speech and language disorder, reading and spelling disorder, ASD, epilepsy

ELP4

181 kb

chr11:31,561,220-31,625,448

64 kb

speech and language delay

ELP4

132 kb

chr11:31,573,422-31,674,789

101 kb

developmental delay, microcephaly

ELP4

164 kb

chr11:31,584,329-31,642,325

58 kb

language disorder, behavioral problems

ELP4

174 kb

chr11:31,601,768-31,632,347

31 kb

developmental delay, hypotonia, ventriculomegaly

(Addis et al. 2015)

ELP4

84 kb

chr11:31,691,270-31,722,740

31 kb

developmental delay, speech and language disorder, microcephaly, mild cognitive delay, motor skills development disorder

ELP4

59 kb

chr11:31,705,076-31,747,631

43 kb

autism, learning difficulties

ELP4

20 kb

chr11:31,760,904-31,786,914

26 kb

moderate developmental delay, autism

ELP4

4 kb

chr11:31,597,322-31,802,120

205 kb

severe intellectual disability, muscle hypotrophy, severe dysphagia, craniofacial abnormalities

ELP4

31 kb

chr11:31,605,859-31,775,457

170 kb

developmental delay, behavioral problems, pervasive developmental disorder

ELP4

31 kb

chr11:31,625,389-31,775,457

150 kb

behavioral and speech problems, mild mental retardation

ELP4, IMMP1L

151 kb

chr11:31,460,506-31,655,108

195 kb

autism

ELP4, IMMP1L

199 kb

chr11:31,488,890-31,607,986

119 kb

autism

(Addis et al. 2015)

ELP4, IMMP1L

157 kb

chr11:31,518,924-31,649,475

131 kb

autism, language delay

ELP4

76 kb

chr11:31,576,768-31,653,568

77 kb

autism, coordination problems

ELP4

112 kb

chr11:31,652,219-31,764,393

112 kb

autism, language delay, mild developmental delay, motor delay

ND – no data, ASD – autism spectrum disorder, ADHD – attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as promoters, enhancers, insulators, and boundary elements play an important role in the regulation of gene expression, they determine the time, place, and the level of the expression of their target genes. Cis-regulatory elements can spread hundreds of kilobases upstream or downstream from the transcription start site of the genes. Human genetic studies using YAC transgenic mouse, DNaseI hypersensitivity mapping and reporter transgenic assays revealed a presence of SIMO enhancer located in the 3′- distal region, 124 kb from the PAX6 polyadenylation site, a retina-specific enhancer located within a fragment containing HS2 and HS3 elements and a lens-specific enhancer. These sequences located within introns of the adjacent ELP4 gene are PAX6-specific long range control elements (DRR – downstream regulatory region) (Kleinjan et al. 2001, 2002). DNaseI hypersensitivity and ultraconservation analysis carried out by McBride et al. allowed identification of new long range enhancers HS5 and HS6 at the Pax6 cis-regulatory region. HS5 plays a role in maintaining the PAX6 gene expression in the optic cup and diencephalon, while HS6 drives the PAX6 gene expression in the developing eye and the precerebellar neuron-epithelium of the hindbrain in a time specific manner during development (McBride et al. 2011). Deletion of the DRR region (including the retina enhancer in the HS2 and HS3 fragment) in mouse abolished Pax6 expression in the retina, iris, and ciliary body indicating that the presence of the DRR region is indispensable in this structure (Kleinjan et al. 2006). Additional cis-regulatory elements may be present in the DRR region, but have not been discovered yet.

Deletion of the SIMO enhancer in mouse did not completely abolish the Pax6 gene expression in the lens due to the presence of additional enhancers regulating its expression in this tissue (Kleinjan et al. 2006). However, Bhatia et al. demonstrated using the BAC-transgenic approach in zebrafish and mouse reporter that continued tissue-specific expression from the Pax6 promoters is critically dependent on the presence of the SIMO enhancer. The point mutation that disrupts the autoregulatory PAX6 binding site within SIMO causes loss of enhancer activity and abolishes lens and late retinal expression in transgenic mouse. The identified mutation of an autoregulatory binding site revealed a distinct regulatory mechanism by disruption of a positive feedback loop critical for gene expression during development (Bhatia et al. 2013).

