Advertisement

Journal of Applied Genetics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 97–105 | Cite as

Is black coat color in wolves of Iran an evidence of admixed ancestry with dogs?

  • Rasoul Khosravi
  • Marzieh Asadi Aghbolaghi
  • Hamid Reza Rezaei
  • Elham Nourani
  • Mohammad Kaboli
Animal Genetics • Original Paper

Abstract

Melanism is not considered a typical characteristic in wolves of Iran and dark wolves are believed to have originated from crossbreeding with dogs. Such hybrid individuals can be identified with the combined use of genetic and morphological markers. We analyzed two black wolves using a 544 base pairs (bp) fragment of the mtDNA control region and 15 microsatellite loci in comparison with 28 dogs, 28 wolves, and four known hybrids. The artificial neural networks (ANNs) method was applied to microsatellite data to separate genetically differentiated samples of wolves, dogs, and hybrids, and to determine the correct class for the black specimens. Individual assignments based on ANNs showed that black samples were genetically closer to wolves. Also, in the neighbor-joining network of mtDNA haplotypes, wolves and dogs were separated, with the dark specimens located in the wolf branch as two separate haplotypes. Furthermore, we compared 20 craniometrical characters of the two black individuals with 14 other wolves. The results showed that craniometrical measures of the two black wolves fall within the range of wolf skulls. We found no trace of recent hybridization with free-ranging dogs in the two black wolves. Dark coat color might be the result of a natural combination of alleles in the coat-color-determining gene, mutation in the K locus due to past hybridization with free-ranging dogs, or the effect of ecological factors and adaption to habitat conditions.

Keywords

Black wolf Hybridization mtDNA Microsatellite Artificial neural networks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported financially by the Iran Department of Environment, Hamedan Provincial Office. We thank Ali Shaabani, Vahid Nouri, and Shahabaddin Montazami for their help. The authors also thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this article.