The previous studies showed that genomic sequences located in a region of approximately 120 kb 3′ to the transcription start site are important for transcriptional activation of the PAX6 gene. Recent studies performed by Ansari et al. in a cohort of aniridia and Gillespie syndrome patients negative for the PAX6 gene mutations suggest a new “critical region” of 244 kb that includes cis-regulatory elements, essential for PAX6 transcriptional activation. This region spans a fragment of the DNAJC24, IMMP1L genes, and introns 1-7 of the ELP4 gene (chr11:31,379,000 (hg18) and 31,622,916 (hg18)) (Ansari et al. 2016).

Microdeletions including or disrupting the ELP4 gene were also shown in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum, speech/language disorders, epilepsy, and developmental delay. Microdeletions identified by Addis et al. do not involve the entire critical region. Only in two patients with aniridia, deletions downstream of the PAX6 gene including the ELP4 gene affecting the entire critical region were identified (Fig. 3). Therefore, deletions including the critical region cause aniridia or other ocular malformation and may also predispose to neurodevelopmental disorders (Addis et al. 2015).
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of the previously reported microdeletions in the 11p13 region, downstream of the PAX6 gene in the aniridia patients. Horizontal blue blocks represent deletions that have been identified in the aniridia patients. The vertical blue dashed lines indicate the “critical region” required for the PAX6 gene transcription suggested by Ansari et al. 2016

PAX6 gene mutations and 11p13 microdeletions in non aniridia patients

Although most mutations in the PAX6 gene are responsible for aniridia, some mutations can be connected to some other ocular disorders including: microphthalmia, microcornea, foveal hypoplasia, ocular coloboma, keratitis, congenital cataract, Gillespie syndrome, Peters anomaly, and morning glory disc anomaly (Mirzayans et al. 1995; van Heyningen and Williamson 2002; Azuma et al. 2003; Tzoulaki et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2012). Aniridia is predominantly associated with truncating mutations in the PAX6 gene, while missense mutations usually lead to non-aniridia phenotypes (Tzoulaki et al. 2005).

Genomic rearrangements at 11p13 region, have also been reported in non aniridia patients, suggesting that clinical manifestation may vary depending on the location of the breakpoints and genes involoved. The 681 kb deletion downstream of the PAX6 gene including the DCDC5, DCDC1, DNAJC24, IMMP1L genes and a part of the ELP4 gene has been discovered in a patient with ocular coloboma (Guo et al. 2013). A familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 11 associated with submicroscopic interstitial deletion of 11p13 and duplication of 11q22.3 was presented by Balay et al. The 11p13 deletion of 163 kb included the IMMP1L gene and part of the DNAJC24 and ELP4 genes. The patient’s phenotype was characterized by intellectual disability, speech abnormalities, and autistic behaviors; however, nobody in this family presented aniridia or other eye anomalies (Balay et al. 2016).

Perspectives of the gene therapy

Identification of the PAX6 gene transcription network, that means genes directly regulated by the PAX6 gene, is essential in explaining tissue sensitivity to PAX6 dosage. Xia Wang et al., using laser capture microdissection in mouse, chromatin immunoprecipitation, promoter-reporter assays, and immunochemistry methods, demonstrated for the first time that the Bmp4, Tgfβ2, and Foxc1 genes are direct downstream targets of Pax6 in developing iris and ciliary body (Wang et al. 2017b). In some patients with either no PAX6 gene intragenic mutations nor 11p13 genomic rearrangements, mutations in the Pax6 downstream targets are the cause of aniridia. Furthermore, the previous study performed by Gregory-Evans et al. demonstrated that by after birth manipulation of Pax6 dosage using nonsense suppression, it is possible to prevent the development of aniridic phenotype in mouse. It suggests that downstream targets are also active after birth. These studies gives an opportunity for future treatment of aniridia using Pax6 targets (Gregory-Evans et al. 2014).

A nonsense suppression therapy is a promising therapeutic approach that has been introduced and successfully used in an animal model. In recent studies, Xia Wang et al. used a nonsense suppression to manipulate Pax6 dosage at different stages during eye development of the small eye mouse model of aniridia. They performed in vivo tests to study effects in the developing retina, cornea, and lens, using Ataluren — a compound with nonsense suppression activity, which suppresses the abnormal nonsense codon in the mRNA template. Eye malformations responded to delivered after birth nonsense supression in a manner dependent on the Pax6 dose and specific time. The obtained results seem to be very promising and give hope for aniridia patients with nonsense mutations. Nonsense mutation supression strategy could be significant for the patients if the drug could be targeted to the affected tissue at the appropriate time (Wang et al. 2017a).

This findings seems to be very important regarding the possible therapeutic startegies for patients with aniridia.

Summary

In many studies it was proven that aniridia is a typical autosomal dominant disorder resulting from inactivation of one allele of the PAX6 gene, predominantly through intragenic mutations leading to premature termination of the protein. Due to the fast development of the molecular diagnostic methods the genetic background of aniridia became much more complex. Chromosomal abnormalities at chromosome 11p13, including the PAX6 gene deletions, contiguous genes deletions of the PAX6 and other neighboring genes, as well as microdeletions affecting only the 3′ regulatory enhancers, have also been reported in association with both sporadic and familial cases of aniridia. The unusual and wide spectrum of molecular defects observed in the aniridia patients makes this disease a model monogenic disorder in terms of its molecular background.

Due to clinical and allelic heterogeneity, as well as the great variability of the genetic mechanisms involved in aniridia, molecular analysis of the patients is performed by combining different molecular approaches including Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and an array based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Although the intragenic PAX6 gene mutations are more common than microdeletions, in newborns affected with aniridia the analysis toward deletions is recommended first, due to the clinical importance of early WAGR syndrome identification. At the same time this strategy gives an opportunity to detect genomic rearrangements at 11p13 in approximately 30% of aniridia patients. High resolution aCGH, and to some degree also commercially available MLPA set, allow for detection of small intragenic copy number variations (CNVs) at the resolution of single exons (Morice-Picard et al. 2014). Recently, Blanco-Kelly et al. developed a customized single locus aCGH for aniridia called WAGR-array with a high resolution CNV detection and precision of identified breakpoints (Blanco-Kelly et al. 2017). Precise mapping of the breakpoints is very important in accurate molecular diagnosis of children with aniridia in order to determine not only the risk of developing Wilms tumor but also neurodevelopmental disorder (deletion of the ELP4 gene). In situations when MLPA, aCGH, and the PAX6 gene sequencing do not identify any cause of the disease, a whole exome (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) could be used for identification of novel (e.g., deep intronic) mutations in the PAX6 gene or novel genes involved in pathogenesis of aniridia.