References

  1. Aghbolaghi MA, Rezaei HR, Scandura M, Kaboli M (2014) Low gene flow between Iranian Grey Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs documented using uniparental genetic markers. Zool Middle East 60:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson TM, vonHoldt BM, Candille SI, Musiani M, Greco C, Stahler DR, Smith DW, Padhukasahasram B, Randi E, Leonard JA, Bustamante CD, Ostrander EA, Tang H, Wayne RK, Barsh GS (2009) Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American gray wolves. Science 323:1339–1343PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersone Ž, Lucchini V, Ozoliņš J (2002) Hybridisation between wolves and dogs in Latvia as documented using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA markers. Mamm Biol Z Säugetierkd 67:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apollonio M, Mattioli L, Scandura M (2004) Occurrence of black wolves in the Northern Apennines, Italy. Acta Theriol 49:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ardalan A, Kluetsch CFC, Zhang A-B, Erdogan M, Uhlén M, Houshmand M, Tepeli C, Ashtiani SRM, Savolainen P (2011) Comprehensive study of mtDNA among Southwest Asian dogs contradicts independent domestication of wolf, but implies dog–wolf hybridization. Ecol Evol 1:373–385PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aurelle D, Lek S, Giraudel J-L, Berrebi P (1999) Microsatellites and artificial neural networks: tools for the discrimination between natural and hatchery brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) in Atlantic populations. Ecol Model 120:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azadeh A, Ghaderi SF, Sohrabkhani S (2008) A simulated-based neural network algorithm for forecasting electrical energy consumption in Iran. Energ Policy 36:2637–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boitani L (1992) Wolf research and conservation in Italy. Biol Conserv 61:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewster W, Fritts S (1995) Taxonomy and genetics of the gray wolf in western North America: a review. In: Carbyn LN, Fritts SH, Seip DR (eds) Ecology and conservation of wolves in a changing world. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, pp 353–374Google Scholar
  10. Carmichael LE, Krizan J, Nagy JA, Fuglei E, Dumond M, Johnson D, Veitch A, Berteaux D, Strobeck C (2007) Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in arctic canids. Mol Ecol 16:3466–3483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciucci P, Lucchini V, Boitani L, Randi E (2003) Dewclaws in wolves as evidence of admixed ancestry with dogs. Can J Zool 81:2077–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornuet J-M, Aulagnier S, Lek S, Franck S, Solignac M (1996) Classifying individuals among infra-specific taxa using microsatellite data and neural networks. C R Acad Sci III 319:1167–1177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. del Zorro Rojo EM (2005) Morphometric examination of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from the Van-Yoncatepe necropolis in eastern Anatolia. Int J Morphol 23:253–260Google Scholar
  14. Douzery E, Randi E (1997) The mitochondrial control region of Cervidae: evolutionary patterns and phylogenetic content. Mol Biol Evol 14:1154–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ermis K, Midilli A, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2007) Artificial neural network analysis of world green energy use. Energ Policy 35:1731–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47Google Scholar
  17. Freeland JR (2005) Molecular ecology. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Geffen ELI, Anderson MJ, Wayne RK (2004) Climate and habitat barriers to dispersal in the highly mobile grey wolf. Mol Ecol 13:2481–2490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heidari MD, Omid M, Akram A (2011) Application of artificial neural network for modeling benefit to cost ratio of broiler farms in tropical regions of Iran. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3:546–552Google Scholar
  21. Khosravi R, Kaboli M, Imani J, Nourani E (2012) Morphometric variations of the skull in the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in Iran. Acta Theriol 57:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khosravi R, Rezaei HR, Kaboli M (2013) Detecting hybridization between Iranian wild wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) and free-ranging domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by analysis of microsatellite markers. Zool Sci 30:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI 14:1137–1145Google Scholar
  24. Mech LD (1970) The wolf: the ecology and behavior of an endangered species. American Museum of Natural History, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Milenković M, Habijan-Mikeš V, Matić R (2006) Cases of spontaneous interbreeding of wolf and domestic dog in the region of Southeast Banat. Arch Biol Sci 58:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Milenkovic M, Šipetic VJ, Blagojevic J, Tatovic S, Vujoševic M (2010) Skull variation in Dinaric-Balkan and Carpathian gray wolf populations revealed by geometric morphometric approaches. J Mammal 91:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Musiani M, Leonard JA, Cluff H, Gates CC, Mariani S, Paquet PC, Vilà C, Wayne RK (2007) Differentiation of tundra/taiga and boreal coniferous forest wolves: genetics, coat colour and association with migratory caribou. Mol Ecol 16:4149–4170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Omid M, Baharlooei A, Ahmadi H (2009) Modeling drying kinetics of pistachio nuts with multilayer feed-forward neural network. Dry Technol 27:1069–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pilot M, Jedrzejewski W, Branicki W, Sidorovich VE, Jedrzejewska B, Stachura K, Funk SM (2006) Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Mol Ecol 15:4533–4553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Randi E, Lucchini V (2002) Detecting rare introgression of domestic dog genes into wild wolf (Canis lupus) populations by Bayesian admixture analyses of microsatellite variation. Conserv Genet 3:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Randi E, Lucchini V, Christensen MF, Mucci N, Funk SM, Dolf G, Loeschcke V (2000) Mitochondrial DNA variability in Italian and East European wolves: detecting the consequences of small population size and hybridization. Conserv Biol 14:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sponenberg D, Rothschild MF (2001) Genetics of coat colour and hair texture. In: Ruvinsky A, Sampson J (eds) The genetics of the dog. CABI Publishing, New York, pp 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsuda K, Kikkawa Y, Yonekawa H, Tanabe Y (1997) Extensive interbreeding occurred among multiple matriarchal ancestors during the domestication of dogs: evidence from inter- and intraspecies polymorphisms in the D-loop region of mitochondrial DNA between dogs and wolves. Genes Genet Syst 72:229–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO‐CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verardi A, Lucchini V, Randi E (2006) Detecting introgressive hybridization between free‐ranging domestic dogs and wild wolves (Canis lupus) by admixture linkage disequilibrium analysis. Mol Ecol 15:2845–2855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vila C, Wayne RK (1999) Hybridization between wolves and dogs. Conserv Biol 13:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vila C, Sundqvist A-K, Flagstad Ø, Seddon J, Kojola I, Casulli A, Sand H, Wabakken P, Ellegren H (2003) Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant. Proc Biol Sci 270:91–97PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wayne RK, Lehman N, Fuller TK (1995) Conservation genetics of the gray wolf. In: Carbyn L, Fritts S, Seip D (eds) Ecology and conservation of wolves in a changing world. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Occasional Publication No. 35, Edmonton, pp 399–407Google Scholar
  42. Zangeneh M, Omid M, Akram A (2010) Assessment of machinery energy ratio in potato production by means of artificial neural network. Afr J Agric Res 5:993–998Google Scholar
  43. Ziaie H (2008) A field guide to mammals of Iran, 2nd edn. Iran Wildlife Center, TehranGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rasoul Khosravi
    • 1
  • Marzieh Asadi Aghbolaghi
    • 2
  • Hamid Reza Rezaei
    • 3
  • Elham Nourani
    • 2
  • Mohammad Kaboli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural ResourcesIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural ResourcesGorgan University of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesGorganIran

Personalised recommendations