In our studies, despite using all the above mentioned techniques, there is still a proportion of aniridia patients that remain unsolved. Our patients do not have the PAX6 gene mutations, nor genomic rearrangements that involve the PAX6 gene or its regulatory elements. It suggests that mutations in the other genes, yet undiscovered genetic loci or unknown mechanisms disrupting the PAX6 gene function could be the cause of aniridia. We await descriptions of both genocopies and possible recessive mechanisms of aniridia that are already suggested by the pedigree analysis.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Addis L, Ahn JW, Dobson R et al (2015) Microdeletions of ELP4 are associated with language impairment, autism spectrum disorder, and mental retardation. Hum Mutat 36:842–850.  https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22816
  2. Aggarwal S, Jinda W, Limwongse C et al (2011) Run-on mutation in the PAX6 gene and chorioretinal degeneration in autosomal dominant aniridia. Mol Vis 17:1305–1309PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansari M, Rainger J, Hanson IM et al (2016) Genetic analysis of “PAX6-negative” individuals with Aniridia or Gillespie syndrome. PLoS One 11:e0153757.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153757 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Azuma N, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H et al (1999) Missense mutation in the alternative splice region of the PAX6 gene in eye anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 65:656–663.  https://doi.org/10.1086/302529 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Azuma N, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H et al (2003) Mutations of the PAX6 gene detected in patients with a variety of optic-nerve malformations. Am J Hum Genet 72:1565–1570.  https://doi.org/10.1086/375555 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker KE, Parker R (2004) Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: terminating erroneous gene expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:293–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Balay L, Totten E, Okada L et al (2016) A familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 11 associated with a microdeletion of 163 kb and microduplication of 288 kb at 11p13 and 11q22.3 without aniridia or eye anomalies. Am J Med Genet A 170A:202–209.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37388 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bamiou D-E, Free SL, Sisodiya SM et al (2007) Auditory interhemispheric transfer deficits, hearing difficulties, and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in children with congenital Aniridia due to PAX6 mutations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:463.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.5.463 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayrakli F, Guney I, Bayri Y et al (2009) A novel heterozygous deletion within the 3' region of the PAX6 gene causing isolated aniridia in a large family group. J Clin Neurosci. 16(12):1610–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.022
  10. Bhatia S, Bengani H, Fish M et al (2013) Disruption of autoregulatory feedback by a mutation in a remote, ultraconserved PAX6 enhancer causes Aniridia. Am J Hum Genet 93:1126–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.028
  11. Blanco-Kelly F, Palomares M, Vallespín E et al (2017) Improving molecular diagnosis of aniridia and WAGR syndrome using customized targeted array-based CGH. PLoS One 12:e0172363.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172363 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng F, Song W, Kang Y et al (2011) A 556 kb deletion in the downstream region of the PAX6 gene causes familial aniridia and other eye anomalies in a Chinese family. Mol Vis 10(17)448–55Google Scholar
  13. Crolla JA, van Heyningen V (2002) Frequent chromosome aberrations revealed by molecular cytogenetic studies in patients with Aniridia. Am J Hum Genet 71:1138–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1086/344396 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cvekl A, Callaerts P (2017) PAX6: 25th anniversary and more to learn. Exp Eye Res 156:10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2016.04.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis LK, Meyer KJ, Rudd DS et al (2008) Pax6 3′ deletion results in aniridia, autism and mental retardation. Hum Genet 123:371–378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-008-0484-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. D'Elia AV, Pellizzari L, Fabbro D et al (2007) A deletion 3' to the PAX6 gene in familial aniridia cases. Mol Vis 23(13)1245–50Google Scholar
  17. Fantes JA, Bickmore WA, Fletcher JM et al (1992) Submicroscopic deletions at the WAGR locus, revealed by nonradioactive in situ hybridization. Am J Hum Genet 51:1286–1294PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fantes J, Redeker B, Breen M et al (1995) Aniridia-associated cytogenetic rearrangements suggest that a position effect may cause the mutant phenotype. Hum Mol Genet 4:415–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischbach BV, Trout KL, Lewis J et al (2005) WAGR syndrome: a clinical review of 54 cases. Pediatrics 116:984–988.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0467 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerber S, Alzayady KJ, Burglen L et al (2016) Recessive and dominant de novo ITPR1 mutations cause Gillespie syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 98:971–980.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillespie FD (1965) ANIRIDIA, cerebellar ataxia, and OLIGOPHRENIA in siblings. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill 1960) 73:338–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glaser T, Walton DS, Maas RL (1992) Genomic structure, evolutionary conservation and aniridia mutations in the human PAX6 gene. Nat Genet 2:232–239.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1192-232 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser T, Jepeal L, Edwards JG et al (1994) PAX6 gene dosage effect in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects. Nat Genet 7:463–471.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0894-463 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregory-Evans CY, Wang X, Wasan KM et al (2014) Postnatal manipulation of Pax6 dosage reverses congenital tissue malformation defects. J Clin Invest 124:111–116.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI70462 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Grønskov K, Olsen JH, Sand A et al (2001) Population-based risk estimates of Wilms tumor in sporadic aniridia. A comprehensive mutation screening procedure of PAX6 identifies 80% of mutations in aniridia. Hum Genet 109:11–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo H, Dai L, Huang Y et al (2013) A large novel deletion downstream of PAX6 gene in a Chinese family with ocular Coloboma. PLoS One 8:e83073.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083073 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanson IM, Fletcher JM, Jordan T et al (1994) Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peters’ anomaly. Nat Genet 6:168–173.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0294-168 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Heyningen V, Williamson KA (2002) PAX6 in sensory development. Hum Mol Genet 11:1161–1167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BLM et al (1991) Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature 354:522–525.  https://doi.org/10.1038/354522a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V (2012) Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet 20:1011–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.100 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu P, Meng L, Ma D et al (2015) A novel 11p13 microdeletion encompassing PAX6 in a Chinese Han family with aniridia, ptosis and mental retardation. Mol Cytogenet 8:3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0110-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleinjan DA, Seawright A, Schedl A et al (2001) Aniridia-associated translocations, DNase hypersensitivity, sequence comparison and transgenic analysis redefine the functional domain of PAX6. Hum Mol Genet 10:2049–2059CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleinjan DA, Seawright A, Elgar G, van Heyningen V (2002) Characterization of a novel gene adjacent to PAX6, revealing synteny conservation with functional significance. Mamm Genome 13:102–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-001-3058-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kleinjan DA, Seawright A, Mella S et al (2006) Long-range downstream enhancers are essential for Pax6 expression. Dev Biol 299:563–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.060 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kokotas H, Petersen M (2010) Clinical and molecular aspects of aniridia. Clin Genet 77:409–420.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01372.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lang D, Powell SK, Plummer RS et al (2007) PAX genes: roles in development, pathophysiology, and cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 73:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2006.06.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lauderdale JD, Wilensky JS, Oliver ER et al (2000) 3′ deletions cause aniridia by preventing PAX6 gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:13755–13759.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240398797 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsuo T, Osumi-Yamashita N, Noji S et al (1993) A mutation in the Pax-6 gene in rat small eye is associated with impaired migration of midbrain crest cells. Nat Genet 3:299–304.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0493-299 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McBride DJ, Buckle A, van Heyningen V, Kleinjan DA (2011) DNaseI hypersensitivity and ultraconservation reveal novel, interdependent long-range enhancers at the complex Pax6 cis-regulatory region. PLoS One 6:e28616.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028616 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Mirzayans F, Pearce WG, MacDonald IM, Walter MA (1995) Mutation of the PAX6 gene in patients with autosomal dominant keratitis. Am J Hum Genet 57:539–548PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitchell TN, Free SL, Williamson KA et al (2003) Polymicrogyria and absence of pineal gland due toPAX6 mutation. Ann Neurol 53:658–663.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10576 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Morice-Picard F, Lasseaux E, Cailley D et al (2014) High-resolution array-CGH in patients with oculocutaneous albinism identifies new deletions of the TYR, OCA2, and SLC45A2 genes and a complex rearrangement of the OCA2 gene. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 27:59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12173 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Muto R, Yamamori S, Ohashi H, Osawa M (2002) Prediction by FISH analysis of the occurrence of Wilms tumor in aniridia patients. Am J Med Genet 108:285–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson DO, Howarth RJ, Williamson KA et al (2008) Genetic analysis of chromosome 11p13 and thePAX6 gene in a series of 125 cases referred with aniridia. Am J Med Genet Part A 146A:558–569.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32209 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt-Sidor B, Szymańska K, Williamson K et al (2009) Malformations of the brain in two fetuses with a compound heterozygosity for two PAX6 mutations. Folia Neuropathol 47:372–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Simioni M, Vieira TP, Sgardioli IC et al (2012) Insertional translocation of 15q25-q26 into 11p13 and duplication at 8p23.1 characterized by high resolution arrays in a boy with congenital malformations and aniridia. Am J Med Genet A 158A(11):2905–10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35603
  47. Sisodiya SM, Free SL, Williamson KA et al (2001) PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes cerebral malformation and olfactory dysfunction in humans. Nat Genet 28:214–216.  https://doi.org/10.1038/90042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Solomon BD, Pineda-Alvarez DE, Balog JZ et al (2009) Compound heterozygosity for mutations in PAX6 in a patient with complex brain anomaly, neonatal diabetes mellitus, and microophthalmia. Am J Med Genet Part A 149A:2543–2546.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33081 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Ticho BH, Hilchie-Schmidt C, Egel RT et al (2006) Ocular findings in Gillespie-like syndrome: association with a new PAX6 mutation. Ophthalmic Genet 27:145–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810600976897 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ton CC, Hirvonen H, Miwa H et al (1991) Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene from the aniridia region. Cell 67:1059–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tzoulaki I, White IM, Hanson IM (2005) PAX6 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlations. BMC Genet 6:27.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-27 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang P, Sun W, Li S et al (2012) PAX6 mutations identified in 4 of 35 families with microcornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:6338–6342.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10472 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang X, Gregory-Evans K, Wasan KM et al (2017a) Efficacy of postnatal in vivo nonsense suppression therapy in a Pax6 mouse model of Aniridia. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 7:417–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2017.05.002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang X, Shan X, Gregory-Evans CY (2017b) A mouse model of aniridia reveals the in vivo downstream targets of Pax6 driving iris and ciliary body development in the eye. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis 1863:60–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wawrocka A, Budny B, Debicki S et al (2012) PAX6 3' deletion in a family with aniridia. Ophthalmic Genet 33(1):44–8.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13816810.2011.615076
  56. Wawrocka A, Sikora A, Kuszel L, Krawczynski MR (2013) 11p13 deletions can be more frequent than the PAX6 gene point mutations in polish patients with aniridia. J Appl Genet 54:345–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-013-0154-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang X, Zhang Q, Tong Y et al (2011) Large novel deletions detected in Chinese families with aniridia: correlation between genotype and phenotype. Mol Vis 17:548–557PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical GeneticsPoznan University of Medical SciencesPoznanPoland
  2. 2.Centers for Medical Genetics GENESISPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations